Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

BİLANÇO DIŞI İŞLEMLER İLE KARLILIK VE MAKROEKONOMİK DEĞİŞKENLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN MARS METODU İLE BELİRLENMESİ

Year 2020, Issue: 1 - 19th International Business Congress Special Issue, 40 - 54, 25.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.844814

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı Bankacılık bilanço dışı işlemleri ile makroekonomik değişkeneler arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi oluşturmaktadır. Bu amaçla Bilanço dışı işlemler çalışmada bağımlı değişken olarak kullanılmış olup, toplam aktifler, öz sermaye büyüklüğü ve karlılık bilanço içi bağımsız değişkenler olarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada analiz yöntemi olarak bağımlı ve bağımsız değişken arasında fonksiyonel ilişkiye dair varsayımda bulunan ve parametrik olmayan Çok Değişkenli Adaptif Regresyon Uzanımları (Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines; MARS) metodu kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda değişkenlere ait tüm P olasılık değerlerinin her birinin 0,01 değerinden düşük olduğu ve anlamlı olduğu görülmektedir. Modelin tümünün anlamlı olduğu ise Fistatistik değeri 88,97833 ve anlamlılığının 0,00 olduğundan anlaşılmaktadır. R kare %87 çıkmış olup bağımsız değişkenlerin bağımlı değişkeni açıklama gücünün yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir. Modelde yedi adet temel fonksiyon olup, bilanço dışı işlemlere Özsermaye büyüklüğü, aktif toplamı, karlılık, döviz kuru ve toplam zorunlu karşılıkların bir etkisi olduğu görülmüştür. Modele göre aktif değişkenin aldığı tüm değerlerde Bilanço dışı işlemlere etki ettiği görülmektedir. Yine modele yakından bakıldığında, özsermaye değişkeninin 1,378 değerinden büyük değerlerde, döviz kuru değişkeninin 1256,33 değerinden daha büyük değerlerde, toplam zorunlu karşılıklar değişkeninin ise 4,69932 değerinden daha büyük değerlerinde Bilanço dışı işlemlerin büyüklüğünü belirlemede etkili oldukları görülmektedir.

