Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

SOSYAL SERMAYENİN İNOVASYON ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN TÜRKİYE AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ: MEKANSAL EKONOMETRİK ANALİZ

Year 2017, Issue: 50, 95 - 120, 19.12.2017

Mustafa Ercan Kılıç , Ali Koçyiğit

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.368572
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu
çalışma günümüz toplumunda ekonomik kalkınma için olmazsa olmaz iki unsurun
birbiriyle olan ilişkisini araştırmak adına ortaya konmuştur. Bu iki unsur
sosyal sermaye ve inovasyondur. Çalışmanın temel hipotezi sosyal sermayenin
inovasyonu olumlu yönde etkilediğini iddia etmektedir. Sosyal sermayenin
inovasyon üzerindeki muhtemel pozitif etkileri ekonometrik yöntemle
araştırılmıştır. Analiz Türkiye’nin 81 ilini kapsamıştır. Klasik regresyon
analizi yanında mekansal eknometrik analiz uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın temel hipotezini
destekleyecek birçok olumlu sonuç elde edilmiştir.

Keywords

: Sosyal Sermaye İnovasyon Mekânsal Ekonometri

References

  • ANSELIN, Luc.; (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dorddrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • ANSELIN, Luc; Anil K. BERA, Raymond FLORAX and Mann J. YOON; (1996), “Simple Diagnostic Tests for Spatial Dependence”,Regional Science And Urban Economics, 26(1), pp. 77-104.
  • ANSELIN, Luc and Sergio Joseph REY; (2014), Modern Spatial Econometrics İn Practice: A Guidetogeoda, Geoda Space And Pysal, GeoDa Press LLC.
  • ARBIA, Giuseppe; (2014), A Primer For Spatial Econometrics: With Applications in R., Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  • BOURDIEU, Pierre, and Loïc JD WACQUANT; (1992), An ınvitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  • BRILMAN, Jean; (2002), Nowoczesnekoncepcje i metodyzarządzania. PWE, Warszawa.
  • BARNETT, Homer Garner; (1953), The Basis of Cultural Change, New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
  • CASTIGLIONE, Dario; Jan W. VAN DETH, and Guglielmo WOLLEB; (2008), The Handbook of Social Capital, : USA: Oxford University Press on Demand.
  • CLIFF, Andrew David, and J. Keith ORD; (1972), Spatial Autocorrelation, London: Pion.
  • COLEMAN, James S.; (1988), “Socialcapital In the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp. 95-120.
  • CONWAY, Edmund; (2009), Gerçekten Bilmeniz Gereken 50 Ekonomi Fikri, İstanbul: Domingo Yayınevi.
  • DAKHLI, Mourad, and Dirk DE CLERCQ; (2004), “Human Capital, Socialcapital, And Innovation: A Multi-Country Study”, Entrepreneurship &Regional Development, 16(2), pp. 107-128.
  • ECHEBARRIA, Carmen, and Jose M. BARRUTIA; (2013), “Limits of Social Capital as a Driver of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis in the Context of European Regions”, Regional Studies, 47(7), pp.1001-1017.
  • ELHORST, J. Paul; (2014), Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data To Spatial Panels .Berlin:Springer.
  • FIELD, John (2006), Sosyal Sermaye, Çev.: Bahar BİLGEN ve Bayram ŞEN, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • FREEMAN, Christopher and Luc SOETE; (1997), The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Oxon: Psychology Press.
  • GARCIA, Rosanna and Roger CALANTONE; (2002), “A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativenessterminology: A Literature Review”, Journal of Product İnnovation Management, 19(2), pp. 110-132.
  • GETIS, Arthur; (2007), “Reflections on Spatial Autocorrelation” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(4), pp. 491-496.
  • GHAZINOORY, Sepehr; Ali BITAAB and Ardeshir LOHRASBI; (2014), “Social Capital and National Innovation System: A Cross-Country Analysis”, Cross Cultural Management-An International Journal, 21(4), pp. 453-475.
  • HAUSER, Christoph; Gottfried TAPPEINER and Janette WALDE; (2007), “The Learning Region: The Impact of Social Capital And Weak Ties on Innovation” Regional Studies, 41(1), pp. 75-88.
  • KAASA, Anneli; (2009), “Effects of Different Dimensions of Social Capital on Innovative Activity: Evidence from Europe at the Regional Level” Technovation, 29 (3), pp. 218-233.
  • KRUGMAN, Paul; (1979), “A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income”, Journal of Political Economy, 87(2), pp. 253-266
  • MANSFIELD, Edwin; (1968), Industrial Research and Technological Innovation; An Econometric Analysis, New York City: Norton Publications.
  • MORAN, Patrick A.P.; (1950a), “Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena”, Biometrika 37, pp. 17-23.
  • MORAN, Patrick A.P.; (1950b), “A Test for the Serial Independence of Residuals”, Biometrika 37, pp. 178-181.
  • MUNSEY, Lizzie; (2015), Ekonomi Kitabı, İkinci Basım, Çev.: Yosun AKVERDİ ve Suphi Nejat AĞIRNASLI, İstanbul: Alfa yayınları.
  • NARAYAN, Deepa and Lant PRITCHETT (2000). Social Capital: Evidence and Implications in Partha DASGUPTA and Ismail SERAGELDİN (Ed.), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, The World Bank Publications, pp.269-295.
  • ORD, Keith; (1975), “Estimation Methods For Models of Spatial Interaction”,Journal of theAmerican Statistical Association, 70(349), pp. 120-126.
  • OSTROM, Elinior; (2000), “Social Capital: A Fad or A Fundamental Concept”, Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, 172(173), pp. 172-215.
  • O'SULLIVAN, David and Lawrence DOOLEY; (2008), Applying Innovation, London: Sage Publications.
  • PUTNAM, Robert D.; Robert LEONARDI and Raffaella Y. NANETTI; (1993), Making Democracy Work, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • PUTNAM, Robert D.; (1995), “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America”, PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(04), pp. 664-683.
  • PUTNAM, Robert D.; (2001), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York City:Simon and Schuster Publications,.
  • SCHUMPETER, Joseph Alois; (1934), TheTheory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interests andThe Business Cycle, London: Oxford University Press.
  • PASSERON, Jean C. and Pierre BOURDIEU; (1973), Grundlagen Einer Theorie Der Symbolischen Gewalt, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • TOBLER, Waldo R.; (1979), “A Geographical Migration Probability Density Function. Ontario Geography”, 13, pp. 41-46.
  • TURANLI, Rona ve Ercan SARIDOĞAN; (2010), Bilim-Teknoloji-İnovasyon Temelli Ekonomi ve Toplum. İstanbul Ticaret Odası Yayınları.
  • VEGA, S. Halleck and J. Paul ELHORST; (2015), “The SLX Model”, Journal of Regional Science, 3, pp. 339-364.

