Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Hüsni Zaim Darbesi Karşısında Türkiye'nin Suriye Politikası

Year 2020, Issue: 57, 233 - 252, 23.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.705321

Abstract

II. Dünya Savaşı’ndan günümüze kadar askeri darbeler Orta Doğu’da değişmeyen siyasal olgulardan biridir. Suriye, tartışmalı sınırları ve çoklu toplum yapısı dolayısıyla darbelerin en yoğun yaşandığı ülkelerden biri olmuştur. 30 Mart 1949 tarihinde Suriye’de gerçekleşen Albay Zaim Darbesi, Orta Doğu’da II. Dünya Savaşı sonrasındaki askeri darbe dalgasının başlangıcını ve prototipini oluşturur. Bu darbeyle ilk defa ABD, Orta Doğu’da ki ulusal çıkarlarını, askeri diktatörlüklerle rahatlıkla koruyabildiğini görerek, bölgede birçok askeri darbenin aktörü oldu ve çeşitli ülkelerde diktatörleri iktidara getirdi. Dört buçuk ay gibi kısa süreli bir tarih kesitini işaret eden Zaim yönetimi, günümüze kadar Hatay’ın Türkiye toprağı olduğunu kabul ederek Türkiye’nin siyasal egemenliğini ve toprak bütünlüğünü tanıyan tek Suriye iktidarıdır. Zaim’in bu dostane politikasına karşılık Türkiye de iyimser bir yaklaşımla darbe yönetimini erken tanıyan ülkelerden biri olmuştur. Ancak Türkiye’nin Albay Zaim iktidarı döneminde Suriye politikası makro planda SSCB tehdidi, Arap devletleri arasında güç mücadeleleri ve Suriye’nin iç politik konjonktürünün zorlamalarının da etkisiyle kontrollü olmuştur.

References

  • ARI, T. (2014). Geçmişten Günümüze Ortadoğu Siyaset, Savaş, Diplomasi. Bursa: Dora Basım Yayın.
  • ARMAOĞLU, F. (2017). Filistin Meselesi ve Arap-İsrail Savaşları (1948-1988). İstanbul: Kronik Kitap.
  • BE’ERİ, E. (1982). The Waning of the Military Coup in Arab Politics”. Middle East Studies, 18(1), 69-81. CARLETON, A. (1950). The Syrian Coups D’Etat of 1949. Middle East Journal, 4(1), 1-11.
  • EPPEL, M. (1996). Syrian-Iraqi Relations During the 1948 Palestine War. Middle Easern Studies, 32(3), 74-91.
  • GINAT, R. (1996). Policy Towards The Arab World 1945-1948. Middle Eastern Studies, 32(4), 321-335.
  • GOLDSCHMİDT, A. ve LAWRENCE, D. (2005). Kısa Orta Doğu Tarihi. Çev. Aydemir GÜLER. İstanbul: Ufuk Matbaası.
  • BERKTAY, H. (2017). “Devrim Darbe Demokrasi”, 23 Temmuz 2017, http://www.serbestiyet.com/yazarlar/halil-berktay/devrim-darbe-demokrasi-806154 (Erişim Tarihi 7 Şubat 2019).
  • HASSAN, S. (2008). Turkey’s İsrael Policy Since 1945. İndian History Congress, 69, 921-929.
  • HINNEBUSCH, R. (2002) . The Foreing Policy of Syria, Raymond Hinnesbush ve Anoushiravan Ehteshami (Ed.). The Foreing Policies of Middle East içinde (pp. 141-165). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • KHADDURİ, M. (1951). Constitutinal Development in Syria: With Emphasis on the Constitution of 1950. Middle East Journal, 5(2), 137-160.
  • KÜRKÇÜOĞLU, Ö, (1972). Türkiye’nin Arap Orta Doğusuna Karşı Politikası (1945-1970), Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları.
  • LITTLE, D. (1990). Cold War and Covert Action: The United States and Syria 1945-1958. Middle East Jounal, 44( 1), 51-75.
  • LITTLE, D. (2004). The CIA and the Cult of Covert Action in the Middle East. Diplomatic History, 28 (5), 663-701. LUTTWAK, E. (1996). Bir Uzmanın Gözüyle Darbe, Çev. Edib İ.POLAT, Ankara: Yaba Yayınları.
  • LYNCH M. (2002). Jordan’s Identity and Interest . Shibley Telhami and Michael Barnett(Ed.), Identity and Foreing Policy In The Middle East içinde (pp.26-57). Newyork: Cornell Universty Press.
  • MAITY, A.(1954). The Problem Of Turkish Straits. The Indian Journal Of Political Science, 15(2), 134-152.
  • MILTON, E. (2008). Contemporary Politics in the Middle East. Malden: Polity Press.
  • OWEN, R. (2004). State, Power And Politics in The Making Of The Modern Middle East. New York: Taylor Fracis Group Press.
  • QAZAZZ, A. (1967). Military Regimes and