References

  • Aktan, B., Gee, C. S., Žiković, S., and Evrim-Mandaci, P. (2013). Off-balance sheet activities impact on commercial banks performance: An emerging market perspective, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 26(3), 117-132.
  • Altan, M. (2004). Türkiye’de banka gruplarının bilanço dışı işlemleri ve bu işlemlerin bankaların karlılık, sermaye yeterliliği, aktif kalitesi ve likiditesi üzerinde yarattığı etki. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(7), 19-37.
  • Anbar, A., ve Alper, D. (2011). Bankaların türev ürün kullanım yoğunluğunu etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (50), 77-94.
  • Angbazo, L. (1997). Commercial bank net interest margins, default risk, interestrate risk, and off-balance sheet banking, Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(1), 55-87.
  • Aydın, A. (2000). Bilanço dışı işlemler, Bankacılık Dergisi, 34(01). BDKK. (2018). Türk bankacılık sektörü temel göstergeleri, Erişim Adresi: https://www.bddk.org.tr/ContentBddk/dokuman/veri_0014_38.pdf. 14.02.20202 tarihinde erişim sağlandı.
  • Casu, B., and Girardone, C. (2005). An analysis of the relevance of off-balance sheet items in explaining productivity change in European banking. Applied Financial Economics, 15(15), 1053-1061.
  • Chalmers, I., Bracken, M. B., Djulbegovic, B., Garattini, S., Grant, J., Gülmezoglu, A. M., ... & Oliver, S. (2014). How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet, 383(9912), 156-165.
  • Craven, P. ve Wahba, G. (1978). Smoothing Noisy Data with Spline Functions. Numerische Mathematik, 31(4), 377-403.
  • Friedman, J. H. (1991). Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. The Annals of Statistics, 19(1), 1-67. http://doi:10.1214/aos/1176347963.
  • Friedman, J. H., and Roosen, C. B. (1995). An introduction to multivariate adaptive regression splines, Statistical Methods in Medical Research https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029500400303
  • Güçver. C. (2015). Türk bankacılık sisteminde türev ürün kullanımı ile bankaya özgü değişkenler ve makro ekonomik değişkenler arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi diş ticaret enstitüsü working paper series Tartışma Metinleri WPS NO/ 08 / 2015-10.
  • Jagtiani, J., Saunders, A., and Udell, G. (1995). The effect of bank capital requirements on bank off-balance sheet financial innovations. Journal of Banking & Finance, 19(3-4), 647-658.
  • Kartal, M. Depren, S. K. ve Depren, Ö. (2018). Türkiye’de döviz kurlarını etkileyen makroekonomik göstergelerin belirlenmesi: MARS yöntemi ile bir inceleme. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 209-229.
  • Khasawneh, A. Y., and Hassan, M. K. (2009). The risks of off-balance sheet derivatives in US commercial banks. Networks Financial Institute Working Paper.
  • Mayordomo, S., Rodriguez-Moreno, M. and Peña, J. I. (2014). Derivatives Holdings and Systemic Risk in the US Banking Sector, Journal of Banking & Finance, 45, 84-104.
  • Nacar, S. Kankal, M., ve Hınıs, M. A. (2018). Çok değişkenli uyarlanabilir regresyon eğrileri (çdure) ile günlük akarsu akımlarının tahmini-Haldizen deresi örneği, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(1), 38-47.
  • Rogers, K., and Sinkey Jr, J. F. (1999). An analysis of nontraditional activities at US commercial banks. Review of Financial Economics, 8(1), 25-39.
  • Selimler, H. and Kale, S. (2012). Türk bankacılık sektöründe bilanço dışı işlemlerin risk ve karlılık açısından değerlendirilmesi, Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B. Dergisi, 33(2), 173-204.
  • Shiu, Y. and Moles, P. (2010), What Motivates Banks to Use Derivatives: Evidence from Taiwan, The Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 67-78.
  • Shiu, Y. ve Moles, P. (2010). What Motivates Banks to Use Derivatives: Evidence from Taiwan, The Journal of Derivatives, 17, 67-78.
  • Simons, Katerina (1995). Interest Rate Derivatives and Asset-Liability Management by Commercial Banks, New England Economic Review, (02),17-28. Sinkey Jr, J. F., and Carter, D. A. (2000). Evidence on the financial characteristics of banks that do and do not use derivatives. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 40(4), 431-449.
  • Turgutlu, E. (2014). Dynamics of profitability in the Turkish banking industry. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 14(1), 43-52.
  • Yenice, S. ve Tanrıöven, C. (2014). Bankaların türev araç kullanımlarının risklilik ve karlılık üzerine etkisi – Türkiye örneği. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 25-46.

DETERMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OFFBALANCE SHEET AND PROFITABILITY AND MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES BY MARS METHOD

Year 2020, Issue: 1 - 19th International Business Congress Special Issue, 40 - 54, 25.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.844814

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between banking off-balance sheet
transactions and macroeconomic variables. For this purpose, off-balance sheet transactions were used
as dependent variables in the study, and total assets, equity size and profitability were determined as
on-balance sheet independent variables. The non-parametric Multivariate Adaptive Regression
Splines (MARS) method, which assumes the functional relationship between dependent and
independent variables, was used as the analysis method in the study. As a result of the study, it is seen
that all P probability values of the variables are lower than 0.01 and are significant. It is understood
that the whole of the model is significant because the F-statistic value is 88.97833 and its significance
is 0.0000. R squared is 87%, indicating that the independent variables have high explanatory power
for the dependent variable. There are seven basic functions in the model, and it was observed that the
size of equity, total assets, profitability, exchange rate and total required reserves have an effect on
off-balance sheet transactions. According to the model, it is seen that the active variable affects the
off-balance sheet transactions in all values it receives. Again, when the model is examined closely, it
is seen that the equity variable is effective in determining the size of off-balance sheet transactions at
values greater than 1,378, the exchange rate variable with values greater than 1256.33, and the total
reserve requirement variables greater than 4,69932.

