THE REMUNERATION-PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: EVIDENCE FROM BOARD MEMBERS’ REMUNERATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE

Year 2024, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 231 - 248, 02.07.2024

Gökhan Özer , Nagihan Aktaş , Abdullah Kürşat Merter

https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1329041

Abstract

The board of directors is an important corporate governance mechanism as it is responsible for the operation of a firm and protects the value of the investment made by investors in the firm. Therefore, board members should be supplied with an appropriate incentive to properly discharge their duties. One of the most important incentive mechanisms is remuneration. This study aims to reveal the effect of board members’ remuneration on the firm performance. Regression analysis was performed to test the hypotheses. 210 firm-year observations obtained from 76 non-financial firms traded in the BIST 100 between the 2018-2020 period were used. The indicators of firm performance return on assets, return on equity, and earnings per share. As a consequence of the study, the relationship between board members' remuneration and firm performance was found to be positive and statistically significant. These results show that the board members' remuneration is a strong incentive used to increase the firm performance and that a suitable remuneration policy should be established for directors.

Keywords

Firm Performance, Board of Directors, Corporate Governance, Remuneration

KURUMSAL YÖNETİMDE ÜCRET-PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ: YÖNETİM KURULU ÜYELERİNİN ÜCRETİ VE FİRMA PERFORMANSINDAN KANITLAR

Abstract

Yönetim kurulu, bir firmanın işleyişinden sorumlu olması ve yatırımcıların firmaya yaptıkları yatırımın değerini koruması nedeniyle önemli bir kurumsal yönetim mekanizmasıdır. Dolayısıyla yönetim kurulunda yer alan üyelere görevlerini düzgün bir şekilde yerine getirmeleri için uygun bir teşvik sağlanmalıdır. En önemli teşvik mekanizmalarından biri de ücrettir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, yönetim kurulu üyelerine ödenen ücretin firma performansı üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Oluşturulan hipotezleri test etmek amacıyla 2018-2020 dönemi arasında BİST 100’de işlem gören finans dışı 76 firmadan elde edilen 210 firma yılı gözleminden yararlanarak regresyon analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Firma performansının göstergesi olarak aktif kârlılığı, özkaynak kârlılığı ve hisse başına kâr kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda yönetim kurulu üyelerine ödenen ücret ile firma performansı arasında pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Bu sonuçlar, yönetim kurulu üyelerine ödenen ücretin firmanın performansını arttırmak amacıyla kullanılan güçlü bir teşvik unsuru olduğunu ve yönetim kurulunda görev yapan üyelere uygun bir ücretlendirme politikasının oluşturulması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Firma Performansı, Yönetim Kurulu, Kurumsal Yönetim, Ücret

