THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT VERTICAL GROWTH ON FACIAL MORPHOLOGY IN CLASS II CASES

Year 2022, , 67 - 70, 15.02.2022

Barçın Eröz Dilaver Şeyma Gündoğdu Ali Kiki

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.1013064

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the effects of different vertical growth pattern on sagittal structures.
Methods: The material consisted of cephalometric films of untreated 50 Class II subjects, 24 boys and 26 girls, aged 9 to 12 years. Subjects were divided into three groups with increased vertical facial growth pattern (SN/GoGn>320), normal vertical facial growth pattern (280≤SN/GoGn≤320) and decreased vertical facial growth pattern (SN/GoGn<280). Differences between vertical groups were assessed by the means of variance analyses and least significant difference (LSD) test. And correlation coefficient between vertical groups and other variables were calculated.
Results: SNA (P < .01), SNB (P < .05), Gonial angle (P < .001), Jarabak ratio (P < .001) and IMPA (P < .01) were found to be related with vertical growth pattern. Negative correlation was found between SN/GoGn and SNA, SNB, IMPA angles and Jarabak ratio, and also positive correlation was observed between SN/GoGn and Gonial angle.
Conclusion: The change in vertical growth pattern influenced sagittal parameters of face.
Keywords: Growth and development, maxilla, mandible, vertical dimension, maxillofacial development

ÖZ
Amaç: Bu retrospektif çalışmanın amacı farklı vertikal yüz gelişim paterninin sagittal yapılar üzerine olan etkisini incelemektir.
Yöntemler: Çalışma materyalini, yaşları 9 ile 12 arasında değişen 24 erkek ve 26 kız olmak üzere tedavi edilmemiş 50 Sınıf II vakanın sefalmetrik filmleri oluşturmaktadır. Bireyler dikey yüz büyümesi artmış bireyler (SN/GoGn> 320), dikey yüz büyümesi normal olan bireyler (280≤SN/GoGn≤320) ve dikey yüz büyümesi azalmış bireyler (SN/GoGn<280) olmak üzere 3 gruba ayrılmıştır. Vertikal gruplar arasındaki farklılıklar varyans analizi ve LSD testi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Dik yön ile diğer değişkenler arasındaki korelasyon katsayısı belirlenmiştir.
Bulgular: SNA (P < .01), SNB (P < .05), Gonial açı (P < .001), Jarabak oranı (P < .001) ve IMPA (P < .01) farklı vertikal gelişim paternleriyle ilişkili bulunmuştur. SN/GoGn ile SNA, SNB, IMPA açıları ve Jarabak oranı arasında negatif, Gonial açı ile de pozitif korelasyon saptanmıştır.
Sonuç: Dikey yüz gelişimdeki değişiklikler yüzün sagittal gelişimi etkilemektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Büyüme ve gelişim, maksilla, mandibula, vertikal boyut, maksilofasiyal gelişim

Keywords

Growth and development, maxilla, mandible, vertical dimension, maxillofacial development

