Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatının Lojistik üzerindeki Etkilerini CIMO-Logic ile Analizi

Year 2022, Issue: 34, 568 - 572, 31.03.2022

Mehmet Ali Taş , Batin Latif Aylak

https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1082778

Abstract

Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatı (AYM), Avrupa'yı 2050 yılına kadar karbon-nötr haline gelen ilk kıta haline getirmeyi amaçlayan bir dizi mevzuat ve politika kılavuzudur. AYM’ye göre, sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefine ulaşmak için çeşitli alanlarda değişiklik ve dönüşümler öngörülmektedir. Lojistik sektörünün de odak noktası, bu mutabakata uygun olarak eko-lojistik olarak da bilinen yeşil lojistiğe kaymıştır. Söz konusu kavram, depolama, nakliye ve diğer lojistik faaliyetlerin çevresel etkisini en aza indirmek için lojistik endüstrisi tarafından uygulanan sürdürülebilir yaklaşımları tanımlamaktadır. AYM'nin lojistik üzerindeki etkileri incelenmeli ve daha iyi sonuçlar verebilecek uygulamalar geliştirilmelidir. Bu çalışmada, süreçlerin incelenmesini ve bilimsel kanıt sunulmasını sağlayan tasarım bilimi araştırma yaklaşımlarından biri olan CIMO-Logic'ten yararlanılmıştır. Çalışma bulgularının, mutabakatın lojistik uygulamaları üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya koymaya yardımcı olması amaçlanmaktadır.

Keywords

Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatı (AYM), Lojistik, Eko-lojistik, CIMO-Logic

Analysing the Impacts of European Green Deal on Logistics through CIMO-Logic

Abstract

The European Green Deal (EGD) is a set of legislation and policy guidelines aimed at making Europe the first continent to become carbon neutral by 2050. According to this agreement, changes and transformations are foreseen in various fields in order to achieve the sustainable development goal. The focus of the logistics industry has shifted to green logistics, also known as eco-logistics, in compliance with this deal. This concept describes the sustainable approaches implemented by the wider logistics industry on the continent to minimize the environmental impact of warehousing and transporting goods as well as other logistical activities. The effects of EGD on logistics should be examined and practices that can give better results should be developed. In this study, CIMO-Logic, which is one of the design science research approaches that enable the evaluation of processes and the presentation of scientific evidence, is promoted. The findings of the study are intended to help reveal the effects of this deal on logistics practices.

Keywords

European Green Deal (EGD), Logistics, Eco-logistics, CIMO-Logic

References

• Bălan, C. (2018). The disruptive impact of future advanced ICTs on maritime transport: a systematic review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0133
• Basiago, A. D. (1998). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist, 19(2), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006697118620
• Borowy, I. (2013). Defining sustainable development for our common future: A history of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203383797
• Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson Uk.
• Costa, E., Soares, A. L., & Sousa, J. P. D. (2018, September). Exploring the CIMO-logic in the design of collaborative networks mediated by digital platforms. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 266-277). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99127-6_23
• Costa, E., Soares, A. L., & de Sousa, J. P. (2020). Industrial business associations improving the internationalisation of SMEs with digital platforms: A design science research approach. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102070
• de Sousa Junior, W. T., Montevechi, J. A. B., de Carvalho Miranda, R., & Campos, A. T. (2019). Discrete simulation-based optimization methods for industrial engineering problems: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 526-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.073
• Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization studies, 29(3), 393-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088020
• Eckert, E., & Kovalevska, O. (2021). Sustainability in the European Union: analyzing the discourse of the European green deal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020080
• Eskelinen, T., Rajahonka, M., Villman, K., & Santti, U. (2017). Improving internal communication management in SMEs: Two case studies in service design. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(6), 16-24.
• European Commission. (2013). Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T). https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/infrastructure-and-investment/trans-european-transport-network-ten-t_en
• European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf
• Hafner, M., & Raimondi, P. P. (2020). Priorities and challenges of the EU energy transition: From the European Green Package to the new Green Deal. Russian Journal of Economics, 6, 374. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.6.55375
• Hainsch, K., Brauers, H., Burandt, T., Goeke, L., von Hirschhausen, C. R., Kemfert, C., ... & Wealer, B. (2020). Make the European Green Deal real: Combining climate neutrality and economic recovery (No. 153). DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt.
• Halminen, O., Chen, A., Tenhunen, H., & Lillrank, P. (2021). Demonstrating the value of digital health: Guidance on contextual evidence gathering for companies in different stages of maturity. Health Services Management Research, 34(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951484820971447
• Jäger-Waldau, A., Kougias, I., Taylor, N., & Thiel, C. (2020). How photovoltaics can contribute to GHG emission reductions of 55% in the EU by 2030. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 126, 109836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109836
• Kajanus, M., Leban, V., Glavonjić, P., Krč, J., Nedeljković, J., Nonić, D., ... & Eskelinen, T. (2019). What can we learn from business models in the European forest sector: Exploring the key elements of new business model designs. Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.005
• Kochan, C. G., & Nowicki, D. R. (2018). Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(8), 842-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0099
• La Notte, A., Tonin, S., & Lucaroni, G. (2018). Assessing direct and indirect emissions of greenhouse gases in road transportation, taking into account the role of uncertainty in the emissions inventory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 69, 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.008
• Mentzer, J. T., Min, S., & Bobbitt, L. M. (2004). Toward a unified theory of logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, (34)8, 606-627. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410557758
• Nurmala, N., de Leeuw, S., & Dullaert, W. (2017). Humanitarian–business partnerships in managing humanitarian logistics. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(1), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2016-0262
• Öberg, M., Nilsson, K. L., & Johansson, C. M. (2018). Complementary governance for sustainable development in transport: The European TEN-T Core network corridors. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(4), 674-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.08.006
• Panagakos, G. (2016). Green corridors and network design. In Green transportation logistics (pp. 123-160). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17175-3_4
• Pucher, J., Korattyswaropam, N., Mittal, N., & Ittyerah, N. (2005). Urban transport crisis in India. Transport Policy, 12(3), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.02.008
• Robert, K. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: science and policy for sustainable development, 47(3), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444
• Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 11(4), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00062-8
• Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Currency.
• Sneddon, C., Howarth, R. B., & Norgaard, R. B. (2006). Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological economics, 57(2), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.013
• Stoilova, S., Munier, N., Kendra, M., & Skrúcaný, T. (2020). Multi-criteria evaluation of railway network performance in countries of the TEN-T orient–east med corridor. Sustainability, 12(4), 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041482
• Thiell, M., Zuluaga, J. P. S., Montañez, J. P. M., & van Hoof, B. (2011). Green logistics: Global practices and their implementation in emerging markets. In Green finance and sustainability: Environmentally-aware business models and technologies (pp. 334-357). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-531-5.ch018
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2019). Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2021). Routes to Lower Greenhouse Gas Emissions Transportation Future. https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/routes-lower-greenhouse-gas-emissions-transportation-future
• Waas, T., Hugé, J., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2011). Sustainable development: A bird’s eye view. Sustainability, 3(10), 1637-1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101637
• Walton, S. V., Handfield, R. B., & Melnyk, S. A. (1998). The green supply chain: integrating suppliers into environmental management processes. International journal of purchasing and materials management, 34(1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1998.tb00042.x
• Wolf, S., Teitge, J., Mielke, J., Schütze, F., & Jaeger, C. (2021). The European Green Deal—more than climate neutrality. Intereconomics, 56(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-0963-z
• Yu, W., Jacobs, M. A., Salisbury, W. D., & Enns, H. (2013). The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 346-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.023