Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE EFFECT OF PROACTIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS OF HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ON GREEN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

Year 2022, Issue: 61, 17 - 42, 29.04.2022

Fatma Mansur , Özlem Gedik

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.962995
Cited By: 3

Abstract

Globalization, technology, ecology, climate change, pollution, green... While it is possible to increase similar concepts, the concept of sustainability, which is frequently mentioned today, must have come to mind. Sustainability that initiates change by integrating the environmental efforts of organizations into their business strategies, sometimes green hospital, sometimes zero waste, sometimes it finds its place in health institutions with green behaviors. The important question is who will initiate the change. In response, proactive people who are aware of the change and have the ability to turn their direction to a livable order can be given. Proactive personality appears as an inherent personality trait of the individual in accordance with the Social Learning Theory. It is thought that this intersects with the sustainable pro-environmental behaviors that constitute the starting point of the study. In this study, in which a sustainable perspective is discussed, the effect of the proactive personality trait of healthcare workers on green organizational behavior has been tried to be determined, and has 390 participants. Environmental sensitivity, environmental participation, economic sensitivity, green purchasing and technological sensitivity are the dimensions of green organizational behavior. As a result of the research, it was concluded that proactive personality has a positive effect on green organizational behavior and its dimensions.

Keywords

: Proactive personality green organizational behavior environmental sensitivity environmental participation economic sensitivity green purchasing technological sensitivity sustainability.