Turkey's Syria Policy Regarding Husni Zaim Coup

Year 2020, Issue: 57, 233 - 252, 23.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.705321

Abstract

From the World War II to the present military coups have become one of the unchanging
political phenomenon in Middle East. Syria has been one of the countries with the most intense
experiences due to the disputable borders and the multi-society structure. The Colonel Zaim coup in
Syria on March 30, 1949 constitutes the beginning and prototype of the military coup wave in the
Middle East. Short-lived Zaim government has become the only one in Syria up to now to accept
sovereignty and territorial of Turkey, Hatay district as Turkey's land. Turkey was one of the earliest
countries to recognize the government of coup in Syria in an optimistic policy in return for Zaim's
friendly approach. However, Turkey's Syria policy in Zaim period was restrained due to the internal
political balance in Syria and the threat of USSR as well as the power struggle between the Arab
states in the macro plan. 

References

  • ARI, T. (2014). Geçmişten Günümüze Ortadoğu Siyaset, Savaş, Diplomasi. Bursa: Dora Basım Yayın.
  • ARMAOĞLU, F. (2017). Filistin Meselesi ve Arap-İsrail Savaşları (1948-1988). İstanbul: Kronik Kitap.
  • BE’ERİ, E. (1982). The Waning of the Military Coup in Arab Politics”. Middle East Studies, 18(1), 69-81. CARLETON, A. (1950). The Syrian Coups D’Etat of 1949. Middle East Journal, 4(1), 1-11.
  • EPPEL, M. (1996). Syrian-Iraqi Relations During the 1948 Palestine War. Middle Easern Studies, 32(3), 74-91.
  • GINAT, R. (1996). Policy Towards The Arab World 1945-1948. Middle Eastern Studies, 32(4), 321-335.
  • GOLDSCHMİDT, A. ve LAWRENCE, D. (2005). Kısa Orta Doğu Tarihi. Çev. Aydemir GÜLER. İstanbul: Ufuk Matbaası.
  • BERKTAY, H. (2017). “Devrim Darbe Demokrasi”, 23 Temmuz 2017, http://www.serbestiyet.com/yazarlar/halil-berktay/devrim-darbe-demokrasi-806154 (Erişim Tarihi 7 Şubat 2019).
  • HASSAN, S. (2008). Turkey’s İsrael Policy Since 1945. İndian History Congress, 69, 921-929.
  • HINNEBUSCH, R. (2002) . The Foreing Policy of Syria, Raymond Hinnesbush ve Anoushiravan Ehteshami (Ed.). The Foreing Policies of Middle East içinde (pp. 141-165). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • KHADDURİ, M. (1951). Constitutinal Development in Syria: With Emphasis on the Constitution of 1950. Middle East Journal, 5(2), 137-160.
  • KÜRKÇÜOĞLU, Ö, (1972). Türkiye’nin Arap Orta Doğusuna Karşı Politikası (1945-1970), Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları.
  • LITTLE, D. (1990). Cold War and Covert Action: The United States and Syria 1945-1958. Middle East Jounal, 44( 1), 51-75.
  • LITTLE, D. (2004). The CIA and the Cult of Covert Action in the Middle East. Diplomatic History, 28 (5), 663-701. LUTTWAK, E. (1996). Bir Uzmanın Gözüyle Darbe, Çev. Edib İ.POLAT, Ankara: Yaba Yayınları.
  • LYNCH M. (2002). Jordan’s Identity and Interest . Shibley Telhami and Michael Barnett(Ed.), Identity and Foreing Policy In The Middle East içinde (pp.26-57). Newyork: Cornell Universty Press.
  • MAITY, A.(1954). The Problem Of Turkish Straits. The Indian Journal Of Political Science, 15(2), 134-152.
  • MILTON, E. (2008). Contemporary Politics in the Middle East. Malden: Polity Press.
  • OWEN, R. (2004). State, Power And Politics in The Making Of The Modern Middle East. New York: Taylor Fracis Group Press.
  • QAZAZZ, A. (1967). Military Regimes and
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Alpaslan Öztürkci 0000-0003-2877-8415

Publication Date December 23, 2020
Acceptance Date October 12, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Issue: 57

Cite

APA Öztürkci, A. (2020). Hüsni Zaim Darbesi Karşısında Türkiye’nin Suriye Politikası. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(57), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.705321

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.