Kahvede Bekletilen Farklı CAD/CAM Blokların Renk Stabilitelerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2021, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 284 - 289, 20.09.2021

Soner Şişmanoğlu , Aliye Tuğçe Gürcan

https://doi.org/10.33631/duzcesbed.840660

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Amaç: Renk uyumu, hastaların estetik olarak uyumlu restorasyon arayışlarının artması nedeniyle günümüzde daha da önem kazanmıştır. Bununla birlikte, mevcut CAD/CAM blokların renk değişikliği ve translusentliklerindeki değişiklikler hakkında hala bilgi eksikliği bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kahvede bir ay bekletme süresinin ardından farklı CAD/CAM blokların renk stabilitesinin, translusentliğinin, su emiliminin ve suda çözünürlüğünün araştırılmasıdır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Dört CAD/CAM blok materyali ve bir geleneksel kompozit reçine değerlendirilmeye alınmıştır. Örnekler 2 mm kalınlığında hazırlanmıştır ve örneklerin CIELab değerleri, siyah ve beyaz arka plan üzerinde klinik spektrofotometre ile ölçülmüştür (n=6). Kahve veya distile suda bir ay bekletildikten sonra renk ve translusentlik değişimleri hesaplanmıştır. Su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük değerleri ayrıca ISO 4049: 2009'a göre belirlenmiştir (n=6). Veriler iki yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey’in ikili karşılaştırmalarıyla analiz edilmiştir (α=0,05).
Bulgular: CAD/CAM blokların renk değişimleri 1,5 ile 7,3 arasında bulunmuş ve translusentlikleri azalmıştır. Bir aylık kahvede bekletilme sonucunda, en yüksek renk değişimi nano kompozit reçinede (7,3) gözlenirken en düşük renk değişimi feldspatik porselende (1,5) gözlenmiştir. Polimer bazlı CAD/CAM materyaller arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamaktadır. Renk değişiklikleri ile su emilimi veya suda çözünürlük arasında korelasyon bulunmamıştır.
Sonuç: Feldspat seramik hariç tüm materyaller kahve içerisinde bir ay bekletildikten sonra klinik olarak kabul edilebilir eşik seviyesini (2.7) aşan bir renk değişikliği göstermiştir. En yüksek renk değişimi nano kompozit reçine materyalde gözlenmiştir.

Keywords

CAD/CAM, renk stabilitesi, reçine kompozitler, renklenebilirlik, renklenme

Evaluation of Stain Susceptibility of Different CAD/CAM Blocks After Immersion in Coffee

Abstract

Aim: Color stability is gaining more importance today due to majority of patients are seeking color matching restorations. However, there is still lack of information on staining and changes in translucency of recent CAD/CAM block materials. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the discoloration susceptibility, translucency change, water solubility, and water sorption of different CAD/CAM materials after one-month of immersion in coffee.
Material and Methods: Four CAD/CAM block materials and one conventional composite resin were examined. The CIELab values of CAD/CAM materials were determined using a clinical spectrophotometer on black and white backgrounds. The color changes and translucency differences were calculated after immersion in coffee or distilled water for one month (n=6). Water solubility and sorption were also determined according to the ISO 4049:2009 (n=6). The data were calculated by 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s pair-wise comparisons (α=0.05).
Results: Color changes of the CAD/CAM materials tested ranged from 1.5 to 7.3, and translucency reduced. The highest color change was observed in nanocomposite resin (7.3), whereas the lowest color change was observed in feldspathic porcelain (1.5) after storing in coffee for a month. There was no significant difference among the polymer-based CAD/CAM materials. No correlation was determined between color changes and water sorption/solubility.
Conclusion: All materials except feldspar ceramic showed a discoloration exceeding the clinically acceptable threshold level (2.7) after being stored in coffee for one month. The highest color change was observed in nanocomposite resin material.