References

  • Aktan, B., Gee, C. S., Žiković, S., and Evrim-Mandaci, P. (2013). Off-balance sheet activities impact on commercial banks performance: An emerging market perspective, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 26(3), 117-132.
  • Altan, M. (2004). Türkiye’de banka gruplarının bilanço dışı işlemleri ve bu işlemlerin bankaların karlılık, sermaye yeterliliği, aktif kalitesi ve likiditesi üzerinde yarattığı etki. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(7), 19-37.
  • Anbar, A., ve Alper, D. (2011). Bankaların türev ürün kullanım yoğunluğunu etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (50), 77-94.
  • Angbazo, L. (1997). Commercial bank net interest margins, default risk, interestrate risk, and off-balance sheet banking, Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(1), 55-87.
  • Aydın, A. (2000). Bilanço dışı işlemler, Bankacılık Dergisi, 34(01). BDKK. (2018). Türk bankacılık sektörü temel göstergeleri, Erişim Adresi: https://www.bddk.org.tr/ContentBddk/dokuman/veri_0014_38.pdf. 14.02.20202 tarihinde erişim sağlandı.
  • Casu, B., and Girardone, C. (2005). An analysis of the relevance of off-balance sheet items in explaining productivity change in European banking. Applied Financial Economics, 15(15), 1053-1061.
  • Chalmers, I., Bracken, M. B., Djulbegovic, B., Garattini, S., Grant, J., Gülmezoglu, A. M., ... & Oliver, S. (2014). How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet, 383(9912), 156-165.
  • Craven, P. ve Wahba, G. (1978). Smoothing Noisy Data with Spline Functions. Numerische Mathematik, 31(4), 377-403.
  • Friedman, J. H. (1991). Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. The Annals of Statistics, 19(1), 1-67. http://doi:10.1214/aos/1176347963.
  • Friedman, J. H., and Roosen, C. B. (1995). An introduction to multivariate adaptive regression splines, Statistical Methods in Medical Research https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029500400303
  • Güçver. C. (2015). Türk bankacılık sisteminde türev ürün kullanımı ile bankaya özgü değişkenler ve makro ekonomik değişkenler arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi diş ticaret enstitüsü working paper series Tartışma Metinleri WPS NO/ 08 / 2015-10.
  • Jagtiani, J., Saunders, A., and Udell, G. (1995). The effect of bank capital requirements on bank off-balance sheet financial innovations. Journal of Banking & Finance, 19(3-4), 647-658.
  • Kartal, M. Depren, S. K. ve Depren, Ö. (2018). Türkiye’de döviz kurlarını etkileyen makroekonomik göstergelerin belirlenmesi: MARS yöntemi ile bir inceleme. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 209-229.
  • Khasawneh, A. Y., and Hassan, M. K. (2009). The risks of off-balance sheet derivatives in US commercial banks. Networks Financial Institute Working Paper.
  • Mayordomo, S., Rodriguez-Moreno, M. and Peña, J. I. (2014). Derivatives Holdings and Systemic Risk in the US Banking Sector, Journal of Banking & Finance, 45, 84-104.
  • Nacar, S. Kankal, M., ve Hınıs, M. A. (2018). Çok değişkenli uyarlanabilir regresyon eğrileri (çdure) ile günlük akarsu akımlarının tahmini-Haldizen deresi örneği, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(1), 38-47.
  • Rogers, K., and Sinkey Jr, J. F. (1999). An analysis of nontraditional activities at US commercial banks. Review of Financial Economics, 8(1), 25-39.
  • Selimler, H. and Kale, S. (2012). Türk bankacılık sektöründe bilanço dışı işlemlerin risk ve karlılık açısından değerlendirilmesi, Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B. Dergisi, 33(2), 173-204.
  • Shiu, Y. and Moles, P. (2010), What Motivates Banks to Use Derivatives: Evidence from Taiwan, The Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 67-78.
  • Shiu, Y. ve Moles, P. (2010). What Motivates Banks to Use Derivatives: Evidence from Taiwan, The Journal of Derivatives, 17, 67-78.
  • Simons, Katerina (1995). Interest Rate Derivatives and Asset-Liability Management by Commercial Banks, New England Economic Review, (02),17-28. Sinkey Jr, J. F., and Carter, D. A. (2000). Evidence on the financial characteristics of banks that do and do not use derivatives. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 40(4), 431-449.
  • Turgutlu, E. (2014). Dynamics of profitability in the Turkish banking industry. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 14(1), 43-52.
  • Yenice, S. ve Tanrıöven, C. (2014). Bankaların türev araç kullanımlarının risklilik ve karlılık üzerine etkisi – Türkiye örneği. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 25-46.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Eyyüp Ensari Şahin 0000-0003-2110-7571

Ceyda Aktan 0000-0001-7040-4711

Publication Date December 25, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Issue: 1 - 19th International Business Congress Special Issue

Cite

APA Şahin, E. E., & Aktan, C. (2020). BİLANÇO DIŞI İŞLEMLER İLE KARLILIK VE MAKROEKONOMİK DEĞİŞKENLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN MARS METODU İLE BELİRLENMESİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.844814

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.