Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye’de Borsa ve Makroekonomik Değişkenler Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Dalgacık Bağdaşıklığı Analizi ile Yeniden İnceleme

Year 2020, Issue: 56, 229 - 254, 30.08.2020
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.666618

Abstract

Bu çalışmada makroekonomik değişkenlere ait (Bist100, 2 yıllık devlet tahvil faizi, 5 yıllık CDS, döviz sepeti, gram altın) eşbütünleşme ve nedensellik ilişkisi araştırılmıştır. 2011-01-14 ve 2019-04-30 arası günlük kapanış fiyatları kullanılarak önemli ampirik bulgular elde edilmiştir. Öncelikle, tüm değişkenler birinci farkta durağandır. İkincisi, oluşturulan yirmi modelin on üçünde eşbütünleşme ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Üçüncüsü, VECM modeline göre kısa ve uzun dönemli tek ve çift yönlü nedensellik bulgularına rastlanmıştır. Dördüncüsü, dalgacık bağdaşıklığı test sonuçlarına göre Bist100-döviz sepeti ve Bist100-altın fiyatları zıt yönde; tahvil faizleri-döviz sepeti, tahvil faizleri-altın fiyatları ve CDS-altın fiyatları aynı yönde hareket etmektedir. Ayrıca, 16-128 günlük periyotta ve 2013-2017 yılları arasında döviz sepeti, Bist100 endeksini tek yönlü olarak takip etmektedir. Durağan değişkenlerin ele alındığı testte, Bist100 ile CDS arasındaki anlamsız ve altın-döviz sepeti arasındaki iki yönlü hariç olmak üzere, diğer değişkenler arasında tek yönlü varyansta nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar portföy ve risk yönetimi ve finansal istikrarın sağlanmasına yönelik alınacak kararlar için büyük öneme sahiptir.