References

  • Abid, G., Arya, B., Arshad, A., Ahmed, S., Farooqi, S. (2021). Positive personality traits and self-leadership in sustainable organizations: Mediating influence of thriving and moderating role of proactive personality, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 299-311.
  • Ahmad, S. (2015) Green Human Resource Management: Policies and practices, Cogent Business & Management, 2(1), 1-13.
  • Ahmed, M., Guo, Q., Qureshi, M.A., Raza, S.A., Khan, K.A., & Salam, J. (2021). Do green HR practices enhance green motivation and proactive environmental management maturity in hotel industry?, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94.
  • Amrutha, V.N. & Geetha, S.N. (2021). Linking organizational green training and voluntary workplace green behavior: Mediating role of green supporting climate and employees’ green satisfaction, Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 1-12.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective,” Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
  • Bateman, T.S. & Crant, J.M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: a measure and correlates, Journal of organizational behavior, 14, 103-118.
  • Caracuel, J.A., Torres, N.E.H., & Correa, J.A.A. (2012). Does international experience help firms to be green? A knowledge-based view of how international experience and organisational learning influence proactive environmental strategies, International Business Review, 21(5), 847-861.
  • Dai, J., Cantor, D.E., & Montabon, F.L. (2017). Examining corporate environmental proactivity and operational performance: A strategy-structure-capabilities-performance perspective within a green context, International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 272-280.
  • Ergen, A., Bozkurt, F., & Giray, C. (2016). Activism: A Strong Predictor of Proactive Environmentally Friendly Buying Behavior in Turkey. International Journal of Research In Business and Social Science, 3, 130-142.
  • Eroymak, S., İzgüden, D., Erdem, R. (2018). “Çalışanların Yeşil Davranışının Kavramsal Çerçevede İncelenmesi”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(3), 961-971.
  • Gedik, Ö. (2020). Endüstri 4.0’ın Teknoloji Kabul Modeli Çerçevesinde Sağlık Sektörüne Yansımaları: Bir Uygulama. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Govindarajulu, N., & Daily, B.F. (2004). Motivating employees for environmental improvement, Industrial Management Data Systems, 104, 364-372. Grant, A.M. & Ashford, S.J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34.
  • Guerci, M., & Pedrini, M. (2014). The consensus between Italian HR and sustainability managers on HR management for sustainability-driven change – towards a 'strong' HR management system. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(13), 1787-1814.
  • Guerci, M., Longoni, A., & Luzzini, D. (2016). Translating stakeholder pressures into environmental performance – the mediating role of green HRM practices, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(2), 262-289.
  • Holmner, A., Rocklöv, J., Nawi, Ng., and Nilsson M. (2012). “Climate change and e-Health: a promising strategy for health sector mitigation and adaptation”, Global Health Action, 5, 1-9.
  • Jerónimo, H.M., Henriques, P.L., Lacerda, T.C., Silva, F.P., & Vieira, P.R. (2020). Going green and sustainable: The influence of green HR practices on the organizational rationale for sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 112, 413-421.
  • Kuşat, N. (2012). “Sürdürülebilir İşletmeler İçin Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik ve İçsel Unsurları”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 227-242.
  • Li, W.D., Fay, D., Frese, M., Harms, P.D., Gao, X.Y. (2014). Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality and work characteristics. A latent change score approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 948–965.
  • Liu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Seuring, S. (2017). Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity, International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 182-195.
  • Loi, R., Liu, Y., Lam, L.W., & Xu, A.J. (2016). Buffering emotional job demands: The interplay between proactive personality and team potency. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95-96, 128-137.
  • Lülfs, R., & Hahn, R. (2014). Sustainable behavior in the business sphere: Acomprehensive overview of the explanatory power of psychologicalmodels. Organization and Environment, 27(1), 43-64.
  • Mansur, F. ve Korkmaz, S. (2020). Sağlık Hizmeti Kullanıcılarının Yeşil Hastane Farkındalık Düzeylerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(3), 827-850.
  • Mo, Z., & Liu, M. (2019). Proactive Personality and Employee Workplace Green Behavior: Applying Theory of Planned Behavior.
  • Morelli, J. (2011). “Environmental sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals”, Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 1-9.
  • Neneh, B.N. (2019). From entrepreneurial intentions to behavior: The role of anticipated regret and proactive personality, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 311-324.
  • Norton, T.A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N.M. (2015). Employeegreen behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and futureresearch agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103-125.
  • Ocak, E.A. (2021). “Plastik Kirliliği”, Bilim ve Teknik Dergisi, 54(639), 24-39.
  • Paille, P. & Raineri, N. (2015). Linking perceived corporate environmental policies and employees’ eco-initiatives: the influence of perceived organizational support and psychological contract breach. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2404-2411.
  • Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., van der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., Anderton, K., Sethi, M., & Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1-16.
  • Pinhoa, C., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2020). Exploring the conditions of success in e-libraries in the higher education context through the lens of the social learning theory. Information & Management, 57(4), 1-11.
  • Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Effects of ‘green’ training on pro-environmental behaviors and job satisfaction: Evidence from the Italian healthcare sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 221-232.
  • Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Redman, T. (2016). Progressing in the change journey towards sustainability in healthcare: the role of ‘Green’ HRM, Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 201-211.
  • Pluess, M. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity, Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 138–143.
  • Sambasivan, M., Bah, S.M., & Ann, H.J. (2013). Making the case for operating “Green”: impact of environmental proactivity on multiple performance outcomes of Malaysian firms, Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 69-82.
  • Scholza, G., & Methne, N. (2020). A social learning and transition perspective on a climate change project in South Africa. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 322-335.
  • Seibert, S.E., Crant, J.M., and Kraimer, M.L. (1999). "Proactive Personality and Career Success," Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416-427.
  • Singh, S.K. & El-Kassar, A.N. (2019). Role of big data analytics in developing sustainable capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 1264-1273.
  • Su, L., and Swanson, S.R. (2019). “Perveived corporate social responsibility’s impact on the well-being and supportive green behaviors of hotel employees: The mediating role of the employee-corporate relationship”, Tourism Management, 72, 437-450.
  • Teng, H.Y & Chen, C.Y. (2019). Proactive personality and job crafting in the tourism industry: Does job resourcefulness matter?, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 41, 110-116.
  • Tidball, K.G., & Aktipis, A. (2018). Feedback enhances greening during disaster recovery: A model of social and ecological processes in neighborhood scale investment, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, 269-280.
  • Unsworth, K.L., Davis, M.C., Russell, S.V., & Bretter, C. (2021). Employee green behaviour: How organizations can help the environment, Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 1-6.
  • Van Mierlo, B., & Beers, P.J. (2018). Understanding and governing learning in sustainability transitions: a review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 255-269.
  • Vanwalleghem, D. & Mirowska, A. (2020). The investor that could and would: The effect of proactive personality on sustainable investment choice, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 26, 1-5.
  • Wang, H., Guo, T., & Tang, Q. (2021). The effect of national culture on corporate green proactivity, Journal of Business Research, 131, 140-150.
  • Wiernik, B. M., Dilchert, S., and Ones, D. S. (2016). “Age and Employee Green Behaviors: A metaanalysis”, Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1-15.
  • Yolcu, İ.U., ve Çakmak, A.F. (2017). “Proaktif Kişilik ile Proaktif Çalışma Davranışı İlişkisi Üzerinde Psikolojik Güçlendirmenin Etkisi”, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(2), 72-438.
  • Young, W., Davis, M., McNeill, I.M., Malhotra, B., Russell, S., Unsworth, K., & Clegg, C.W. (2015). Changing behaviour: Successful environmentalprogrammes in the workplace. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 689-703.

SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARININ PROAKTİF KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİĞİNİN YEŞİL ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞA ETKİSİ

Year 2022, Issue: 61, 17 - 42, 29.04.2022

Fatma Mansur , Özlem Gedik

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.962995
Cited By: 3

Abstract

Küreselleşme, teknoloji, ekoloji, iklim değişikliği, kirlilik, yeşil… Benzer kavramları artırmak mümkünken bu haliyle bile günümüzde adından sıklıkla söz ettiren sürdürülebilirlik kavramı akıllara gelmiş olmalı. Kurumların çevresel çabalarını iş yapma stratejilerine entegre ederek değişimi başlatan sürdürülebilirlik, kimi zaman yeşil hastane, kimi zaman sıfır atık, kimi zaman da yeşil davranışlar ile sağlık kurumlarında kendine yer bulmaktadır. Burada önemli olan soru değişimi kimin başlatacağıdır. Yanıt olarak değişimin farkında olan ve yönünü yaşanabilir bir düzene çevirme özeliğine sahip proaktif kişiler verilebilir. Proaktif kişilik, Sosyal Öğrenme Kuramı gereğince bireyin kendi doğasında var olan bir kişilik özelliği olarak belirmektedir. Bunun ise çalışmanın hareket noktasını oluşturan sürdürülebilir çevre yanlısı davranışlar ile kesiştiği düşünülmektedir. Sürdürülebilir bir bakış açısının ele alındığı bu çalışmada, sağlık çalışanlarının proaktif kişilik özelliğinin yeşil örgütsel davranışa etkisi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmaya dâhil olan sağlık çalışanı sayısı 390’dır. Yeşil örgütsel davranış boyutlarını çevresel duyarlılık, çevresel katılım, ekonomik duyarlılık, yeşil satın alma ve teknolojik duyarlılık oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın sonucunda proaktif kişiliğin yeşil örgütsel davranış ve boyutları üzerinde olumlu etkiye sahip olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Proaktif kişilik yeşil örgütsel davranış çevresel duyarlılık çevresel katılım ekonomik duyarlılık yeşil satın alma teknolojik duyarlılık sürdürülebilirlik

