Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

READING NOËL COWARD’S CAVALCADE AS A PROBLEM PLAY

Year 2024, Volume: 64 Issue: 1, 469 - 487, 25.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2024.64.1.19

Abstract

Sir Noël Peirce Coward (1899-1973) was a prolific English playwright, actor, director, writer, composer, songwriter, and screenwriter who produced numerous works of plays, musicals, songs, short stories, poetry and a novel. However, Coward is most admired for his drama. He is acknowledged to be a playwright of comedy of manners, musical comedy, and light comedy. The 1930s showed the peak of his theatrical success. Coward stages the realities of the twentieth century life in Britain by means of intellectual, psychological and witty discussion of the sociopolitical issues in everyday life. Although he is known for his comedies, he became successful with one of his noncomic plays: Cavalcade (1931). Coward reveals his sense of the theatre and his stagecraft in the play to thrill, distress and puzzle the audience. The play presents the changes in nation’s spirit and society with the coming of the new age, which bring about domestic, social, political, economic and moral problems for English people. It discusses such problems as the conflict between patriotism and jingoism, Englishness, futility of war, human cost of war, breakdown of the social class system, tension between the lower and upper classes, social mobility, modernisation in life and society, generation gap, maintenance of peace, honour and dignity, and political partisanship. Although the play presents conflicting opinions or situations at the same time, it does not suggest any formula to resolve the contradiction. In this respect, this article aims to analyse Coward’s serious and realistic play as a problem play both in form and content by interpreting the historical events and topical sociopolitical issues of Coward’s time.

References

  • Antony, L. (2003). The puzzle of patriotism. Peace Review, 15(4), 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040265032000156843
  • Baldick, C. (2004). The Oxford English literary history: The modern movement, 1910-1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Blamires, H. (1974). A short history of English literature. London: Methuen.
  • Boas, F. S. (1896). Shakespeare and his predecessors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Braybrooke, P. (1933). The amazing Mr. Noel Coward. London: Denis Archer.
  • Brustein, R. (2009). Introduction. In H. Kissel, Coward in an hour (pp. vii-viii). Hanover: Smith and Kraus.
  • Clark, I. G. (2007). Rhetorical readings, dark comedies, and Shakespeare’s problem plays. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
  • Coward, N. P. (1953). Resmigeçit. (A. Givda, Trans.). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Coward, N. P. (1942). Cavalcade. In B. A. Cerf & V. H. Cartmell (Comps.), Sixteen famous British plays (pp. 542-590). New York: Garden City.
  • Coward, N. P. (1937). Present indicative. London: William Heinemann.
  • Day, B. (Ed.). (2010). The Noël Coward reader. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Dietrich, R. F. (1989). British drama, 1890 to 1950: A critical history. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
  • Donne, W. B. (1858). Essays on the drama. London: John W. Parker and Son.
  • Fisher, C. (1992). Noël Coward. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Fraser, G. S. (1960). The modern writer and his world. Calcutta: Rupa & Co.
  • Gassner, J. (1954). Masters of the drama. New York: Dover.
  • Gray, F. (1987). Macmillan modern dramatists: Noel Coward. London: Macmillan.
  • Henderson, A. (1956). George Bernard Shaw: Man of the century. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Hoare, P. (1998). Noël Coward: A biography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Hobson, J. A. (1900). The war in South Africa: Its causes and effects. London: James Nisbet & Co.
  • Jackson, R. (2022). Noël Coward: The playwright’s craft in a changing theatre. London: Methuen.
  • Kiernan, R. F. (1986). Noel Coward. New York: Ungar.
  • Lahr, J. (1982). Coward the playwright. London: Methuen.
  • Lawrence, W. W. (1931). Shakespeare’s problem comedies. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Lesley, C., Payn G., & Morley, S. (1979). Noel Coward and his friends. New York: William Morrow and Company.
  • Mannin, E. (1932, Jan. 29). A play which makes me rage. New Leader.
  • Margolies, D. (2012). Shakespeare’s irrational endings: The problem plays. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Marsh, N. (2003). Shakespeare: Three problem plays. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • McFarlane, J. W., (Ed. and Trans.). (1961). Introduction. In The Oxford Ibsen: Pillars of Society, A Doll’s House, Ghosts (pp. 1-17). London: Oxford University Press.
  • Morley, S. (2016). A talent to amuse: A life of Noel Coward. Salisbury: Dean Street Press.
  • Morse, C. R. (1973). Mad dogs and Englishmen: A study of Noel Coward. The Emporia State Research Studies, 21(4), 1-52. Retrieved from https://esirc.emporia.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/285/115.pdf?sequence=1
  • O’Casey, S. (1994). The green crow. London: Virgin.
  • Rossiter, A. P. (1961). Angel with horns and other Shakespeare lectures. G. Storey (Ed.). New York: Theatre Arts Books.
  • Schanzer, E. (1963). The problem plays of Shakespeare: A study of Julius Caesar, Measure for Measure, Antony and Cleopatra. London: Routledge.
  • Shaw, G. B. (1983). Plays unpleasant: Widowers’ Houses, The Philanderer, Mrs Warren’s Profession. New York: Penguin.
  • Shaw, G. B. (1958). The problem play—A symposium. In E. J. West (Ed.). Shaw on theatre (pp. 58-66). New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Shaw, G. B. (1913). The quintessence of Ibsenism. London: Constable and Company.
  • Shaw, G. B. (1907). Dramatic opinions and essays with an apology (Vol. 2). New York: Brentano’s.
  • Singh, B. D. (1986). English and Hindi problem plays: A comparative study of George Bernard Shaw and Lakshmi Narayan Mishra (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gauhati University, Guwahati.
  • Thomas, V. (1991). The moral universe of Shakespeare’s problem plays. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Wyrick, G. D. (Ed.). (1973). Foreword to mad dogs and Englishmen: A study of Noel Coward by Clarence Ralph Morse. The Emporia State Research Studies, 21(4), 1-52. Retrieved from https://esirc.emporia.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/285/115.pdf?sequence=1
  • Yachnin, P. (2003). Shakespeare’s problem plays and the drama of his time: Troilus and Cressida, All’s Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure. In R. Dutton & J. E. Howard (Eds.). A companion to Shakespeare’s works: The poems, problem comedies, late plays (pp. 46-68). Oxford: Blackwell.