References

  • Akkaya, M. (2017). Türk tahvillerinin CDS primlerini etkileyen içsel faktörlerin analizi [Analysis of internal factors affecting CDS premiums of Turkish treasuries]. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, 1(107), 130-145.
  • Aksoylu, E. and Görmüş, Ş. (2018). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ülke riski göstergesi olarak kredi temerrüt swapları: asimetrik nedensellik yöntemi [Credit default swaps as an indicator of sovereign risk in developing countries: asymmetric causality method]. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(1), 15-33.
  • Aktug, R. E., Vasconcellos, G. and Bae, Y. (2012). The dynamics of sovereign credit default swap and bond markets: empirical evidence from the 2001 to 2007 period. Applied Economics Letters, 19(3), 251-259.
  • Andrieş, A. M., Ihnatov, I. and Tiwari, A. K. (2014). Analyzing time–frequency relationship between interest rate, stock price and exchange rate through continuous wavelet. Economic Modelling, 41, 227-238.
  • Arouri, M. E. H., Lahiani, A. and Nguyen, D. K. (2015). World gold prices and stock returns in China: insights for hedging and diversification strategies. Economic Modelling, 44, 273-282.
  • Balı, S. and Cinel, M. (2011). Altın fiyatlarının İMKB 100 Endeksi’ne etkisi ve bu etkinin ölçümlenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(3-4), 45-63.
  • Başarır, Ç. and Keten, M. (2016). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerin CDS primleri ile hisse senetleri ve döviz kurları arasındaki kointegrasyon ilişkisi [A cointegration analysis between CDS premiums, stock indexes and exchange rates in emerging countries]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 369-380.
  • Baur, D. G. and Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold. Financial Review, 45(2), 217-229.
  • Bhunia, A. (2013). Cointegration and causal relationship among crude price, domestic gold price and financial variables: an evidence of BSE and NSE. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business Research, 2(1), 1-10.
  • Chkili, W. (2016). Dynamic correlations and hedging effectiveness between gold and stock markets: evidence for BRICS countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 22-34.
  • Ciner, C., Gurdgiev, C. and Lucey, B. M. (2013). Hedges and safe havens: An examination of stocks, bonds, gold, oil and exchange rates. International Review of Financial Analysis, 29, 202-211.
  • Dahir, A. M., Mahat, F., Ab Razak, N. H. and Bany-Ariffin, A. N. (2018). Revisiting the dynamic relationship between exchange rates and stock prices in BRICS countries: A wavelet analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(2), 101-113.
  • Delis, M. D. and Mylonidis, N. (2011). The chicken or the egg? A note on the dynamic interrelation between government bond spreads and credit default swaps. Finance Research Letters, 8(3), 163-170.
  • Dornbusch, R. (1976). Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1161–1176.
  • Dornbusch, R. and Fisher, S. (1980). Exchange rates and the current account. American Economic Review, 70(5), 960-971.
  • Elmas, B. and Polat, M. (2014). Altın fiyatlarını etkileyen talep yönlü faktörlerin tespiti: 1988-2013 dönemi [Determination Demand Faktors of Affecting Gold Price: Period 1988-2013]. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 171-187.
  • Flannery, M. J. and James, C. M. (1984). The effect of interest rate changes on the common stock returns of financial institutions. The Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1141-1153.
  • Forte, S. and Pena, J. I. (2009). Credit spreads: An empirical analysis on the informational content of stocks, bonds, and CDS. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(11), 2013-2025.
  • Frankel, J. A. (1984). Tests of Monetary and Portfolio Balance Models of Exchange Rate Determination. John Bilson and Richard Marston (Eds.) eds., In Exchange Rate Theory and Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER, (pp.239-260).
  • García, M. M., Valle, C. T. and Marín, J. L. M. (2014). Sovereign bond spreads and credit default swap premia: cointegration and causality. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 11(2), 47-59.
  • Granger, C. W., Huangb, B. N. and Yang, C. W. (2000). A bivariate causality between stock prices and exchange rates: evidence from recent Asian flu. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 40(3), 337-354.
  • Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C. and Jevrejeva, S. (2004). Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 11(5/6), 561-566.
  • Gün, M., Kutlu, M. and Karamustafa, O. (2016). Gezi parkı olaylarının Türkiye kredi temerrüt swapları (CDS) üzerine etkisi [The Effects of Gezi Park Protests on Turkey’s Credit Default Swaps (CDS)]. Journal of Business Research Turk, 557-575.
  • Hacker, R. S., Karlsson, H. K. and Månsson, K. (2014). An investigation of the causal relations between exchange rates and interest rate differentials using wavelets. International Review of Economics & Finance, 29, 321-329.
  • Hafner, C. M. and Herwartz, H. (2006). A Lagrange multiplier test for causality in variance. Economics letters, 93(1), 137-141. Hatemi-J, A. (2008). Tests for cointegration with two unknown regime shifts with an application to financial market integration. Empirical Economics, 35(3), 497-505.
  • Ingalhalli, V. and Reddy, Y. V. (2016). A study on dynamic relationship between oil, gold, forex and stock markets in Indian context. Paradigm, 20(1), 83-91.
  • Jain, A. and Biswal, P.C. (2016). Dynamic linkages among oil price, gold price, exchange rate, and stock market in India. Resources Policy, 49, 179-185.
  • Jarrow, R. A. and Yu, F. (2001). Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable securities. The Journal of Finance, 56(5), 1765-1799.
  • Kim, K. H. (2003). Dollar exchange rate and stock price: evidence from multivariate cointegration and error correction model. Review of Financial economics, 12(3), 301-313.
  • Le, T. and Chang, Y. (2016). Dynamics between strategic commodities and financial variables: evidence from Japan. Resources Policy, 50, 1-9.
  • Lee, J. and Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089.
  • Longstaff, P. F., Mithal, S. and Neis, E. (2003). The credit-default swap market: is credit protection priced correctly? Working Paper, Anderson School, UCLA, August, 1-31.
  • Malhotra, J. and Corelli, A. (2018). The determinants of CDS spreads in multiple industry sectors: a comparison between the US and Europe. Risks, 6(3), 89.
  • Merton, R. C. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of finance, 29(2), 449-470.
  • Norden, L. and Weber, M. (2009). The co‐movement of credit default swap, bond and stock markets: An empirical analysis. European financial management, 15(3), 529-562.
  • Özpınar, Ö., Özman, H. and Doru, O. (2018). Kredi temerrüt takası (CDS) ve kur-faiz ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği [Credit Default Swap (CDS) & The Link Between Currency And Interest Rate: Turkey]. Bankacılık ve Sermaye Piyasası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 31-45.
  • Smith, G. (2001). The price of gold and stock price indices for the United States. The World Gold Council, 8(1), 1-16.
  • Şahin, E. E. and Özkan, O. (2018). Kredi temerrüt takası, döviz kuru ve Bist100 Endeksi İlişkisi [Credit Default Swap, Exchange Rates and BİST100 Index Relationship: Cointegration and Causality Analysis]. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(3), 1939-1945.
  • Tiwari, A. K., Bhanja, N., Dar, A. B. and Islam, F. (2015). Time–frequency relationship between share prices and exchange rates in India: Evidence from continuous wavelets. Empirical Economics, 48(2), 699-714.
  • Tokat, H. A. (2013). Altın, döviz ve hisse senedi piyasalarında oynaklık etkileşimi mekanizmasının analizi [Volatility interaction mechanism among the gold, foreign exchange and equity markets]. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 48, 151-162.
  • Toraman, C., Başarır, Ç. and Bayramoğlu, M. F. (2011). Altın fiyatlarını etkileyen faktörlerin tespiti üzerine: MGARCH modeli ile bir inceleme [Determination of factors affecting the price of gold: a study of MGARCH model]. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 1-20.
  • Torrence, C. and Webster, P. J. (1999). Interdecadal changes in the ENSO–monsoon system. Journal of Climate, 12(8), 2679-2690.
  • Yıldız, A. (2014). BIST100 endeksi ile alternatif yatırım araçlarının ilişkisi [The relationship between Bist100 index and alternative investment instruments]. SDÜ İİBF Dergisi, 19(2), 39-56.
  • Zhang, G., Yau, J. and Fung, H. G. (2010). Do credit default swaps predict currency values?. Applied Financial Economics, 20(6), 439-458.
  • Živkov, D., Njegiċ, J. and Peċanac, M. (2019). Wavelet analysis of the interdependence between stocks and bonds in the selected East European and Eurasian emerging markets. Ekonomický Časopis (Journal of Economics), 67(2), 175-194.

