BibTex RIS Cite

OTEL İŞLETMESİ İŞGÖRENLERİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞLARININ DEMOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERİNE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2010, Issue: 36, 113 - 132, 20.05.2015

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, otel işletmesi işgörenlerinin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının, demografik özelliklerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini belirleyebilmektir. Bu amaçla, Ankara’da faaliyet gösteren dört ve beş yıldızlı otel işletmelerindeki 359 işgören üzerinde anket uygulanmıştır. İşgörenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının demografik özelliklerine göre farklılıklarını belirleyebilmek için, bağımsız örneklemler için t testinden ve tek yönlü varyans analizinden (ANOVA) yararlanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, işgörenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarında çalıştıkları otel türleri, çalıştıkları bölümler ve eğitim düzeylerine göre anlamlı farklılıklar gösterdiği belirlenmiştir.

References

  • ACAR, A.Zafer.; (2006), “Örgütsel Yurttaşlık Davranışı: Kavramsal Gelişimi İle Kişisel ve Örgütsel Etkileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7 (1) , ss,1-14.
  • ACKFELDT, Anna Lena ve Leonardo V. COOTE; (2005), “A Study of Organizational Citizenship Behavior in a Retail Setting”, Journal of Bussines Research, 58, ss.151-159.
  • AĞAOĞLU, Orhan Kemal; (1992), “İşgücünü Verimli Kullanma Tekniklerinin Turizm Sektörüne Uygulanması” Verimlilik Dergisi, 1992, ss.110-121.
  • AY, Bilgen; (2007). Öğretmenlerin Öz-Yeterlikleri ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Afyonkarahisar: Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • BARKSLADE, Kewin ve Jon M. WERNER; (2001), “Managerial Ratings of In-role Behaviors, Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, and Overall Performance: Testing Different Models of Their Relationship”, Journal of Bussines Research, 51, ss.145 – 155.
  • BATEMAN, Thomas S. Ve Dennis W. ORGAN; (1983), “Job Satisfaction and The Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Effect and Employee Citizenship”, Academy of Management Journal, (26) 4, ss.587-595.
  • BORMAN, Walter C. and Stephan J. MOTOWIDLO; (1997), “Introduction: Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Contextual Performance”, Human Performance, 10, ss. 67-69.
  • CELEP, Cevat. , Soner POLAT, Nilgün ELBİR ve Elif YAZICI; (2004), “Orta- öğretim Okullarındaki Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Tutumları, XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı”, 6-9 Temmuz 2004 İnönü Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Malatya.
  • CHIABURU, Dan S., Sophia V. MARINOVA ve Audrey S. LIM; (2007), “Helping and Proactive Extra-Role Behaviors: The İnfluence of Motives, Goal Orientation and Social Context”, Personality and Individual Differences, 43, ss. 2282- 2293.
  • COHEN, Aaron ve Eran VIGODA; (2000), “Do Good Citizens Make Good Organizational Citizens? An Empirical Examination of The Relationship Between General Citizenship and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Israel”, Administration and Society, (32)5, ss.596-624.
  • ÇEKMECELİOĞLU, Hülya G.; (2007), “Yönetim Desteği, Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ve İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişkilerin Değerlendirilmesi”, 15. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 23-25 Mayıs 2007, Sakarya, ss.185-192.
  • ÇETİN, Münevver.Ö.; (2004), Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı, Birinci Baskı, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 184s.
  • DELUGA, Ronald J.; (1995), “The Relation Between Trust in The Supervisor and subordinate organizational citizenship behaviors”, Military Psychology, (7) 1, ss.1-16.
  • DELUGA, Ronald J.; (1994), “Supervisior Trust Building, Leader–Member Exchange and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, ss. 315 – 326.
  • DEMİR, Pelin; (2007), Aile Şirketlerinde Örgütsel Vatandaşlık: Gaziantep Uygulaması. (Yüksek lisans tezi). Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bi- limler Enstitüsü.