THE EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL CAPITAL ON INNOVATION FOR TURKEY: SPATIAL ANALYSIS

Year 2017, Issue: 50, 95 - 120, 19.12.2017

Mustafa Ercan Kılıç , Ali Koçyiğit

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.368572
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Today two issues
are indispensable for the economic development; social capital and innovation.
This study is carried out to examine relationship between these two issues. The
main hypothesis of this study claims that social capital has a positive effect
upon innovation. This positive effect is analyzed with an econometric
method.  This analysis involves 81 city
of Turkey. Besides classical regression analysis, spatial econometric analysis
is applied. Many supportive results for the main hypothesis are obtained from
econometric analyses.

Keywords

Social Capital Innovation Spatial Analysis

References

  • ANSELIN, Luc.; (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dorddrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • ANSELIN, Luc; Anil K. BERA, Raymond FLORAX and Mann J. YOON; (1996), “Simple Diagnostic Tests for Spatial Dependence”,Regional Science And Urban Economics, 26(1), pp. 77-104.
  • ANSELIN, Luc and Sergio Joseph REY; (2014), Modern Spatial Econometrics İn Practice: A Guidetogeoda, Geoda Space And Pysal, GeoDa Press LLC.
  • ARBIA, Giuseppe; (2014), A Primer For Spatial Econometrics: With Applications in R., Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  • BOURDIEU, Pierre, and Loïc JD WACQUANT; (1992), An ınvitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  • BRILMAN, Jean; (2002), Nowoczesnekoncepcje i metodyzarządzania. PWE, Warszawa.
  • BARNETT, Homer Garner; (1953), The Basis of Cultural Change, New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
  • CASTIGLIONE, Dario; Jan W. VAN DETH, and Guglielmo WOLLEB; (2008), The Handbook of Social Capital, : USA: Oxford University Press on Demand.
  • CLIFF, Andrew David, and J. Keith ORD; (1972), Spatial Autocorrelation, London: Pion.
  • COLEMAN, James S.; (1988), “Socialcapital In the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp. 95-120.
  • CONWAY, Edmund; (2009), Gerçekten Bilmeniz Gereken 50 Ekonomi Fikri, İstanbul: Domingo Yayınevi.
  • DAKHLI, Mourad, and Dirk DE CLERCQ; (2004), “Human Capital, Socialcapital, And Innovation: A Multi-Country Study”, Entrepreneurship &Regional Development, 16(2), pp. 107-128.
  • ECHEBARRIA, Carmen, and Jose M. BARRUTIA; (2013), “Limits of Social Capital as a Driver of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis in the Context of European Regions”, Regional Studies, 47(7), pp.1001-1017.
  • ELHORST, J. Paul; (2014), Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data To Spatial Panels .Berlin:Springer.
  • FIELD, John (2006), Sosyal Sermaye, Çev.: Bahar BİLGEN ve Bayram ŞEN, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • FREEMAN, Christopher and Luc SOETE; (1997), The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Oxon: Psychology Press.
  • GARCIA, Rosanna and Roger CALANTONE; (2002), “A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativenessterminology: A Literature Review”, Journal of Product İnnovation Management, 19(2), pp. 110-132.
  • GETIS, Arthur; (2007), “Reflections on Spatial Autocorrelation” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(4), pp. 491-496.
  • GHAZINOORY, Sepehr; Ali BITAAB and Ardeshir LOHRASBI; (2014), “Social Capital and National Innovation System: A Cross-Country Analysis”, Cross Cultural Management-An International Journal, 21(4), pp. 453-475.
