YÖNETİCİLERİN GİRİŞİMCİ LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞLARININ İŞLETME PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİNDE FARKLILAŞTIRMA STRATEJİSİNİN ARACI ROLÜ
Abstract
Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yöneticilerin gösterdikleri girişimci liderlik davranışları ile
işletme performansı arasındaki ilişkide farklılaştırma stratejilerinin aracı rolünü incelemektir.
Araştırma, Erzurum Ticaret ve Sanayi Odasına bağlı sekiz sektörde faaliyet gösteren orta ölçekli
işletmelerin kurucu veya yöneticilerine anket uygulanarak yapılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler yapısal
eşitlik modellemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda beklendiği gibi girişimci liderlik
ve işletme performansı arasındaki ilişkide farklılaştırma stratejisinin kısmi aracı etkisi olduğu tespit
edilmiştir
References
- Altuntas, G. (2014). "Girişimcilik ve Stratejik Yönetim İlişkisi: Bir Stratejik Girişimcilik Modeli ve Testi", İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi 1(2), 103-129.
- Antoncic, B, Hisrich, R D. (2004). "Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation". Journal of Management Development, 23(6), 518-550.
- Baum, J R, Locke, E A, Smith, K G. (2001). "A multidimensional model of venture growth". Academy of management journal, 44(2), 292-303.
- Chheda, K, Banga, C. (2013). "Impact of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in India". Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 9(2), 34.
- Daft, R. L. (2010). Management (9th ed.). United States: Thomson.
- Espino-Rodríguez, T F, Lai, P C. (2014). "Activity outsourcing and competitive strategy in the hotel industry. The moderator role of asset specificity". International Journal of Hospitality Management, 42, 9-19.
- Fontana, A, Fontana, A, Musa, S, Musa, S. (2017). "The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovation management and its measurement validation". International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 2-19.
- Gopalakrishna, P, Subramanian, R. (2001). "Revisiting the pure versus hybrid dilemma: Porter's generic strategies in a developing economy". Journal of Global Marketing, 15(2), 61-79.
- Graetz, F. (2002). "Strategic thinking versus strategic planning: towards understanding the complementarities". Management decision, 40(5), 456- 462.
- Gupta, V, MacMillan, I C, Surie, G. (2004). "Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct". Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 241-260.
- Hamel, G. (2000). "Leading the Revolution Harvard Business School Press". Boston, MA, USA, 343-354. Hitt, M A, Ireland, R D, Camp, S M, Sexton, D L. (2001). "Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation". Strategic management journal, 22(6‐7), 479-491.
- Hollins, B, Pugh, S. (1990). Successful product design: what to do and when. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Huang, S, Ding, D, Chen, Z. (2014). "Entrepreneurial leadership and performance in Chinese new ventures: A moderated mediation model of exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and environmental dynamism". Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 453-471.
- Ireland, R D, Hitt, M A, Camp, S M, Sexton, D L. (2001). "Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth". The Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 49-63.
- Kesidou, E, Carter, S. (2014). "Entrepreneurial leadership and firm performance: reconciling the objective-subjective dichotomy". Rencontres St Gall. 9(1), 1-23.
- Kotler, P, Amstrong, G. (2004). "Prinsip-prinsip Marketing". Edisi Ketujuh, Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
- Leask, G, Parker, D. (2007). "Strategic groups, competitive groups and performance within the UK pharmaceutical industry: Improving our understanding of the competitive process". Strategic Management Journal, 28(7), 723-745.
- Leitch, C M, Volery, T. (2017). "Entrepreneurial leadership: Insights and directions". International Small Business Journal, 35(2), 147-156.
- Martinez-Simarro, D, Devece, C, Llopis-Albert, C. (2015). "How information systems strategy moderates the relationship between business strategy and performance". Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1592-1594.
- Murray, A I. (1988). "A contingency view of Porter's “generic strategies”". Academy of management review, 13(3), 390-400.
- Newman, A, Neesham, C, Manville, G, Tse, H H. (2017). "Examining the influence of servant and entrepreneurial leadership on the work outcomes of employees in social enterprises". The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-22.
