Abstract
Küreselleşme süreciyle birlikte İnsan Kaynakları Yönetiminde (İKY) yetkinlik kavramına verilen önem giderek artmış ve iş analizine dayalı uygulamalardan iş analizi ve yetkinlik analizinin birlikte ele alındığı uygulamalara geçilmiştir. Yetkinlik kavramının ülkemizde de önem kazanmaya başlamasıyla birçok işletme yetkinliğe dayalı insan kaynakları yönetimini benimsemeye başlamıştır. Bu kapsamda birçok meslekte çalışanlardan beklenen yetkinlikler uluslararası örgütlerin belirlediği kriterlere uygun hale getirilmiştir. 1990’lı yıllardan itibaren birçok ülkede meslek olarak tanınan koçluğun yetkinlikleri belirlenmiş, Türkiye’de ise Mesleki Yeterlilik Kurumu (MYK) tarafından Koç Meslek Standardı, 2013 yılında Resmi Gazete’de yayımlanarak yürürlüğe girmiştir. Bu çalışmada, Anka Koçluk Eğitim Danışmanlık Belgelendirme A.Ş.’de, iş analizi ve yetkinlik modelleme çalışmaları ile belirlenmiş olan on sekiz adet koç mesleği (koçluk) yetkinliğinin, meslek profesyonelleri tarafından Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) yöntemiyle karşılaştırmalı analizi yapılmıştır.
References
- Akgeyik, T. (2019, 30 Ocak). İnsan Kaynaklarında Yetkinlik Yönetimi. Erişim adresi:https://www.academia.edu/30734196/%C4%B0nsan_Kaynaklar%C4%B1nda_Yetkinlik_Y%C3%B6netimi
- Aydın, A. A. (2019). İş Analizi ve Yetkinlik Modelleme: Koç ve Koç Eğitmenine Yönelik Örnek Bir Araştırma (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Cao D., Leung L. ve Law J. (2008). Modifying Inconsistent Comparison Matrix in Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Heuristic Approach. Decision Support Systems, 44(4): 944-953.
- Capaldo, G. Iandoli, L. Zollo, G. (2006). A Situationalist Perspective To Competency Management. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 429-448.
- Chou Y. ve Hsu Y. (2008). Human Resources For Science And Technology Analyzing Competitiveness Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Technology in Society, 30(2): 141- 153.
- Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan E., Kurt M. (2005). Çalışanların Toplam İş Yükü Seviyelerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Model ve Uygulaması. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (4).
- European Mentoring & Coaching Council. (2020, Şubat 5). Erişim adresi: https://emccturkey.org/hakkimizda/emcc-turkiye/
- Gürel, A. (2006). İşletmelerde Personel Seçme ve Yerleştirmede Yetkinlik Yönetimi: Bir Araştırma. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü işletme Ana Bilim Dalı Yönetim ve Organizasyon Bilim Dalı.
- International Coach Federation (2020, Şubat 5). Erişim adresi: http://www.icfturkey.org/icf-hakkinda/icf-turkiye/icf-turkiye-hakkinda/
- Koç (Seviye 6) Ulusal Meslek Standardı. (2013). Resmi Gazete, (28692), Rev.01:06.12.2018-30617 (Mükerrer)
- Kordon, E. (2006). Yetkinliklere Dayalı Kariyer Planlama ve Endüstri Mühendisliği Öğrencileri İçin Bir Uygulama. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Pamukkale Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
- Marrelli, A. F., Tondora, J., Hoge, M. A. (2005). Strategies for Developing Competency Models. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 32(5-6), 533-561.
- McClelland, D. C. (1974). Testing for competence rather than for 'intelligence'. American Psychologist, 29(1), 59.
- Saaty T.L. (1990). An Exposition of The AHP in Reply To The Paper Remarks On The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 36(3): 259-268.
