Boz Irk Sığırlarda Dil Papillalarının Anatomik Yapısının Elektron Mikroskobik İncelenmesi

Year 2023, , 118 - 126, 01.08.2023

Onur Tütüncü Şükrü Hakan Atalgın

https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.1332492

Abstract

Bu çalışma, boz ırk sığırda dil yüzeyinin dorsal ve lateral kısımlarındaki papillaların yüzeyinin ve papillasız kısımlardaki özelliklerin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, 7 adet erkek Boz Irk sığır dili kullanılmıştır. Dilin üst (dorsal) tarafındaki apeks, korpus ve radiks lingua'dan elde edilen materyaller taramalı elektron mikroskobik incelemeler için alındı. Taramalı elektron mikroskobik görüntüler için rutin prosedür uygulandı. Yapılan çalışmada büyük ruminant dil papillalarından, papilla filiformis, papilla fungiformis, papilla conica, papilla lentiformis ve papilla vallata’nın varlığı gözlendi. Papilla filiformes’lerin kök kısmının hendek şeklinde bir çöküntüye sahip olduğu saptandı. Dilin uç kısmındaki papilla filiformis’lerin çok az sekonder papillaya sahip olduğu görüldü. Corpus lingua’daki papilla filiformis’lerin ise 2-4 arası sekonder papilla’ya sahip olduğu saptandı. Papilla fungiformis yüzeyinde 2000 büyütmede hücre sınırları görüldü, tat porları saptandı, 10000 büyütmede ise mikroridge yapısı çok net saptandı. Papilla vallata’da zayıf bir annular pad görüldü. Yüzey görüntülerinde 2500'lük büyütmede hücre sınırları görüldü 5000'lik büyütmede tat porları saptandı. Çalışmamızda zor şartlara dayanıklı, ülkemizde sayısı çok az olan bu ırkın dil papillaları incelenmiş olup, dil papillaları hakkında eksik olan literatüre katkı sağlanması, bu türün gündeme gelmesi ve sahiplenmesi hedeflenmiştir.

Keywords

Boz Irk, dil, papilla, taramalı elektron mikroskop

Electron Microscopic Examination of Anatomical Structure of Tongue Papillae in Turkish Grey

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the surface of the papillae in the dorsal and lateral parts of the tongue surface and the features in the non-papillary parts of Turkish Grey. In the study, 7 male Turkish Grey tongues were used. Materials obtained from the apex, corpus and radix lingua of the upper (dorsal) side of the tongue were taken for scanning electron microscopic examinations. The routine procedure was applied for scanning electron micro- scopic images.In the study, the presence of large ruminant tongue papillae, papilla filiformis, papilla fungiformis, papilla conica, papilla lentiformis and papilla vallata, was observed. It was determined that the root part of Papilla filiformes had a depression in the form of a ditch. It was observed that the papilla filiformis at the tip of the tongue had very few secondary papillae. Papilla filiformis in the corpus lingua was found to have 2-4 secondary papillae.On the surface of the papilla fungiformis, cell borders were seen at 2000 magnification, taste pores were detected, and the microridge structure was clearly detected at 10000 magnification. A weak annular pad was seen in the papilla vallata. Cell borders were seen at 2500 magnification on surface images. Taste pores were detected at 5000 magnification. In this study, the tongue papillae of Turkish gray, which is very few in Turkey and resistant to harsh conditions, were examined, and it was aimed to contribute and own the missing literature about tongue papillae.

