Beliren Yetişkinlikte Romantik İlişki Kalitesi ile Bağlanma İlişkisinde Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar ve Zedelenmiş Otonominin Aracı Etkisi

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 26, 267 - 288, 15.08.2020

Hasan Eşici Yaşar Özbay

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, beliren yetişkinlik dönemindeki üniversite öğrencilerinin erken dönem uyumsuz şemalarından zedelenmiş otonomi şema alanının, bağlanma
biçimleri ile psikolojik ihtiyaç doyumlarının, romantik ilişki kalitesi üzerindeki etkilerinin araştırılmasıdır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu 18-25 yaşları arasında yer alan,
beliren yetişkinlik dönemindeki 327 kız, 134 erkek olmak üzere toplam 461 üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri-II (Selçuk, Günaydın, Sümer ve Uysal, 2005), Young Şema Ölçeği-Kısa Form 3 (Soygüt, Karaosmanoğlu ve Çakır, 2009), Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar Ölçeği (Eşici, 2014) ve Romantik İlişki Kalitesi Ölçeği (Eşici, 2014) kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizi için SPSS 21 ve AMOS 18 paket programları kullanılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre; bağlanma, romantik ilişki kalitesiyle doğrudan ve zedelenmiş otonomi şema alanı ve psikolojik ihtiyaçlar üzerinden dolaylı olarak, zedelenmiş otonomi şema alanı, romantik ilişki kalitesiyle doğrudan ve psikolojik ihtiyaçlar üzerinden dolaylı olarak ve psikolojik ihtiyaçlar, romantik ilişki kalitesiyle doğrudan ilişkili olarak bulunmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular literatür çerçevesinde tartışılmıştır. Sonuç olarak bireylerin romantik ilişki kalitesinin kaygılı ve kaçınmacı bağlanma düzeyleri ile arasındaki ilişkide erken dönem uyumsuz şemalarından zedelenmiş otonominin aracılık etmesi bilişsel açıdan bireyin değerlendirilmesi ile ilişkili olabileceği düşünülmektedir. Yani bireyin bilişsel yapılarındaki değişimlerin veya olumsuz özelliklerin kaygılı ve kaçınmacı bağlanma durumlarıyla ilişkili olabileceği ve bu değişim veya olumsuz özelliklerin ise bireylerin romantik ilişki kalitesini negatif yönde etkileyebileceği düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Romantik İlişki Kalitesi, Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar, Zedelenmiş Otonomi, Bağlanma

References

• AİNSWORTH, Marry S. ve BOWLBY, John, (1991), “An Ethological Approach to Personality Development”, American Psychologist, XLVI, 4: 333-341.
• ALDERFER, Clayton P, (1969), “An Empirical Test of A New Theory of Human Needs”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, IV, 2: 142–175.
• ARNETT, Jeffrey Jensen, (1994), “Are College Students Adults? Their Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood.” Journal of Adult Development, I, 4: 213-224.
• ARNETT, Jeffrey Jensen, (1998), “Learning to Stand Alone: The Contemporary American Transition to Adulthood in Cultural and Historical Context”, Human Development, XLI, 5-6: 295-315.
• ARNETT, Jeffrey Jensen, (2000), “Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Development from the Late Teens Through the Twenties”, American Psychologist, LV, 5: 469–480.
• ARNETT, Jeffrey Jensen, (2004), Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens Through the Twenties, New York: Oxford University Press.
• ARON, A., ARON, E. ve SMOLLAN, D. (1992), “Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, LXIII, 4: 596-612.
• ATAK, Hasan ve Çok, Figen, (2010), “Emerging Adulthood: A New Period in Human Life”, Child’s and Youth’s Mental Health Magazine, XVII, 1: 39-50.
• ATAK, Hasan, (2011), “Gradual Transition to Adulthood: Is Emerging Adulthood the Only Main Road?”, Elementary Education Online, X, 1: 51-67.
• AXİNN, William G. ve THORNTON, Arland, (1993), “Mothers, Children, and Cohabitation: The Intergenerational Effects of Attitudes and Behavior”, American Sociological Review, LVIII,2: 233-246.
• BAUMEİSTER, Roy F ve LEARY, Mark R (1995), “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation”, Psychological Bulletin, CXVII, 3: 497-529.