  • DICK, Rolf V., Daan V. KNIPPENBERG, Rudolf KERSCHREITER, Guido HERTEL, ve Jan WIESEKE; (2008), “Interactive Effects of Group and Organizational Identification on Job Satisfaction and Extra-Role Behavior”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, ss.388-399.
  • DURUKAN, Haydar; (2003), “Yönetimde İnsan İlişkileri”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, (11) 2, ss. 277-284.
  • FARH, Jiing-Lin L., Philip M. PODSAKOFF ve Dennis W. ORGAN; (1990), “Accounting for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Leader Fairness and Task Scope Versus Satisfaction”, Journal of Management, (16) 4, ss.705 – 721.
  • GEÇER, Hüseyin; (2008), Bir Üniversite Hastanesindeki Hemşirelerin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranış Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Te- zi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • GRAHAM, Jill W.; (1991), “An Essay On Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, (4) 4, ss.249–270.
  • GREENBERG, Jerald ve BARON, Robert A.; (2000), Behavior in Organizations, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 700s.
  • GÜVEN, Murat; (2006), Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Sos- yal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • HUI, Chun., Cynthia LEE ve Denise M. ROUSSEAU; (2004), “Psychological Contract and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in China: Investigating Generalizability and Instrumentality”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (89) 2, ss.311 – 321.
  • KARASAR, Niyazi; (2008), Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (Kavramlar- İlkeler-Teknikler), Onsekizinci Baskı, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Anka- ra, 310s.
  • KIDDER, Deborah L.; (2002), “The Influence of Gender on The Performance of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors”, Journal of Management, (28) 5, ss, 629-648.
  • KONOVSKY, Marry A. ve Dennis W. ORGAN; (1996), “Dispositional and Contextual Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, ss.253-266.
  • KÖSE, Sevinç, Burak KARTAL ve Nilgün KAYALI; (2003), “Örgütsel Vatan- daşlık Davranışı ve Tutuma İlişkin Faktörlerle İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakülte- si Dergisi, 20, ss.1-19.
  • KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM BAKANLIĞI; (2007a), Turizm Belgeli Tesis İstatistik- leri, 2006. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yatırım İşletmeleri Genel Mü- dürlüğü Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Daire Başkanlığı.
  • KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM BAKANLIĞI; (2007b), Konaklama İstatistikleri, 2006. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yatırım İşletmeleri Genel Müdürlüğü Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Daire Başkanlığı.
  • MOORMAN, Robert H.; (1991), “Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions İnfluence Employee Citizenship?”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (76) 6, ss.845-855.
  • MOORMAN, Robert H., Brian P. NIEHOFF ve Dennis W. ORGAN; (1993), “Treating Employees Fairly and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Sorting The Effects of Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Procedural Justice”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, (6) 3, ss.209-225.
  • NEA (National Education Asociation); (1965), Sampling and Statistic Handbook For Surveys in Education, Asociation Press, Washington.
  • NEUMAN, George A. ve Jill R. KICKUL; (1998), “Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Achievement Orientation and Personality”, Journal of Bussines and Psychology, (13) 2, ss. 263-279.
  • ORGAN, Dennis W.; (1997), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It’s Construct Clean-up Time, Human Performance, (10)2, ss. 85-97.
  • ORGAN, Dennis W.; (1988), O.C.B.: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington Book, Lexington Ma, 160s.
  • ORGAN, Dennis W. ve Mary A. KONOVSKY; (1989), “Cognitive Versus Affective Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (74) 1, ss. 157-164.