Causality Between Stock Market and Macroeconomic Variables in Turkey: New Evidence From Wavelet Coherence Analysis

Year 2020, Issue: 56, 229 - 254, 30.08.2020
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.666618

Abstract

We examine the dependence and causal linkages among selected macroeconomic variables, namely BIST100, bond yields, CDS, currency basket, and gold prices, in Turkey. Using daily data covering the period 2011-01-14 to 2019-04-30, we find the following empirical results. First, all variables are found to be integrated into the first order, namely stationary in first log-difference. Second, our paper detects evidence of significant interdependence in thirteen out of twenty pairs of variables. Third, the findings of the VECM test reveal unidirectional and bidirectional causalities in the short- and long-run. Fourth, the results of wavelet coherence analysis highlight a negative relationship for the pairs of BIST100-currency basket and BIST100-gold prices while positive linkages are observed for the pairs of bond rates-currency basket, bond rates-gold prices, and CDS-gold prices. In addition, the BIST100 index unidirectionally leads currency basket between 16- and 128-day holding periods between 2013-2017 years. Lastly, there exist unidirectional causal linkages among changes in prices for all the pairs of variables, except for BIST100-CDS with noncausality and gold-currency basket with two-way causality. Our findings yield significant implications for portfolio and risk management and financial stability.

