Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

TARİHSEL TECRÜBELER IŞIĞINDA TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ RİSK YÖNETİMİNİN ÖNEMİ

Year 2017, Issue: 50, 121 - 139, 19.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.368576

Abstract

Tedarik zinciri
risk yönetimi (TZRY) uzun vadede kârlı, rekabetçi ve sürdürülebilir bir tedarik
zinciri (TZ) için son derece önemlidir. Tarihsel süreç içerisinde küresel çapta
etki gösteren pek çok yıkıcı risk olayı meydana gelmiştir. Bu risk olayları
sonucu meydana gelen zararlar TZ’lerinin riskler karşısında ne kadar kırılgan
olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

Tarihi seyri
içerisinde gerçekleşen önemli TZ risk olaylarında da görüleceği üzere
başlangıçta önemsenmeyen küçük risk olayları bile makro seviyede milyar
dolarları bulan maliyetlere ve uzun süreli TZ kesintilerine neden
olabilmektedir. Yine TZ risklerinin çok boyutlu ve kompleks olması nedeniyle
bir riskin TZ üzerindeki toplam etkisini belirlemek çok zordur. Riskli olay
sadece TZ’nin bir bölümünü etkilemiş görünse de kısa sürede bu etkinin tüm
paydaşlar üzerindeki etkisi hissedilebilmektedir.





Bu çalışmada
TZRY öneminin ortaya konulabilmesi için önemli TZ risk olaylarından başarılı ve
başarısız örnekler tarihi seyri içerisinde sunularak TZRY’ne olan ihtiyacın
resmedilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

