USE OF FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH) IN MELANOCYTIC LESIONS

Year 2022, , 357 - 368, 27.01.2023

Yasemin Çakır , Banu Lebe

https://doi.org/10.18614/deutip.1217278

Abstract

The melanocytic proliferations including a wide of various lesions from melanocytic nevi to melanoma comprise one of the major groups of daily dermatopathology pratic. While a part of these lesions can be easily distinguished whether they are benign or malign, a group of lesions cannot be diagnosed exactly with only histopathologic features. In recent years, many research has been published about using of fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for differential diagnosis and to predict the clinical behaviour of these ambiguous lesions. The results have been showed that using of FISH test including a prob set (6p25, 6q23, 8q24, 9p21, 11q13) can be an ancillary molecular test to diagnose with high sensitivity and specificity, and the FISH results can provide prognostic information. However, FISH results should be evaluated with histopathologic findings due to high rates of false negativity or false positivity of the test.
In the current review, the research investigating FISH method in different melanocytic lesion subgroups with different evaluation criteria will be summarized.

Keywords

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization, FISH, melanoma, melanocytic lesions

MELANOSİTİK LEZYONLARDA FLORESAN İN-SİTU HİBRİDİZASYON (FISH) YÖNTEMİNİN KULLANIMI

Abstract

Dermatopatoloji pratiğinin önemli bir bölümünü oluşturan melanositik proliferasyonlar banal nevüsten melanoma kadar değişen geniş bir lezyon grubunu kapsamaktadır. Bu lezyonların bir kısmında benign ve malign ayrımı histopatolojik bulgular ile kolayca yapılırken, bir grup lezyonda ise net histopatolojik tanı verilememektedir. Son zamanlarda, bu grubu oluşturan lezyonların ayırıcı tanısında ve klinik davranışının tahmininde yardımcı bir moleküler test olarak floresan in-situ hibridizasyon (FISH) yönteminin kullanımı ile ilgili çok sayıda çalışma yayınlanmıştır. Özellikle geniş bir prob setini (6p25, 6q23, 8q24, 9p21, 11q13) içeren FISH testi kullanımının yüksek oranda duyarlılık ve özgüllük ile ayırıcı tanıda yardımcı olabileceği ve FISH testi sonuçlarının prognoz hakkında bilgi verebileceğine dair sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Ancak, yanlış negatif ve yanlış pozitif FISH sonuçları göz önünde bulundurularak sonuçların mutlaka histopatolojik bulgular eşliğinde değerlendirilmesi gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır.
Bu derlemede, FISH yöntemini farklı melanositik lezyon alt gruplarında, farklı kriterler ile değerlendiren çalışmalar özetlenecektir.

Keywords

Floresan in-situ hibridizasyon, FISH, melanom, melanositik lezyonlar

References

• Ensslin CJ, Hibler BP, Lee EH, Nehal KS, Busam KJ, Rossi AM. Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations: A Review of the Literature. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Feb;44(2):159–74.
• 2. Ferrara G, Argenziano G. The WHO 2018 Classification of Cutaneous Melanocytic Neoplasms: Suggestions From Routine Practice. Front Oncol. 2021;11:675296.
• 3. Bastian BC, LeBoit PE, Hamm H, Bröcker EB, Pinkel D. Chromosomal gains and losses in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res. 1998 May 15;58(10):2170–5.
• 4. Bastian BC, Olshen AB, LeBoit PE, Pinkel D. Classifying melanocytic tumors based on DNA copy number changes. Am J Pathol. 2003 Nov;163(5):1765–70. 5. Gerami P, Zembowicz A. Update on Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Melanoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:8.
• 6. Casorzo L, Luzzi C, Nardacchione A, Picciotto F, Pisacane A, Risio M. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) evaluation of chromosomes 6, 7, 9 and 10 throughout human melanocytic tumorigenesis: Melanoma Research. 2005 Jun;15(3):155–60.
• 7. Kraehn GM, Utikal J, Udart M, Greulich KM, Bezold G, Kaskel P, et al. Extra c-myc oncogene copies in high risk cutaneous malignant melanoma and melanoma metastases. Br J Cancer. 2001 Jan 5;84(1):72–9.
• 8. Gerami P, Jewell SS, Blondin B, Legator M, Charzan S, Lertsbarapa T, et al. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) as an Ancillary Diagnostic Tool in the Diagnosis of Melanoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(8):11.
• 9. Newman MD, Mirzabeigi M, Gerami P. Chromosomal copy number changes supporting the classification of lentiginous junctional melanoma of the elderly as a subtype of melanoma. Mod Pathol. 2009 Sep;22(9):1258–62.
• 10. Morey AL, Murali R, McCarthy SW, Mann GJ, Scolyer RA. Diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic
• tumours by four-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Pathology. 2009 Jun;41(4):383–7. 11. Gaiser T, Kutzner H, Palmedo G, Siegelin MD, Wiesner T, Bruckner T, et al. Classifying ambiguous melanocytic lesions with FISH and correlation with clinical long-term follow up. Mod Pathol. 2010 Mar;23(3):413–9.
• 12. Moore MW, Gasparini R. FISH as an effective diagnostic tool for the management of challenging melanocytic lesions. Diagn Pathol. 2011 Dec;6(1):76.
• 13. Vergier B, Prochazkova-Carlotti M, de la Fouchardière A, Cerroni L, Massi D, De Giorgi V, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization, a diagnostic aid in ambiguous melanocytic tumors: European study of 113 cases. Mod Pathol. 2011 May;24(5):613–23.
• 14. Fang Y, Dusza S, Jhanwar S, Busam KJ. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of melanocytic nevi and melanomas: sensitivity, specificity, and lack of association with sentinel node status. Int J Surg Pathol. 2012 Oct;20(5):434–40.
• 15. Gerami P, Mafee M, Lurtsbarapa T, Guitart J, Haghighat Z, Newman M. Sensitivity of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Melanoma Diagnosis Using RREB1, MYB, Cep6, and 11q13 Probes in Melanoma Subtypes. Arch Dermatol [Internet]. 2010 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Aug 3];146(3). Available from: http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?do i=10.1001/archdermatol.2009.386
• 16. North JP, Vetto JT, Murali R, White KP, White CR, Bastian BC. Assessment of Copy Number Status of Chromosomes 6 and 11 by FISH Provides Independent Prognostic Information in Primary Melanoma. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2011 Aug;35(8):1146–50.
• 17. Requena C, Rubio L, Traves V, Sanmartín O, Nagore E, Llombart B, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the differential diagnosis between Spitz naevus and spitzoid melanoma: FISH in Spitz naevus versus spitzoid melanoma. Histopathology. 2012 Nov;61(5):899–909.
• 18. Kerl K, Palmedo G, Wiesner T, Mentzel T, Rütten A, Schärer L, et al. A Proposal for Improving Multicolor FISH Sensitivity in the Diagnosis of Malignant Melanoma Using New Combined Criteria. The American Journal of Dermatopathology. 2012 Aug;34(6):580–5.
• 19. Ferrara G, Misciali C, Brenn T, Cerroni L, Kazakov DW, Perasole A, et al. The Impact of Molecular Morphology Techniques on the Expert Diagnosis in Melanocytic Skin Neoplasms. Int J Surg Pathol. 2013 Oct;21(5):483–92.