References

  • Akkaya, M. (2017). Türk tahvillerinin CDS primlerini etkileyen içsel faktörlerin analizi [Analysis of internal factors affecting CDS premiums of Turkish treasuries]. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, 1(107), 130-145.
  • Aksoylu, E. and Görmüş, Ş. (2018). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ülke riski göstergesi olarak kredi temerrüt swapları: asimetrik nedensellik yöntemi [Credit default swaps as an indicator of sovereign risk in developing countries: asymmetric causality method]. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(1), 15-33.
  • Aktug, R. E., Vasconcellos, G. and Bae, Y. (2012). The dynamics of sovereign credit default swap and bond markets: empirical evidence from the 2001 to 2007 period. Applied Economics Letters, 19(3), 251-259.
  • Andrieş, A. M., Ihnatov, I. and Tiwari, A. K. (2014). Analyzing time–frequency relationship between interest rate, stock price and exchange rate through continuous wavelet. Economic Modelling, 41, 227-238.
  • Arouri, M. E. H., Lahiani, A. and Nguyen, D. K. (2015). World gold prices and stock returns in China: insights for hedging and diversification strategies. Economic Modelling, 44, 273-282.
  • Balı, S. and Cinel, M. (2011). Altın fiyatlarının İMKB 100 Endeksi’ne etkisi ve bu etkinin ölçümlenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(3-4), 45-63.
  • Başarır, Ç. and Keten, M. (2016). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerin CDS primleri ile hisse senetleri ve döviz kurları arasındaki kointegrasyon ilişkisi [A cointegration analysis between CDS premiums, stock indexes and exchange rates in emerging countries]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 369-380.
  • Baur, D. G. and Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold. Financial Review, 45(2), 217-229.
  • Bhunia, A. (2013). Cointegration and causal relationship among crude price, domestic gold price and financial variables: an evidence of BSE and NSE. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business Research, 2(1), 1-10.
  • Chkili, W. (2016). Dynamic correlations and hedging effectiveness between gold and stock markets: evidence for BRICS countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 22-34.
  • Ciner, C., Gurdgiev, C. and Lucey, B. M. (2013). Hedges and safe havens: An examination of stocks, bonds, gold, oil and exchange rates. International Review of Financial Analysis, 29, 202-211.
  • Dahir, A. M., Mahat, F., Ab Razak, N. H. and Bany-Ariffin, A. N. (2018). Revisiting the dynamic relationship between exchange rates and stock prices in BRICS countries: A wavelet analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(2), 101-113.
  • Delis, M. D. and Mylonidis, N. (2011). The chicken or the egg? A note on the dynamic interrelation between government bond spreads and credit default swaps. Finance Research Letters, 8(3), 163-170.
  • Dornbusch, R. (1976). Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1161–1176.
  • Dornbusch, R. and Fisher, S. (1980). Exchange rates and the current account. American Economic Review, 70(5), 960-971.
  • Elmas, B. and Polat, M. (2014). Altın fiyatlarını etkileyen talep yönlü faktörlerin tespiti: 1988-2013 dönemi [Determination Demand Faktors of Affecting Gold Price: Period 1988-2013]. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 171-187.
  • Flannery, M. J. and James, C. M. (1984). The effect of interest rate changes on the common stock returns of financial institutions. The Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1141-1153.
  • Forte, S. and Pena, J. I. (2009). Credit spreads: An empirical analysis on the informational content of stocks, bonds, and CDS. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(11), 2013-2025.
  • Frankel, J. A. (1984). Tests of Monetary and Portfolio Balance Models of Exchange Rate Determination. John Bilson and Richard Marston (Eds.) eds., In Exchange Rate Theory and Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER, (pp.239-260).
  • García, M. M., Valle, C. T. and Marín, J. L. M. (2014). Sovereign bond spreads and credit default swap premia: cointegration and causality. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 11(2), 47-59.
  • Granger, C. W., Huangb, B. N. and Yang, C. W. (2000). A bivariate causality between stock prices and exchange rates: evidence from recent Asian flu. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 40(3), 337-354.
  • Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C. and Jevrejeva, S. (2004). Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 11(5/6), 561-566.
  • Gün, M., Kutlu, M. and Karamustafa, O. (2016). Gezi parkı olaylarının Türkiye kredi temerrüt swapları (CDS) üzerine etkisi [The Effects of Gezi Park Protests on Turkey’s Credit Default Swaps (CDS)]. Journal of Business Research Turk, 557-575.
