Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

YEŞİLE BOYAMA VE YEŞİL SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞI: ÇEVRESEL AÇIDAN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR BİR BAKIŞ AÇISI

Year 2022, Issue: 61, 407 - 436, 29.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.997078

Abstract

Çalışma, işletmelerin yeşile boyama uygulamalarına ilişkin tüketici algılarını ölçmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu kapsamda işletmelerin yeşile boyama uygulamaları ile tüketicilerin yeşil marka aşkı, yeşil marka imajı, yeşil marka sadakati ve yeşil satın alma davranışları arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın evrenini Türkiye’de yeşil ürünleri deneyimleyen tüketiciler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın veri analizi için Smart (PLS-SEM) kullanılmıştır. Gerçekleştirilen yapısal eşitlik modeli sonuçlarına göre, yeşile boyamanın yeşil satın alma davranışı, yeşil marka aşkı, yeşil marka imajı ve yeşil marka sadakati üzerinde olumsuz bir etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Diğer yandan yeşil marka aşkı, yeşil marka imajı ve yeşil marka sadakatinin yeşil satın alma davranışı üzerinde olumlu etkileri olduğu belirlenmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında yeşil marka aşkı, yeşil marka imajı ve yeşil marka sadakatinin yeşile boyama ile yeşil satın alma davranışı arasında aracılık etkisi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Gerçekleştirilen analizler neticesinde yeşil marka aşkı, yeşil marka imajı ve yeşil marka sadakatinin yeşile boyama ile yeşil satın alma davranışı arasında negatif kısmi aracılık etkisi tespit edilmiştir.