  • ÖZDAMAR, Kazım; (2001), Paket Programlar ve İstatistiksel Veri Analizi (Çok Değişkenli Analizler), Dördüncü Baskı, Kaan Yayınları, Eski- şehir, 528s.
  • ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, Mahmut; (2003), “Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ile Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bazı Demografik Özellikleri ve Akademik Başarıları Arasındaki İlişkilerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakülte- si Dergisi, 20, ss.117-135.
  • PODSAKOFF, Philip M., Scott B. MACKENZIE, Julie B. PAINE ve Daniel G. BACHRACH; (2000), “Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of The Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Sug- gestions For Future Research”, Journal of Management, (26) 3, ss. 513-563.
  • SAMANCI, Sevinç; (2006), Örgütsel İklim ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Afyonkarahisar: Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • SCHNAKE, Mel E. ve Michael P. DUMLER; (2003), “Levels of Measurement and Analysis Issues in Organizational Citizenship Behavior Research”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, ss.283 – 301.
  • SMITH, C.Ann, Dennis W. ORGAN ve Janet P. NEAR; (1983), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature and Antecedents”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (68) 4, ss. 653-663.
  • SOMECH, Anit ve Ifat RON; (2007), “Promoting Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Schools: The Impact of Individual and Organizational Characteristics”, Educational Administration Quarterly, (43) 1, ss.38-66.
  • SÖKMEN, Alptekin ve Yasin BOYLU; (2010), Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Cinsiyete Göre Farklılık Gösterir Mi? Otel İşletmeleri Açısından Bir Değerlendirme.11. Ulusal Turizm Kongresi Bildirler Kitabı, 2-5 Aralık 2010, Kuşadası, ss.1-13.
  • SPECTOR, Paul E. ve Suzy FOX; (2002), “An Emotion-Centered Model Of Voluntary Work Behavior Some Parallels Between Counterproductive Work Behavior And Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Human Resource Management Review, 12, ss. 269-292.
  • TANSKY, Judith W. (1993), “Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: What is the Relationship”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, (6)3, ss. 195-207.
  • TURİZM BAKANLIĞI; (1989), Otelcilik ve Turizm Endüstrisinde İşgücü Araştırması. Ankara: Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  • TURNIPSEED, David L.; (2002), “Are Good Soldiers Good? Exploring The Link Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Personal Ethics”, Journal of Bussines Research, 55, ss.1-15.
  • TURNIPSEED, D.L. ve Gene MURKINSON; (1996), “Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Examination of the influence of The Workplace”, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 17, ss.42-47.
  • URAL, Ayhan ve İbrahim KILIÇ; (2006), Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci ve SPSS İle Veri Analizi, İkinci Baskı, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, 288s.
  • ÜLKER, Gönül; (2007); “Örgütsel Bağlılık, Örgütsel Vatandaşlık ve Örgütte Kalma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişki: Bunların Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi”, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Ens- titüsü Dergisi, 14 (1), ss.227-248.
  • VEY, Meredith A. ve John P. CAMPBELL; (2004), “In-Role Or Extra-Role Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Which Are We Measuring?”, Human Performance, 1 (17), ss.19 -135.
  • WANXIAN, Li ve Wan WEIWEU; (2007), “A Demographic Study on Citizenship Behavior as in-role Orientation”, Personality and Individual Differences, 42, ss.225–234.
  • WILLIAMS, Larry J. ve Stella E. ANDERSON (1991), “Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and in-role Behaviors”, Journal of Management, 17, ss. 601-617.
  • YU, Chia-Ping ve Tsai-Hsin CHU; (2007), “Exploring Knowledge Contribution from an OCB Perspective”, Information and Management, 44, ss. 321-331.
Year 2010, Issue: 36, 113 - 132, 20.05.2015