References

• 1. Rosso L, Riatti R, Contardo L. Sagittal and Vertical Craniofacial Growth Pattern and Timing of Circumpubertal Skeletal Maturation: A Multiple Regression Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1728712.
• 2. Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. WB Saunders Company, 1996.
• 3. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Contemporary Orthodontics, 2000.
• 4. Moss ML, Rankow RM. The role of the functional matrix in mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 1968;38(2):95-103.
• 5. Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112(1):8-11.
• 6. Isaacson JR, Speidel T, Frank W. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod. 1971;41(3):219-229.
• 7. Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod. 1964;34(2):75-93.
• 8. Isaacson RJ, Zapfel RJ, Worms FW, Arthur GE. Effects of rotational jaw growth on the occlusion and profile. Am J Orthod. 1977;72(3):276-286.
• 9. Björk A, Skieller V. Growth and development of the maxillary complex. Informationen aus Orthodontie und Kieferorthopadie: mit Beitragen aus der internationalen Literatur. 1984;16:9-52.
• 10. Schendel SA, Eisenfeld J, Bell WH, Epker BN, Mishelevich DJ. The long face syndrome: vertical maxillary excess. Am J Orthod. 1976;70(4):398-408.
• 11. Opdebeeck H, Bell WH, Eisenfeld J, Mishelevich D. Comparative study between the SFS and LFS rotation as a possible morphogenic mechanism. Am J Orthod. 1978;74(5):509-521.
• 12. Opdebeeck H, Bell WH. The short face syndrome. Am J Orthod. 1978;73(5):499-511.
• 13. Sergueef N. Cranial Osteopathy For Infants, Children and Adolescents: A Pratical Handbook. Elsvier Health Science, England. 2007;301.
• 14. Fields HW, Warren DW, Black K, Phillips CL. Relationship between vertical dentofacial morphology and respiration in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99(2):147-154.
• 15. Linder-Aronson S. Respiratory function in relation to facial morphology and the dentition. Br J Orthod. 1979;6(2):59-71.
• 16. Mahony D, Karsten A, Linder-Aronson S. Effects of adenoidectomy and changed mode of breathing on incisor and molar dentoalveolar heights and anterior face heights. Aust Orthod J. 2004;20(2):93-98.
• 17. Yamada T, Tanne K, Miyamoto K, Yamauchi K. Influences of nasal respiratory obstruction on craniofacial growth in young Macaca fuscata monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111(1):38-43.
• 18. Woodside DG, Linder-Aronson S, Lundström A, McWilliam J. Mandibular and maxillary growth after changed mode of breathing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100(1):1-18.
• 19. Erverdi N. Çağdaş Ortodonti. Quintessence Publishing, 2017;97.
• 20. Van Der Klaauw JC. Size and position of the functional components of the skull. A contribution to the knowledge of the architecture of the skull, based on data in the literature. Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie. 1952;9(1):1-556.
• 21. Sicher H, Dubruk E, Lloyd. Sicher’s oral anatomy. Mosby Incorporated, 1980.
• 22. Kuitert R, Beckmann S, van Loenen M, Tuinzing B, Zentner A. Dentoalveolar compensation in subjects with vertical skeletal dysplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(5):649-657.
• 23. Kucera J, Marek I, Tycova H, Baccetti T. Molar height and dentoalveolar compensation in adult subjects with skeletal open bite. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(4):564-569.
• 24. Beckmann SH, Kuikert RB, Prahl-Andersen B, Segner D, The RPS, Tuinzing DB. Alveolar and skeletal dimensions associatedwith overbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(4):443-452.
• 25. Ishikawa H, Shinji N, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsukada H, Sato Y. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships. Angle Orthod. 1999;69(6):534-538.
• 26. Bishara SSE, Jakobsen JR. Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. Am J Orthod. 1985;88(6):466-502.
• 27. Schudy FF. The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth: its implications in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1965;35:36-50.
• 28. Isaacson RJ, Zapfel RJ, Worms FW, Erdman AG. Effects of rotational jaw growth on the occlusion and profile. Am J Orthod. 1977;72(3):276-286.
• 29. Ceylan İ, Baydaş B, Erdem A. Ağız Solunumunun Yatay ve Dikey Yüz Gelişimi Üzerine Olan Etkilerinin İncelenmesi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 1995;5(2):39-46.
• 30. Chung C-H, Wong WW. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class II subjects: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122(6):619-626.
• 31. Ellis 3rd E.Throckmorton G, Sinn DP. Functional characteristics of patients with anterior open bite before and after surgical correction. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1996;11(3):211-223.
• 32. Richardson A. Skeletal factors in anterior open-bite and deep overbite. Am J Orthod. 1969;56(2):114-127.
• 33. Thompson GW, Popovich F. Static and dynamic analyses of gonial angle size. Angle Orthod. 1974;44(3):227-234.
• 34. Ishii N, Deguchi T, Hunt NP. Craniofacial morphology of Japanese girls with Class II division 1 malocclusion. J Orthod. 2001;28(3):211-215.
• 35. Ishii N, Deguchi T, Hunt NP. Morphological differences in the craniofacial structure between Japanese and Caucasian girls with Class II Division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24(1):61-67.
• 36. Lux CJ, Raeth O, Burden D, Conradt C, Komposch G. Sagittal and vertical growth of the jaws in class II, division 1 and class II, division 2 malocclusions during prepubertal and pubertal development. J Orofac Orthop. 2004;65(4):290-311.
• 37. Hering K, Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1999;69(5):470-477.
• 38. Rübendüz M, Esenlik E. Derin kapanışlı bireylerin karakteristik yapı özellikleri ve erken dönem tedavi yaklaşımları. Turk J Orthod. 2002;15(2):28-35.