Abstract
Food safety is a significant problem concern in business. Companies show great effort to
transport food safely and to minimize food losses. The purpose of this study is aimed to determine the
criteria that affect the food transportation process. These criteria were determined with the literature
research and expert opinions, and were analyzed and ranked using the analytical hierarchy process (AHS)
method, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method. Among the determining
factors, vehicle suitability and safety, compliance with the ATP (The Agreement on the International
Carriage of Perishable Foodstuff and on the Special Equipment to be used for such Carriage) convention,
selection of software used for transportation coordination are essential success criteria. With the proposed
criteria, the characteristics that companies engaged in food transportation should have were tried to be
determined and the company managers were tried to help long-term plan strategies
References
- 1. Ackerley, Nyssa, Aylin Sertkaya, and Rachel Lange (2010). Food transportation safety: characterizing risks and controls by use of expert. Food protection trends, 30(4), 212-222.
- 2. Adaş Sayın, T. (2015). Perakende lojistiği ve Trakya Bölgesi’nde bir çalışma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Edirne.
- 3. Ali Azadeh, Seyed Mohammad Asadzadeh, Mehrab Tanhaeean, (2017). A consensus-based AHP for improved assessment of resilience engineering in maintenance organizations, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 47,151-160
- 4. Akkerman, R., Farahani, P., ve Grunow, M. (2010). Quality, safety and sustainability in food distribution: a review of quantitative operations management approaches and challenges. Or Spectrum, 32(4), 863-904.
- 5. Anthony, R. (1965), Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston.
- 6. Atlatırlar, T. (2017). Soğuk zincir ürünlerinin sıcaklıklarının kontrolü ve doğrulanması. http://www.lojistikdunyasi.net/soguk-zincir-urunlerinin-sicakliklarinin-kontrolu-ve-dogrulanmasi.html
- 7. Bai, Chunguang, and Joseph Sarkis (2013). A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors, International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 281-292.
- 8. Bojan Srdjevic, Yvonilde Dantas Pinto Medeiros (2008). Fuzzy AHP Assessment of Water Management Plans, Water Resources Management, 22, 877–894,
- 9. Du Plessis, Erika, and Lise Korsten (2015). Irrigation and food safety: feature. Water Wheel 14 (4), 32-35.
- 10. Gabriel R.Bitran, DevanathTirupati (1993), Chapter 10 Hierarchical production planning, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Volume 4, Pages 523-568.
- 11. Jacqueline M. Bloemhof, Jack G.A.J. van der Vorst, Marko Bastl & Hamid Allaoui (2015). Sustainability assessment of food chain logistics, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 18:2, 101-117.
- 12. Jeng-Fung Chen, Ho-Nien Hsieh, Quang Hung Do (2015). Evaluating teaching performance based on fuzzy AHP and comprehensive evaluation approach, Applied Soft Computing, 28, 100-108
- 13. Josef Jablonsky (2007). Measuring the efficiency of production units by AHP models, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46 (7–8),1091-1098
- 14. Kim, Hyoun-Wook, et al (2009). Overview of the management characteristics of food (livestock products) transportation systems on internationaland national-level HACCP application. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 29(4), 513-522.
- 15. Lele, U., M. Klousia-Marquis, and S. Goswami (2013). Good governance for food, water and energy security, Aquatic procedia 1: 44-63.
- 16. Lixin Shena, Kamalakant Mudulib, Akhilesh Barve (2015), Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP approach, Resources Policy Volume 46(1), 15-26
- 17. Marsh, Kenneth, and Betty Bugusu (2007). Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental issues, Journal of food science, 72(3), 39-55.
- 18. Mathiyazhagan, K., Kannan Govindan, and A. Noorul Haq (2014). Pressure analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Production Research 52(1), 188-202.
- 19. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York,
- 20. Sankarankutty, K. Meera (2014). Biosensors and their Applications for Ensuring Food Safety, Global Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, 2(1), 15-21.
- 21. Silvestre, Clara, Donatella Duraccio, and Sossio Cimmino (2011). Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials, Progress in Polymer Science 36(12), 1766-1782.
- 22. Şen, A. (2008). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde soğuk lojistik uygulamalarının etkinliğinin arttırılmasına yönelik bir çalışma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
- 23. Thomas, Kevin JA, and Tukufu Zuberi. "Demographic Change, the IMPACT Model, and Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa." UNDP Regional Bureau for Africa Working Paper (2012).
- 24. Tilman, D., K. G. Cassman, P. A. Matson, R. Naylor, and S. Polasky, (2002). Agricultural Sustainability and Intensive Production Practices, Nature, 418, 671–677.
- 25. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S., and Sushil Kumar (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications, European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 1-29.
- 26. Yam, Kit L., Paul T. Takhistov, and Joseph Miltz (2005). Intelligent packaging: concepts and applications. Journal of food science, 70(1), 1-10
- 27. Yıldıztekin, A. (2011). Gıda Lojistiği. http://www.lojistikdunyasi.net/gida-lojistigi.html (Erişim Tarihi: 24.01.2021)
Abstract
Gıda güvenliği günümüzde büyük bir sorun oluşturmaktadır. Şirketler gıdanın güvenli bir
şekilde taşınması ve gıda kayıplarını en aza indirmek için büyük çaba göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada,
özellikle gıda taşımacılığı sürecinde yaşanan sorunlar dikkate alınarak gıda taşımacılığı sürecini etkileyen
kriterlerin neler olduğunun belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Bu kriterler, literatür araştırması ve uzman
görüşleri doğrultusunda belirlenerek yaygın olarak kullanılan çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) yöntemi
olan analitik hiyerarşi süreci (AHS) yöntemi ile analiz edilmiş ve sıralanmıştır. Belirlenen faktörler
arasında araç uygunluğu ve güvenliği, ATP (Bozulabilir Gıda Maddelerinin Uluslararası Taşımacılığı ve
Taşımalarında Özel Araçların Kullanımı Antlaşması) konvansiyonuna uygunluk, taşımacılık
koordinasyonu için kullanılan yazılım seçimi önemli başarı kriterleri olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır.
