Morphometric Characteristics of Some Anatomical Structures in The Maxillofacial Region in Patients Planning Orthognatic Surgery

Year 2023, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 146 - 152, 28.12.2023

Esin Bozdemir (haştar) , Derya Gezer

https://doi.org/10.21306/dishekimligi.1387295

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the morphometric features of some anatomical structures in the maxillofacial region in patients planning orthognathic surgery and to compare these features according to different jaw relations in the sagittal direction, gender and age.
Materials-Methods: 235 adult patients between the ages of 18-50 who received cone beam computed tomography for planning orthognathic surgery were included in the study. Posterior superior alveolar artery (PSAA) diameter was measured in coronal section on cone beam computed tomography images. The width of the incisive foramen (IF) was measured as millimeter in the sagittal plane. The diameter of the mental foramen (MF) was determined by measuring the distance between the lower and upper borders of the foramen on cross-sectional sections.
Results: The relationship between the mean diameter of PSAA and gender was found to be statistically significant in both right and left jaws (p<0.0001). PSAA diameter was found to be significantly larger in men than in women. A statistically significant difference between the diameter value of the left maxilla and age was determined, and a positive correlation was found between these two parameters (p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant relationship between PSAA diameter and malocclusion type (p>0.05). The average IF diameter was determined to be 3.2±0.85 mm in Class 1 individuals, 3.1±0.69 mm in Class 2 individuals, and 3.1±0.79 mm in Class 3 individuals. There was no statistically significant relationship between IF diameter and malocclusion type (p>0.05). MF diameter was found to be statistically significantly larger in men than in women (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between age, malocclusion and MF diameter (p>0.05).
Conclusion: It was determined that the type of malocclusion did not affect the morphometric measurements of the posterior superior alveolar artery, incisive foramen and mental foramen in patients planning orthognathic surgery.

Keywords

Orthognathic surgery, cone beam computed tomography, incisive foramen, mental foramen, posterior superior alveolar artery

Ortognatı̇k Cerrahı̇ Planlanan Hastalarda Maksillofasiyal Bölgedeki Bazı Anatomik Yapıların Morfometrik Özellikleri

Abstract

Amaç: Ortognatik cerrahi planlanan hastalarda maksillofasiyal bölgedeki bazı anatomik yapıların morfometrik özelliklerini değerlendirmek ve bu özellikleri sagittal yönde farklı çene ilişkilerine cinsiyete ve yaşa göre karşılaştırmaktır.
Gereç-Yöntem: Çalışmaya 18-50 yaş arası ortognatik cerrahi planlanlanması amacıyla konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi alınan 235 yetişkin hasta dahil edildi. konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntülerinde posterior süperior alveolar arter (PSAA) çapı koronal kesitte ölçüldü. İnsiziv foramen (İF) genişliği sagital düzlemde milimetre cinsinden ölçüldü. Mental foramenin (MF) çapı cross-sectional kesitler üzerinde foramenin alt ve üst sınırı arasındaki mesafe ölçülerek belirlenmiştir.
Bulgular: PSAA’nın ortalama çapı ile cinsiyetler arasındaki ilişki sağ ve sol her iki çenede de istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p<0,0001). PSAA çapı, erkeklerde kadınlardan anlamlı derecede fazla bulundu. Sol maksilladaki çap değeri ile yaş arasında anlamlı bir fark belirlendi ve bu iki parametre arasında pozitif korelasyon bulundu (p=0,03). PSAA çapı ile maloklüzyon tipi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki görülmedi (p>0,05). Sınıf 1 bireylerde ortalama İF çapı 3,2±0,85 mm, Sınıf 2 bireylerde 3,1±0,69 mm ve Sınıf 3 bireylerde 3,1±0,79 mm tespit edildi. İF çapı ile maloklüzyon tipi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki bulunmadı (p>0,05). Erkeklerde MF çapı kadınlara göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede fazla bulundu (p=0,000). Yaş ve maloklüzyon ile MF çapı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmadı (p>0,05).
Sonuç: Ortognatik cerrahi planlanan hastalarda maloklüzyon tipinin posterior superior alveoler arter, insiziv foramen ve mental foramenin morfometrik ölçümlerini etkilemediği belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Ortognatik cerrahi, konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi, insiziv foramen, mental foramen, posterior superior alveolar arter

