Endüstri 4.0 Bünyesindeki Otonom Robotların Sürdürülebilirlik Perspektifleri Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2021, Volume: 35 Issue: 4, 1534 - 1553, 17.12.2021

Elif Çirkin , Aşkın Özdağoğlu

https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.997049

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Gelişmekte olan teknolojiler ve yenilikler tarih boyunca üretim yaklaşımlarına ve felsefelerine yeni soluklar getirmiştir. Endüstri 4.0 ve bünyesinde barındırdığı teknolojiler de son yıllarda daha hızlı, daha esnek, daha kaliteli ve daha verimli üretim ekosistemleri yaratmayı amaçlayan organizasyonların gündemini meşgul etmektedir. Bununla birlikte, artan endüstriyel faaliyetler neticesinde ortaya çıkan ekolojik bozulmalar, iklim değişikliği, biyolojik çeşitliliğin azalması ve yenilenemeyen enerji kaynaklarının kullanımından ortaya çıkan çevresel sorunlara insan merkezli ve ekonomik çözümler yaratma isteği sürdürülebilirlik kavramına olan ilgiyi de artırmıştır. Günümüz küresel ortamında, Endüstri 4.0 ve bünyesinde barındırdığı teknolojilere artan ilgiye rağmen, bu üretim paradigmasının sürdürülebilirliğin çevresel, ekonomik ve sosyal boyutlarını bütünüyle dâhil ettiği kavramsal ve uygulanabilirlik çerçevelerinde yapılan çalışmalara yönelik eksiklikler bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışma kapsamında Endüstri 4.0 bünyesindeki otonom robotların sürdürülebilirliğin çevresel, ekonomik ve sosyal boyutlarına yaptığı katkılar bütünsel bir bakış açısıyla değerlendirilecektir. Bu amaçla, çalışmanın çatısını oluşturan Endüstri 4.0, Otonom Robotlar ve Sürdürülebilirlik anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak ilgili yazın taraması yapılmış ve web tabanlı veri görselleştirme aracı kullanılarak bu kavramlar çerçevesinde bir etiket bulutu oluşturulmuştur. İlgili yazın taraması sonucunda otonom robotlar kapsamlı bir şekilde değerlendirilerek çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik sürdürülebilirlik boyutları üzerindeki etkileri ortaya konmuştur. Etiket bulutu verilerinin analizinde ise ekonomik, sosyal, çevresel sürdürebilirlik optimizasyon, standardizasyon, üretim, esneklik, özerklik, enerji, performans, inovasyon, etkinlik, işbirlikçilik, verimlilik, hassasiyet, yönetim gibi kavramların ön plana çıktığı belirlenmiştir. Bu bağlamda sürdürülebilir üretim ekosistemi yaratmada otonom robotların yeri, önemi ve etkilerinin neler olacağı konusunda çalışmanın hem ilgili yazına katkı sağlayacağı hem de organizasyonlara yol gösterici nitelikte olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Endüstri 4.0, Otonom robotlar, Sürdürülebilirlik

Thanks

Bu çalışma tezden üretilmiştir.

Evaluation of Autonomous Robots in Industry 4.0 in terms of Sustainability Perspectives

Abstract

Developing technologies and innovations have brought a new breath into production approaches and philosophies throughout history. Industry 4.0 and the technologies it incorporates have been on the agenda of organizations aiming to create faster, more flexible, higher quality, and more efficient production ecosystems in recent years. Furthermore, the desire to create human-centric and economic solutions to environmental problems arising from the ecological deterioration, climate change, reduction of biological diversity and the use of non-renewable energy sources as a result of increasing industrial activities has also increased the interest in the concept of sustainability. In today's global environment, despite the increasing interest in Industry 4.0 and the technologies it contains, there are deficiencies in the conceptual and applicability frameworks in which this production paradigm includes the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainability. Within the scope of this study, the contributions of autonomous robots within Industry 4.0 to the environmental, economic and social dimensions of sustainability will be evaluated from a holistic perspective. For this purpose, a literature review was conducted using the keywords Industry 4.0, Autonomous Robots and Sustainability, which constitute the framework of the study and a tag cloud was created within the framework of these concepts using a web-based data visualization tool. As a result of the literature review, autonomous robots were evaluated comprehensively and their effects on environmental, social and economic sustainability dimensions were revealed. In the analysis of tag cloud data, it was determined that concepts such as economic, social, environmental sustainability, optimization, standardization, production, flexibility, autonomy, energy, performance, innovation, autonomy, efficiency, collaboration, productivity, sensitivity, and management came into prominence. In this context, it is thought that the study on the place, importance and effects of autonomous robots will both contribute to the relevant literature and guide the organizations in creating a sustainable production ecosystem.