References

  • Allianz Risk Barometer; (2015, 5 October), “Top Business Risks 2015”, Internet Address: http://www.agcs.allianz.com/assets/PDFs/Reports/ Allianz-Risk-Barometer-2015_ EN.pdf, Date of Access:10.07.2017.
  • BASOLE, Rahul C. and Marcus A. BELLAMY; (2014), “Visual Analysis of Supply Network Risks: Insights from The Electronics Industry”, Decision Support Systems, 67, pp.109-120.
  • BRADLEY, James R.; (2014), “An Improved Method for Managing Catastrophic Supply Chain Disruptions”, Business Horizons, 57(4), pp.483-495.
  • BRUNING, Marie; J.Henning BUCHHOLZ and Julia BENDUL; (2014), “Transferability of Self-Healing Principles to The Recovery of Supply Network Disruptions–The Case of Renesas Electronics”, Procedia CIRP, 19, pp.14-20.
  • CARBAUGH, Robert J.; (2013), Contemporary Economics: An Applications Approach, Seventh Edition, London: ME Sharpe.
  • CARTER, David A. and Betty J. SIMKINS; (2004), “The Market’s Reaction to Unexpected, Catastrophic Events: The Case of Airline Stock Returns and The September 11th Attacks”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 44(4), pp.539-558.
  • CAVINATO, Joseph L.; (2004), “Supply Chain Logistics Risks: From The Back Room To The Board Room”, International Journal of Physical Distribution ve Logistics Management, 34, pp.383-387.
  • CHATZIDIMITRIOU, Kyriakos C.; Andreas L. SYMEONIDIS; Ioannis KONTOGOUNIS and Pericles A. MITKAS; (2008), “Agent Mertacor: A Robust Design for Dealing with Uncertainty and Variation in SCM Environments”, Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), pp.591-603.
  • CNNMoney.com; (2008, 20 March), “China steel association denies boycott of Australian spot iron ore imports”, Internet Address: http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/12/news/economy/china-steel-europe-dumping/index.html, Date of Access:01.07.2017.
  • Cranfield University; (2002), “Supply chain Vulnerability”, Executive Report, Internet Address: http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/research/centres/ lscm/downloads/Vulnerability_report.pdf, Date of Access:05.08.2017.
  • DEMİRDÖĞEN, Osman ve Orhan KÜÇÜK; (2011), Üretim İşlemler Yönetimi, İkinci Baskı, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • DEMİRDÖĞEN, Osman; Yasemin TATLI ve Selçuk KORUCUK; (2015), “Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Afet Lojistiği Uygulamalarının Genel Durumu Üzerine Bir Literatür Araştırması”, IV. Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi, 21-23 Mayıs 2015, Gümüşhane, ss.423-429, İnternet Adresi: http://ultzk2015.gumushane.edu.tr/index/, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2017.
  • DEMİRKOL, İsa; Mustafa Cahit ÜNGAN ve Murat AYANOĞLU; (2015), “Tedarik Zinciri Risklerinin İşletme Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir Uygulama”, İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 3(1), ss.20-37.
  • Dünya Ekonomik Forumu; (2012), “New Models for Addressing Supply Chain and Transport Risk”, Internet Address: http://www3.weforum.org/ docs/WEF_SCT_RRN_NewModelsAddressingSupplyChainTransportRisk_IndustryAgenda_2012.pdf, Date of Access:02.08.2017.
  • Dünya Ekonomik Forumu; (2015), “Global Risks 2015”, Internet Address: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_2015_Report15.pdf, Date of Access: 05.09.2017.
  • ERDAL, Hamit; (2017). “Tedarik Zinciri Ağında Riskin Yönetimi: Tedarik Yönlü Bir Karar Destek Sistemi Tasarımı”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • GHADGE, Abheejit; Samir DANI and Roy KALAWSKY; (2012), “Supply Chain Risk Management: Present and Future Scope”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(3), pp.313-339.
  • GOVAN, Fiona; (2011, 31 May), “Spain Calls for Compensation After Being ‘Wrongly’ Blamed for E.Coli Cucumbers” Internet Address: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ spain/8548296/Spain-calls-for-compensation-after-being-wrongly-blamed-for-E.coli-cucumbers.html, Date of Access: 06.08.2017.
  • GÜVEN, Barış; (2010), “Arz Zinciri Risklerinin Yönetiminde Enformasyon Teknolojilerinin Kullanımı”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul: Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • HANDFIELD, Robert B.; Jennifer LACKHURST; Debra ELKINS and Christopher W.; (2007) “A Framework for Reducing The Impact of Disruptions to The Supply Chain: Observations from Multiple Executives”, in Robert B. HANDFIELD and Kevin MCCORMACK (Ed.), Supply Chain Risk Management: Minimizing Disruption in Global Sourcing, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis, pp.29-49.
  • HECKMANN, Iris; Tina COMES and Stefan NICKEL; (2015), “A Critical Review on Supply Chain Risk–Definition, Measure and Modeling”, Omega, 52, pp.119-132.
  • HENDRICKS, Kevin B. and Vinod R. SINGHAL; (2003), “The Effect of Supply Chain Glitches on Shareholder Wealth”, Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), pp.501-522.
  • HENDRICKS, Kevin B. and Vinod R. SINGHAL; (2005), “An Empirical Analysis of The Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long-run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of The Firm”, Production and Operations Management, 14(1), pp.35-52.