References

  • Abid, G., Arya, B., Arshad, A., Ahmed, S., Farooqi, S. (2021). Positive personality traits and self-leadership in sustainable organizations: Mediating influence of thriving and moderating role of proactive personality, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 299-311.
  • Ahmad, S. (2015) Green Human Resource Management: Policies and practices, Cogent Business & Management, 2(1), 1-13.
  • Ahmed, M., Guo, Q., Qureshi, M.A., Raza, S.A., Khan, K.A., & Salam, J. (2021). Do green HR practices enhance green motivation and proactive environmental management maturity in hotel industry?, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94.
  • Amrutha, V.N. & Geetha, S.N. (2021). Linking organizational green training and voluntary workplace green behavior: Mediating role of green supporting climate and employees’ green satisfaction, Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 1-12.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective,” Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
  • Bateman, T.S. & Crant, J.M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: a measure and correlates, Journal of organizational behavior, 14, 103-118.
  • Caracuel, J.A., Torres, N.E.H., & Correa, J.A.A. (2012). Does international experience help firms to be green? A knowledge-based view of how international experience and organisational learning influence proactive environmental strategies, International Business Review, 21(5), 847-861.
  • Dai, J., Cantor, D.E., & Montabon, F.L. (2017). Examining corporate environmental proactivity and operational performance: A strategy-structure-capabilities-performance perspective within a green context, International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 272-280.
  • Ergen, A., Bozkurt, F., & Giray, C. (2016). Activism: A Strong Predictor of Proactive Environmentally Friendly Buying Behavior in Turkey. International Journal of Research In Business and Social Science, 3, 130-142.
  • Eroymak, S., İzgüden, D., Erdem, R. (2018). “Çalışanların Yeşil Davranışının Kavramsal Çerçevede İncelenmesi”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(3), 961-971.
  • Gedik, Ö. (2020). Endüstri 4.0’ın Teknoloji Kabul Modeli Çerçevesinde Sağlık Sektörüne Yansımaları: Bir Uygulama. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Govindarajulu, N., & Daily, B.F. (2004). Motivating employees for environmental improvement, Industrial Management Data Systems, 104, 364-372. Grant, A.M. & Ashford, S.J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34.
  • Guerci, M., & Pedrini, M. (2014). The consensus between Italian HR and sustainability managers on HR management for sustainability-driven change – towards a 'strong' HR management system. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(13), 1787-1814.
  • Guerci, M., Longoni, A., & Luzzini, D. (2016). Translating stakeholder pressures into environmental performance – the mediating role of green HRM practices, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(2), 262-289.
  • Holmner, A., Rocklöv, J., Nawi, Ng., and Nilsson M. (2012). “Climate change and e-Health: a promising strategy for health sector mitigation and adaptation”, Global Health Action, 5, 1-9.
  • Jerónimo, H.M., Henriques, P.L., Lacerda, T.C., Silva, F.P., & Vieira, P.R. (2020). Going green and sustainable: The influence of green HR practices on the organizational rationale for sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 112, 413-421.
  • Kuşat, N. (2012). “Sürdürülebilir İşletmeler İçin Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik ve İçsel Unsurları”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 227-242.
  • Li, W.D., Fay, D., Frese, M., Harms, P.D., Gao, X.Y. (2014). Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality and work characteristics. A latent change score approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 948–965.
  • Liu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Seuring, S. (2017). Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity, International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 182-195.
  • Loi, R., Liu, Y., Lam, L.W., & Xu, A.J. (2016). Buffering emotional job demands: The interplay between proactive personality and team potency. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95-96, 128-137.
  • Lülfs, R., & Hahn, R. (2014). Sustainable behavior in the business sphere: Acomprehensive overview of the explanatory power of psychologicalmodels. Organization and Environment, 27(1), 43-64.
  • Mansur, F. ve Korkmaz, S. (2020). Sağlık Hizmeti Kullanıcılarının Yeşil Hastane Farkındalık Düzeylerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(3), 827-850.
  • Mo, Z., & Liu, M. (2019). Proactive Personality and Employee Workplace Green Behavior: Applying Theory of Planned Behavior.
  • Morelli, J. (2011). “Environmental sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals”, Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 1-9.
  • Neneh, B.N. (2019). From entrepreneurial intentions to behavior: The role of anticipated regret and proactive personality, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 311-324.
  • Norton, T.A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N.M. (2015). Employeegreen behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and futureresearch agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103-125.
  • Ocak, E.A. (2021). “Plastik Kirliliği”, Bilim ve Teknik Dergisi, 54(639), 24-39.