Abstract

References

  • ACAR, A.Zafer.; (2006), “Örgütsel Yurttaşlık Davranışı: Kavramsal Gelişimi İle Kişisel ve Örgütsel Etkileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7 (1) , ss,1-14.
  • ACKFELDT, Anna Lena ve Leonardo V. COOTE; (2005), “A Study of Organizational Citizenship Behavior in a Retail Setting”, Journal of Bussines Research, 58, ss.151-159.
  • AĞAOĞLU, Orhan Kemal; (1992), “İşgücünü Verimli Kullanma Tekniklerinin Turizm Sektörüne Uygulanması” Verimlilik Dergisi, 1992, ss.110-121.
  • AY, Bilgen; (2007). Öğretmenlerin Öz-Yeterlikleri ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Afyonkarahisar: Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • BARKSLADE, Kewin ve Jon M. WERNER; (2001), “Managerial Ratings of In-role Behaviors, Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, and Overall Performance: Testing Different Models of Their Relationship”, Journal of Bussines Research, 51, ss.145 – 155.
  • BATEMAN, Thomas S. Ve Dennis W. ORGAN; (1983), “Job Satisfaction and The Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Effect and Employee Citizenship”, Academy of Management Journal, (26) 4, ss.587-595.
  • BORMAN, Walter C. and Stephan J. MOTOWIDLO; (1997), “Introduction: Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Contextual Performance”, Human Performance, 10, ss. 67-69.
  • CELEP, Cevat. , Soner POLAT, Nilgün ELBİR ve Elif YAZICI; (2004), “Orta- öğretim Okullarındaki Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Tutumları, XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı”, 6-9 Temmuz 2004 İnönü Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Malatya.
  • CHIABURU, Dan S., Sophia V. MARINOVA ve Audrey S. LIM; (2007), “Helping and Proactive Extra-Role Behaviors: The İnfluence of Motives, Goal Orientation and Social Context”, Personality and Individual Differences, 43, ss. 2282- 2293.
  • COHEN, Aaron ve Eran VIGODA; (2000), “Do Good Citizens Make Good Organizational Citizens? An Empirical Examination of The Relationship Between General Citizenship and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Israel”, Administration and Society, (32)5, ss.596-624.
  • ÇEKMECELİOĞLU, Hülya G.; (2007), “Yönetim Desteği, Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ve İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişkilerin Değerlendirilmesi”, 15. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 23-25 Mayıs 2007, Sakarya, ss.185-192.
  • ÇETİN, Münevver.Ö.; (2004), Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı, Birinci Baskı, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 184s.
  • DELUGA, Ronald J.; (1995), “The Relation Between Trust in The Supervisor and subordinate organizational citizenship behaviors”, Military Psychology, (7) 1, ss.1-16.
  • DELUGA, Ronald J.; (1994), “Supervisior Trust Building, Leader–Member Exchange and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, ss. 315 – 326.
  • DEMİR, Pelin; (2007), Aile Şirketlerinde Örgütsel Vatandaşlık: Gaziantep Uygulaması. (Yüksek lisans tezi). Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bi- limler Enstitüsü.
  • DICK, Rolf V., Daan V. KNIPPENBERG, Rudolf KERSCHREITER, Guido HERTEL, ve Jan WIESEKE; (2008), “Interactive Effects of Group and Organizational Identification on Job Satisfaction and Extra-Role Behavior”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, ss.388-399.
  • DURUKAN, Haydar; (2003), “Yönetimde İnsan İlişkileri”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, (11) 2, ss. 277-284.
  • FARH, Jiing-Lin L., Philip M. PODSAKOFF ve Dennis W. ORGAN; (1990), “Accounting for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Leader Fairness and Task Scope Versus Satisfaction”, Journal of Management, (16) 4, ss.705 – 721.
  • GEÇER, Hüseyin; (2008), Bir Üniversite Hastanesindeki Hemşirelerin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranış Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Te- zi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • GRAHAM, Jill W.; (1991), “An Essay On Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, (4) 4, ss.249–270.
  • GREENBERG, Jerald ve BARON, Robert A.; (2000), Behavior in Organizations, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 700s.
  • GÜVEN, Murat; (2006), Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Sos- yal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • HUI, Chun., Cynthia LEE ve Denise M. ROUSSEAU; (2004), “Psychological Contract and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in China: Investigating Generalizability and Instrumentality”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (89) 2, ss.311 – 321.
  • KARASAR, Niyazi; (2008), Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (Kavramlar- İlkeler-Teknikler), Onsekizinci Baskı, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Anka- ra, 310s.
  • KIDDER, Deborah L.; (2002), “The Influence of Gender on The Performance of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors”, Journal of Management, (28) 5, ss, 629-648.
  • KONOVSKY, Marry A. ve Dennis W. ORGAN; (1996), “Dispositional and Contextual Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, ss.253-266.
  • KÖSE, Sevinç, Burak KARTAL ve Nilgün KAYALI; (2003), “Örgütsel Vatan- daşlık Davranışı ve Tutuma İlişkin Faktörlerle İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakülte- si Dergisi, 20, ss.1-19.
  • KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM BAKANLIĞI; (2007a), Turizm Belgeli Tesis İstatistik- leri, 2006. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yatırım İşletmeleri Genel Mü- dürlüğü Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Daire Başkanlığı.
  • KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM BAKANLIĞI; (2007b), Konaklama İstatistikleri, 2006. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yatırım İşletmeleri Genel Müdürlüğü Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Daire Başkanlığı.