  • International Standards Organisation; (2009), “Risk Management Vocabulary”, Internet Address: https://www.iso.org/ obp/ui/#iso:std:iso: guide:73:ed-1:v1:en, Date of Access: 05.06.2017.
  • KABA, Nilay; (2013), Lojistik İşletmesinde Risk Odaklı Bir Yönetim, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul: Kadir Has Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • KARA, Merve Er ve Seniye Ümit FIRAT; (2015), “Tedarik Zinciri Risk Yönetiminin Gelişmesini Tetikleyen Risk Olayları Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, IV. Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi, 21-23 Mayıs 2015, Gümüşhane, ss.326-334, İnternet Adresi: http://ultzk2015.gumushane.edu.tr/index/, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2017.
  • KAYA, Murat and Özalp ÖZER; (2012), “Pricing in Business-to-Business Contracts: Sharing Risk, Profit, and Information”, Özalp ÖZER and Robert PHILLIPS (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management, pp. 738-783, Internet Address: http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1963666, Date of Access: 08.07.2017.
  • KIRILMAZ, Oğuzhan; (2014), Tedarik Zinciri Şebekesinde Risk Yönetimi: Otomotiv Endüstrisinde Bir Uygulama, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • KOCH, Christopher; (2004), “Nike Rebounds: How (and Why) Nike Recovered from Its Supply Chain Diaster”, CIO Austrialia’s Magazine for Executives, Internet Address: http://www.cio.com.au/article/166633/ nike_rebounds/, Date of Access: 02.06.2017.
  • LAVASTRE, Olivier; Angappa GUNASEKARAN and Alain SPALANZANI; (2012), “Supply Chain Risk Management in French Companies”, Decision Support Systems, 52(4), pp.828-838.
  • LEE, Hau L.; (2004), “The Triple-A Supply Chain”, Harvard Business Review, 82(10), pp.102-113.
  • LIU, Zugang and Jose M. CRUZ; (2012), “Supply Chain Networks with Corporate Financial Risks and Trade Credits Under Economic Uncertainty”, International Journal of Production Economics, 137(1), pp.55-67.
  • MUELLER, John and Mark G. STEWART; (2011), “Balancing The Risks, Benefits, and Costs of Homeland Security”, Homeland Security Affairs, 7(1), pp.1-26.
  • NORRMAN, Andreas and Ulf JANSSON; (2004), “Ericsson’s Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management Approach After A Serious Sub-supplier Accident”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), pp.434-456.
  • POIRIER, C.C. and F.J. QUINN; (2004), “How Are We Doing: A Survey of Supply Chain Progress”, Supply Chain Management Review, 8 (8), pp.24-31.
  • ROTHSTEIN, Ritchard; (1997), “Union Strength in The United States: Lessons from The UPS Strike”, International Labour Review, 136(4), pp.469-491.
  • ROWAT, Christine; (2003), “Supply-chain Risk and Vulnerability Workshop”, Logistics and Transports Focus, 5(2), pp.68-69.
  • SHEFFI, Yossi and James B. RICE; (2005), “A Supply Chain View of The Resilient Enterprise”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), p.41.
  • SINGHAL, Vinod R.; (2008), “Managing Supply Chain Risks”, Internet Address: http://www.mhi.org/media/ news/7777, Date of access: 04.06.2017.
  • SODHI, ManMohan S. and Christopher S. TANG; (2012), “Managing Supply Chain Risk”, Springer Science ve Business Media, 172, pp. 1-20.
  • SOUTER, G.; (2000), “Risks from Supply Chain Also Demand Attention”, Business Insurance, 34(20), pp.26-28. Swiss Re; (2016), “Natural Catastrophes and Man-made Disasters in 2015”, Internet Address: http://www.swissre.com/sigma/?year=2016#anchor0, Date of Access: 05.09.2017.
  • TAKATA, Shozo and Masato YAMANAKA; (2013), “BOM Based Supply Chain Risk Management”, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 62(1), pp.479-482.
  • TANG, Christopher S.; (2006), “Robust Strategies for Mitigating Supply Chain Disruptions”, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), pp.33-45.
  • TANG, Ou and S. Nurmaya MUSA; (2011), “Identifying Risk Issues and Research Advancements in Supply Chain Risk Management”, International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), pp.25-34.
  • THUN, Jörn-Henrik and Daniel HOENIG; (2011), “An Empirical Analysis of Supply Chain Risk Management in The German Automotive Industry”, International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), pp.242-249.
  • TRKMAN, Peter and Kevin MCCORMACK; (2009), “Supply Chain Risk in Turbulent Environments-A Conceptual Model for Managing Supply Chain Network Risk”, International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), pp.247-258.
  • VESA, Jarkko; (2005), “Mobile Services in The Networked Economy”, IGI Global, 99, pp.118-150.
  • VILKO, Jayri P. and Jukka M. HALLIKAS; (2012), “Risk Assessment in Multimodal Supply Chains”, International Journal of Production Economics, 140(2), pp.586-595.
  • WATERS, Daniel; (2011), Supply Chain Risk Management: Vulnerability and Resilience in Logistics, Kogan Page Publishers.
  • WILLIAMS, Kathy; (2008), “Supply Chain Risks: Are You Prepared?”, Strategic Finance, 89 (11), pp.23-61.
  • ZSIDISIN, George A. and Bob RITCHIE; (2009), “Supply Chain Risk Management–Developments, Issues and Challenges”, in ZSIDISIN, George A. and Bob RITCHIE, B (Ed.), Supply Chain Risk, US: Springer, pp. 1-12.

