Development of job satisfaction and motivation measuring appliance on pilots: Validity and reliability study
Abstract
In the introduction part of
the validity and reliability study measuring concepts of job satisfaction and
motivation on pilots were examined related with validity and reliability
concepts. In the materials and methods section; scree plot, eigenvalues
greater than 1 rule and explanatory percentage criteria of total variance
were used. The reliability of questionnaire was explained by concepts of
internal consistency and inter-class consistency. In the validity section of
questionnaire, the validity/explanatory factor analysis between matrix of
rotated components (factor loads), descriptive statistics of the factors,
correlation matrix and relationship between these factors were expressed with
tables and figures. In the final part conclusions and recommendations,
relationships in correlation matrix were interpreted between 15 different
factors and suggestions which can be analyzed for future studies.
Keywords
Validity and Reliability Validity and Explanatory Factor Analysis Rotational Components Matrix Spearman’s Rho Correlation Coefficients Scatter Plot Matrix
References
- CRESWELL, John W.; (2003), Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications.
- GUBA, Egon G. ve Yvonna S. LİNCOLN; (1982), Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication & Technology Journal, 30(4), ss.233-235.
- HINKLE, Dennis E., William WIERSMA ve Stephen G. JURS; (2003), Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- HOUSER, Janet; (2015), Nursing research: reading, using, and creating evidence. (3rd ed.). Burlington: Jones ve Bartlett Learning.
- KREFTING, Laura; (1991), Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), ss.214-222.
- MERRIAM, Sharan B.; (2013), Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber. (Çev. Turan, S.), Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık (Özgün çalışma, 2009).
- ÖZDAMAR, Kazım; (2004), Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. 5. Baskı. Eskişehir, Kaan Kitabevi, ss.345-500, 379-412.
- PORTNEY, Leslie G. ve Mary P. WATKINS; (1993), Foundation of Clinical Research. ss.42-44, 56-57, 72-73. Erişim adresi http://merttr.blogspot.com/2007/06/faktöranalizigecerlilikguvenilirlik.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2018).
- ROBSON, Colin; (1998), Real World Research. 6. Edt. Oxford UK. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., ss.66-75, 220-250.
- STREUBERT, Helen J. ve Dona Rinaldi CARPENTER; (2011), Qualitative research in nursing. (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams ve Wilkins.
- ŞENCAN, Hüner; (2005), Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik. 1.Baskı. Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, ss.50-420.
- ŞENOCAK, Mustafa Şükrü; (1998), Fate Of Abstracts Presented At The Annual Scientific Meeting Of The Undersea. Journal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, ss.51-55.
- WHITTEMORE, Robin, Susan K. CHASE, ve Carol Lynn MANDLE; (2001), Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), ss.522-537.
- YILDIRIM, Ali ve Hasan ŞİMŞEK; (2006), Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 6. Baskı, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, ss.255-273.
- YILDIRIM, Ali ve Hasan ŞİMŞEK; (2013), Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 9. Baskı, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, ss.255-273.
Pilotlar üzerinde iş tatmini ve motivasyon ölçme aracının geliştirilmesi: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması
Abstract
Pilotlar üzerindeki iş
tatmini ve motivasyonu ölçmek amacıyla yapılan geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik
çalışmasının giriş bölümünde, geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik kavramları
incelenmiştir. Materyal ve metod bölümünde; kayşat planı (scree plot),
özdeğerlerin 1’den büyük olma kuralı ve toplam varyansın açıklayıcılık yüzdesi
ölçütleri kullanılmıştır. Anketin güvenilirliği iç tutarlılık ve sınıflararası
tutarlılık kavramları ile açıklanmıştır. Anketin geçerliliği bölümünde ise
geçerlilik/açıklayıcı faktör analizi ile birlikte rotasyonlu bileşenler matrisi
(faktör yükleri), faktörlerin tanımlayıcı istatistikleri ve korelasyon matrisi
ile faktörler arasındaki ilişki tablo ve şekiller ile ifade edilmiştir. Son
bölüm sonuç ve önerilerde ise 15 ayrı faktörün birbirleriyle korelasyon analiz
edilerek yorumlanmış ve ilerideki çalışmalar için öneride bulunulmuştur.
Keywords
Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Geçerlilik ve Açıklayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) Rotasyonlu Bileşenler Matrisi Spearman’s rho korelasyon katsayıları Saçılım Grafiği Matrisi
References
- CRESWELL, John W.; (2003), Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications.
- GUBA, Egon G. ve Yvonna S. LİNCOLN; (1982), Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication & Technology Journal, 30(4), ss.233-235.
- HINKLE, Dennis E., William WIERSMA ve Stephen G. JURS; (2003), Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- HOUSER, Janet; (2015), Nursing research: reading, using, and creating evidence. (3rd ed.). Burlington: Jones ve Bartlett Learning.
- KREFTING, Laura; (1991), Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), ss.214-222.
- MERRIAM, Sharan B.; (2013), Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber. (Çev. Turan, S.), Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık (Özgün çalışma, 2009).
- ÖZDAMAR, Kazım; (2004), Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. 5. Baskı. Eskişehir, Kaan Kitabevi, ss.345-500, 379-412.
- PORTNEY, Leslie G. ve Mary P. WATKINS; (1993), Foundation of Clinical Research. ss.42-44, 56-57, 72-73. Erişim adresi http://merttr.blogspot.com/2007/06/faktöranalizigecerlilikguvenilirlik.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2018).
- ROBSON, Colin; (1998), Real World Research. 6. Edt. Oxford UK. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., ss.66-75, 220-250.
- STREUBERT, Helen J. ve Dona Rinaldi CARPENTER; (2011), Qualitative research in nursing. (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams ve Wilkins.
- ŞENCAN, Hüner; (2005), Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik. 1.Baskı. Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, ss.50-420.
- ŞENOCAK, Mustafa Şükrü; (1998), Fate Of Abstracts Presented At The Annual Scientific Meeting Of The Undersea. Journal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, ss.51-55.
- WHITTEMORE, Robin, Susan K. CHASE, ve Carol Lynn MANDLE; (2001), Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), ss.522-537.
- YILDIRIM, Ali ve Hasan ŞİMŞEK; (2006), Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 6. Baskı, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, ss.255-273.
- YILDIRIM, Ali ve Hasan ŞİMŞEK; (2013), Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 9. Baskı, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, ss.255-273.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 31, 2019 |
| Acceptance Date | July 10, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Issue: 54 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.