BALIKÇI GEMİLERİNDE ÇATIŞMA KAZALARININ İNSAN FAKTÖRLERİ ANALİZ VE SINIFLANDIRMA SİSTEMİ (HFACS) İLE İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 203 - 220, 16.12.2019

Umut Yıldırım , Ersan Başar

https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.659807

Cited By: 1

Öz

Dünya balıkçılık sektöründeki toplam istihdam yaklaşık 60 milyon insana ve balıkçı teknelerinin sayısı 4,6 milyona ulaşmıştır. Bu devasa endüstrinin sürdürülebilirliği için emniyet son derece önemlidir. Bu çalışmada balıkçı tekneleri ve ticari gemiler arasında gerçekleşmiş çatışma kazaları irdelenerek emniyetin geliştirilmesine katkı sağlanmaya çalışılmış, balıkçı gemileri için kaza nedenlerinin belirlenmesi ve sınıflandırılması yapılmıştır. Literatürde birçok alanda uygulanmakta olan İnsan Faktörleri Analiz ve Sınıflandırma Sistemi (HFACS) çalışmanın metodolojisi olarak seçilmiştir. Dış faktörler, kurumsal etkiler, emniyetsiz yönetim, emniyetsiz eylemi hazırlayan alt nedenler ve emniyetsiz eylemler alt başlıklarından oluşan bu yöntem ile kaza nedenleri kategorize edilebilmektedir. Çalışmada balıkçı teknesi ve diğer gemi türleri arasında gerçekleşmiş 45 adet çatışma kazasının raporu incelenerek kaza nedenleri elde edilmiştir. İncelenen raporlar uluslararası boyutta kaza araştırması yapan kurum ve kuruluşlarının hazırlamış ve yayınlamış olduğu resmi raporlardır. Kaza nedenleri sınıflandırıldığında ihlaller, karar hataları, köprü üstü kaynak yönetimi eksiklikleri, yönetimin ihlalleri, uygunsuz iş planlaması ve fiziksel çevrenin balıkçı gemileri için çatışma kazalarında en önemli faktörler olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Balıkçı Gemileri, Çatışma Kazaları, İnsan Hatası, HFACS

ANALYSIS OF COLLISION ACCIDENTS ON FISHING VESSELS THROUGH HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (HFACS)

Öz

The fishing sector employs a total of 60 million people worldwide, with some 4.6 million fishing boats currently in operation. Safety is of utmost importance for the sustainability of this enormous sector. This study aims to contribute to the improvement of safety in the sector by examining the records of collisions encountered between fishing boats and commercial vessels, and identifying and classifying the causes of accidents involving fishing boats. The methodology adopts the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), which has found use in many fields in literature. Through this approach, a categorization is made of the external factors, organizational reasons, unsafe management, unsafe actions and the preconditions of unsafe acts that result in accidents. The accident reports of 45 collisions between fishing boats and other vessels have been examined to identify the leading causes of accidents. The reports examined are official documents prepared and published by international agencies and organizations responsible for investigating accidents. The classification of the causes of accidents reveal that the leading causes of accidents involving fishing boats have been violations, decision errors, bridge resource management shortfalls, management violations, inadequate work planning and the physical environment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fishing Vessels, Collision Accidents, Human Error, HFACS