References

• 1. Patel Pravin K, and Micheal V Novia. The surgical tools: the LeFort I, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible, and the osseous genioplasty. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2007;34(3): 447-75.
• 2. Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Incidence Of Complications And Problems Releated To Orthognathic Surgery: A Review Of 655 Patient. J O'ryan F,Alessandro S. Complications with Orthognatic Surgery. In: Fonseca RJ MR,Turvey TA.,editor. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008. p.324-56.
• 3. Kramer F, Baethage C, Swennen G, Et Al. Intra- And Perioperative Complications Of The Lefort I Osteotomy: A Prospective Evaluation Of 1000 Patients. J Craniofacial Surg. 2004;15:971.
• 4. Boyacıoğlu Doğru H, Uysal S, Avcu N. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile ortodontik uygulamalar ve ortognatik cerrahi planlaması. Kamburoğlu K, editör. Dentomaksillofasiyal Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi: Temel Prensipler, Teknikler ve Klinik Uygulamalar. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2019. p.94-9.
• 5. Lorenzoni DC, Bolognese AM, Garib DG, Guedes FR, Sant'anna EF. Cone-beam computed tomography and radiographs in dentistry: aspects related to radiation dose. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:813768.
• 6. Rathod R, Singh M.P, Nahar P, Mathur H, Daga D. Assessment Of Pathway And Location Of Posterior Superior Alveolar Artery: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Cureus, 2022;14(2):92-6.
• 7. Tassoker M. Cone Beam CT Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus And Posterior Superior Alveolar Artery. Selcuk Dent J. 2022;9(1):191-99.
• 8. Khojastepour L, Haghnegahdar A, Keshtkar M. Morphology And Dimensions Of Nasopalatine Canal: A Radiographic Analysis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017;18(4):244-50.
• 9. Fernández-Alonso A, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Rapado-González O, Suárez-Cunqueiro MM. Morphometric differences of nasopalatine canal based on 3D classifications: descriptive analysis on CBCT. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37(7):825-33.
• 10. Friedrich RE, Laumann F, Zrnc T, Assaf AT. The Nasopalatine Canal in Adults on Cone Beam Computed Tomograms-A Clinical Study and Review of the Literature. In Vivo. 2015;29(4):467-86.
• 11. Voljevica A, Talović E, Hasanović A. Morphological and morphometric analysis of the shape, position, number and size of mental foramen on human mandibles. Acta Med Acad. 2015;44(1):31-8.
• 12. Zmyslowska-Polakowska E, Radwanski M, Ledzion S, Leski M, Zmyslowska A, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Evaluation of Size and Location of a Mental Foramen in the Polish Population Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1659476.
• 13. Fontenele RC, Farias Gomes A, Moreira NR. Do the location and dimensions of the mental foramen differ among individuals of different facial types and skeletal classes? A CBCT study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;1–7.
• 14. Bornstein MM, Balsiger R, Sendi P, von Arx T. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(3):295-301.
• 15. Prado GM, Fontenele RC, Costa ED, Freitas DQ, Oliveira ML. Morphological and topographic evaluation of the mandibular canal and its relationship with the facial profile, skeletal class, and sex. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;27(1):17-23.
• 16. Martis C. Complications After Mandibular Sagittal Split Osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1984;42:101-07.
• 17. Kim JH, Ryu JS, Kim KD, Hwang SH, Moon HS. A radiographic study of the posterior superior alveolar artery. Implant Dent. 2011;20(4):306-10.
• 18. Danesh-Sani SA, Movahed A, ElChaar ES, Chong Chan K, Amintavakoli N. Radiographic Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Lateral Wall and Posterior Superior Alveolar Artery Anatomy: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(1):151-160.