References

  • Ak, F. R., Yogendran, D., ve Mundol, A. A. (2020). Factors Influencing Green Brand Loyalty and Green Purchase Behaviour, National Institute of Technology, 14(2), 921-928.
  • Akturan, U. (2018). How does greenwashing affect green branding equity and purchase intention? An empirical research. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(7), 809-824. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-12-2017-0339
  • Alamsyah, D. P., Suhartini, T., Rahayu, Y., Setyawati, I., ve Hariyanto, O. I. B. (2018). Green advertising, green brand image and green awareness for environmental products. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 434(1), IOP Publishing.
  • Alhaddad, A. (2015). A structural model of the relationships between brand image, brand trust and brand loyalty. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 5(3), 137-144.
  • Asgharian, R., Salehi, M., Saleki, Z. S., Hojabri, R., ve Nikkheslat, M. (2012). Green product quality, green customer satisfaction, and green customer loyalty. International Journal of Research in Management & Technology, 2(5), 499-503.
  • Avcilar, M. Y., ve Demirgünes, B. K. (2017). Developing perceived greenwash index and its effect on green brand equity: A research on gas station companies in Turkey. International Business Research, 10(1), 222-239.
  • Back, K., ve Parks, S. C. (2003). A brand loyalty model involving cognitive, affective, and conative brand loyalty and customer satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 27(4), 419-435.
  • Bashir, S., Khwaja, M. G., Rashid, Y., Turi, J. A., ve Waheed, T. (2020). Green Brand Benefits and Brand Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Green Brand Image. SAGE Open, 10(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020953156
  • Bukhari, A., Rana, R. A., ve Bhatti, U. T. (2017). Factors influencing consumer’s green product purchase decision by mediation of green brand image. International Journal of Research, 4(7), 1620-1632.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
  • Carroll, B. A., ve Ahuvia, A. C. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing letters, 17(2), 79-89.
  • Chang, N. J., ve Fong, C. M. (2010). Green product quality, green corporate image, green customer satisfaction, and green customer loyalty. African journal of business management, 4(13), 2836-2844.
  • Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business ethics, 93(2), 307-319.
  • Chen, Y. S. (2013). Towards green loyalty: Driving from green perceived value, green satisfaction, and green trust. Sustainable Development, 21, 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.v21.5
  • Chen, Y. S., ve Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of business ethics, 114(3), 489-500.
  • Chen, Y. S., Huang, A. F., Wang, T. Y., ve Chen, Y. R. (2020). Greenwash and green purchase behaviour: The mediation of green brand image and green brand loyalty. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(1-2), 194-209.
  • Chen, Y. S., Hung, S. T., Wang, T. Y., Huang, A. F., ve Liao, Y. W. (2017). The influence of excessive product packaging on green brand attachment: The mediation roles of green brand attitude and green brand image. Sustainability, 9(4), 1-15.
  • Cheng, S. I. (2011). Comparisons of competing models between attitudinal loyalty and behavioral loyalty. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(10), 149-166.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Dabija, D. C., Bejan, B. M., ve Grant, D. B. (2018). The impact of consumer green behaviour on green loyalty among retail formats. Moravian geographical reports, 26(3), 173-185.
  • Delmas, M. A., ve Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California management review, 54(1), 64-87.
  • Du, X. (2015). How the market values greenwashing? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 547-574.
  • Feinstein, N. (2013). Learning from past mistakes: future regulation to prevent greenwashing. BC Envtl. Aff. L. Rev., 40(1), 229-257.
  • Ferrón‐Vílchez, V., Valero‐Gil, J., ve Suárez‐Perales, I. (2021). How does greenwashing influence managers' decision‐making? An experimental approach under stakeholder view. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 860-880.
  • Fornell, C., ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373.
  • Ghazali, E. M., Mutum, D. S., ve Ariswibowo, N. (2018). Impact of religious values and habit on an extended green purchase behaviour model. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 639-654.
  • Guo, R., Tao, L., Li, C. B., ve Wang, T. (2017). A path analysis of greenwashing in a trust crisis among Chinese energy companies: The role of brand legitimacy and brand loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 523-536.
  • Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., ve Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European business review, 26(2), 106-121.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., ve Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I-method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63-76.
  • Hameed, I., Hyder, Z., Imran, M., ve Shafiq, K. (2021). Greenwash and green purchase behavior: An environmentally sustainable perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 13113-13134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01202-1
  • Henseler, J., Hubona, G., ve Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
  • Hu, L. T., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Huang, T. L., & Liu, B. S. (2021). Augmented reality is human-like: How the humanizing experience inspires destination brand love. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120853
  • Jacoby, J., ve Chestnut, R. W. (1978). Brand Loyalty: Measurement and management. New York, Wiley.
  • Jakubczak, A., ve Gotowska, M. (2020). Green consumerism vs. greenwashing. European Research Studies Journal, 23(4), 1098-1112.
  • Joshi, Y., ve Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic management review, 3(1-2), 128-143.
  • Kanchanapibul, M., Lacka, E., Wang, X., ve Chan, H. K. (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 528-536.
  • Khan, M. S., Saengon, P., Alganad, A. M. N., Chongcharoen, D., ve Farrukh, M. (2020). Consumer green behaviour: An approach towards environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1168-1180.
  • Khandelwal, M., Sharma, A., ve Jain, V. (2019). Greenwashing: A study on the effects of greenwashing on consumer perception and trust build-up. Res. Rev. Int. J. Mult, 4, 607-612.
  • Kim, Y., ve Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. ACR North American Advances.