  • HAUSER, Christoph; Gottfried TAPPEINER and Janette WALDE; (2007), “The Learning Region: The Impact of Social Capital And Weak Ties on Innovation” Regional Studies, 41(1), pp. 75-88.
  • KAASA, Anneli; (2009), “Effects of Different Dimensions of Social Capital on Innovative Activity: Evidence from Europe at the Regional Level” Technovation, 29 (3), pp. 218-233.
  • KRUGMAN, Paul; (1979), “A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income”, Journal of Political Economy, 87(2), pp. 253-266
  • MANSFIELD, Edwin; (1968), Industrial Research and Technological Innovation; An Econometric Analysis, New York City: Norton Publications.
  • MORAN, Patrick A.P.; (1950a), “Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena”, Biometrika 37, pp. 17-23.
  • MORAN, Patrick A.P.; (1950b), “A Test for the Serial Independence of Residuals”, Biometrika 37, pp. 178-181.
  • MUNSEY, Lizzie; (2015), Ekonomi Kitabı, İkinci Basım, Çev.: Yosun AKVERDİ ve Suphi Nejat AĞIRNASLI, İstanbul: Alfa yayınları.
  • NARAYAN, Deepa and Lant PRITCHETT (2000). Social Capital: Evidence and Implications in Partha DASGUPTA and Ismail SERAGELDİN (Ed.), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, The World Bank Publications, pp.269-295.
  • ORD, Keith; (1975), “Estimation Methods For Models of Spatial Interaction”,Journal of theAmerican Statistical Association, 70(349), pp. 120-126.
  • OSTROM, Elinior; (2000), “Social Capital: A Fad or A Fundamental Concept”, Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, 172(173), pp. 172-215.
  • O'SULLIVAN, David and Lawrence DOOLEY; (2008), Applying Innovation, London: Sage Publications.
  • PUTNAM, Robert D.; Robert LEONARDI and Raffaella Y. NANETTI; (1993), Making Democracy Work, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • PUTNAM, Robert D.; (1995), “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America”, PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(04), pp. 664-683.
  • PUTNAM, Robert D.; (2001), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York City:Simon and Schuster Publications,.
  • SCHUMPETER, Joseph Alois; (1934), TheTheory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interests andThe Business Cycle, London: Oxford University Press.
  • PASSERON, Jean C. and Pierre BOURDIEU; (1973), Grundlagen Einer Theorie Der Symbolischen Gewalt, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • TOBLER, Waldo R.; (1979), “A Geographical Migration Probability Density Function. Ontario Geography”, 13, pp. 41-46.
  • TURANLI, Rona ve Ercan SARIDOĞAN; (2010), Bilim-Teknoloji-İnovasyon Temelli Ekonomi ve Toplum. İstanbul Ticaret Odası Yayınları.
  • VEGA, S. Halleck and J. Paul ELHORST; (2015), “The SLX Model”, Journal of Regional Science, 3, pp. 339-364.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Mustafa Ercan Kılıç

Ali Koçyiğit This is me

Publication Date December 19, 2017
Acceptance Date July 31, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Issue: 50

Cite

APA Kılıç, M. E., & Koçyiğit, A. (2017). SOSYAL SERMAYENİN İNOVASYON ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN TÜRKİYE AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ: MEKANSAL EKONOMETRİK ANALİZ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(50), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.368572

Cited By

SOSYAL SERMAYE VE İNOVASYON: OECD ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE AMPİRİK BİR ANALİZ
Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1062703

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.