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE LIGHT OF HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE

Year 2017, Issue: 50, 121 - 139, 19.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.368576

Abstract

Supply chain
risk management (SCRM) is crucial for a long-term profitable, competitive and
sustainable supply chain (SC). Many destructive risk incidents that have
affected the global scale have come into play in the historical process. The
losses, occured due to these risk incidents, revealed how the SCs are fragile
against the risks.

As can be seen
in the major SC risk incidents that occur during the historical process, even
the small risk incidents that are initially ignored can cause billions of
dollars in macro-level costs and long-term SC interruptions. Again, because the
risks of SC are multidimensional and complex, it is too difficult to determine
the total effect of a risky incident upon a SC. Although the risky incident
seems to have affected only a part of the SC, it may soon feel the effect on
all partners.





In this study,
successful and unsuccessful examples of important SC risk incidents have been
presented in the historical process so that the need for the SCRM would be
portrayed.

References

  • Allianz Risk Barometer; (2015, 5 October), “Top Business Risks 2015”, Internet Address: http://www.agcs.allianz.com/assets/PDFs/Reports/ Allianz-Risk-Barometer-2015_ EN.pdf, Date of Access:10.07.2017.
  • BASOLE, Rahul C. and Marcus A. BELLAMY; (2014), “Visual Analysis of Supply Network Risks: Insights from The Electronics Industry”, Decision Support Systems, 67, pp.109-120.
  • BRADLEY, James R.; (2014), “An Improved Method for Managing Catastrophic Supply Chain Disruptions”, Business Horizons, 57(4), pp.483-495.
  • BRUNING, Marie; J.Henning BUCHHOLZ and Julia BENDUL; (2014), “Transferability of Self-Healing Principles to The Recovery of Supply Network Disruptions–The Case of Renesas Electronics”, Procedia CIRP, 19, pp.14-20.
  • CARBAUGH, Robert J.; (2013), Contemporary Economics: An Applications Approach, Seventh Edition, London: ME Sharpe.
  • CARTER, David A. and Betty J. SIMKINS; (2004), “The Market’s Reaction to Unexpected, Catastrophic Events: The Case of Airline Stock Returns and The September 11th Attacks”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 44(4), pp.539-558.
  • CAVINATO, Joseph L.; (2004), “Supply Chain Logistics Risks: From The Back Room To The Board Room”, International Journal of Physical Distribution ve Logistics Management, 34, pp.383-387.
  • CHATZIDIMITRIOU, Kyriakos C.; Andreas L. SYMEONIDIS; Ioannis KONTOGOUNIS and Pericles A. MITKAS; (2008), “Agent Mertacor: A Robust Design for Dealing with Uncertainty and Variation in SCM Environments”, Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), pp.591-603.
  • CNNMoney.com; (2008, 20 March), “China steel association denies boycott of Australian spot iron ore imports”, Internet Address: http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/12/news/economy/china-steel-europe-dumping/index.html, Date of Access:01.07.2017.
  • Cranfield University; (2002), “Supply chain Vulnerability”, Executive Report, Internet Address: http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/research/centres/ lscm/downloads/Vulnerability_report.pdf, Date of Access:05.08.2017.
  • DEMİRDÖĞEN, Osman ve Orhan KÜÇÜK; (2011), Üretim İşlemler Yönetimi, İkinci Baskı, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • DEMİRDÖĞEN, Osman; Yasemin TATLI ve Selçuk KORUCUK; (2015), “Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Afet Lojistiği Uygulamalarının Genel Durumu Üzerine Bir Literatür Araştırması”, IV. Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi, 21-23 Mayıs 2015, Gümüşhane, ss.423-429, İnternet Adresi: http://ultzk2015.gumushane.edu.tr/index/, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2017.
  • DEMİRKOL, İsa; Mustafa Cahit ÜNGAN ve Murat AYANOĞLU; (2015), “Tedarik Zinciri Risklerinin İşletme Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir Uygulama”, İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 3(1), ss.20-37.