Keywords

CAD/CAM, color stability, resin composites, stainability, staining

References

• 1. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98(5): 389-404.
• 2. della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139(4): 8-13.
• 3. Samra APB, Pereira SK, Delgado LC, Borges CP. Color stability evaluation of aesthetic restorative materials. Braz Oral Res. 2020; 22(3): 205-210.
• 4. Fontes ST, Fernández MR, de Moura CM, Meireles SS. Color stability of a nanofill composite: effect of different immersion media. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020; 17(5): 388-391.
• 5. Watts A, Addy M. Tooth discolouration and staining: A review of the literature. Br Dent J. 2001; 190(6): 309-316.
• 6. Choi MS, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing. J Mater Sci. 2005; 16(4): 347-353.
• 7. Awad D, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Ilie N. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113(6): 534-540.
• 8. Ardu S, Braut V, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Dietschi D, Feilzer AJA. A long-term laboratory test on staining susceptibility of esthetic composite resin materials. Quintessence Int. 2010; 41(8): 695-702.
• 9. Sabatini C. Color stability behavior of methacrylate-based resin composites polymerized with light-emitting diodes and quartz-tungsten-halogen. Oper Dent. 2015; 40(3): 271-281.
• 10. Gresnigt MMM, Ozcan M. Fracture strength of direct versus indirect laminates with and without fiber application at the cementation interface. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(8): 927-933.
• 11. Karaarslan E, Bulucu B, Ertas E. Clinical evaluation of direct composite restorations and inlays: Results at 12 months. J Restor Dent. 2014; 2(2): 70-77.
• 12. Barutcigil C, Yildiz M. Intrinsic and extrinsic discoloration of dimethacrylate and silorane based composites. J Dent. 2012; 40(1): e57-63.
• 13. Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135(5): 587-594.
• 14. Sham ASK, Chu FCS, Chai J, Chow TW. Color stability of provisional prosthodontic materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91(5): 447-452.
• 15. Alharbi A, Ardu S, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices. Odontology 2017; 105: 162-169.
• 16. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CHF. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/ CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: Effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31(3): 377-383.
• 17. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013; 29(4): 419-426.
• 18. Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101(3): 193-199.
• 19. Lauvahutanon S, Shiozawa M, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Oki M, Finger WJ, et al. Discoloration of various CAD/CAM blocks after immersion in coffee. Restor Dent Endod. 2017; 42(1): 9-18.
• 20. Barutcigil C, Bilgili D, Barutcigil K, Dundar A, Buyukkaplan US, Yilmaz B. Discoloration and translucency changes of CAD-CAM materials after exposure to beverages. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 122(3): 325-331.
• 21. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27(1): S1-S9.
• 22. Aguiar FHB, Georgetto MH, Soares GP, Catelan A, Dos Santos PH, Ambrosano GM, et al. Effect of different light-curing modes on degree of conversion, staining susceptibility and stain’s retention using different beverages in a nanofilled composite resin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23(2): 106-114.
• 23. Malekipour MR, Sharafi A, Kazemi S, Khazaei S, Shirani F. Comparison of color stability of a composite resin in different color media. J Dent Res. 2012; 9(4): 441-446.
• 24. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(1): 12-18.
• 25. Arocha MA, Mayoral JR, Lefever D, Mercade M, Basilio J, Roig M. Color stability of siloranes versus methacrylate-based composites after immersion in staining solutions. Clin Oral Invest 2013; 17: 1481-1487.
• 26. Arocha MA, Basilio J, Llopis J, Di Bella E, Roig M, Ardu S, et al. Colour stainability of indirect CAD-CAM processed composites vs conventionally laboratory processed composites after immersion in staining solutions. J Dent. 2014; 42(7): 831-838.
• 27. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115(1): 71-75.
• 28. Quek SHQ, Yap AUJ, Rosa V, Tan KBC, Teoh KH. Effect of staining beverages on color and translucency of CAD/CAM composites. J Esthet Restore Dent. 2018; 30(2): E9-E17.
• 29. Ertas E, Guler AU, Yucel AC, Koprulu H, Guler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25(2): 371-376.
• 30. Khashayar G, Bain PA, Salari S, Dozic A; Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry. J Dent. 2014; 42(6): 637-644.