Önerilen kriterler ile, gıda taşımacılığı yapan firmaların sahip olması gereken özellikler belirlenmeye
çalışılmış ve firma yöneticilerinin uzun vadeli stratejiler planlamasına yardımcı olmaya çalışılmıştır.
References
- 1. Ackerley, Nyssa, Aylin Sertkaya, and Rachel Lange (2010). Food transportation safety: characterizing risks and controls by use of expert. Food protection trends, 30(4), 212-222.
- 2. Adaş Sayın, T. (2015). Perakende lojistiği ve Trakya Bölgesi’nde bir çalışma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Edirne.
- 3. Ali Azadeh, Seyed Mohammad Asadzadeh, Mehrab Tanhaeean, (2017). A consensus-based AHP for improved assessment of resilience engineering in maintenance organizations, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 47,151-160
- 4. Akkerman, R., Farahani, P., ve Grunow, M. (2010). Quality, safety and sustainability in food distribution: a review of quantitative operations management approaches and challenges. Or Spectrum, 32(4), 863-904.
- 5. Anthony, R. (1965), Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston.
- 6. Atlatırlar, T. (2017). Soğuk zincir ürünlerinin sıcaklıklarının kontrolü ve doğrulanması. http://www.lojistikdunyasi.net/soguk-zincir-urunlerinin-sicakliklarinin-kontrolu-ve-dogrulanmasi.html
- 7. Bai, Chunguang, and Joseph Sarkis (2013). A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors, International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 281-292.
- 8. Bojan Srdjevic, Yvonilde Dantas Pinto Medeiros (2008). Fuzzy AHP Assessment of Water Management Plans, Water Resources Management, 22, 877–894,
- 9. Du Plessis, Erika, and Lise Korsten (2015). Irrigation and food safety: feature. Water Wheel 14 (4), 32-35.
- 10. Gabriel R.Bitran, DevanathTirupati (1993), Chapter 10 Hierarchical production planning, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Volume 4, Pages 523-568.
- 11. Jacqueline M. Bloemhof, Jack G.A.J. van der Vorst, Marko Bastl & Hamid Allaoui (2015). Sustainability assessment of food chain logistics, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 18:2, 101-117.
- 12. Jeng-Fung Chen, Ho-Nien Hsieh, Quang Hung Do (2015). Evaluating teaching performance based on fuzzy AHP and comprehensive evaluation approach, Applied Soft Computing, 28, 100-108
- 13. Josef Jablonsky (2007). Measuring the efficiency of production units by AHP models, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46 (7–8),1091-1098
- 14. Kim, Hyoun-Wook, et al (2009). Overview of the management characteristics of food (livestock products) transportation systems on internationaland national-level HACCP application. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 29(4), 513-522.
- 15. Lele, U., M. Klousia-Marquis, and S. Goswami (2013). Good governance for food, water and energy security, Aquatic procedia 1: 44-63.
- 16. Lixin Shena, Kamalakant Mudulib, Akhilesh Barve (2015), Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP approach, Resources Policy Volume 46(1), 15-26
- 17. Marsh, Kenneth, and Betty Bugusu (2007). Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental issues, Journal of food science, 72(3), 39-55.
- 18. Mathiyazhagan, K., Kannan Govindan, and A. Noorul Haq (2014). Pressure analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Production Research 52(1), 188-202.
- 19. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York,
- 20. Sankarankutty, K. Meera (2014). Biosensors and their Applications for Ensuring Food Safety, Global Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, 2(1), 15-21.
- 21. Silvestre, Clara, Donatella Duraccio, and Sossio Cimmino (2011). Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials, Progress in Polymer Science 36(12), 1766-1782.
- 22. Şen, A. (2008). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde soğuk lojistik uygulamalarının etkinliğinin arttırılmasına yönelik bir çalışma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
- 23. Thomas, Kevin JA, and Tukufu Zuberi. "Demographic Change, the IMPACT Model, and Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa." UNDP Regional Bureau for Africa Working Paper (2012).
- 24. Tilman, D., K. G. Cassman, P. A. Matson, R. Naylor, and S. Polasky, (2002). Agricultural Sustainability and Intensive Production Practices, Nature, 418, 671–677.
- 25. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S., and Sushil Kumar (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications, European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 1-29.
- 26. Yam, Kit L., Paul T. Takhistov, and Joseph Miltz (2005). Intelligent packaging: concepts and applications. Journal of food science, 70(1), 1-10
- 27. Yıldıztekin, A. (2011). Gıda Lojistiği. http://www.lojistikdunyasi.net/gida-lojistigi.html (Erişim Tarihi: 24.01.2021)
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | April 30, 2021 |
| Acceptance Date | March 17, 2021 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2021 Issue: 58 |
Cited By
CCovıd-19 Sonrası Süt ve Süt Ürünleri Tedarik Zincirinde Verimliliği Etkileyen Faktörler
Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.1333241
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.