  • Dünya Ekonomik Forumu; (2012), “New Models for Addressing Supply Chain and Transport Risk”, Internet Address: http://www3.weforum.org/ docs/WEF_SCT_RRN_NewModelsAddressingSupplyChainTransportRisk_IndustryAgenda_2012.pdf, Date of Access:02.08.2017.
  • Dünya Ekonomik Forumu; (2015), “Global Risks 2015”, Internet Address: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_2015_Report15.pdf, Date of Access: 05.09.2017.
  • ERDAL, Hamit; (2017). “Tedarik Zinciri Ağında Riskin Yönetimi: Tedarik Yönlü Bir Karar Destek Sistemi Tasarımı”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • GHADGE, Abheejit; Samir DANI and Roy KALAWSKY; (2012), “Supply Chain Risk Management: Present and Future Scope”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(3), pp.313-339.
  • GOVAN, Fiona; (2011, 31 May), “Spain Calls for Compensation After Being ‘Wrongly’ Blamed for E.Coli Cucumbers” Internet Address: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ spain/8548296/Spain-calls-for-compensation-after-being-wrongly-blamed-for-E.coli-cucumbers.html, Date of Access: 06.08.2017.
  • GÜVEN, Barış; (2010), “Arz Zinciri Risklerinin Yönetiminde Enformasyon Teknolojilerinin Kullanımı”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul: Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • HANDFIELD, Robert B.; Jennifer LACKHURST; Debra ELKINS and Christopher W.; (2007) “A Framework for Reducing The Impact of Disruptions to The Supply Chain: Observations from Multiple Executives”, in Robert B. HANDFIELD and Kevin MCCORMACK (Ed.), Supply Chain Risk Management: Minimizing Disruption in Global Sourcing, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis, pp.29-49.
  • HECKMANN, Iris; Tina COMES and Stefan NICKEL; (2015), “A Critical Review on Supply Chain Risk–Definition, Measure and Modeling”, Omega, 52, pp.119-132.
  • HENDRICKS, Kevin B. and Vinod R. SINGHAL; (2003), “The Effect of Supply Chain Glitches on Shareholder Wealth”, Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), pp.501-522.
  • HENDRICKS, Kevin B. and Vinod R. SINGHAL; (2005), “An Empirical Analysis of The Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long-run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of The Firm”, Production and Operations Management, 14(1), pp.35-52.
  • International Standards Organisation; (2009), “Risk Management Vocabulary”, Internet Address: https://www.iso.org/ obp/ui/#iso:std:iso: guide:73:ed-1:v1:en, Date of Access: 05.06.2017.
  • KABA, Nilay; (2013), Lojistik İşletmesinde Risk Odaklı Bir Yönetim, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul: Kadir Has Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • KARA, Merve Er ve Seniye Ümit FIRAT; (2015), “Tedarik Zinciri Risk Yönetiminin Gelişmesini Tetikleyen Risk Olayları Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, IV. Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi, 21-23 Mayıs 2015, Gümüşhane, ss.326-334, İnternet Adresi: http://ultzk2015.gumushane.edu.tr/index/, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2017.
  • KAYA, Murat and Özalp ÖZER; (2012), “Pricing in Business-to-Business Contracts: Sharing Risk, Profit, and Information”, Özalp ÖZER and Robert PHILLIPS (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management, pp. 738-783, Internet Address: http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1963666, Date of Access: 08.07.2017.
  • KIRILMAZ, Oğuzhan; (2014), Tedarik Zinciri Şebekesinde Risk Yönetimi: Otomotiv Endüstrisinde Bir Uygulama, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • KOCH, Christopher; (2004), “Nike Rebounds: How (and Why) Nike Recovered from Its Supply Chain Diaster”, CIO Austrialia’s Magazine for Executives, Internet Address: http://www.cio.com.au/article/166633/ nike_rebounds/, Date of Access: 02.06.2017.
  • LAVASTRE, Olivier; Angappa GUNASEKARAN and Alain SPALANZANI; (2012), “Supply Chain Risk Management in French Companies”, Decision Support Systems, 52(4), pp.828-838.