  • Hacker, R. S., Karlsson, H. K. and Månsson, K. (2014). An investigation of the causal relations between exchange rates and interest rate differentials using wavelets. International Review of Economics & Finance, 29, 321-329.
  • Hafner, C. M. and Herwartz, H. (2006). A Lagrange multiplier test for causality in variance. Economics letters, 93(1), 137-141. Hatemi-J, A. (2008). Tests for cointegration with two unknown regime shifts with an application to financial market integration. Empirical Economics, 35(3), 497-505.
  • Ingalhalli, V. and Reddy, Y. V. (2016). A study on dynamic relationship between oil, gold, forex and stock markets in Indian context. Paradigm, 20(1), 83-91.
  • Jain, A. and Biswal, P.C. (2016). Dynamic linkages among oil price, gold price, exchange rate, and stock market in India. Resources Policy, 49, 179-185.
  • Jarrow, R. A. and Yu, F. (2001). Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable securities. The Journal of Finance, 56(5), 1765-1799.
  • Kim, K. H. (2003). Dollar exchange rate and stock price: evidence from multivariate cointegration and error correction model. Review of Financial economics, 12(3), 301-313.
  • Le, T. and Chang, Y. (2016). Dynamics between strategic commodities and financial variables: evidence from Japan. Resources Policy, 50, 1-9.
  • Lee, J. and Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089.
  • Longstaff, P. F., Mithal, S. and Neis, E. (2003). The credit-default swap market: is credit protection priced correctly? Working Paper, Anderson School, UCLA, August, 1-31.
  • Malhotra, J. and Corelli, A. (2018). The determinants of CDS spreads in multiple industry sectors: a comparison between the US and Europe. Risks, 6(3), 89.
  • Merton, R. C. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of finance, 29(2), 449-470.
  • Norden, L. and Weber, M. (2009). The co‐movement of credit default swap, bond and stock markets: An empirical analysis. European financial management, 15(3), 529-562.
  • Özpınar, Ö., Özman, H. and Doru, O. (2018). Kredi temerrüt takası (CDS) ve kur-faiz ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği [Credit Default Swap (CDS) & The Link Between Currency And Interest Rate: Turkey]. Bankacılık ve Sermaye Piyasası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 31-45.
  • Smith, G. (2001). The price of gold and stock price indices for the United States. The World Gold Council, 8(1), 1-16.
  • Şahin, E. E. and Özkan, O. (2018). Kredi temerrüt takası, döviz kuru ve Bist100 Endeksi İlişkisi [Credit Default Swap, Exchange Rates and BİST100 Index Relationship: Cointegration and Causality Analysis]. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(3), 1939-1945.
  • Tiwari, A. K., Bhanja, N., Dar, A. B. and Islam, F. (2015). Time–frequency relationship between share prices and exchange rates in India: Evidence from continuous wavelets. Empirical Economics, 48(2), 699-714.
  • Tokat, H. A. (2013). Altın, döviz ve hisse senedi piyasalarında oynaklık etkileşimi mekanizmasının analizi [Volatility interaction mechanism among the gold, foreign exchange and equity markets]. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 48, 151-162.
  • Toraman, C., Başarır, Ç. and Bayramoğlu, M. F. (2011). Altın fiyatlarını etkileyen faktörlerin tespiti üzerine: MGARCH modeli ile bir inceleme [Determination of factors affecting the price of gold: a study of MGARCH model]. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 1-20.
  • Torrence, C. and Webster, P. J. (1999). Interdecadal changes in the ENSO–monsoon system. Journal of Climate, 12(8), 2679-2690.
  • Yıldız, A. (2014). BIST100 endeksi ile alternatif yatırım araçlarının ilişkisi [The relationship between Bist100 index and alternative investment instruments]. SDÜ İİBF Dergisi, 19(2), 39-56.
  • Zhang, G., Yau, J. and Fung, H. G. (2010). Do credit default swaps predict currency values?. Applied Financial Economics, 20(6), 439-458.
  • Živkov, D., Njegiċ, J. and Peċanac, M. (2019). Wavelet analysis of the interdependence between stocks and bonds in the selected East European and Eurasian emerging markets. Ekonomický Časopis (Journal of Economics), 67(2), 175-194.
There are 45 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Remzi Gök 0000-0002-9216-5210

Publication Date August 30, 2020
Acceptance Date July 3, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Issue: 56

Cite

APA Gök, R. (2020). Causality Between Stock Market and Macroeconomic Variables in Turkey: New Evidence From Wavelet Coherence Analysis. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(56), 229-254. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.666618

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.