• BECK, Judith. S. (2001), Bilişsel Terapi: Temel İlkeler ve Ötesi (Çeviren: N. Hisli Şahin). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları, No 22.
• BERSCHEID, Ellen ve REİS, Harry. T. (1998). Attraction and Close Relationships. The Handbook of Social Psychology (Ed. D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske ve G. Lindzey), New York: Oxford University Press, 193–281.
• BERSCHEID, Ellen, SNYDER, Mark ve OMOTO, Allen. M. (1989), “The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, LVII, 5: 792-807.
• BURGER, Jerry M, (2006). Kişilik (Çeviren: İ. D. Erguvan). Birinci Baskı. Istanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları
• BURLESON, B. R. (2005), “A Different Voice on Different Cultures: Illusion and Reality in the Study of Sex Differences in Personal Relationships”, Personal Relationships, IV: 229–241.
• ÇERİ, Özge, (2009), Analysis of Basic Congitive Schemas and Attachment Styles in Women Receiving a Diagnosis of Vaginismus and Their Partners. Master Thesis. Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
• CLARK, Margaret S ve REİS, Harry T, (1988), “Interpersonal Processes in Close Relationships”, Annual Review of Psychology, XXXIX: 609-672.
• COLLİNS, Andrew ve VAN DULMEN, Manfred, (2006), Friendships and romance in emerging adulthood: Assessing distinctiveness in close relationships. Emerging Adults in America: Coming of Age in the 21st century (Ed. I J. J. Arnett - J. L. Tanner), Washington, DC; American Psycohological Association, 219-234.
• CONNOLLY, Jennifer ve GOLDBERG, Adele, (1999), Romantic Relationships in Adolescence: The Role Of Friends and Pers in Their Emergence and Development. The Development of Romantic Relationships in Adolescence (Ed. W. Furman, B. Brown, - C. Feiring) New York: Cambridge University Press, 266-290.
• CONNOLLY, Jennifer. A. ve JOHNSON, Anne. M, (1996), “Adolescents’ Romantic Relationships and the Structure and Quality of Their Close İnterpersonal Ties”, Personal Relationships, III, 2: 185-195.
• DAĞ, İhsan ve GÜLÜM, Volkan, (2013), “The Mediator Role of Cognitive Features in the Relationship Between Adult Attachment Patterns and Psychopathology Symptoms: Cognitive Flexibility”, Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, XXIV, 4: 240-247.
• DECİ, Edward. L. ve VANSTEENKİSTE, Maarten, (2004), “Self-Determination Theory and Basic Need Satisfaction: Understanding Human Development in Positive Psychology”, Ricerche di Psicologia, I, 27: 23-40.
• DUMİTRESCU, Daciana ve RUSU, Alina S. (2012), “Relationship Between Early Maladaptive Schemas, Couple Satisfaction and İndividual Mate Value: An Evolutionary Psychological Approach”, Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, XII, 1: 63-76.
• ELDER, Glen. H., Jr. (1985). Life Course Dynamics. New York: Cornell Universty Press.
• ERYILMAZ, Ali ve ERCAN, Leyla, (2010), “Initiaing Romantic Intimacy at Emerging Adulthood: Is it Intimacy or Isolation?”, Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, IV,34: 119-128.
• ERYILMAZ, Ali ve Ercan, Leyla, (2011), “Starting Romantic Intimacy In Emerging Adulthood and Perceived Control”, GU, Gazi Education Faculty Journal, XXXI, 2: 359-380.
• ERYILMAZ, Ali ve ATAK, Hasan, (2011), “Investigation of Starting Romantic Intimacy in Emerging Adulthood in Terms of Self-Esteem, Sex and Sexual Roles”, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. XI, 2: 595-600.
• EŞİCİ, Hasan, (2014), Investigation of the Romantic Relationships Quality in terms of Early Maladaptive Schemas, Attachment, Psychological Needs. Doctoral Dissertation. Gazi University, Instute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• FEIRING, Candice, (1996), “Concepts of Romance in 15-Year-Old Adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence”, VI, 2: 181–200.
• FINCHAM Frank. D. ve Cui Ming, (2011). “Emerging Adulhood and Romantic Relationships: An Introduction”, Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood (Ed. F. D. Fincam ve M. Cui). New York: Cambridge Universty Press, 3-15.
• FLETCHER, Garth .J.O., SIMPSON, Jeffry A. ve THOMAS, Geoff, (2000), “The Measurement of Perceived Relationship Quality Components: A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, XXVI, 3: 340- 354.
