Abstract
Bu çalışma, Fairclough'un eleştirel söylem analizi modelini, münafıkların söyleminin ideolojik bakış açısını çözmek ve münafıklar hakkındaki eleştirel Kur'an bilgisini geliştirmek amacıyla Allah'ın münafıkların iddialarını nasıl ele aldığını tasvir etmek için Kur'an'ın Medenî Surelerinden 15 ayetle ilgili olarak kullanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, bu ayetlerin derin yapılarındaki merkezi anlamları ortaya çıkarmak ve Kur'an'ın münafıklığa karşı söylem oluşturma yöntemlerini anlamak için ideolojik yapıları betimsel düzeyde incelemektedir. Çalışma, ayetleri incelemek için disiplinler arası bir yaklaşım kullanması ve aynı zamanda klasik ve çağdaş yorumları kullanmasıyla öne çıkmaktadır. Veri analizine göre Kur'an, münafıklık söylemini çürütmek ve eleştirmek için anlamsal karşıtlık, şartlı ve olumsuz ifadeler, dolaylı alıntılar, modalite, aktif ve pasif fiiller, retorik sorular ve münafıklarla uğraşırken açık eleştiri gibi betimsel düzeyde söylemsel yapılar kullanmaktadır. Ayetlerin söyleminin yorumsal düzeyde incelenmesi, vahiy zamanındaki durumun bağlamını ve toplumdaki ikiyüzlü söylemin varlığını yansıtan psikolojik unsuru yansıtır. Açıklayıcı düzeyde analiz, Kur'an'ın münafıkların dinleyicileri ikna etme iddialarına dini, işlevsel ve motivasyonel eleştiriler inşa ederek ve aynı zamanda tek tanrılı inanç ve ahiret inancını kullanarak nasıl karşı koyduğunun derinliğini göstermektedir.
References
- The Holy Quran. google scholar
- Aghagolzadeh, Ferdos, Taromi ,Tahereh. ‘ Linguistic analysis of the rival discourses in the educational scholarshipsfile: Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis approach ’. Language Related Research,7 ,6, 391-414, (2016). google scholar
- Baron, R & N Branscombe. Social Psychology. 14th Edition. Publisher Pearson, 2017. google scholar
- Dastranj, Fatemeh. ‘An Investigation on the Effect of Syntactic Analysis on the Quranic Discourse of Wasiyat Verse’. Language Related Research, Vol. 9 ,1, 213-238, (2018). google scholar
- Fairclough, Norman . Language and Power. New York: Longman Inc, 1989. google scholar
- Fairclough, Norman . Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Pree, 1992. google scholar
- Fairclough, Norman. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York, 2003. google scholar
- Gnabady, Sultan Muhammad. Tafsir Bayan Al-saadah fi Maghamat Al-ebadah. 2rd ed. Mu’assisat al-A'lamî Lelmatboat, 1988. google scholar
- İbn Sa‘d, Muhammad. al-Tabaqat al-Kubra. Beirut: Darol-Kotob elmiyeh, 1990. google scholar
- İbn Hişâm,‘Abd almalk. al-Sırat al-Nabawıyah. Beirut: Darol-Maaref. google scholar
- Jawadî Âmulî, 'abdullah. Tasnım. Qum: Nashri Asra’, 2009. google scholar
- Jorgensen, Marianne and Louise Phillips (2010), Discourse analysis as theory and method, translated by Hadî jalîlî, Tehran: Nasr-e Ney, 2018. google scholar
- Jurjanî, ‘Alî ibn Muhammad. Al-Tarifat. Beirut: Darol-Nafayes. 2004. google scholar
- Makarem Shirazi, Naser. et al. Tafsir Nemooneh. Tehran: Dar al-Kotob al-islamiyah, Islamic Republic of Iran, 1995. google scholar
- Mahdavi Damghani, Mahmood. ‘Muhammad (PHU) and Hypocrisy’. History Studies of Islam, 1 ,1, 134-151, 2009. google scholar