  • Kumar, S., Murphy, M., Talwar, S., Kaur, P., ve Dhir, A. (2021). What drives brand love and purchase intentions toward the local food distribution system? A study of social media-based REKO (fair consumption) groups. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102444
  • Latha, B., ve Akila, M. (2016). Impact of brand loyalty on purchasing behaviour of selected consumer durable goods. IJAR, 2(7), 603-606.
  • Lee, H. S. (2016). Do ethical consumers really love green brand? A comparison of Chinese and Korean consumers. The Journal of Distribution Science, 14(12), 23-30.
  • Lippert, I. (2011). Greenwashing. In P. Robbins, K. Wehr, and J. G. Golson, (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Green Culture Sage Publications, New Dehli, India
  • Lyon, T. P., ve Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3-41.
  • Malhotra, Y. (2004). Desperately Seeking Self-Determination: Key to the New Enterprise Logic of Customer Relationships, Customer Relationship Management Mini-track. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2004), New York, New York (pp. 1-8).
  • Mangini, E. R., Amaral, L. M., Conejero, M. A., ve Pires, C. S. (2020). Greenwashing Study and Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions. Consumer Behavior Review, 4(3), 229-244.
  • Marvi, M. H., Minbashrazgah, M. M., Zarei, A., ve Baghini, G. S. (2020). Knowledge foundation in green purchase behaviour: Multidimensional scaling method. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1773676
  • More, P. V. (2019). The impact of greenwashing on green brand trust from an Indian perspective. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 8(1), 162-179.
  • Mudambi, S. M., Doyle, P., ve Wong, V. (1997). An exploration of branding in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(5), 433-446.
  • Navaneethakrishnan, K., ve Sathish, A. S. (2020). It’s all about brand love-expressing through purchase intention, brand trust and brand attitude. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(4), 313-318.
  • Nekmahmud, M., ve Fekete-Farkas, M. (2020). Why not green marketing? Determinates of consumers’ intention to green purchase decision in a new developing nation. Sustainability, 12(19), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197880
  • Netto, S. V. F., Sobral, M. F. F, Ribeiro, A. R. B., ve Soares, G. R. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environ Sci Eur, 32(19), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3
  • Nguyen, T. T. H., Yang, Z., Nguyen, N., Johnson, L. W., ve Cao, T. K. (2019). Greenwash and green purchase intention: The mediating role of green skepticism. Sustainability, 11(9), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092653
  • Nunnally, J., ve Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Nur, H. (2012). The effect of customer satisfaction, customer trust on custromer loyalty of the card users of PT. Indosat tbk. In proceedings intl conf information system business competitiveness, 91-100.
  • O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & quantity, 41(5), 673-690.
  • Papista, E., ve Dimitriadis, S. (2019). Consumer-green brand relationships: revisiting benefits, relationship quality and outcomes. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(2), 166-187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2016-1316
  • Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., ve Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15-28.
  • Pimonenko, T. V., Liulov, O. V., ve Chyhryn, O. Y. (2019). Company’s image and greenwashing in the framework of green investment concept. Scientific Bulletin of the Odessa National Economic University, 2, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.32680/2409-9260-2019-2-265- 143-157
  • Qomariah, A., ve Prabawani, B. (2020). The effects of environmental knowledge, environmental concern, and green brand image on green purchase intention with perceived product price and quality as the moderating variable. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 448(1), IOP Publishing.
  • Rahmi, D. Y., Rozalia, Y., Chan, D. N., Anira, Q., ve Prima, R. (2017). Green brand image, green awareness, green advertisement, and ecological knowledge in improving green purchase intention and green purchase behavior on creative industry products. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 20(2), 177-186.
  • Sarumathi, S. (2014). Green purchase behavior-a conceptual framework of socially conscious consumer behavior. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 6(8), 777-782.
  • Selvakumar, J. J., ve Arthi, T. S. (2019). Influence of green brand image on brand loyalty-a study on leading automobile brands. Global Management Review, 13(1), 23-38.
  • Sheikh, F. Z., Mirza, A. A., Aftab, A., ve Asghar, B. (2014). Consumer green behaviour toward green products and green purchase decision. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering, 5(9), 1-9.
  • Sinisalo, C. (2020). Effect of Greenwashing on Brand Image and Buying Behaviour in Fast Fashion: A Consumer Perspective (Doktora Tezi). Erişim adresi https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/347178
  • Smith, R. A., White-McNeil, A., ve Ali, F. (2020). Students’ perceptions and behavior toward on-campus foodservice operations. International Hospitality Review, 34(1), 13-28.
  • Sönmez Çakır, F. (2020). Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (PLS-SEM) SmartPLS 3.2. Uygulamaları. Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Sreen, N., Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Tan, T. M., ve Alharbi, F. (2021). Behavioral reasoning perspectives to brand love toward natural products: Moderating role of environmental concern and household size. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102549
  • Syed Alwi, S. F., Nguyen, B., Melewar, T., Loh, Y. H., ve Liu, M. (2016). Explicating industrial brand equity: Integrating brand trust, brand performance and industrial brand image. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(5), 858-882. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS- 09-2015-0364
  • Tanford, S. (2013). The impact of tier level on attitudinal and behavioral loyalty of hotel reward program members. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 285-294.
  • Xiao, Z., Wang, Y., Ji, X., ve Cai, L. (2021). Greenwash, moral decoupling, and brand loyalty. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 49(4), 1-8.
  • Zameer, H., Wang, Y., ve Yasmeen, H. (2020). Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: implications for cleaner production in China. Journal of cleaner production, 247, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119119
  • Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., ve Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206.

