Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Key Audit Matters: A Research on Borsa Istanbul

Year 2018, Issue: 52, 47 - 70, 28.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.439076

Abstract

Key audit matters are defined as the most important matters that auditors pay attention to during audit process. With the standard numbered as BDS 701 issued in 2017, it has been mandatory to use key audit matters in independent audit reports. Aim of this research is to determine which matters (key audit matters) does auditors pay attention in the course of audit process. With this scope, independent audit reports of companies that reside in Borsa İstanbul Manufacturing Sector has been investigated to make an assessment about what key audit matters are. According to the results of the research, most reported key audit matters are; Revenue, Tangible Fixed Assets, Trade Receivables and Inventories.

References

  • BACKOF, Ann; BOWLIN, Kendal and GOODSON, Brian; (2014), “Mandatory Emphasis Paragraphs, Clarifying Language, and Juror Assessments of Auditor Liability”. Working paper. Mississippi: University of Virginia and The University of Mississippi.
  • BDS 200 – Bağımsız Denetçinin Genel Amaçları Ve Bağımsız Denetimin Bağımsız Denetim Standartlarına Uygun Olarak Yürütülmesi, İnternet Adresi: http://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/PDF%20linkleri/standartlar%20ve%20ilke%20kararlar%C4%B1/DENET%C4%B0M%20STANDARTLARI/BDS_200.pdf , Erişim Tarihi: 02.02.2018
  • BDS 701 - Kilit Denetim Konularının Bağımsız Denetçi Raporunda Bildirilmesi, İnternet Adresi: http://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/ Duyurular/v2/BDS/BDS%20701.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2018
  • BEDARD, Jean; GONTHIER-BESACIER, Nathalie and SCHATT, Alain; (2014), “Costs and Benefits of Reporting Key Audit Matters in the Audit Report: The French Experience”, International Symposium on Audit Researh (s. 5-21). Maastricht: ISAR-International Symposium on Audit Researh.
  • BİLGİN, Nuri; (2006), Sosyal Bilimlerde İçerik Analizi, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • BRASEL, Kelsey, DOXEY, Marcus M., GRENIER Jonathan H. And REFFET, Andrew; (2016), “Risk Disclosure Preceding Negative Outcomes: The Effects of Reporting Critical Audit Matters on Judgments of Auditor Liability”, Current Issues In Audıtıng, American Accounting Association, p.1-10.
  • BROWN, Tim; MAJORS, Tracie M. And PEECHER, Marc; (2015), “The Influence of Evaluator Expertise, a Judgment Rule, and Critical Audit Matters on Assessments of Auditor Legal Liability”. Working paper. Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
  • CAN, Mahmut; (2017), “BDS 701 Kilit Denetim Konularının Bağımsız Denetçi Raporunda Bildirilmesi Standardı Uygulamasına İlişkin Denetçi Beklentilerinin Araştırılması”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • CHRISTENSEN, Brant E.; GLOVER, Steven M. And WOLFE, Christopher J.; (2014), “Do Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs in the Audit Report Change Nonprofessional Investors’ Decision to Invest?”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 33, No. 4, 71-90
  • CORDOŞ, George-Silviu and FÜLOP, Melinde-Timea; (2015), “Understanding audit reporting changes: introduction of Key Audit Matters”, Accounting and Management Information Systems Vol. 14, No. 1, 128-152.
  • DOĞAN, Aziz; (2017), “Yeni Denetim Raporlaması”, Muhasebe ve Denetim Dünyası, Yıl.2, Sayı.4, s.1-20.
  • DOĞAN, Aziz; (2018), “Bağımsız Denetimde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Kilit Denetim Konuları”, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt.20, Sayı.1, s.65-89
  • GIMBAR, Christine, HANSEN, Bowe and OZLANSKI, Michael E.; (2016), “Early Early Evidence on the Effects of Critical Audit Matters on Auditor Liability”. Current Issues In Audıtıng, Vol. 10, No. 1,, A24–A33.
  • GIMBAR, Christine, HANSEN, Bowe and OZLANSKI, Michael E.; (2016), “The Effects of Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs and Accounting Standard Precision on Auditor Liability”. The Accounting Review, Volume 91, Issue 6.
  • IAASB (2009), Auditor’s Report – IAASB Working Group Report, IAASB Main Agenda, İnternet Adresi: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/meetings/ files/5108.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2018
  • IAASB (2016), The New Auditor’s Report: A Comparison between the ISAs and the US PCAOB Reproposal, İnternet Adresi: http://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IAASBAuditorReporting-Comparison-between-IAASB-Standards-and-PCAOBReproposal_0.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2018
  • KACHELMIER, Steven, SCHMIDT Jemie, J. And VALENTINE, Kristen; (2014), “The Effect of Disclosing Critical Audit Matters in the Auditor’s Report on Perceived Auditor Responsibility for Misstatements”, Working paper. Texas: The University of Texas at Austin.
  • KGK (2017), Kilit Denetim Konularına İlişkin Açıklayıcı Örnekler, İnternet Adresi: http://www.dtaudit.com/dosyalar/Kutuphane/Ba%C4%9F%C4%B1ms%C4%B1z%20Denetim%20Standard%C4%B1%20%28BDS701%29.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2018
  • KURTOĞLU, Ramazan; (2016), “Perakendecilerin Web Sitelerinin Pazarlama İletişimi Açısından İncelenmesi: Türkiye’de Perakende 100 Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt.8, Sayı.4, s.230-252
  • SAYAR, Zafer ve ERGÜDEN, Engin; (2016), “Son Düzenlemeler ve Gelişmeler Kapsamında Değişecek ve Yenilenecek Bağımsız Denetçi Raporları”, Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, Sayı.48, s.85-98.
  • TFRS 1 - Türkiye Finansal Raporlama Standartlarının İlk Uygulaması, İnternet Adresi:http://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/DynamicContentFiles/T%C3%BCrkiye%20Muhasebe%20Standartlar%C4%B1/TMSTFRS2016Seti/TFRS_1.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 18.02.2018
  • YANIK, Serap ve KARATAŞ, Muharrem; (2017), “Denetim Raporlarının Geleceği: Yeni Düzenlemeler ve ülke Uygulamaları”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Sayı.73, s.1-25
  • http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/03/20170309-16.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2018