  • MOORMAN, Robert H.; (1991), “Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions İnfluence Employee Citizenship?”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (76) 6, ss.845-855.
  • MOORMAN, Robert H., Brian P. NIEHOFF ve Dennis W. ORGAN; (1993), “Treating Employees Fairly and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Sorting The Effects of Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Procedural Justice”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, (6) 3, ss.209-225.
  • NEA (National Education Asociation); (1965), Sampling and Statistic Handbook For Surveys in Education, Asociation Press, Washington.
  • NEUMAN, George A. ve Jill R. KICKUL; (1998), “Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Achievement Orientation and Personality”, Journal of Bussines and Psychology, (13) 2, ss. 263-279.
  • ORGAN, Dennis W.; (1997), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It’s Construct Clean-up Time, Human Performance, (10)2, ss. 85-97.
  • ORGAN, Dennis W.; (1988), O.C.B.: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington Book, Lexington Ma, 160s.
  • ORGAN, Dennis W. ve Mary A. KONOVSKY; (1989), “Cognitive Versus Affective Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (74) 1, ss. 157-164.
  • ÖZDAMAR, Kazım; (2001), Paket Programlar ve İstatistiksel Veri Analizi (Çok Değişkenli Analizler), Dördüncü Baskı, Kaan Yayınları, Eski- şehir, 528s.
  • ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, Mahmut; (2003), “Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ile Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bazı Demografik Özellikleri ve Akademik Başarıları Arasındaki İlişkilerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakülte- si Dergisi, 20, ss.117-135.
  • PODSAKOFF, Philip M., Scott B. MACKENZIE, Julie B. PAINE ve Daniel G. BACHRACH; (2000), “Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of The Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Sug- gestions For Future Research”, Journal of Management, (26) 3, ss. 513-563.
  • SAMANCI, Sevinç; (2006), Örgütsel İklim ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Afyonkarahisar: Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • SCHNAKE, Mel E. ve Michael P. DUMLER; (2003), “Levels of Measurement and Analysis Issues in Organizational Citizenship Behavior Research”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, ss.283 – 301.
  • SMITH, C.Ann, Dennis W. ORGAN ve Janet P. NEAR; (1983), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature and Antecedents”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (68) 4, ss. 653-663.
  • SOMECH, Anit ve Ifat RON; (2007), “Promoting Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Schools: The Impact of Individual and Organizational Characteristics”, Educational Administration Quarterly, (43) 1, ss.38-66.
  • SÖKMEN, Alptekin ve Yasin BOYLU; (2010), Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Cinsiyete Göre Farklılık Gösterir Mi? Otel İşletmeleri Açısından Bir Değerlendirme.11. Ulusal Turizm Kongresi Bildirler Kitabı, 2-5 Aralık 2010, Kuşadası, ss.1-13.
  • SPECTOR, Paul E. ve Suzy FOX; (2002), “An Emotion-Centered Model Of Voluntary Work Behavior Some Parallels Between Counterproductive Work Behavior And Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Human Resource Management Review, 12, ss. 269-292.
  • TANSKY, Judith W. (1993), “Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: What is the Relationship”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, (6)3, ss. 195-207.
  • TURİZM BAKANLIĞI; (1989), Otelcilik ve Turizm Endüstrisinde İşgücü Araştırması. Ankara: Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  • TURNIPSEED, David L.; (2002), “Are Good Soldiers Good? Exploring The Link Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Personal Ethics”, Journal of Bussines Research, 55, ss.1-15.
  • TURNIPSEED, D.L. ve Gene MURKINSON; (1996), “Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Examination of the influence of The Workplace”, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 17, ss.42-47.
  • URAL, Ayhan ve İbrahim KILIÇ; (2006), Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci ve SPSS İle Veri Analizi, İkinci Baskı, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, 288s.
  • ÜLKER, Gönül; (2007); “Örgütsel Bağlılık, Örgütsel Vatandaşlık ve Örgütte Kalma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişki: Bunların Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi”, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Ens- titüsü Dergisi, 14 (1), ss.227-248.
  • VEY, Meredith A. ve John P. CAMPBELL; (2004), “In-Role Or Extra-Role Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Which Are We Measuring?”, Human Performance, 1 (17), ss.19 -135.
  • WANXIAN, Li ve Wan WEIWEU; (2007), “A Demographic Study on Citizenship Behavior as in-role Orientation”, Personality and Individual Differences, 42, ss.225–234.
  • WILLIAMS, Larry J. ve Stella E. ANDERSON (1991), “Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and in-role Behaviors”, Journal of Management, 17, ss. 601-617.
  • YU, Chia-Ping ve Tsai-Hsin CHU; (2007), “Exploring Knowledge Contribution from an OCB Perspective”, Information and Management, 44, ss. 321-331.
There are 55 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Mehmet Yeşiltaş This is me

Yasin Keleş

Publication Date May 20, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2010 Issue: 36

Cite

APA Yeşiltaş, M., & Keleş, Y. (2015). OTEL İŞLETMESİ İŞGÖRENLERİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞLARININ DEMOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERİNE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(36), 113-132.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.