Bad Split During Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy of Mandible: Case Report

Year 2023, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 60 - 63, 22.09.2023

Doç. Dr. Timuçin Baykul , Yavuz Fındık , Gülperi Koçer , Mehmet Fatih Şentürk , Tayfun Yazıcı , Seçil Duygu Sümengen

Abstract

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is a well-defined process that moves the mandible in three directions of space and
moves it into the correct position. BSSO has been described in the literature as a safe procedure. However, it includes some
intraoperative and postoperative complications. The most common of these is the bad split. The aim of this article is to present
bad splits cases and treatment methods. In our center had made 102 BSSO cases in 2012-2019 and 6 of these include bad split.
5 of these buccal plate fracture on proximal segment, one of these distal segment fracture include condyler process. All cases
had managed intraoperatively with screw osteosynthesis and no need for additional precaution like rigit intermaxillary fixation or
a prolonged stay. All patient were followed for 1 week, 1month, 6 month and 1 year. None of patient had showed poor function or
temporomandibular dysorder postoperatively.
Even if a bad split consist of during surgery, no influence final result or postoperative course.
Consequently, bad split is not avoidable all time. When treated well the chances of functional success are good.

Keywords

Orthognatic surgery, Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy, Bad Split

References

• 1. Travess H, Newton J, Sandy J. The development of a patient-centered measure of theprocess and outcome of combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment. Journal ofOrthodontics.2004;31(220).
• 2. FalterB, SchepersS, VrielinckL, LambrichtsI, ThijsH, PolitisC. Occurrence of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2010;110(4):430-435.doi:10.1016/j. tripleo.2010.02.003
• 3. Verweij JP, Houppermans PNWJ, Gooris P, Mensink G, van Merkesteyn JPR. Riskfactors for common complications associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Aliterature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery.2016;44(9):1170-1180.doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.023
• 4. Jędrzejewski M, Smektała & T, Sporniak-Tutak & K, Olszewski & R. Preoperative,intraoperative,and post operative complications in orthognathic surgery:a systematic review.doi:10.1007/s00784- 015-1452-1
• 5. KimSG, ParkSS. Incidence of Complications and Problems Related to Orthognathic Surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007;65(12): 2438-2444.doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.030
• 6. Mensink G, Verweij JP, Frank MD, Eelco Bergsma J, Richard Van Merkesteyn JP.Bad split during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible with separators: Aretrospective study of 427 patients. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.2013;51(6):525-529.doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.10.009
• 7. Steenen S, Becking A. Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic reviewoff fracture patterns. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.2016;45(7):887-897.
• 8. Kriwalsky MS, Maurer P, Veras RB, Eckert AW, Schubert J. Risk factors for a badsplit during sagittal split osteotomy. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.2008;46(3):177-179. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.09.011
• 9. Reyneke JP, Tsakiris P, Becker P. Age as a factor in the complication rate afterremoval ofunerupted/impacted third molar sat the time of mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2002;60(6):654-659. doi:10.1053/joms.2002.33114
• 10. August M, Marchena J, Donagy J, Kaban L. Neurosensory Deficit and Functional Impairment After Sagittal Ramus Osteotomy:ALong-Term Follow-UpStudy.;1998.
• 11. Veras RB, Kriwalsky MS, Hoffmann S, Maurer P, Schubert J. Functional and radiographic long-term results after bad split in orthognathic surgery. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008;37(7):606-611.doi:10.1016/j. ijom.2008.04.010