Kilit Denetim Konuları: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Year 2018, Issue: 52, 47 - 70, 28.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.439076

Abstract

Kilit denetim konuları, bağımsız denetçinin, denetim esnasında dikkat gösterdiği konulardan en çok önem arz edenleri olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Yayınlanan BDS 701’nolu standart ile 2017 yılından itibaren kilit denetim konularına bağımsız denetim raporlarında yer verilmesi zorunlu hale getirilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, denetçinin yürüttüğü denetim sırasında en çok dikkat ettiği konuların (kilit denetim konularının) neler olduğunun saptanmasıdır. Bu amaçla, Borsa İstanbul İmalat Sektörü işletmelerinin bağımsız denetim raporları incelenerek kilit denetim konularının neler olduğuna dair bir değerlendirme yapılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre en fazla raporlanan kilit denetim konularının; Hasılat, Maddi Duran Varlıklar, Ticari Alacaklar ve Stoklar konularında olduğu değerlendirilmiştir.

References

  • BACKOF, Ann; BOWLIN, Kendal and GOODSON, Brian; (2014), “Mandatory Emphasis Paragraphs, Clarifying Language, and Juror Assessments of Auditor Liability”. Working paper. Mississippi: University of Virginia and The University of Mississippi.
  • BDS 200 – Bağımsız Denetçinin Genel Amaçları Ve Bağımsız Denetimin Bağımsız Denetim Standartlarına Uygun Olarak Yürütülmesi, İnternet Adresi: http://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/PDF%20linkleri/standartlar%20ve%20ilke%20kararlar%C4%B1/DENET%C4%B0M%20STANDARTLARI/BDS_200.pdf , Erişim Tarihi: 02.02.2018
  • BDS 701 - Kilit Denetim Konularının Bağımsız Denetçi Raporunda Bildirilmesi, İnternet Adresi: http://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/ Duyurular/v2/BDS/BDS%20701.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2018
  • BEDARD, Jean; GONTHIER-BESACIER, Nathalie and SCHATT, Alain; (2014), “Costs and Benefits of Reporting Key Audit Matters in the Audit Report: The French Experience”, International Symposium on Audit Researh (s. 5-21). Maastricht: ISAR-International Symposium on Audit Researh.
  • BİLGİN, Nuri; (2006), Sosyal Bilimlerde İçerik Analizi, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • BRASEL, Kelsey, DOXEY, Marcus M., GRENIER Jonathan H. And REFFET, Andrew; (2016), “Risk Disclosure Preceding Negative Outcomes: The Effects of Reporting Critical Audit Matters on Judgments of Auditor Liability”, Current Issues In Audıtıng, American Accounting Association, p.1-10.
  • BROWN, Tim; MAJORS, Tracie M. And PEECHER, Marc; (2015), “The Influence of Evaluator Expertise, a Judgment Rule, and Critical Audit Matters on Assessments of Auditor Legal Liability”. Working paper. Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
  • CAN, Mahmut; (2017), “BDS 701 Kilit Denetim Konularının Bağımsız Denetçi Raporunda Bildirilmesi Standardı Uygulamasına İlişkin Denetçi Beklentilerinin Araştırılması”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • CHRISTENSEN, Brant E.; GLOVER, Steven M. And WOLFE, Christopher J.; (2014), “Do Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs in the Audit Report Change Nonprofessional Investors’ Decision to Invest?”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 33, No. 4, 71-90
  • CORDOŞ, George-Silviu and FÜLOP, Melinde-Timea; (2015), “Understanding audit reporting changes: introduction of Key Audit Matters”, Accounting and Management Information Systems Vol. 14, No. 1, 128-152.