Kaynakça

• Antoa, P. and Soares C., G. (2006). Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of ropax vessels. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 3(2), 107-116.
• Cintron, R., (2015). Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Interrater Reliability for Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Investigations, Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University.
• Daramola A.,Y. (2014). An investigation of air accidents in Nigeria using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework. Journal of Air Transport Management, 35, 39-50
• Davis, M.E. (2011). Occupational safety and regulatory compliance in US commercial fishing. Journal of Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health, 66, (4), 209-216.
• Davis, M.E. (2012). Perceptions of occupational risk by US commercial fishermen. Marine Policy, 36, 28-33.
• Dekker, S.,W.,A. (2002). Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. Journal of Safety Research, 33(3), 371-385.
• EMSA, (2015). European Maritime and Safety Agency. Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2015, http://www.emsa.europa.eu/implementation-tasks/accident-investigation/items.html?cid=141&id=2551 Erişim Tarihi:07.10.2018
• EMSA, (2016). European Maritime and Safety Agency, Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2016
• EMSA, (2018). European Maritime and Safety Agency, Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2018, http://www.emsa.europa.eu/accident-investigation-publications/annual-overview.html, Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2019
• Erol, S. and Başar, E. (2014). The analysis of ship accident occurred in Turkish search and rescue area by using decision tree. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(4), 377-388.
• Gordon, R. (1998). The Contribution of Human Factors to Accidents ın The Offshore Oil Industry. Reliability Engineering And System Safety, Special Issue on Offshore Safety, 61(1-2), 95-108.
• Hetherington, C., Flin, R. and Mearns, K. (2006). Safety in Shipping: The human element. Journal of Safety Research, 37(4), 401-411.
• Hinrichs J.,S., Baldauf M. and Ghirxi K.,T. (2011). Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(3), 1187–1196.
• Hinrichs J.,S., Hollnagel E. and Baldauf M. (2012). From Titanic to Costa Concordia—a century of lessons not learned. WMU J Maritime Affairs, 11(2), 151–167.
• ILO, (1999. 99/47). Fishing among the most dangerous of all professions, says ILO. http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/media-centre/releases/WCMS_071324/lang--en/index.htm
• IMO, (2000). A 21/Res.884, Amendments to the Code for the Investigation of Marine Casualties and Incidents-Resolution A.849.20.
• Jin, D., Kite-Powell, H. and Talley, W. (2001). The safety of commercial fishing: Determinants of vessel total losses and injuries. Journal of Safety Research, 32(2), 209-228.
• Kaplan, I.M. and Kite-Powell, H.L. (2000). Safety at sea and fisheries management: fishermen's attitudes and the need for co-management. Marine Policy, 24, 493-497.
• Karahalios H. (2014). The Contribution of risk manegement in ship management: The case of ship collision. Safety Science, 63, 104-114.
• MCA, (2016). Maritime & Coastguard Agency, Fishermen’s Safety Guide, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/553544/sept__16_Fishermans_Safety_Guide.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2018
• Morel, G. and Chauvin, C. (2006). A socio-technical approach of risk management applied to collisions involving fishing vessels, Safety Science, 44, 599-619.
• Nilsson, R., Gärling, T. and Lützhöft, M. (2009). An experimental simulation study of advanced decision support system for ship navigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(3), 188–197.
• Oh, J.H., Kim, K. and Jeong, J.S. (2015). A Study on the Risk Analysis based on the Trajectory of Fishing Vessels in the VTS Area. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2, 38-46.
• Patterson, J.,M. and Shappel S.,A. (2010). Operator error and system deficiencies: Analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(4), 1379–1385.
• Perez-Labajos, C. (2008). Fishing safety policy and research. Marine Policy, 32, 40-45.
• Pourzanjani, M. (2001). Analysis of Human Error in Co-ordinating Ship’s Collision Avoidance Action, Southampton Institute, 85–91
• Roberts, E.S. (2010). Britain’s most hazardous occupation: Commercial fishing. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42, 44–49.
• Silva, J.S. (2016). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Director-General. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5555e.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 02.10.2018
• Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Rafferty, L. A., Walker, G. H., Baber, C., and Jenkins, D. P., (2013). Human factors methods: A practical guide for engineering and design (2nd ed.), CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, ISBN-13:978-1-4094-5753-4.
• Uğurlu, Ö., Köse E., Yıldırım U. and Yüksekyıldız E. (2015). Marine accident analysis for collision and grounding in oil tanker with FTA method. Maritime Policy and Management, 42(2), 163-185.
• Uğurlu, Ö., Yıldız, S., Loughney, S. and Wang, J. (2018). Modified human factor analysis and classification system for passenger vessel accidents (HFACS-PV), Ocean Engineering, 161, 47-61
• UN, (2016). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016. Rome.
• UNCTAD, (2019). UNCTAD STAT, Merchant fleet by flag of registration and by type of ship, annual, 1980-2018. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2019
• Wang, J., Pillay, A., Kwon, Y.,S., Wall, A.,D. and Loughran, C.,G. (2005). An analysis of fishing vessel accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(6), 1019-1024.
• Wiegmann, D. and Shappell, S. (2001). Human Error Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), https://www.faa.gov/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/2000s/media/0103.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2018
• Yıldırım, U., Uğurlu, Ö. ve Başar, E. (2015). Karaya Oturma Kazalarında İnsan Hatası: Konteyner Gemileri için Örnek Çalışma. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 3(1), 1-10.
• Yıldırım, U., Başar, E. and Uğurlu, Ö. (2017). Assessment of collisions and grounding accidents with human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and statistical methods. Safety Science, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.022
• Zhang, Y., Jing, L. and Sun, C., (2018). Systems-Based Analysis of China-Tianjin Port Fire and Explosion: A Comparison of HFACS, AcciMap, and STAMP. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 18(6), 1386–1400.
• Zhou, J.L., Bai, Z.,H. and Zhi-Yu, S. (2014). A hybrid approach for safety assessment in high-risk hydropower-construction-project work systems. Safety Science, 64, 163–172.