- Maraghî Ahmad ibn Mustafa. Al-Tafsır al-Maraghi. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi. google scholar
- Mudarresi Muhammad Taghi. Min Huda al-Qur’an. Tehran: Dar Muhebbi al-Hossain, 1999. google scholar
- Mukhtar ‘Umar, Ahmad. Semantics book. Ghahereh: The World of Books, 1999. google scholar
- Mustafawî, Hassan. Tafsır Rooshan. Tehran: Book Publishing Center, 2001. google scholar
- Palmer, F.R. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. google scholar
- Raghib Isfahanî Husayn ibn Muhammad. Müfredâtu elfâzi’l-Kur’ân. Beirut: Darol-elm, 1991. google scholar
- Râzî, Fahreddîn Muhammed b. Ömer. Mefâtîhu’l-Gayb. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikr, 1981. google scholar
- Shairi, Hamid Reza. ‘A survey of variety of discourse systems from semiotic point of view’. 7th Iranian Linguistics Conference. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba’i University, 2007. google scholar
- Taberî, Ebû Cafer Muhammed b. Cerîr. Câmiu’l-beyân an te’vîli âyi’l-Kur’ân. thk. Dr. Abdullah b. Abdu’l- Muhsin et-Türkî. 26 Cilt. Kahire: Dâru’l-Hicr, 1412. google scholar
- Tabarsî, Fadl Ibn Hasan. Majma' al-Bayan f Tafsır al-Qur 'an. Tehran: Naser Khosrov Publications, 1994. google scholar
- Tusî, Muhammad Ibn Hasan. Al-Tibyan fi Tafsir alQur ’an, Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi. google scholar
- Tabatabaei, Mohammed Hussein. Al-Mizan fi tafsir al-Qur'an. Qom: The Islamic Bookstore of Qom Scientific Foundation. 5th edition, 1996. google scholar
- Waqidî, Muhammad Ibn 'umar. al-Maghazı. Biyrut, Mu’assisat al-A'lamî, 1989. google scholar
- Zemahşerî, Cârullah. el-Keşşâf an hakâikı ğavâmizi't-tenzîl ve ‘uyûni'l-ekâvîlfî vücûhi't-te'vîl. google scholar
- Beyrut: Dârü’l-kitâbi’l-‘Arabî, 3. Basım, 1407. google scholar
Abstract
This study uses Fairclough’s model of critical discourse analysis with regard to 15 ayahs from the Qur’an’s Madani Surahs to delineate how God deals with hypocrites’ claims in order to decode the ideological view of hypocrites’ discourse and improve critical Qur’anic knowledge about hypocrites. This study examines the ideological structures at the descriptive level to reveal the central meanings in the deep structures of these ayahs and to understand the Qur’an’s discoursebuilding methods against hypocrisy. This study is distinguished by its use of an interdisciplinary approach to examine ayahs while also using classical and contemporary interpretations. Based on the data analysis, the Qur’an uses discursive constructions at the descriptive level, including semantic opposition, conditional and negative statements, indirect quotations, modality, active and passive verbs, rhetorical questions, and explicit criticism when dealing with hypocrites to refute and rebuke the discourse of hypocrisy. The exploration of the ayahs’ discourse at the interpretive level reflects the context of the situation at the time of revelation and the psychological element that reflects the presence of hypocritical discourse in society. At the explanatory level, the analysis demonstrates the depth of how the Qur’an confronts the hypocrites’ claims to persuade the audience by constructing religious, functional, and motivational criticisms, as well as by using monotheistic ideology and belief in the afterlife.