• FRAENKEL, Jack R., NORMAN, E. Wallen ve HYUN, Helen H., (2012), How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Boston: McGraw-Hil.
• FRALEY, R. Chris, WALLER, Niels G. ve BRENNAN, Kelly A. (2000), “An Item-Response Theory Analysis of Self-Report Measures of Adult Attachment”, Personality and Social Psycology Journal, LXXVIII, 2: 350-365.
• GALL, Meredith Damien, BORG, Walter R. ve GALL, Joyce P. (1996), Educational Research: An Introduction. (6th ed.). New York: Longman Publishers.
• GALLIHER, R.C., WELSH, D.P., ROSTOSKY, S.S. ve KAWAGUCHİ, M.C. (1998).Power in adolescent romantic relationships and its association with well-being. In Paul Florsheim (Chair), Adolescent Romantic Relations: Interpersonal Processes in Developmental Perspective. Symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego, CA.
• Glasser, William (1965), Reality Therapy: A New Approches to Psychiatry. New York: Harper And Row.Glasser, William (2003), Seçim Teorisi (Çev. Muge İzmirli). İstanbul: Hayat Yayınları.
• GRIFFITHS, K. ve BURLESON, B. R. (1995). Gender and Communication Values in Friendships: A Comparison of Gender-Related Similarities and Differences in Same-sex and Cross-sex Friendships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Central States Communication Association. Indianapolis, In, April 1995.
• HARTUP, Willard W. (1993), “Adolescents and Their Friends.” Close Friendships in Adolescence (Ed. B. Laursen), San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 3-22.
• HAZAN, Cindy ve SHAVER, Phillip (1987), “Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,LII, 3: 511–524.
• İLHAN, Tahsin ve ÖZDEMİR, Yalçın, (2012), “The Predictive Role of Age, Gender, and Attachment Styles on Identity Status among Emerging Adults”, Dicle University Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty Journal, XIX: 227-241. Family Function and Psychological Symptoms: Early Maladaptive Schemas’ Intermediary Role”, Clinic Psychiatry, XIII: 127-136.
• KARNEY, Benjamin R. ve BRADBURY, Thomas N. (1995), “The Longitudinal Course of Marital Quality and Stability: A Review of Theory, Methods, and Research” Psychological Bulletin, CXVIII, 1: 3-34.
• KASTRO, Rosita Morlevi, (1998). Marital adjustment and depression: A study on the quality of marital relationship and symtom formation in spauses, (Master Thesis). Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
• KLINE, Rex B., (2011), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3th ed.), New York: Guilford Press.
• KONUKÇU, Hacer Bolat, AKKOYUNLU, Serkan ve TÜRKÇAPAR, M. Hakan (2013), “Early Maladaptive Schemas in Depressed Women and its Relationship with Depression” Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, II, 2: 98- 105.
• KURDEK, Lawrence A. (1998), “The Nature and Predictors of the Trajectory of Change in Marital Quality Over the First 4 Years of Marriage for First-Married Husbands and Wives” Journal of Family Psychology, XII, 4: 494-510.
• LE, Benjamin ve AGNEW, Christopher R, (2001), “Need Fulfillment and Emotional Experience in Interdependent Romantic Relationships”, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , XVII, 3: 423-440.
• LEMPERS, Jacques. D, ve CLARK-LEMPERS, Dania S. (1993), “A Functional Comparison of Same-Sex and Opposite-Sex Friendships During Adolescence”, Journal of Adolescent Research, IIX, 1: 89–108.
• LINDER, Jennifer Ruh, (2002), Parent and peer predictors of physical aggression, verbal aggression, and conflict management in romantic relationships in late adolescence and young adulthood: A prospective developmental study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
• LINDER, Jennifer Ruh., CRICK, Nicki. R. ve COLLINS, W. Andrew, (2002), “Relational aggression and victimization in young adults’ romantic relationships: Associations with perceptions of parent, peer, and romantic relationship quality” Social Development, XI, 1: 69–86.
• MISHLER, J.A. ve CHERRY, S. (1999). Correlating Glasser’s Choice Theory to the Behavioral Requirements of IDEA 97. Rural Special Education for the New Millenium. Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES). 19th, Albuquerque, New Mexico, March 25-27, 1999.
