Güç Sistemlerinde Geçici Kararlılık için UPFC, GSSC ve Alt-Geçici Dinamik Modellerin Geliştirilmesi

Year 2020, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 1612 - 1625, 30.04.2020

Kenan Döşoğlu

https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.688782

Abstract

Güç sistemlerinin çalışması esnasında bazı nedenlerden dolayı kararsızlık problemleri ile karşı karşıya kalmaktadır. Kararsızlık problemlerinin en önemli nedenlerinden birisi kısa devre durumlarıdır. Kısa devre güç sistemlerinde salınımlara sebep olmaktadır. Bu salınımları ortadan kaldırmak için Güç Salınım Sönümleme Kontrolü (GSSC) kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, güç sistemlerinde osilasyonların sönümlenmesi için Kundur 4 makinalı sistemde farklı senaryolar ile analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca çok makinalı sistemde kullanılan senkron generatörlerin alt-geçici durum dinamik modellemeleri bu çalışmada tercih edilmiştir. Birleştirilmiş Güç Akışı Kontrolü (UPFC), GSSC ve alt-geçici durum dinamik modellemelerinin kullanıldığı ve kullanılmadığı durumlarda karşılaştırmalar yapılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar ile geliştirilen modellerin geleneksel olarak kullanılan modellere göre sistemi kısa sürede kararlı hale getirdiği ve salınımların azalttığı görülmüştür.

Keywords

UPFC, GSSC, Senkron generatör, , Alt-geçici durum dinamik modelleri

Enhancement of UPFC, PODC and Sub-Transient Dynamic Model for Transient Stability in Power Systems

Abstract

During power system operation, it faces instability problems thanks to some reason. One of the most important causes of instability problems is short circuit conditions. It causes oscillations in power systems. Power Swing Damping Control (PSDC) is used to eliminate these oscillations. In this study, analyzes were carried out with different scenarios in Kundur 4 machine system in order to dampen oscillations in power systems. In addition, sub-transient state dynamic models of synchronous generators used in multi-machine system are preferred in this study. Comparisons were made when Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC), PSDC, and sub-transient state dynamic models were used and not used. It has been observed that the models developed with the results obtained have stabilized the system in a short time and the oscillations decreased compared to the traditionally used models.

References

• [1] R. K. Pandey ve N. K. Singh, “UPFC control parameter identification for effective power oscillation damping,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, c. 31, s. 6, ss. 269-276, 2009.
• [2] M. A. Furini, A. L. S. Pereira, ve P. B. Araujo, “Pole placement by coordinated tuning of power system stabilizers and FACTS-POD stabilizers,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, c. 33, s. 3, ss. 615-622, 2011.
• [3] S. N. Dhurvey, ve V. K. Chandrakar, “Performance comparison of UPFC in co-ordination with optimized POD and PSS on damping of power system oscillations,” WSEAS Trans on Power System, c. 3, s. 5, ss. 287-299, 2008.
• [4] M. Sobha, R. S. Kumar, ve S. George, “ANFIS based coordination of multiple UPFC control functions for damping low frequency oscillations in power systems,” International Energy Journal, c. 9, s. 4, ss. 291-302, 2009.
• [5] N. Anwer, A. S. Siddiqui, ve A. Umar, “Analysis of UPFC, SSSC with and without POD in congestion management of transmission system,” In 2012 IEEE 5th India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE), 2012, ss. 1-6.
• [6] S. K. Samal, ve P. C. Panda, “Damping of power system oscillations by using unified power flow controller with POD and PID controllers,” In 2014 International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing Technologies [ICCPCT-2014], 2014, ss. 662-667.
• [7] P. Krishnagandhi, “Power oscillation damping of two machine system,” In 2014 IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), 2014, ss. 167-171.
• [8] L. F. B. Martins, P. B. de Araujo, E. de Vargas Fortes, ve L. H. Macedo, “Design of the PI–UPFC–POD and PSS damping controllers using an artificial bee colony algorithm,” Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, c. 28, s. 6, ss.762-773, 2017.
• [9] C. R. Makkar, ve L. Dewan, “Simultaneous coordination of power system stabilizer and UPFC for improving dynamic stability of multimachine system,” In 2014 IEEE 6th India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE), 2014, ss. 1-4.
• [10] B. E. Maleki, ve H. Beiranvand, “A novel method of FACTS-POD design to more enhancement of inter-area mode damping in a multi-machine power system,” Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations, c. 6, s. 1, ss. 95-106, 2018.
• [11] M. Sarkar, “Load flow studies with UPFC power injection model,” Master Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Hindistan, 2013.
• [12] H. M. Ayres, I. Kopcak, M. S. Castro, F. Milano, ve V. F. Da Costa, “A didactic procedure for designing power oscillation dampers of FACTS devices,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, c. 18, s. 6, ss. 896-909, 2010.
• [13] M. S. Castro, H. M. Ayres, V. F. Da Costa, ve L. C. P. Da Silva, “Impacts of the SSSC control modes on small-signal and transient stability of a power system,” Electric Power Systems Research, c.77, s. 1, ss. 1-9, 2007.
• [14] F. Milano, “An open source power system analysis toolbox,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, c. 20, s. 3, ss. 1199-1206, 2005.