- The Association for Coaching. (2020, Şubat 5). Erişim adresi: https://www.associationforcoaching.com/
- The International Coaching Community. (2020, Şubat 5). Erişim adresi: https://internationalcoachingcommunity.com/about-icc/
- Yılmaz M. (2010). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) ve Bir Uygulama: Lider Bir Kütüphane Müdürü Seçimi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 24(2): 206-234.
Abstract
With the globalization process, the importance given to the concept of competence in Human Resources Management (HRM) has gradually increased and instead of applications based on job analysis, applications where job analysis and competency analysis were handled together were started. The concept of competence has also started to gain importance in our country and many businesses have started to adopt competence-based human resources management. In this context, the competencies expected from employees in many professions have been adapted to the criteria determined by international organizations. Since the 1990s, coaching has been recognized as a profession in many countries and its competencies have been determined. In Turkey, Coach Professional Standard was published in the Official Gazette in 2013 and entered into force by Vocational Qualifications Authority (VQA). In this study, comparative analysis of eighteen coaching competencies determined by job analysis and competency modeling studies was carried out by professionals using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in Anka Koçluk Eğitim Danışmanlık Belgelendirme A.Ş
References
- Akgeyik, T. (2019, 30 Ocak). İnsan Kaynaklarında Yetkinlik Yönetimi. Erişim adresi:https://www.academia.edu/30734196/%C4%B0nsan_Kaynaklar%C4%B1nda_Yetkinlik_Y%C3%B6netimi
- Aydın, A. A. (2019). İş Analizi ve Yetkinlik Modelleme: Koç ve Koç Eğitmenine Yönelik Örnek Bir Araştırma (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Cao D., Leung L. ve Law J. (2008). Modifying Inconsistent Comparison Matrix in Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Heuristic Approach. Decision Support Systems, 44(4): 944-953.
- Capaldo, G. Iandoli, L. Zollo, G. (2006). A Situationalist Perspective To Competency Management. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 429-448.
- Chou Y. ve Hsu Y. (2008). Human Resources For Science And Technology Analyzing Competitiveness Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Technology in Society, 30(2): 141- 153.
- Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan E., Kurt M. (2005). Çalışanların Toplam İş Yükü Seviyelerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Model ve Uygulaması. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (4).
- European Mentoring & Coaching Council. (2020, Şubat 5). Erişim adresi: https://emccturkey.org/hakkimizda/emcc-turkiye/
- Gürel, A. (2006). İşletmelerde Personel Seçme ve Yerleştirmede Yetkinlik Yönetimi: Bir Araştırma. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü işletme Ana Bilim Dalı Yönetim ve Organizasyon Bilim Dalı.
- International Coach Federation (2020, Şubat 5). Erişim adresi: http://www.icfturkey.org/icf-hakkinda/icf-turkiye/icf-turkiye-hakkinda/
- Koç (Seviye 6) Ulusal Meslek Standardı. (2013). Resmi Gazete, (28692), Rev.01:06.12.2018-30617 (Mükerrer)
- Kordon, E. (2006). Yetkinliklere Dayalı Kariyer Planlama ve Endüstri Mühendisliği Öğrencileri İçin Bir Uygulama. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Pamukkale Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
- Marrelli, A. F., Tondora, J., Hoge, M. A. (2005). Strategies for Developing Competency Models. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 32(5-6), 533-561.
- McClelland, D. C. (1974). Testing for competence rather than for 'intelligence'. American Psychologist, 29(1), 59.
- Saaty T.L. (1990). An Exposition of The AHP in Reply To The Paper Remarks On The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 36(3): 259-268.
- The Association for Coaching. (2020, Şubat 5). Erişim adresi: https://www.associationforcoaching.com/
- The International Coaching Community. (2020, Şubat 5). Erişim adresi: https://internationalcoachingcommunity.com/about-icc/
- Yılmaz M. (2010). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) ve Bir Uygulama: Lider Bir Kütüphane Müdürü Seçimi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 24(2): 206-234.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 25, 2020 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2020 Issue: 1 - 19th International Business Congress Special Issue |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.