References
- The Holy Quran. google scholar
- Aghagolzadeh, Ferdos, Taromi ,Tahereh. ‘ Linguistic analysis of the rival discourses in the educational scholarshipsfile: Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis approach ’. Language Related Research,7 ,6, 391-414, (2016). google scholar
- Baron, R & N Branscombe. Social Psychology. 14th Edition. Publisher Pearson, 2017. google scholar
- Dastranj, Fatemeh. ‘An Investigation on the Effect of Syntactic Analysis on the Quranic Discourse of Wasiyat Verse’. Language Related Research, Vol. 9 ,1, 213-238, (2018). google scholar
- Fairclough, Norman . Language and Power. New York: Longman Inc, 1989. google scholar
- Fairclough, Norman . Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Pree, 1992. google scholar
- Fairclough, Norman. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York, 2003. google scholar
- Gnabady, Sultan Muhammad. Tafsir Bayan Al-saadah fi Maghamat Al-ebadah. 2rd ed. Mu’assisat al-A'lamî Lelmatboat, 1988. google scholar
- İbn Sa‘d, Muhammad. al-Tabaqat al-Kubra. Beirut: Darol-Kotob elmiyeh, 1990. google scholar
- İbn Hişâm,‘Abd almalk. al-Sırat al-Nabawıyah. Beirut: Darol-Maaref. google scholar
- Jawadî Âmulî, 'abdullah. Tasnım. Qum: Nashri Asra’, 2009. google scholar
- Jorgensen, Marianne and Louise Phillips (2010), Discourse analysis as theory and method, translated by Hadî jalîlî, Tehran: Nasr-e Ney, 2018. google scholar
- Jurjanî, ‘Alî ibn Muhammad. Al-Tarifat. Beirut: Darol-Nafayes. 2004. google scholar
- Makarem Shirazi, Naser. et al. Tafsir Nemooneh. Tehran: Dar al-Kotob al-islamiyah, Islamic Republic of Iran, 1995. google scholar
- Mahdavi Damghani, Mahmood. ‘Muhammad (PHU) and Hypocrisy’. History Studies of Islam, 1 ,1, 134-151, 2009. google scholar
- Maraghî Ahmad ibn Mustafa. Al-Tafsır al-Maraghi. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi. google scholar
- Mudarresi Muhammad Taghi. Min Huda al-Qur’an. Tehran: Dar Muhebbi al-Hossain, 1999. google scholar
- Mukhtar ‘Umar, Ahmad. Semantics book. Ghahereh: The World of Books, 1999. google scholar
- Mustafawî, Hassan. Tafsır Rooshan. Tehran: Book Publishing Center, 2001. google scholar
- Palmer, F.R. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. google scholar
- Raghib Isfahanî Husayn ibn Muhammad. Müfredâtu elfâzi’l-Kur’ân. Beirut: Darol-elm, 1991. google scholar
- Râzî, Fahreddîn Muhammed b. Ömer. Mefâtîhu’l-Gayb. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikr, 1981. google scholar
- Shairi, Hamid Reza. ‘A survey of variety of discourse systems from semiotic point of view’. 7th Iranian Linguistics Conference. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba’i University, 2007. google scholar
- Taberî, Ebû Cafer Muhammed b. Cerîr. Câmiu’l-beyân an te’vîli âyi’l-Kur’ân. thk. Dr. Abdullah b. Abdu’l- Muhsin et-Türkî. 26 Cilt. Kahire: Dâru’l-Hicr, 1412. google scholar
- Tabarsî, Fadl Ibn Hasan. Majma' al-Bayan f Tafsır al-Qur 'an. Tehran: Naser Khosrov Publications, 1994. google scholar
- Tusî, Muhammad Ibn Hasan. Al-Tibyan fi Tafsir alQur ’an, Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi. google scholar
- Tabatabaei, Mohammed Hussein. Al-Mizan fi tafsir al-Qur'an. Qom: The Islamic Bookstore of Qom Scientific Foundation. 5th edition, 1996. google scholar
- Waqidî, Muhammad Ibn 'umar. al-Maghazı. Biyrut, Mu’assisat al-A'lamî, 1989. google scholar
- Zemahşerî, Cârullah. el-Keşşâf an hakâikı ğavâmizi't-tenzîl ve ‘uyûni'l-ekâvîlfî vücûhi't-te'vîl. google scholar
- Beyrut: Dârü’l-kitâbi’l-‘Arabî, 3. Basım, 1407. google scholar
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Religious Studies (Other) |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 7, 2024 |
| Submission Date | July 6, 2023 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024 Volume: 35 Issue: 1 |
