Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

INVESTIGATION OF ZERO WASTE MANAGEMENT IN TERMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS APPROACHES

Year 2023, Issue: 64, 21 - 28, 27.04.2023

Muhammed Yunus Bilgili

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1173752
Cited By: 3

Abstract

Production and consumption activities carried out in order to meet human needs cause the occurrence of waste. Processing and/or disposal of wastes without risking human and environmental health are the main purpose of waste management. Today, many countries have adopted zero waste management in order to prevent waste-related risks. Practices such as reuse, recycling and recovery of wastes within the scope of zero waste management have various effects on environmental elements. The discussions on determining which practices within the scope of zero waste management are good and bad on behalf of environment and human health make it possible to look at the issue from the perspective of environmental ethics, which systematically examines human and environment relations. This study aims to examine the zero waste management in terms of environmental ethics approaches and to determine the position of the relevant management within these approaches. Within the scope of the study, zero waste management and environmental ethics approaches were examined, and it was determined that positioning the mentioned waste management system in eco centric environmental ethics would be a more correct point of view.

Keywords

Waste Waste Management Zero Waste Environmental Ethics

References

  • Akarsu, B. (1997). Bilimsel özgürlük ve çevre etiği. R. Keleş (Ed.), İnsan çevre toplum içinde (s. 18-40). 2. Baskı. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Attfield, R. (2012). Biocentrism and artificial life. Environmental Values, 21(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327112X13225063228069
  • Barkin, J. S. (2006). Discounting the discount rate: Ecocentrism and environmental economics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(4), 56-72.
  • Bilgili, M. Y. (2021). Sıfır atık yaklaşımının kökenleri ve günümüzdeki anlamı. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(40), 683-703. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.787711
  • Buczyńska-Pizoń, N. (2020). The promotion of the zero-waste concept by ınfluencers in social media. Zarządzanie Publiczne (Public Governance), 2(52), 63-74. https://doi.org: 10.15678/ZP.2020.52.2.06
  • Callicott, J. B. (1984). Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(4), 299-309.
  • Cano, N. S. S. L., Iacovidou E. ve Rutkowski, E. W. (2022). Typology of municipal solid waste recycling value chains: A global perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 336, 130386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130386
  • Carrico, M. ve Kim, V. (2014). Expanding zero-waste design practices: A discussion paper. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 7(1), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2013.837967
  • Chen, T., Zhang, S. ve Zengwei, Y. (2020). Adoption of solid organic waste composting products: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122712
  • Chen, X., Geng, Y. ve Fujita, T. (2010). An overview of municipal solid waste management in China. Waste Management, 30, 716-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.10.011
  • Cleary, J. (2010). The incorporation of waste prevention activities into life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: Methodological issues. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 579-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0186-1
  • Curran, T. ve Williams, I. D. (2012). A zero waste vision for industrial networks in Europe. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 207-208, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.122
  • Debnath, B. (2020). The basic concept of environmental ethics. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 7(1), 385-391.
  • Demirbas, A. (2011). Waste management, waste resource facilities and waste conversion processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(2), 1280-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.025
  • Des Jardins, J. R. (2013). Environmental ethics: An introduction to environmental philosophy. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Dicks, H. (2017). Environmental ethics and biomimetic ethics: Nature as object of ethics and nature as source of ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30, 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9667-6
  • Dijkgraaf, E. ve Vollebergh, H. R. J. (2004). Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods. Ecological Economics, 50(3-4), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.029
  • Dileep, M. R. (2007). Tourism and waste management: A review of implementation of ‘zero waste’ at Kovalam. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 12(4), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941660701823314
  • Ertan, B. (2004). 2000’li yıllarda çevre etiği yaklaşımları ve Türkiye. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 93-108.
  • Fortuna, L. M. ve Diyamandoglu, V. (2017). Optimization of greenhouse gas emissions in second-hand consumer product recovery through reuse platforms. Waste Management, 66, 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.032
  • Fox, W. (2000). Introduction: Ethics and built environment. W. Fox (Ed.), Ethics and built environment içinde (s. 1-12). London: Routledge.
  • Giovanis, E. (2014). Relationship between well-being and recycling rates: Evidence from life satisfaction approach in Britain. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(2), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2014.883941
  • Giusti, L. (2009). A review of waste management practices and their ımpact on human health. Waste Management, 29(8), 2227-2239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.028
  • Gosling, J. ve Case, P. (2013). Social dreaming and ecocentric ethics: Sources of non-rational ınsight in the face of climate change catastrophe. Organization, 20(5),705-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413489814
  • Hannon, J., Zaman, A., Rittl, G., Rossi, R., Meireles, S., & Palandi, F. E. D. (2019). Moving toward zero waste cities: A nexus for international zero waste academic collaboration (NIZAC). Walter Leal Filho ve Udo Bardi (Eds.). Sustainability on University Campuses: Learning, Skills Building and Best Practices içinde (s. 379-414). Cham: Springer.
  • Hoornweg, D. ve Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. Washington: World Bank Group.
  • Jakobsen, T. G. (2017). Environmental ethics: Anthropocentrism and nonanthropocentrism revised in the light of critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(2), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2016.1265878