- Ocak, M, Peker, G, Nacak, A O. (2017). "Strateji Tipolojilerinin Firmaların Kurumsal Girişimcilik Davranışları ile Finansal Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: Türk Sanayi Firmalarında Görgül Bir Araştırma". İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 4(1), 1-16.
- Özdamar, K. (2013). “Paket Programları İle İstatistiksel Veri Analizi (Çok Değişkenli Analizler) 2.” Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir.
- Rauch, A, Wiklund, J, Lumpkin, G T, Frese, M. (2009). "Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future". Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(3), 761-787.
- Renko, M, El Tarabishy, A, Carsrud, A L, Brännback, M. (2015). "Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style". Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54-74.
- Ruvio, A, Rosenblatt, Z, Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2010). "Entrepreneurial leadership vision in nonprofit vs. for-profit organizations". The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 144-158.
- Ward, P T, Duray, R. (2000). "Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy". Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 123-138.
- Volery, T, Mueller, S, von Siemens, B. (2015). "Entrepreneur ambidexterity: A study of entrepreneur behaviours and competencies in growth-oriented small and medium-sized enterprises". International Small Business Journal, 33(2), 109-129.
- Yamin, S, Gunasekaran, A, Mavondo, F T. (1999). "Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: an empirical analysis". Technovation, 19(8), 507-518.
- Yaşar, F. (2010). "Competitive Strategies And Firm Performance: Case Study On Gaziantep Carpeting Sector/Rekabet Stratejileri Ve Firma Performansi: Gaziantep Hali Sektörü Üzerinde Bir Durum Çalişmasi". Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 309-324.
- Yücel, R, Ahmetoğulları, K. (2017). "Rekabet Stratejilerinin İleri İmalat Teknolojileri ve Firma Performansı Üzerine Etkileri". AİBÜ-İİBF Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(2), 113-129.
- Zehir, S. (2016). Pazar yönelimi, öğrenme yönelimi, rekabet stratejileri ve firma performansı ilişkisi. Gebze teknik üniversitesi sosyal bilimler enstitüsü. (Yayınlanmammış doktora tezi).
THE MEDIATING ROLE OF THE DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY IN THE IMPACT OF MANAGERS' ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS ON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
Abstract
he main purpose of this study is to examine the mediating role of differentiation strategies
in the relationship between the entrepreneurial leadership behaviors of managers and business
performance. The research was conducted by applying a questionnaire to the founders or managers of
medium-sized enterprises operating in eight sectors affiliated to Erzurum Chamber of Commerce and
Industry. The data obtained were analyzed by structural equation modeling. As a result of the
analysis, it was determined that the differentiation strategy has a partial mediating effect on the
relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and business performance.
References
- Altuntas, G. (2014). "Girişimcilik ve Stratejik Yönetim İlişkisi: Bir Stratejik Girişimcilik Modeli ve Testi", İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi 1(2), 103-129.
- Antoncic, B, Hisrich, R D. (2004). "Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation". Journal of Management Development, 23(6), 518-550.
- Baum, J R, Locke, E A, Smith, K G. (2001). "A multidimensional model of venture growth". Academy of management journal, 44(2), 292-303.
- Chheda, K, Banga, C. (2013). "Impact of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in India". Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 9(2), 34.
- Daft, R. L. (2010). Management (9th ed.). United States: Thomson.
- Espino-Rodríguez, T F, Lai, P C. (2014). "Activity outsourcing and competitive strategy in the hotel industry. The moderator role of asset specificity". International Journal of Hospitality Management, 42, 9-19.
- Fontana, A, Fontana, A, Musa, S, Musa, S. (2017). "The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovation management and its measurement validation". International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 2-19.
- Gopalakrishna, P, Subramanian, R. (2001). "Revisiting the pure versus hybrid dilemma: Porter's generic strategies in a developing economy". Journal of Global Marketing, 15(2), 61-79.
- Graetz, F. (2002). "Strategic thinking versus strategic planning: towards understanding the complementarities". Management decision, 40(5), 456- 462.
- Gupta, V, MacMillan, I C, Surie, G. (2004). "Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct". Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 241-260.