Keywords

Industry 4.0, Autonomous robots, Sustainability

References

• Afolalu, S. A., Ikumapayi, O. M., Abdulkareem, A., Soetan, S. B., Emetere, M. E., & Ongbali, S. O. (2021). Enviable roles of manufacturing processes in sustainable fourth industrial revolution–A case study of mechatronics. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 2895-2901.
• Agostini, L., & Filippini, R. (2019). Organizational and managerial challenges in the path toward Industry 4.0. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(3), 406-421.
• Ahmad, A., Ordoñez, J., Cartujo, P., & Martos, V. (2021). Remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) in agriculture: A pursuit of sustainability. Agronomy, 11(1), 7.
• Almada-Lobo, F. (2015). The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of manufacturing execution systems (MES). Journal of Innovation Management, 3(4), 16-21.
• Arowoshegbe, A. O., Emmanuel, U., & Gina, A. (2016). Sustainability and triple bottom line: An overview of two interrelated concepts. Igbinedion University Journal of Accounting, 2(16), 88-126.
• Bahrin, M. A. K., Othman, M. F., Azli, N. N., & Talib, M. F. (2016). Industry 4.0: A review on industrial automation and robotic. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6-13), 137-143.
• Bausys, R., Cavallaro, F., & Semenas, R. (2019). Application of sustainability principles for harsh environment exploration by autonomous robot. Sustainability, 11(9), 2518.
• Bechtsis, D., Tsolakis, N., Vlachos, D., & Iakovou, E. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management in the digitalisation era: The impact of automated guided vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3970-3984.
• Bekey, G. A. (2005). Autonomous robots: from biological inspiration to implementation and control. MIT Press.
• Benotsmane, R., Kovács, G., & Dudás, L. (2019). Economic, social impacts and operation of smart factories in Industry 4.0 focusing on simulation and artificial intelligence of collaborating robots. Social Sciences, 8(5), 143.
• Brundtland, G.H. (1987). The United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
• Bugmann, G., Siegel, M., & Burcin, R. (2011). A role for robotics in sustainable development?. In IEEE Africon'11 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
• Çengelci, B., & Çimen, H. (2005). Endüstriyel robotlar. Makine Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 2(2), 69-78.
• Dinwiddy, J. (1979). Luddism and politics in the northern counties. Social History, 4(1), 33-63.
• Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century, 73.
• Esmaeilian, B., Behdad, S., & Wang, B. (2016). The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 39, 79-100.
• Fahimi, F. (2009). Autonomous robots. In Autonomous robots. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09538-7
• Fahrner, W. R., Werner, M., & Job, R. (2001). Sensors and smart electronics in harsh environment applications. Microsystem Technologies, 7(4), 138–144.
• Fırat, O. Z., & Fırat, S. Ü. (2017). Endüstri 4.0 yolculuğunda trendler ve robotlar. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(2), 211-223.
• Fitzgerald, J., & Quasney, E. (2017). Using autonomous robots to drive supply chain innovation. Deloitte Perspectives.
• Freund, E., & Rossmann, J. (1994). Intelligent autonomous robots for industrial and space applications. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'94) (Vol. 2, pp. 1072-1079). IEEE.
• Geray, H. (2006). Toplumsal arasţırmalarda nicel ve nitel yon̈temlere giriş̧: İletisi̧m alanından or̈neklerle. Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Gillis, A. (2021, Eylül). What is triple bottom line? https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/triple-bottom-line-3BL
• Gümüşoğlu, Ş. (2018). Bilimsel yaklaşımlarla değişim, dönüşüm ve kalite 4.0. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2), 543-568.
• Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Feng, Y., Lau, W. S.-t., Mao, C. (2015). Greenhouse gas emissions during the construction phase of a building: a case study in China. J. Clean. Prod.103, 249-259.
• Indoria, M., Kumar, P., Panwar, Y., & Sharma, T. (2021). Implementation of industry 4.0 to achieve sustainable manufacturing in steel industry: A case study. Systematic Literature Review and Meta- Analysis Journal, 2(1), 1-9.
• Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion.
• Kiel, D., Müller, J. M., Arnold, C., & Voigt, K. I. (2017). Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of industry 4.0. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(08), 1740015.