  • LEE, Hau L.; (2004), “The Triple-A Supply Chain”, Harvard Business Review, 82(10), pp.102-113.
  • LIU, Zugang and Jose M. CRUZ; (2012), “Supply Chain Networks with Corporate Financial Risks and Trade Credits Under Economic Uncertainty”, International Journal of Production Economics, 137(1), pp.55-67.
  • MUELLER, John and Mark G. STEWART; (2011), “Balancing The Risks, Benefits, and Costs of Homeland Security”, Homeland Security Affairs, 7(1), pp.1-26.
  • NORRMAN, Andreas and Ulf JANSSON; (2004), “Ericsson’s Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management Approach After A Serious Sub-supplier Accident”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), pp.434-456.
  • POIRIER, C.C. and F.J. QUINN; (2004), “How Are We Doing: A Survey of Supply Chain Progress”, Supply Chain Management Review, 8 (8), pp.24-31.
  • ROTHSTEIN, Ritchard; (1997), “Union Strength in The United States: Lessons from The UPS Strike”, International Labour Review, 136(4), pp.469-491.
  • ROWAT, Christine; (2003), “Supply-chain Risk and Vulnerability Workshop”, Logistics and Transports Focus, 5(2), pp.68-69.
  • SHEFFI, Yossi and James B. RICE; (2005), “A Supply Chain View of The Resilient Enterprise”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), p.41.
  • SINGHAL, Vinod R.; (2008), “Managing Supply Chain Risks”, Internet Address: http://www.mhi.org/media/ news/7777, Date of access: 04.06.2017.
  • SODHI, ManMohan S. and Christopher S. TANG; (2012), “Managing Supply Chain Risk”, Springer Science ve Business Media, 172, pp. 1-20.
  • SOUTER, G.; (2000), “Risks from Supply Chain Also Demand Attention”, Business Insurance, 34(20), pp.26-28. Swiss Re; (2016), “Natural Catastrophes and Man-made Disasters in 2015”, Internet Address: http://www.swissre.com/sigma/?year=2016#anchor0, Date of Access: 05.09.2017.
  • TAKATA, Shozo and Masato YAMANAKA; (2013), “BOM Based Supply Chain Risk Management”, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 62(1), pp.479-482.
  • TANG, Christopher S.; (2006), “Robust Strategies for Mitigating Supply Chain Disruptions”, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), pp.33-45.
  • TANG, Ou and S. Nurmaya MUSA; (2011), “Identifying Risk Issues and Research Advancements in Supply Chain Risk Management”, International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), pp.25-34.
  • THUN, Jörn-Henrik and Daniel HOENIG; (2011), “An Empirical Analysis of Supply Chain Risk Management in The German Automotive Industry”, International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), pp.242-249.
  • TRKMAN, Peter and Kevin MCCORMACK; (2009), “Supply Chain Risk in Turbulent Environments-A Conceptual Model for Managing Supply Chain Network Risk”, International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), pp.247-258.
  • VESA, Jarkko; (2005), “Mobile Services in The Networked Economy”, IGI Global, 99, pp.118-150.
  • VILKO, Jayri P. and Jukka M. HALLIKAS; (2012), “Risk Assessment in Multimodal Supply Chains”, International Journal of Production Economics, 140(2), pp.586-595.
  • WATERS, Daniel; (2011), Supply Chain Risk Management: Vulnerability and Resilience in Logistics, Kogan Page Publishers.
  • WILLIAMS, Kathy; (2008), “Supply Chain Risks: Are You Prepared?”, Strategic Finance, 89 (11), pp.23-61.
  • ZSIDISIN, George A. and Bob RITCHIE; (2009), “Supply Chain Risk Management–Developments, Issues and Challenges”, in ZSIDISIN, George A. and Bob RITCHIE, B (Ed.), Supply Chain Risk, US: Springer, pp. 1-12.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Hamit Erdal

Publication Date December 19, 2017
Acceptance Date August 1, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Issue: 50

Cite

APA Erdal, H. (2017). TARİHSEL TECRÜBELER IŞIĞINDA TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ RİSK YÖNETİMİNİN ÖNEMİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(50), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.368576

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.