  • DOĞAN, Aziz; (2017), “Yeni Denetim Raporlaması”, Muhasebe ve Denetim Dünyası, Yıl.2, Sayı.4, s.1-20.
  • DOĞAN, Aziz; (2018), “Bağımsız Denetimde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Kilit Denetim Konuları”, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt.20, Sayı.1, s.65-89
  • GIMBAR, Christine, HANSEN, Bowe and OZLANSKI, Michael E.; (2016), “Early Early Evidence on the Effects of Critical Audit Matters on Auditor Liability”. Current Issues In Audıtıng, Vol. 10, No. 1,, A24–A33.
  • GIMBAR, Christine, HANSEN, Bowe and OZLANSKI, Michael E.; (2016), “The Effects of Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs and Accounting Standard Precision on Auditor Liability”. The Accounting Review, Volume 91, Issue 6.
  • IAASB (2009), Auditor’s Report – IAASB Working Group Report, IAASB Main Agenda, İnternet Adresi: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/meetings/ files/5108.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2018
  • IAASB (2016), The New Auditor’s Report: A Comparison between the ISAs and the US PCAOB Reproposal, İnternet Adresi: http://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IAASBAuditorReporting-Comparison-between-IAASB-Standards-and-PCAOBReproposal_0.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2018
  • KACHELMIER, Steven, SCHMIDT Jemie, J. And VALENTINE, Kristen; (2014), “The Effect of Disclosing Critical Audit Matters in the Auditor’s Report on Perceived Auditor Responsibility for Misstatements”, Working paper. Texas: The University of Texas at Austin.
  • KGK (2017), Kilit Denetim Konularına İlişkin Açıklayıcı Örnekler, İnternet Adresi: http://www.dtaudit.com/dosyalar/Kutuphane/Ba%C4%9F%C4%B1ms%C4%B1z%20Denetim%20Standard%C4%B1%20%28BDS701%29.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2018
  • KURTOĞLU, Ramazan; (2016), “Perakendecilerin Web Sitelerinin Pazarlama İletişimi Açısından İncelenmesi: Türkiye’de Perakende 100 Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt.8, Sayı.4, s.230-252
  • SAYAR, Zafer ve ERGÜDEN, Engin; (2016), “Son Düzenlemeler ve Gelişmeler Kapsamında Değişecek ve Yenilenecek Bağımsız Denetçi Raporları”, Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, Sayı.48, s.85-98.
  • TFRS 1 - Türkiye Finansal Raporlama Standartlarının İlk Uygulaması, İnternet Adresi:http://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/DynamicContentFiles/T%C3%BCrkiye%20Muhasebe%20Standartlar%C4%B1/TMSTFRS2016Seti/TFRS_1.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 18.02.2018
  • YANIK, Serap ve KARATAŞ, Muharrem; (2017), “Denetim Raporlarının Geleceği: Yeni Düzenlemeler ve ülke Uygulamaları”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Sayı.73, s.1-25
  • http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/03/20170309-16.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2018
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Şaban Uzay

Çağrı Köylü 0000-0002-7869-0529

Publication Date December 28, 2018
Acceptance Date October 22, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Issue: 52

Cite

APA Uzay, Ş., & Köylü, Ç. (2018). Kilit Denetim Konuları: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(52), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.439076

Cited By















Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.