• Kohl, J. L., van der Schoor, M. J., Syré, A. M., & Göhlich, D. (2020). Social sustainability in the development of service robots. In Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1949- 1958). Cambridge University Press.
• Linner, T., & Bock, T. (2012). Evolution of large-scale industrialization and service-innovation in Japanese prefabrication industry. J. Construct. Innov. Inf. Process Manag., 12, 156-178.
• Mabkhot, M. M., Ferreira, P., Maffei, A., Podržaj, P., Mądziel, M., Antonelli, D., ... & Lohse, N. (2021). Mapping Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies into United Nations Sustainability Development Goals. Sustainability, 13(5), 2560.
• McKinsey & Company (2017, Ağustos 21). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/public%20and%20social%20sector/our%20insights/what%20the%20future%20of%20work%20will%20mean%20for%20jobs%20skills%20and%2 0wages/mgi-jobs-lost-jobs-gained-executive-summary-december-6-2017.pdf
• Mitchell, W. J., Borroni-Bird, C. E., & Burns, L. D. (2010). Reinventing the automobile: Personal urban mobility for the 21st century. MIT Press.
• Morrar, R., Arman, H., & Mousa, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11), 12-20.
• Müller, J. M., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability, 10(1), 247.
• Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution. Sustainability, 11(16), 4371.
• Okwu, Modestus & Tartibu, Lagouge & Machesa, Mosa. (2021). Fourth ındustrial revolution and sustainable ımpact in autonomous fleets for effective supply chain network in manufacturing systems. Conference: Proceedings of the 31st Annual South African Institute for Industrial Engineering, South Africa.
• Öztuna, B. (2017). Endüstri 4.0: Dördüncü sanayi devrimi ile çalışma yaşamının geleceği. Gece Kitaplığı.
• Pan, M., Linner, T., Pan, W., Cheng, H., & Bock, T. (2018). A framework of indicators for assessing construction automation and robotics in the sustainability context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 82- 95.
• Prause, G. (2015). Sustainable business models and structures for Industry 4.0. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 5(2), 159-169.
• Rose, D. C., Lyon, J., de Boon, A., Hanheide, M., & Pearson, S. (2021). Responsible development of autonomous robotics in agriculture. Nature Food, 2(5), 306-309.
• Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54-89.
• Saidani, M., Pan, E., Kim, H., Greenlee, A., Wattonville, J., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y. & Cluzel, F. (2020). Assessing the environmental and economic sustainability of autonomous systems: A case study in the agricultural industry. Procedia CIRP, 90, 209-214.
• Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.
• Sparrow, R., & Howard, M. (2021). Robots in agriculture: prospects, impacts, ethics, and policy. Precision Agriculture, 22(3), 818-833.
• Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp, 40, 536-541.
• Strandhagen, J. W., Alfnes, E., Strandhagen, J. O., & Vallandingham, L. R. (2017). The fit of Industry 4.0 applications in manufacturing logistics: a multiple case study. Advances in Manufacturing, 5(4), 344-358.
• TÜSİAD (2016, Mart 24). Türkiye’nin küresel rekabetçiliği için bir gereklilik olarak sanayi 4.0 – gelişmekte olan ekonomi. http://tusiad.org/tr/tum/item/8671-turkiyenin-sanayi-40-donusumu
• UNDP (2021, Eylül 10). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları. https://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
• Watson, D. P., & Scheidt, D. H. (2005). Autonomous systems. Johns Hopkins APL technical digest, 26(4), 368-376.
• White, M. A. (2013). Sustainability: I know it when I see it. Ecological Economics, 86, 213-217.
• Wong, C., Yang, E., Yan, X.-T., & Gu, D. (2018). Autonomous robots for harsh environments: A holistic overview of current solutions and ongoing challenges. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 6(1), 213–219.
• WordClouds (2021). https://www.wordclouds.com/
• Yazıcı, A. (2016). Endüstri 4.0 ve otonom robotlar. Elektrik Mühendisliği Odası Aralık Sayı 459. https://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/91f2bb2a057879e_ek.pdf?dergi=1069
• Yılmaz, F. (2018). Robotlar hayatımızda. FSM İlmî Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, (12), 109-120.
• Zhong, R. Y., Xu, X., Klotz, E., & Newman, S. T. (2017). Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: A review. Engineering, 3(5), 616-630.