• 19. Tehranchi M, Taleghani F, Shahab S, Nouri A. Prevalence and location of the posterior superior alveolar artery using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47(1):39-44.
• 20. lgüy D, Ilgüy M, Dolekoglu S, Fisekcioglu E. Evaluation of the posterior superior alveolar artery and the maxillary sinus with CBCT. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27(5):431-7.
• 21. Mardinger O, Abba M, Hirshberg A, Schwartz-Arad D. Prevalence, diameter and course of the maxillary intraosseous vascular canal with relation to sinus augmentation procedure: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(8):735-38.
• 22. Khojastepour L, Haghnegahdar A, Keshtkar M. Morphology and Dimensions of Nasopalatine Canal: a Radiographic Analysis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017;18(4):244-50.
• 23. Güncü GN, Yıldırım YD, Yılmaz HG, Galindo-Moreno P, Velasco-Torres M, Al-Hezaimi K, Al-Shawaf R, Karabulut E, Wang HL, Tözüm TF. Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(9):1023-6.
• 24. Al-Amery SM, Nambiar P, Jamaludin M, John J, Ngeow WC. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the maxillary incisive canal and foramen: considerations of anatomical variations when placing immediate implants. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117251.
• 25. Thakur AR, Burde K, Guttal K, Naikmasur VG. Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43(4):273-81.
• 26. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Sanderink G, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(6):396-402.
• 27. Jayasinghe RM, Hettiarachchi PVKS, Fonseka MCN, Nanayakkara D, Jayasighe RD. Morphometric analysis of nasopalatine foramen in Sri Lankan population using CBCT. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Apr-Jun;10(2):238-40.
• 28. Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 ;36(8):805-12.
• 29. Bahşi I, Orhan M, Kervancıoğlu P, Yalçın ED, Aktan AM. Anatomical evaluation of nasopalatine canal on cone beam computed tomography images. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019;78(1):153-62.
• 30. Gönül Y, Bucak A, Atalay Y, Beker-Acay M, Çalişkan A, Sakarya G, Soysal N, Cimbar M, Özbek M. MDCT evaluation of nasopalatine canal morphometry and variations: An analysis of 100 patients. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016;97(11):1165-72.
• 31. Safi Y, Moshfeghi M, Rahimian S, Kheirkhahi M, Manouchehri M E. Assessment of nasopalatine canal anatomic variations using cone beam computed tomography in a group of Iranian population. Iranian J of Radiol. 2017;14(1):16-9.
• 32. Mardinger O, Namani‐Sadan N, Chaushu G, Schwartz‐Arad D. Morphologic changes of the nasopalatine canal related to dental implantation: a radiologic study in different degrees of absorbed maxillae. Journal of Periodontology. 2008;79(9):1659-62.
• 33. Sekerci AE, Cantekin K, Aydinbelge M. Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of neurovascular anatomical variations other than the nasopalatine canal in the anterior maxilla in a pediatric population. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37(2):181-86.
• 34. Hakbilen, S, Mağat, G. Nazopalatin kanal ve klinik önemi: Derleme. Selcuk Dent J. 2019;6(1):91-7.
• 35. Kalender A, Orhan K, Aksoy U. Evaluation of the mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Turkish patients using cone-beam computed tomography images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program. Clin Anat. 2012;25(5):584-92.
• 36. Çağlayan F, Sümbüllü MA, Akgül HM, Altun O. Morphometric and morphologic evaluation of the mental foramen in relation to age and sex: an anatomic cone beam computed tomography study. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(6):2227-30.
• 37. Gungor E, Aglarci OS, Unal M, Dogan MS, Guven S. Evaluation of mental foramen location in the 10-70 years age range using cone-beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(1):88-92.