Çalışma
dokuz Merkezi ve Doğu Avrupa (CEE) ülkesinde 1989-2015 döneminde doğrusal
olmayan panel birim kök testlerinden Sıralı Panel Seçim Yöntemini (SPSM)
kullanarak gelir eşitsizliği yakınsaması mı yoksa gelir dağılımı ıraksaması mı
olup olmadığını araştırmaktadır. Çalışmada Fourier
fonksiyonlu doğrusal olmayan Panel KSS (Ucar ve Omay (2009) tarafından
geliştirilen) kullanarak Chortareas ve Kapetanios (2009) tarafından önerilen
SPSM yöntemi uygulanmaktadır. SPSM yöntemi yapısal kırılmalar, doğrusal olmama,
heterojenite ve yatay kesit bağımlılığını kontrol edebilmede oldukça yetkin bir
yöntemdir. Geleneksel birim kök testleri kullanılarak yapılan analizler CEE
ülkeleri için gelir eşitsizliğinin durağan olduğunu yani gelir dağılımının
yakınsadığını elde etmiştir. Diğer taraftan Fourier fonksiyonlu SPSM
yönteminden elde edilen test sonuçlarında da dokuz CEE ülkesi için 1989-2015
döneminde gelir eşitsizliğinin yakınsaması teyit edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, yapısal
kırılmalar, doğrusal olmama, heterojenite ve yatay kesit bağımlılığı için
kontrol sağlanması durumunda da gelir eşitsizliğinin yakınsadığını
göstermektedir. Ülkeler ortak bir gelir eşitsizliği seviyesine yakınsamaktadır.
Elde edilen bulgular makroekonomik politika, modelleme ve öngörü açısından CEE
ülkeleri için önemli politika belirleyicilerine sahiptir.
This study is to investigate whether income inequality in nine Central
and Eastern European (CEE) countries are converging or diverging using the nonlinear panel unit root tests Sequential
Panel Selection Method (SPSM) over the
period 1989 to 2015. We used the SPSM procedure that proposed by
Chortareas and Kapetanios (2009) using Panel
KSS unit root test (developed by Ucar and Omay (2009)) with a
Fourier function in this paper. The SPSM is a competent method which controls
for structural breaks, nonlinearity, heterogeneity and cross-section
dependency. The empirical analysis of conventional unit root tests shows that
income inequality is stationary or convergence for CEE countries. On the other
hand, the empirical results from the SPSM also point out that the income
distribution convergence holds true for nine CEE countries in the period of
1989 to 2015. The results show that income inequality converges even if control
is provided for structural breaks, non-linearity, heterogeneity and cross-sectional
dependence. Countries converge to a common level of income inequality. Our
findings have some significant policy implications for macroeconomic policy,
modelling and forecasting for these CEE countries.
Income Distribution Convergence Sequential Panel Selection Method Fourier KSS Unit Root Test
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 31, 2019 |
Acceptance Date | August 22, 2019 |
Published in Issue | Year 2019 Issue: 54 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.