GREENWASH AND GREEN PURCHASE BEHAVIOR: AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE PERSPECTIVE

Year 2022, Issue: 61, 407 - 436, 29.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.997078

Abstract

The study was carried out to measure consumer perceptions of greenwash practices of enterprises. In this context, the relationship between greenwash practices of enterprises and consumers' green brand love, green brand image, green brand loyalty and green purchase behavior were examined. The universe of the research consists of consumers who experience green products in Turkey. Smart (PLS-SEM) was used for data analysis of the research. According to the results of the structural equation model, it has been determined that greenwash has a negative effect on green purchase behavior, green brand love, green brand image and green brand loyalty. On the other hand, it has been determined that green brand love, green brand image and green brand loyalty have positive effects on green purchase behavior. Within the scope of the study, it was tried to determine the mediation effect of green brand love, green brand image and green brand loyalty between greenwash and green purchase behavior. As a result of the analyzes carried out, a negative partial mediation effect of green brand love, green brand image and green brand loyalty was found between greenwash and green purchase behavior.

References

  • Ak, F. R., Yogendran, D., ve Mundol, A. A. (2020). Factors Influencing Green Brand Loyalty and Green Purchase Behaviour, National Institute of Technology, 14(2), 921-928.
  • Akturan, U. (2018). How does greenwashing affect green branding equity and purchase intention? An empirical research. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(7), 809-824. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-12-2017-0339
  • Alamsyah, D. P., Suhartini, T., Rahayu, Y., Setyawati, I., ve Hariyanto, O. I. B. (2018). Green advertising, green brand image and green awareness for environmental products. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 434(1), IOP Publishing.
  • Alhaddad, A. (2015). A structural model of the relationships between brand image, brand trust and brand loyalty. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 5(3), 137-144.
  • Asgharian, R., Salehi, M., Saleki, Z. S., Hojabri, R., ve Nikkheslat, M. (2012). Green product quality, green customer satisfaction, and green customer loyalty. International Journal of Research in Management & Technology, 2(5), 499-503.
  • Avcilar, M. Y., ve Demirgünes, B. K. (2017). Developing perceived greenwash index and its effect on green brand equity: A research on gas station companies in Turkey. International Business Research, 10(1), 222-239.
  • Back, K., ve Parks, S. C. (2003). A brand loyalty model involving cognitive, affective, and conative brand loyalty and customer satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 27(4), 419-435.
  • Bashir, S., Khwaja, M. G., Rashid, Y., Turi, J. A., ve Waheed, T. (2020). Green Brand Benefits and Brand Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Green Brand Image. SAGE Open, 10(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020953156
  • Bukhari, A., Rana, R. A., ve Bhatti, U. T. (2017). Factors influencing consumer’s green product purchase decision by mediation of green brand image. International Journal of Research, 4(7), 1620-1632.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
  • Carroll, B. A., ve Ahuvia, A. C. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing letters, 17(2), 79-89.
  • Chang, N. J., ve Fong, C. M. (2010). Green product quality, green corporate image, green customer satisfaction, and green customer loyalty. African journal of business management, 4(13), 2836-2844.
  • Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business ethics, 93(2), 307-319.
  • Chen, Y. S. (2013). Towards green loyalty: Driving from green perceived value, green satisfaction, and green trust. Sustainable Development, 21, 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.v21.5
  • Chen, Y. S., ve Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of business ethics, 114(3), 489-500.
  • Chen, Y. S., Huang, A. F., Wang, T. Y., ve Chen, Y. R. (2020). Greenwash and green purchase behaviour: The mediation of green brand image and green brand loyalty. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(1-2), 194-209.
  • Chen, Y. S., Hung, S. T., Wang, T. Y., Huang, A. F., ve Liao, Y. W. (2017). The influence of excessive product packaging on green brand attachment: The mediation roles of green brand attitude and green brand image. Sustainability, 9(4), 1-15.
  • Cheng, S. I. (2011). Comparisons of competing models between attitudinal loyalty and behavioral loyalty. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(10), 149-166.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Dabija, D. C., Bejan, B. M., ve Grant, D. B. (2018). The impact of consumer green behaviour on green loyalty among retail formats. Moravian geographical reports, 26(3), 173-185.
  • Delmas, M. A., ve Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California management review, 54(1), 64-87.