References

• Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58-107.
• Akter, S., Ali, Md. H. & Hossain, B. (2020). Directors’ remuneration and performance: Evidence from the textile sector of Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 265-275.
• Akram, Farheen, and Abrar ul haq, Muhammad (2018) Assessing the effect of managerial power on firm performance through the perceptual lens of executive remuneration. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanity, 27(1), 293-309.
• Alqatan, D., Chbib, I., & Hussainey, K. (2019). How does board structure impact on firm performance in the UK?. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 15(2), 18-27
• Andreas, J. M., Rapp, M. S., & Wolff, M. (2012). Determinants of director compensation in two-tier systems: evidence from German panel data. Review of Managerial Science, 6(1), 33-79.
• Barontini, R., & Bozzi, S. (2011). Board compensation and ownership structure: empirical evidence for Italian listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(1), 59-89.
• Berber, N., Pasula, M., & Radošević, M. (2012). Performance management in function of determining incentive systems for managers. C. S. Illes (Ed.) SMEs’ Management in the 21st Century Challenges and Solutions (109-121). Częstochowa. DOI: 10.18515/dBEM.M2012.n01
• Bessouh, D. N., & Ounane, D. B. (2018). The impact of income on performance within a company empirical validation of the case of SAIDAL pharmaceutical group-algeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 10(3), 12-17.
• Brennan, N. M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885-906.
• Brick, I. E., Palmon, O., & Wald, J. K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403-423.
• Brown, J. R., & Martinsson, G. (2019). Does transparency stifle or facilitate innovation?, Management Science, 65(4), 1600-1623.
• Burns, N., Kapalczynski, A., & Wald, J. K. (2020). Independent director compensation, corruption, and monitoring. Financial Review, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12232
• Caldwell, C., & Karri, R. (2005). Organizational governance and ethical systems: A covenantal approach to building trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 249-259.
• Capuano, P. (2022). Does Board of Directors remuneration Affect Banks ‘performance? A Broad Empirical Analysis in The Us Banking System. In of the International Online Conference. May, 34-39.
• Chalmeta, R., & Grangel, R. (2005). Performance measurement systems for virtual enterprise integration. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18(1), 73-84.
• Chen, H. L., Hsu, W. T., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Independent directors’ human and social capital, firm internationalization and performance implications: An integrated agency-resource dependence view. International Business Review, 25(4), 859-871.
• Clegg, S. (2019). Governmentality. Project Management Journal, 50(3), 266-270.
• Conyon, M. J. (1997). Corporate governance and executive compensation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(4), 493-509.
• Crespí-Cladera, R., & Gispert-Pellicer, C. (1999). Board remuneration, performance and corporate governance in large Spanish companies. Performance and Corporate Governance in Large Spanish Companies.
• Çakalı, K. R. (2022). Agency problem in corporate governance: Worldcom case. İşletme, 3(1), 15-31.
• Darmadi, S. (2011). Board compensation, corporate governance, and firm performance in Indonesia. Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance in Indonesia.
• Dong, M., & Ozkan, A. (2008). Institutional investors and director pay: An empirical study of UK companies. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 18(1), 16-29.
• Edmans, A., Gabaix, X., & Jenter, D. (2017). Executive compensation: A survey of theory and evidence. The handbook of the economics of corporate governance, 1, 383-539.
• Fallatah, Y., & Dickins, D. (2012). Corporate governance and firm performance and value in Saudi Arabia. African Journal of Business Management, 6(36), 10025.
• Fernandes, N. (2008). EC: Board compensation and firm performance: The role of “independent” board members. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 18(1), 30-44.
• Filatotchev, I., & Allcock, D. (2010). Corporate governance and executive remuneration: A contingency framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 20-33.
• Ghosh, A., & Aggarwal, R. (2011). Directors' remuneration: various issues relating to firm performance. Paradigm, 15(1-2), 93-101.
• Hassan, S., Christopher, T., & Evans, R. (2003). Directors' remuneration and Firm Performance: Malaysian Evidence. Management & Accounting Review (MAR), 2(1), 57-67.
• Hempel, P., & Fay, C. (1994). Outside director compensation and firm performance. Human Resource Management, 33(1), 111-133.
• Herdan, A., & Szczepanska, K. (2011). Directors remuneration and companies’ performance: the comparison of listed companies in Poland and UK. Foundations of Management, 2(3), 41-53.
• Jaafar, S. B., Wahab, E. A. A., & James, K. (2012). Director remuneration and performance in Malaysia family firms: an expropriation matter?. World Review of Business Research, 2(4), 204-222.
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
• Judge, W. Q., Naoumova, I., & Koutzevol, N. (2003). Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: An empirical study. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 385-396.
• Khalid, S., & Rehman, M. U. (2014). Impact of Directors' Remuneration on Financial Performance of a Firm. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 6(1), 180.
• Kocmanová, A., Hřebíček, J., & Dočekalová, M. (2011). Corporate Governance and Sustainability. Economics & Management, 16, 543-550.
• Lemma, T. T., Mlilo, M., & Gwatidzo, T. (2020). Board remuneration, directors ownership and corporate performance: the South African evidence. International Review of Applied Economics, 34(4), 491-511.
• Lewellen, W., Loderer, C., Martin, K., & Blum, G. (1992). Executive compensation and the performance of the firm. Managerial and Decision Economics, 13(1), 65-74.
• Main, B. G., Bruce, A., & Buck, T. (1996). Total board remuneration and company performance. The Economic Journal, 106(439), 1627-1644.
• Merino, E., Manzaneque, M., & Banegas, R. (2012). Control of directors’ compensation in Spanish companies: Corporate governance and firm performance. Performance measurement and management control: Global issues.
• Murphy, K. J. (1999). Executive compensation. Handbook of labor economics, 3, 2485-2563.
• Mukhina, A. S. (2015). International concept of an assessment of internal control efficiency in the conduct of an audit. Asian Social Science, 11(8), 58-64.
• Müller, V. O. (2014). Do corporate board compensation characteristics influence the financial performance of listed companies?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 983-988.
• Ndayisaba, G., & Ahmed, A. D. (2015). CEO remuneration, board composition and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Australian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-5), 534-552.
• Núñez, F., Arcos-Vargas, Á., Usabiaga, C., & Álvarez-de-Toledo, P. (2022). On directors’ compensation: a multilevel analysis of Spanish listed companies. Empirical Economics, 63(4), 2173-2207.
• Omoye, A. S., & Ogiedu, K. O. (2016). Corporate governance attributes, firm performance and directors’ remuneration. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 35-46.
• Ozkan, N. (2007). Do corporate governance mechanisms influence CEO compensation? An empirical investigation of UK companies. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 17(5), 349-364.
• Parthasarathy, A., Menon, K., & Bhattacherjee, D. (2006). Executive compensation, firm performance and governance: an empirical analysis. Economic and Political Weekly, 4139-4147.
• Pinto, M. B., & Leal, R. P. C. (2013). Ownership concentration, top management and board compensation. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 17, 304-324.
• Rahayu, N. K., Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., & Nowland, J. (2022). Director pay slice, the remuneration committee, and firm financial performance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2087291.
• Raithatha, M., & Komera, S. (2016). Executive compensation and firm performance: Evidence from Indian firms. IIMB Management Review, 28(3), 160-169.
• Razali, M. W. M., Yee, N. S., Hwang, J. Y. T., Tak, A. H. B., & Kadri, N. (2018). Directors’ remuneration and firm’s performance: A study on Malaysian listed firm under consumer product industry. International Business Research, 11(5), 102-109.
• Saurage-Altenloh, S., & Randall, P. M. (2020). The influence of CSR on B2B relationships: leveraging ethical behaviors to create value. Examining Ethics and Intercultural Interactions in International Relations, 83-105.
• Shambaugh, B. A. (2003). The senior management balancing act. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 16(1), 12-16.
• Xuan, S. M., & Loang, O. K. (2023). The role of corporate governance in enhancing financial performance and investor confidence. International Journal of Accounting, 8(50), 234-254.
• Yang, S. (2023). Long-term business sustainability through corporate governance. advances in economics, Management and Political Sciences- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences. 19. 255-262.
• Zain, N. N. M., Ibrahim, N. A., Kassim, A. A. M., & Tamsir, F. (2019). How Does Directors’ Remuneration and Board Structure Impact on Firm Performance in Malaysia Telecommunication Industry?. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 4(4). 1-7.