Keywords

Papilla, scanning electron microscopy, tongue, Turkish Grey

References

• Adnyane I, Zuki A, Noordin M, Agungpriyono S. Morphological study of the lingual papillae in the Barking deer, Muntiacus muntjak. Anat Histol Embryol 2010; 40(1): 73-7.
• Agungpriyono S, Yamada J, Kitamura N, Nisa C, Sigit K, Yamamoto Y. Morphology of the dorsal lingual papillae in the lesser mouse deer, Tragulus javanicus. J Anat 1995; 187: 635-40.
• Alpan O, Aksoy AR. Sığır Yetiştiriciliği ve Besiciliği. Bursa: Milsan Basın San Tic AŞ, 2012.
• Atoji Y, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki Y. Morphology of the tongue of a male formosan serow (Capricornis crispus swinhoei). Anat Histol Embryol 1998; 27: 17-9.
• Can M, Atalgın ŞH, Aydın MF. Scanning electron microscopic studies of the lingual papillae in the English horse. Acta Vet 2016; 66(2): 257-64.
• Can M, Atalgın ŞH. Scanning electron microscopic study of the lingual papillae in the Anatolian water buffalo. Int J Morphol2015; 33(3): 855-9.
• Chamorro CA, De Paz Cabello P, Sandoval J, Fer- nandez JG. Comparative scanning electronmicroscopic study of the lingual papillae in two species of domestic mammals (Equus caballus and Bos taurus): I. Gustatory papillae. Acta Anat 1986; 125: 83-7.
• De Paz Cabello P, Chamorro CA, Sandoval J, Fer- nandez M. Comparative scanning electron micro- scopic study of the lingual papillae in two species of domestic mammals (Equus caballus and Bos taurus): II. Mechanical papillae. Acta Anat 1988; 132: 120-3.
• Eerdunchaolu DV, Takehana K, Yamamoto E, Koba- yashi A, Cao G, Baiyin, Ueda H, Tangkawattana P. Characteristics of dorsal lingual papillae of the Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus). Anat Histol Embryol 2001; 30: 147-51.
• Emura S, Hayakawa D, Chen H, Shoumura S. Mor- phology of the dorsal lingual papillae in the Japa- nese macaque and Savanna monkey. Anat Histol Embryol 2002; 31(5): 313-6.
• Emura S, Okumura T, Chen H, Shoumura S. Morp- hology of the lingual papillae in the raccoon dog and fox. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 2006; 83(3): 73- 6.
• Emura S, Okumura T, Chen H. Morphology of the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores in the Cape Hyrax. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 2008; 85 (1): 29-34.
• Emura S, Tamada A, Hayakawa D, Chen H, Shoumura S. Morphology of the dorsal lingual papillae in the Barbary sheep. Ammotragus lervia. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2000; 77(2-3): 39-45.
• Emura S, Tamada A, Hayakawa D, Chen H, Yano R, Shoumura S. Morphology of the dorsal lingual papillae in the blackbuck, Antilope cervicapra. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 1999; 76(5): 247-53.
• Funato H, Atoji Y, Suzuki Y, Sugimura M. Morpholog- ical studies on the tongue of wild Japanese ser- ows, Capricornis crispus. Res Bull Fac Agr Gifu Univ. 1985; 50: 205-19.
• Harem İŞ, Sarı EK, Harem MK. Akkaraman koyunun- da dorsal dil papillalarının ışık ve taramalı elektron mikroskopik yapısı. Kocatepe Vet Derg 2009; 2(2): 8-14.
• IwasakiS. Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. J Anat 2002; 20: 1-13.
• Jackowiak H, Godynicki S, Skieresz-Szewczyk K, Trzcielińska-Lorych J. Scanning electron microscopic study of the lingual papillae in the arctic fox (Alopex lagopus L., 1758). Anat Histol Embryol2009; 38(5): 377-81.
• Kök S. Keşan, İpsala ve Enez yöresi Boz Step Sığırı yetiştiriciliği üzerine araştırmalar. Yüksek lisans tezi, Trakya Üniv Fen Bil Ens, Edirne 1992.
• König HE, Liebich HG, Bragulla H. Veterinary Anatomy of Domestic Mammals: Textbook and Colour Atlas. Third Edition. Stuttgart, New York: Schattau- er Gmbh&Co., 2015; p. 309-14.
• Kumar P, Kumar S, Singh Y. Tongue papillae in goat: A scanning electron-microscopic study. Anat Histol Embryol 1998; 27: 355-7.
• Kumar S, Bate LA. Scanning electron microscopy of the tongue papillae in the pig (Sus scrofa). Microsc Res Tech 2004; 63(5): 253-8.
• Kurtul I, Atalgin SH. Scanning electron microscopic study on the structure of the lingual papillae of the Saanen goat. Small Rum Res 2008; 80: 52-6.
• NAV. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria, International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature, Sixth Edition. Gent, Belgium: 2017.
• Nonaka K, Zheng J, Kobayashi K. Comparative morphological study on the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores in rabbits. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 2008; 85 (2): 57-66.
• Ojima K. Functional role and angioarchitectural arrangement of the filiform and fungiform papillae on the medial-dorsal surface of the beagle dog tongue. Anat Anz 2001; 183(4): 325-9.
• Quayyum M, Fatani JA, Mohajir AM. Scanning electron microscopic study of the lingual papillae of the one humped camel, Camelus dromedarius. J Anat 1988; 160: 21-6.
• Scala G, Pelagalli GV, Vittoria A, De Girolamo P. Etude morpho-structurale des papilles linguales chez le buffle (Bubalus bubalis). Anat Histol Em- bryol 1993; 22: 264-72.
• Tadjalli M, Pazhoomand R. Tongue papillae in lambs: A scanning electron microscopic study. Small Rum Res 2004; 54: 157-64.
• Takayuki Y, Tomoichiro A, Kobayashi K. Comparative anatomical studies on the stereo structure of the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores in the Japanese serow and Bighorn sheep. Jpn J Oral Biol 2002; 44(2): 127-41.
• Zheng J, Kobayashi K. Comparative morphological study on the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores (CTC) in reeves’ muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi). Ann Anat 2006; 188: 555-64.