  • Du, X. (2015). How the market values greenwashing? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 547-574.
  • Feinstein, N. (2013). Learning from past mistakes: future regulation to prevent greenwashing. BC Envtl. Aff. L. Rev., 40(1), 229-257.
  • Ferrón‐Vílchez, V., Valero‐Gil, J., ve Suárez‐Perales, I. (2021). How does greenwashing influence managers' decision‐making? An experimental approach under stakeholder view. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 860-880.
  • Fornell, C., ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373.
  • Ghazali, E. M., Mutum, D. S., ve Ariswibowo, N. (2018). Impact of religious values and habit on an extended green purchase behaviour model. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 639-654.
  • Guo, R., Tao, L., Li, C. B., ve Wang, T. (2017). A path analysis of greenwashing in a trust crisis among Chinese energy companies: The role of brand legitimacy and brand loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 523-536.
  • Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., ve Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European business review, 26(2), 106-121.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., ve Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I-method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63-76.
  • Hameed, I., Hyder, Z., Imran, M., ve Shafiq, K. (2021). Greenwash and green purchase behavior: An environmentally sustainable perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 13113-13134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01202-1
  • Henseler, J., Hubona, G., ve Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
  • Hu, L. T., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Huang, T. L., & Liu, B. S. (2021). Augmented reality is human-like: How the humanizing experience inspires destination brand love. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120853
  • Jacoby, J., ve Chestnut, R. W. (1978). Brand Loyalty: Measurement and management. New York, Wiley.
  • Jakubczak, A., ve Gotowska, M. (2020). Green consumerism vs. greenwashing. European Research Studies Journal, 23(4), 1098-1112.
  • Joshi, Y., ve Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic management review, 3(1-2), 128-143.
  • Kanchanapibul, M., Lacka, E., Wang, X., ve Chan, H. K. (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 528-536.
  • Khan, M. S., Saengon, P., Alganad, A. M. N., Chongcharoen, D., ve Farrukh, M. (2020). Consumer green behaviour: An approach towards environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1168-1180.
  • Khandelwal, M., Sharma, A., ve Jain, V. (2019). Greenwashing: A study on the effects of greenwashing on consumer perception and trust build-up. Res. Rev. Int. J. Mult, 4, 607-612.
  • Kim, Y., ve Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. ACR North American Advances.
  • Kumar, S., Murphy, M., Talwar, S., Kaur, P., ve Dhir, A. (2021). What drives brand love and purchase intentions toward the local food distribution system? A study of social media-based REKO (fair consumption) groups. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102444
  • Latha, B., ve Akila, M. (2016). Impact of brand loyalty on purchasing behaviour of selected consumer durable goods. IJAR, 2(7), 603-606.
  • Lee, H. S. (2016). Do ethical consumers really love green brand? A comparison of Chinese and Korean consumers. The Journal of Distribution Science, 14(12), 23-30.
  • Lippert, I. (2011). Greenwashing. In P. Robbins, K. Wehr, and J. G. Golson, (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Green Culture Sage Publications, New Dehli, India
  • Lyon, T. P., ve Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3-41.
  • Malhotra, Y. (2004). Desperately Seeking Self-Determination: Key to the New Enterprise Logic of Customer Relationships, Customer Relationship Management Mini-track. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2004), New York, New York (pp. 1-8).
  • Mangini, E. R., Amaral, L. M., Conejero, M. A., ve Pires, C. S. (2020). Greenwashing Study and Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions. Consumer Behavior Review, 4(3), 229-244.
  • Marvi, M. H., Minbashrazgah, M. M., Zarei, A., ve Baghini, G. S. (2020). Knowledge foundation in green purchase behaviour: Multidimensional scaling method. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1773676
  • More, P. V. (2019). The impact of greenwashing on green brand trust from an Indian perspective. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 8(1), 162-179.
  • Mudambi, S. M., Doyle, P., ve Wong, V. (1997). An exploration of branding in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(5), 433-446.
  • Navaneethakrishnan, K., ve Sathish, A. S. (2020). It’s all about brand love-expressing through purchase intention, brand trust and brand attitude. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(4), 313-318.
  • Nekmahmud, M., ve Fekete-Farkas, M. (2020). Why not green marketing? Determinates of consumers’ intention to green purchase decision in a new developing nation. Sustainability, 12(19), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197880