NOËL COWARD’IN RESMİGEÇİT ESERİNİN BİR PROBLEM OYUNU OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

Year 2024, Volume: 64 Issue: 1, 469 - 487, 25.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2024.64.1.19

Abstract

Sir Noël Peirce Coward (1899-1973) çok sayıda tiyatro oyunu, müzikal, şarkı, kısa öykü, şiir ve bir roman eseri kazandıran üretken bir İngiliz oyun yazarı, aktör, yönetmen, yazar, besteci, söz yazarı ve senaristti. Ancak Coward en çok tiyatro oyunlarıyla takdir toplamıştır. Coward, töre komedisi, müzikal komedi ve hafif komedi yazarı olarak kabul edilmektedir. 1930’lu yıllar Coward’ın tiyatro başarısının zirvesi olmuştur. Gündelik hayattaki sosyopolitik meselelerin entelektüel, psikolojik ve esprili tartışmasıyla Britanya'da yirminci yüzyıl yaşamının gerçeklerini sahneye koymuştur. Oyun yazarı, her ne kadar komedileriyle tanınsa da komik olmayan oyunlarından biri olan Resmigeçit (1931) ile büyük başarı elde etmiştir. Seyirciyi heyecanlandırmak, endişelendirmek ve şaşırtmak için tiyatro anlayışını ve sahne sanatını oyunda ortaya koymuştur. Oyun, İngiliz halkına ailevi, toplumsal, siyasî, ekonomik ve ahlakî sorunları beraberinde getiren yeni çağın gelmesiyle birlikte ulus ruhunda ve toplumda meydana gelen değişimleri konu alır. Oyun, vatanseverlik ve aşırı milliyetçilik arasındaki çatışma, İngilizlik, savaşın beyhudeliği, savaşın insan maliyeti, toplumsal sınıf sisteminin çöküşü, alt ve üst sınıflar arasındaki gerilim, toplumsal hareketlilik, yaşamda ve toplumda modernleşme, kuşak farkı, barışın, onurun ve haysiyetin korunması ve siyasî partizanlık gibi sorunları tartışmaktadır. Oyun, birbiriyle çatışan görüş veya durumları birlikte sunsa da çatışmayı çözecek bir formül önermez. Bu bağlamda bu makale, Coward'ın yaşadığı dönemin tarihsel olaylarını ve güncel sosyo-politik konularını yorumlayarak, onun ciddi ve gerçekçi oyununu hem biçim hem içerik bakımından bir problem oyunu olarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.