• PARMAKSIZ, H. Rukiye, (2008), The Participation To The Cultural Activities İn Emerging Adulthood. Master Thesis. Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
• RİSO, Lawrence. P., FROMAN, Shoshana. E., RAOUF, Mona, GABLE, Phillip.,
• MADDUX, Rachel. E., TURİNİ-SANTORELLİ, Nöelle., PENNA, Suzanne, BLANDINO, Jamie A., JACOBS, Carli H., ve CHERRY, Meliss, (2006) “The Long-Term Stability of Early Maladaptive Schemas” Cognitive Therapy and Research, XXX, 4: 515–529.
• ROSCOE, Bruce, DIANA, Mark S. ve BROOKS, Richard H., (1987), “Early, Middle and Late Adolescents’ Views on Dating and Factors Influencing Partner Selection” Adolescence, XXII, 85: 59-68.
• RYAN, Richard M. ve POWELSON, Cynthia L., (1991), “Autonomy and Relatedness as Fundamental to Motivation and Education”, The Journal of Experimental Education, LX, 1: 49-66.
• SCHUMACKER, Randall E. ve LOMAX, Richard. G., (2010), A Beginners Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Routledge.
• SEIFFGE-KRENKE, I. ve LANG, J., (2002). Forming and maintaining romantic relations from early adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence of a developmental sequence: In S. Shulman & I. Seiffge-Krenke (co-chairs), Antecedents of the Quality and Stability of Adolescent Romantic Relationships. Symposium at the conference of the Society for Research on Adolescence, New Orleans, LA.
• SELÇUK, Emre, GÜNAYDIN, Gül, SÜMER, Nebi ve UYSAL Ahmet, (2005). A New Scale Developed to Measrure Adult Attachment Dimensions: Experiences in Close Relationships – Revised (ECR-R) Psychometric Evaluation in a Turkish Sample. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, VIII, 16: 1-11.
• SHAVER, Phillip R., HAZAN, Cindy ve BRADSHAW, Donna, (1988), “Love as Attachment: The Integration of Three Behavioral Systems”, The Psychology of Love (Ed. R. J. Sternberg - M. Barnes), New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 68-99.
• SHULMAN, Shmuel ve KİPNİS, Offer, (2001), “Adolescent Romantic Relationships: A Look from the Future” Journal of Adolescence, XXIV, 3: 337-351.
• SHULMAN, Shmuel, LEVY-SHİFF, Rachel, Kedem, Peri ve Alon, Eitan, (1997), “Intimate Relationships Among Adolescent Romantic Partners and Same-Sex Friends: İndividual and Systemic Perspectives”. Romantic Relationships in Adolescence: Developmental Perspectives, (Ed. S. Shulman - W. A. Collins) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 37–51.
• SOYGÜT, Gonca, KARAOSMANOĞLU, Alp ve ÇAKIR, Zehra, (2009), “Assessment of Early Maladaptive Schemas: A Psychometric Study of the Turkish Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form-3”, Turkish Psychiatry Journal, XX, 1: 75-84.
• STACKERT, Richelle A. ve BURSİK. Krisanne, (2003), “Why am I unsatisfed? adult attachment style, gendered irrational relationship beliefs and young adult romantic relationship satisfaction”. Personality and Individual Differences, XXXIV, 8: 1419-1429.
• SÜMER, Nebi, (2000), “Structural Equality Patterns: Basic concepts and sample practices”, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, III, 6: 74-79.
• YAKA, Ali İhsan, (2011), Attachment, early maladaptive schemas, self regulation and psychological symptoms. Master Thesis, Ankara University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara
• YOUNG, Jeffrey E., (1990), Cognitive Therapy For Personality Disorders: A Schema –Focused Approach. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
• YOUNG, Jeffrey, E., KLOSKO, Janet. S., WEİSHAAR, Marjorie. E., (2009), Schema Therapy. (Çev: T. V. Soylu). Istanbul: Litera Publishing.
• YOUNİSS, James, SMOLLAR, Jacqueline, (1989), “Adolescents’ interpersonal relationships in social context”, Peer Relationships in Child Development, (Ed. Berndt TJ - Ladd GW) New York: Wiley, 300-316.
• ZİMMER-GEMBECK, Melanie. J. (2002), “The development of romantic relationships and adaptations in the system of peer relationships”, Journal of Adolescent Health, XXXI, 6: 216-225.