  • Paille, P. & Raineri, N. (2015). Linking perceived corporate environmental policies and employees’ eco-initiatives: the influence of perceived organizational support and psychological contract breach. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2404-2411.
  • Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., van der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., Anderton, K., Sethi, M., & Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1-16.
  • Pinhoa, C., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2020). Exploring the conditions of success in e-libraries in the higher education context through the lens of the social learning theory. Information & Management, 57(4), 1-11.
  • Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Effects of ‘green’ training on pro-environmental behaviors and job satisfaction: Evidence from the Italian healthcare sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 221-232.
  • Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Redman, T. (2016). Progressing in the change journey towards sustainability in healthcare: the role of ‘Green’ HRM, Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 201-211.
  • Pluess, M. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity, Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 138–143.
  • Sambasivan, M., Bah, S.M., & Ann, H.J. (2013). Making the case for operating “Green”: impact of environmental proactivity on multiple performance outcomes of Malaysian firms, Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 69-82.
  • Scholza, G., & Methne, N. (2020). A social learning and transition perspective on a climate change project in South Africa. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 322-335.
  • Seibert, S.E., Crant, J.M., and Kraimer, M.L. (1999). "Proactive Personality and Career Success," Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416-427.
  • Singh, S.K. & El-Kassar, A.N. (2019). Role of big data analytics in developing sustainable capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 1264-1273.
  • Su, L., and Swanson, S.R. (2019). “Perveived corporate social responsibility’s impact on the well-being and supportive green behaviors of hotel employees: The mediating role of the employee-corporate relationship”, Tourism Management, 72, 437-450.
  • Teng, H.Y & Chen, C.Y. (2019). Proactive personality and job crafting in the tourism industry: Does job resourcefulness matter?, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 41, 110-116.
  • Tidball, K.G., & Aktipis, A. (2018). Feedback enhances greening during disaster recovery: A model of social and ecological processes in neighborhood scale investment, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, 269-280.
  • Unsworth, K.L., Davis, M.C., Russell, S.V., & Bretter, C. (2021). Employee green behaviour: How organizations can help the environment, Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 1-6.
  • Van Mierlo, B., & Beers, P.J. (2018). Understanding and governing learning in sustainability transitions: a review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 255-269.
  • Vanwalleghem, D. & Mirowska, A. (2020). The investor that could and would: The effect of proactive personality on sustainable investment choice, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 26, 1-5.
  • Wang, H., Guo, T., & Tang, Q. (2021). The effect of national culture on corporate green proactivity, Journal of Business Research, 131, 140-150.
  • Wiernik, B. M., Dilchert, S., and Ones, D. S. (2016). “Age and Employee Green Behaviors: A metaanalysis”, Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1-15.
  • Yolcu, İ.U., ve Çakmak, A.F. (2017). “Proaktif Kişilik ile Proaktif Çalışma Davranışı İlişkisi Üzerinde Psikolojik Güçlendirmenin Etkisi”, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(2), 72-438.
  • Young, W., Davis, M., McNeill, I.M., Malhotra, B., Russell, S., Unsworth, K., & Clegg, C.W. (2015). Changing behaviour: Successful environmentalprogrammes in the workplace. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 689-703.
There are 47 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Fatma Mansur 0000-0002-0336-6329

Özlem Gedik 0000-0003-0840-0765

Early Pub Date April 28, 2022
Publication Date April 29, 2022
Acceptance Date October 13, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Issue: 61

Cite

APA Mansur, F., & Gedik, Ö. (2022). SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARININ PROAKTİF KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİĞİNİN YEŞİL ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞA ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(61), 17-42. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.962995

Cited By

SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARININ ÖZ ŞEFKAT DÜZEYİNİN YEŞİL DAVRANIŞA ETKİSİ: TOPLUMA ve ÇEVREYE YÖNELİK SORUMLULUĞUN ARACILIK ROLÜ
Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1398890
Sağlık Sektörü Çalışanlarının Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Farkındalık Düzeylerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Üniversite Hastanesi Örneği
Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.26745/ahbvuibfd.1239635
SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARININ YEŞİL ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ KONUSUNDAKİ FARKINDALIK DÜZEYLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1231295
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.