Çalışmada, Ankara ili Çankaya ilçesinde mesken nitelikli bağımsız bölümlerin fiyat oluşumunda etkin olan parametreler mekânsal ekonometrik yöntemlerde En Küçük Kareler (EKK) yöntemi kullanılarak Spatial Error Model (SEM), Spatial Auto Regressive Model (SAR) ile Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) tarafından döndürülen sonuçlara göre değerlendirilmiştir. Belediyelerin en önemli gelir girdisi olarak emlak vergisinin doğru belirlenmesi bağımsız bölümün fiyatının olabildiğince doğru tahmin edilebilmesine fiyatın doğru tahmin edilebilmesi ise fiyatı oluşturan parametrelerin doğru belirlenebilmesine bağlıdır. Mekânsal ekonometrinin sonuç çıktılarından olan rho katsayısı ile belirlenen yapı stoklarının birbirlerinin fiyatına olan etkisi aracılığıyla incelenen birimdeki sosyal etkileşim de belirli bölgelerin oluşturulması esnasında göz önüne alınması gereklidir. Durbin modelinin döndürdüğü çevre etkileşimi ise hangi sosyal tabakaların hangi fiyat oluşumuna ne kadar etkin olduğunun belirlenmesinde bir araç olarak kullanılabilir. Mekânsal ekonometrik sonuçların doğru değerlendirilmesi fiyat oluşumundan sosyal tabakaların etkileşimine kadar birçok konuda karar verilebilmesine yardımcı olabilecektir. Çalışmada emlak beyan değeri üzerinde etkin parametrelerin özellikle beyan değerinin denklemden dışlanmasıyla ortaya çıktığını dolayısıyla beyan değerinin doğru olarak belirlenmesinin ne derece önemli olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Bu bağlamda belediyelerin profesyonel kurumlardan destek alması zorunluluğu da çalışmanın gayri ihtiyari sonuçlarından birisi olarak ortaya çıkmıştır.
In the study, the parameters that are effective in the price formation of residential independent sections in the Çankaya district of Ankara province were evaluated using spatial econometric methods, according to the results returned by the Least Squares (EKK), Spatial Error (SEM), Spatial Auto Regressive (SAR) and Spatial Durbin models (SDM). The correct determination of the property tax as the most important income input of the municipalities depends on the estimation of the price of the independent section as accurately as possible, and the correct estimation of the price depends on the correct determination of the parameters that make up the price. Social interaction in the examined unit through the effect of building stocks determined by the rho coefficient, which is one of the outputs of spatial econometrics, on each other's prices, should also be taken into account during the creation of certain regions. The environment interaction returned by the Durbin model can be used as a tool to determine which social layers are effective on which price formation. Accurate evaluation of spatial econometric results will help to make decisions on many issues from price formation to the interaction of social strata. In the study, it has been revealed that the effective parameters on the declared value of the real estate arise especially by excluding the declared value from the equation, so how important it is to determine the declared value correctly. In this context, the obligation of municipalities to receive support from professional institutions has emerged as one of the involuntary results of the study.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | August 28, 2022 |
Publication Date | August 30, 2022 |
Acceptance Date | June 30, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022 Issue: 62 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.