References

  • Antony, L. (2003). The puzzle of patriotism. Peace Review, 15(4), 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040265032000156843
  • Baldick, C. (2004). The Oxford English literary history: The modern movement, 1910-1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Blamires, H. (1974). A short history of English literature. London: Methuen.
  • Boas, F. S. (1896). Shakespeare and his predecessors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Braybrooke, P. (1933). The amazing Mr. Noel Coward. London: Denis Archer.
  • Brustein, R. (2009). Introduction. In H. Kissel, Coward in an hour (pp. vii-viii). Hanover: Smith and Kraus.
  • Clark, I. G. (2007). Rhetorical readings, dark comedies, and Shakespeare’s problem plays. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
  • Coward, N. P. (1953). Resmigeçit. (A. Givda, Trans.). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Coward, N. P. (1942). Cavalcade. In B. A. Cerf & V. H. Cartmell (Comps.), Sixteen famous British plays (pp. 542-590). New York: Garden City.
  • Coward, N. P. (1937). Present indicative. London: William Heinemann.
  • Day, B. (Ed.). (2010). The Noël Coward reader. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Dietrich, R. F. (1989). British drama, 1890 to 1950: A critical history. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
  • Donne, W. B. (1858). Essays on the drama. London: John W. Parker and Son.
  • Fisher, C. (1992). Noël Coward. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Fraser, G. S. (1960). The modern writer and his world. Calcutta: Rupa & Co.
  • Gassner, J. (1954). Masters of the drama. New York: Dover.
  • Gray, F. (1987). Macmillan modern dramatists: Noel Coward. London: Macmillan.
  • Henderson, A. (1956). George Bernard Shaw: Man of the century. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Hoare, P. (1998). Noël Coward: A biography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Hobson, J. A. (1900). The war in South Africa: Its causes and effects. London: James Nisbet & Co.
  • Jackson, R. (2022). Noël Coward: The playwright’s craft in a changing theatre. London: Methuen.
  • Kiernan, R. F. (1986). Noel Coward. New York: Ungar.
  • Lahr, J. (1982). Coward the playwright. London: Methuen.
  • Lawrence, W. W. (1931). Shakespeare’s problem comedies. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Lesley, C., Payn G., & Morley, S. (1979). Noel Coward and his friends. New York: William Morrow and Company.
  • Mannin, E. (1932, Jan. 29). A play which makes me rage. New Leader.
  • Margolies, D. (2012). Shakespeare’s irrational endings: The problem plays. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Marsh, N. (2003). Shakespeare: Three problem plays. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • McFarlane, J. W., (Ed. and Trans.). (1961). Introduction. In The Oxford Ibsen: Pillars of Society, A Doll’s House, Ghosts (pp. 1-17). London: Oxford University Press.
  • Morley, S. (2016). A talent to amuse: A life of Noel Coward. Salisbury: Dean Street Press.
  • Morse, C. R. (1973). Mad dogs and Englishmen: A study of Noel Coward. The Emporia State Research Studies, 21(4), 1-52. Retrieved from https://esirc.emporia.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/285/115.pdf?sequence=1
  • O’Casey, S. (1994). The green crow. London: Virgin.
  • Rossiter, A. P. (1961). Angel with horns and other Shakespeare lectures. G. Storey (Ed.). New York: Theatre Arts Books.
  • Schanzer, E. (1963). The problem plays of Shakespeare: A study of Julius Caesar, Measure for Measure, Antony and Cleopatra. London: Routledge.
  • Shaw, G. B. (1983). Plays unpleasant: Widowers’ Houses, The Philanderer, Mrs Warren’s Profession. New York: Penguin.
  • Shaw, G. B. (1958). The problem play—A symposium. In E. J. West (Ed.). Shaw on theatre (pp. 58-66). New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Shaw, G. B. (1913). The quintessence of Ibsenism. London: Constable and Company.
  • Shaw, G. B. (1907). Dramatic opinions and essays with an apology (Vol. 2). New York: Brentano’s.
  • Singh, B. D. (1986). English and Hindi problem plays: A comparative study of George Bernard Shaw and Lakshmi Narayan Mishra (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gauhati University, Guwahati.
  • Thomas, V. (1991). The moral universe of Shakespeare’s problem plays. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Wyrick, G. D. (Ed.). (1973). Foreword to mad dogs and Englishmen: A study of Noel Coward by Clarence Ralph Morse. The Emporia State Research Studies, 21(4), 1-52. Retrieved from https://esirc.emporia.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/285/115.pdf?sequence=1
  • Yachnin, P. (2003). Shakespeare’s problem plays and the drama of his time: Troilus and Cressida, All’s Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure. In R. Dutton & J. E. Howard (Eds.). A companion to Shakespeare’s works: The poems, problem comedies, late plays (pp. 46-68). Oxford: Blackwell.
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects British and Irish Language, Literature and Culture
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ayşe Şensoy 0000-0002-1792-2381

Early Pub Date June 23, 2024
Publication Date June 25, 2024
Submission Date February 13, 2024
Acceptance Date May 10, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 64 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Şensoy, A. (2024). READING NOËL COWARD’S CAVALCADE AS A PROBLEM PLAY. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 64(1), 469-487. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2024.64.1.19

Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Languages and History-Geography

This journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License22455