  • Netto, S. V. F., Sobral, M. F. F, Ribeiro, A. R. B., ve Soares, G. R. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environ Sci Eur, 32(19), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3
  • Nguyen, T. T. H., Yang, Z., Nguyen, N., Johnson, L. W., ve Cao, T. K. (2019). Greenwash and green purchase intention: The mediating role of green skepticism. Sustainability, 11(9), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092653
  • Nunnally, J., ve Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Nur, H. (2012). The effect of customer satisfaction, customer trust on custromer loyalty of the card users of PT. Indosat tbk. In proceedings intl conf information system business competitiveness, 91-100.
  • O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & quantity, 41(5), 673-690.
  • Papista, E., ve Dimitriadis, S. (2019). Consumer-green brand relationships: revisiting benefits, relationship quality and outcomes. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(2), 166-187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2016-1316
  • Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., ve Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15-28.
  • Pimonenko, T. V., Liulov, O. V., ve Chyhryn, O. Y. (2019). Company’s image and greenwashing in the framework of green investment concept. Scientific Bulletin of the Odessa National Economic University, 2, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.32680/2409-9260-2019-2-265- 143-157
  • Qomariah, A., ve Prabawani, B. (2020). The effects of environmental knowledge, environmental concern, and green brand image on green purchase intention with perceived product price and quality as the moderating variable. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 448(1), IOP Publishing.
  • Rahmi, D. Y., Rozalia, Y., Chan, D. N., Anira, Q., ve Prima, R. (2017). Green brand image, green awareness, green advertisement, and ecological knowledge in improving green purchase intention and green purchase behavior on creative industry products. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 20(2), 177-186.
  • Sarumathi, S. (2014). Green purchase behavior-a conceptual framework of socially conscious consumer behavior. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 6(8), 777-782.
  • Selvakumar, J. J., ve Arthi, T. S. (2019). Influence of green brand image on brand loyalty-a study on leading automobile brands. Global Management Review, 13(1), 23-38.
  • Sheikh, F. Z., Mirza, A. A., Aftab, A., ve Asghar, B. (2014). Consumer green behaviour toward green products and green purchase decision. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering, 5(9), 1-9.
  • Sinisalo, C. (2020). Effect of Greenwashing on Brand Image and Buying Behaviour in Fast Fashion: A Consumer Perspective (Doktora Tezi). Erişim adresi https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/347178
  • Smith, R. A., White-McNeil, A., ve Ali, F. (2020). Students’ perceptions and behavior toward on-campus foodservice operations. International Hospitality Review, 34(1), 13-28.
  • Sönmez Çakır, F. (2020). Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (PLS-SEM) SmartPLS 3.2. Uygulamaları. Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Sreen, N., Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Tan, T. M., ve Alharbi, F. (2021). Behavioral reasoning perspectives to brand love toward natural products: Moderating role of environmental concern and household size. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102549
  • Syed Alwi, S. F., Nguyen, B., Melewar, T., Loh, Y. H., ve Liu, M. (2016). Explicating industrial brand equity: Integrating brand trust, brand performance and industrial brand image. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(5), 858-882. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS- 09-2015-0364
  • Tanford, S. (2013). The impact of tier level on attitudinal and behavioral loyalty of hotel reward program members. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 285-294.
  • Xiao, Z., Wang, Y., Ji, X., ve Cai, L. (2021). Greenwash, moral decoupling, and brand loyalty. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 49(4), 1-8.
  • Zameer, H., Wang, Y., ve Yasmeen, H. (2020). Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: implications for cleaner production in China. Journal of cleaner production, 247, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119119
  • Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., ve Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206.
There are 75 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Sinan Çavuşoğlu 0000-0001-9365-8677

Bülent Demirağ 0000-0002-8718-1822

Early Pub Date April 28, 2022
Publication Date April 29, 2022
Acceptance Date February 21, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Issue: 61

Cite

APA Çavuşoğlu, S., & Demirağ, B. (2022). YEŞİLE BOYAMA VE YEŞİL SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞI: ÇEVRESEL AÇIDAN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR BİR BAKIŞ AÇISI. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(61), 407-436. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.997078

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.