- Hamel, G. (2000). "Leading the Revolution Harvard Business School Press". Boston, MA, USA, 343-354. Hitt, M A, Ireland, R D, Camp, S M, Sexton, D L. (2001). "Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation". Strategic management journal, 22(6‐7), 479-491.
- Hollins, B, Pugh, S. (1990). Successful product design: what to do and when. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Huang, S, Ding, D, Chen, Z. (2014). "Entrepreneurial leadership and performance in Chinese new ventures: A moderated mediation model of exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and environmental dynamism". Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 453-471.
- Ireland, R D, Hitt, M A, Camp, S M, Sexton, D L. (2001). "Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth". The Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 49-63.
- Kesidou, E, Carter, S. (2014). "Entrepreneurial leadership and firm performance: reconciling the objective-subjective dichotomy". Rencontres St Gall. 9(1), 1-23.
- Kotler, P, Amstrong, G. (2004). "Prinsip-prinsip Marketing". Edisi Ketujuh, Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
- Leask, G, Parker, D. (2007). "Strategic groups, competitive groups and performance within the UK pharmaceutical industry: Improving our understanding of the competitive process". Strategic Management Journal, 28(7), 723-745.
- Leitch, C M, Volery, T. (2017). "Entrepreneurial leadership: Insights and directions". International Small Business Journal, 35(2), 147-156.
- Martinez-Simarro, D, Devece, C, Llopis-Albert, C. (2015). "How information systems strategy moderates the relationship between business strategy and performance". Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1592-1594.
- Murray, A I. (1988). "A contingency view of Porter's “generic strategies”". Academy of management review, 13(3), 390-400.
- Newman, A, Neesham, C, Manville, G, Tse, H H. (2017). "Examining the influence of servant and entrepreneurial leadership on the work outcomes of employees in social enterprises". The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-22.
- Ocak, M, Peker, G, Nacak, A O. (2017). "Strateji Tipolojilerinin Firmaların Kurumsal Girişimcilik Davranışları ile Finansal Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: Türk Sanayi Firmalarında Görgül Bir Araştırma". İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 4(1), 1-16.
- Özdamar, K. (2013). “Paket Programları İle İstatistiksel Veri Analizi (Çok Değişkenli Analizler) 2.” Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir.
- Rauch, A, Wiklund, J, Lumpkin, G T, Frese, M. (2009). "Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future". Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(3), 761-787.
- Renko, M, El Tarabishy, A, Carsrud, A L, Brännback, M. (2015). "Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style". Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54-74.
- Ruvio, A, Rosenblatt, Z, Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2010). "Entrepreneurial leadership vision in nonprofit vs. for-profit organizations". The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 144-158.
- Ward, P T, Duray, R. (2000). "Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy". Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 123-138.
- Volery, T, Mueller, S, von Siemens, B. (2015). "Entrepreneur ambidexterity: A study of entrepreneur behaviours and competencies in growth-oriented small and medium-sized enterprises". International Small Business Journal, 33(2), 109-129.
- Yamin, S, Gunasekaran, A, Mavondo, F T. (1999). "Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: an empirical analysis". Technovation, 19(8), 507-518.
- Yaşar, F. (2010). "Competitive Strategies And Firm Performance: Case Study On Gaziantep Carpeting Sector/Rekabet Stratejileri Ve Firma Performansi: Gaziantep Hali Sektörü Üzerinde Bir Durum Çalişmasi". Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 309-324.
- Yücel, R, Ahmetoğulları, K. (2017). "Rekabet Stratejilerinin İleri İmalat Teknolojileri ve Firma Performansı Üzerine Etkileri". AİBÜ-İİBF Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(2), 113-129.
- Zehir, S. (2016). Pazar yönelimi, öğrenme yönelimi, rekabet stratejileri ve firma performansı ilişkisi. Gebze teknik üniversitesi sosyal bilimler enstitüsü. (Yayınlanmammış doktora tezi).
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 25, 2020 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2020 Issue: 1 - 19th International Business Congress Special Issue |
Cited By
Küçük İşletme Sahibi Genç Girişimcilerin İşlerini Büyütmeye Yönelik Stratejileri
Girişimcilik İnovasyon ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.31006/gipad.1280988
Girişimci Liderlik: Kavramsal Analiz, Model, İlişki ve Yaklaşımlar
Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.1173171
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.