  • Kania, O. D. (2017). Zero waste philosophy on the example of a selection of international projects. World Scientific News, 72, 576-583.
  • Karakoç, G. (2004). Çevre sorunlarına etik yaklaşım. M. C. Marın ve U. Yıldırım (Ed.), Çevre sorunlarına çağdaş yaklaşımlar içinde (s. 59-72). İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kernohan, A. (2012). Environmental ethics: An interactive introduction. Ontario: Broadview Press.
  • Khattab, M. ve El Haggar, S. (2016). Beyond zero waste concept: A revolution for sustainable community. International Journal of Sustainable Water & Environmental Systems, 8(1), 13-19.
  • Kılıç, S. (2008). Çevre etiği. Ankara: Orion Kitabevi.
  • Lee, L. M. (2017). Bridge back to the future: Public health ethics, bioethics, and environmental ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(9), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1353164
  • Likhacheva, O. I. ve Sovetov, P. M. (2017). Methodological aspects of governing residential solid waste management sphere. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 10(4), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2017.4.52.6
  • Liu, X., Liu, G., Yang, Z., Chen, B. ve Ulgiati, S. (2016). Comparing national environmental and economic performances through emergy sustainability indicators: Moving environmental ethics beyond anthropocentrism toward ecocentrism. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1532-1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.188
  • Lundmark, C. (2007). The new ecological paradigm revisited: Anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430448
  • Martínez, F. (2017). Waste is not the end. For an anthropology of care, maintenance and repair. Social Anthropology, 25(3), 346-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12436
  • McShane, K. (2007). Anthropocentrism vs. nonanthropocentrism: Why should we care?. Environmental Values, 16(2), 169-185.
  • Mesjasz-Lech, A. (2019). Reverse logistics of municipal solid waste - towards zero waste cities. Transportation Research Procedia, 39, 320-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.034
  • Mizzoni, J. (2008). Franciscan biocentrism and the Franciscan tradition. Ethics & the Environment, 13(1), 121-134.
  • Onanuga, M. Y. ve Odunsi, O. (2018). Health is wealth: Concern for households’ solid waste self-disposal practices. Environmental Quality Management, 27, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21556
  • Pasotti, E. (2010). Sorting through the trash: The waste management crisis in Southern Italy. South European Society and Politics, 15(2), 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740903497733
  • Percival, R. (2018). Eating animals: An ecocentric perspective. The Ecological Citizen, 2(1), 33-39.
  • Pietzsch, N., Ribeiro, J. L. D. ve Medeiros, J. F. (2017). Benefits, challenges and critical factors of success for Zero Waste: A systematic literature review. Waste Management, 67, 324-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.004
  • Pigeon, L.E. ve Létourneau, L. (2014). The leading Canadian NGOs’ discourse on fish farming: From ecocentric intuitions to biocentric solutions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27, 767-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9489-8
  • Pongrácz, E. ve Pohjola, V. J. (2004). Re-defining waste, the concept of ownership and the role of waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 40, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00057-0
  • Porta, D., Milani, S., Lazzarino, A. I., Perucci, C. A. ve Forastiere, F. (2009). Systematic review of epidemiological studies on health effects associated with management of solid waste. Environmental Health, 8(60). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-8-60.
  • Preston, C. J. (2007). Re-thinking the unthinkable: Environmental ethics and the presumptive argument against geoengineering. Environmental Values, 20, 457–479.
  • Raman, N. ve Narayanan, D. S. (2008). Impact of solid waste effect on ground water and soil quality nearer to Pallavaram solid waste landfill site in Chennai. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 1(4), 828-836.
  • Reddy, J. P. (2011). Municipal solid waste management: Processing-energy recovery global examples. Hyderabad: BS Publications.
  • Rolston III, H. (2012). A new environmental ethics: The next millennium for life on earth. New York: Routledge.
  • Ross, N. (2020). Anthropocentric tendencies in environmental education: A critical discourse analysis of nature-based learning. Ethics and Education, 15(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1780550
  • Simon, J. M. (2019). A zero waste hierarchy for Europe. https://zerowasteeurope.eu/2019/05/a-zero-waste-hierarchy-for-europe/ (Erişim: 11.09.2022)
  • Singh, S., Ramakrishna, S. ve Gupta, M. K. (2017). Towards zero waste manufacturing: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1230-1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.108
  • Smith, K. K. (2018). Exploring environmental ethics: An introduction. New York: Springer.
  • T. C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. (2014). Düzenli depolama tesisleri saha yönetimi ve işletme kılavuzu. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db /destek/editordosya/ Duzenli _Depolama_Tesis_Saha_Yon_ve_isletme_kilavuzu.pdf (Erişim: 10.09.2022).
  • Taşkaya, S. (2018). Environmental quality and well-being level in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 27935-27944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2806-4
  • Taylor, P. W. (1985). Respect for nature. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press.
  • Thompson, P. B. (2005). The spirit of the soil: Agriculture and environmental ethics. London: Routledge.
  • Wienhues, A. (2022). Looking through the microscope: Microbes as a challenge for theorising biocentrism within environmental ethics. Endeavour, 46(1-2), 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2022.100819
  • Zaman, A. U. (2014). Identification of key assessment indicators of the zero waste management systems. Ecological Indicators, 36, 682-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.024
  • Zero Waste International Alliance. (2022). Zero Waste Hierarchy of Highest and Best Use 8.0. https://zwia.org/zwh/ (Erişim: 11.09.2022)
  • Zorpas, A. A. ve Lasaridi, K. (2013). Measuring waste prevention. Waste Management, 33, 1047-1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.017

SIFIR ATIK YÖNETİMİNİN ÇEVRE ETİĞİ YAKLAŞIMLARI AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Year 2023, Issue: 64, 21 - 28, 27.04.2023

Muhammed Yunus Bilgili

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1173752
Cited By: 3

Abstract

İnsan ihtiyaçlarının karşılanabilmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilen üretim ve tüketim faaliyetleri atıkların ortaya çıkmasına neden olmaktadır. Atıkların insan ve çevre sağlığını riske atmadan işlenmesi ve/ veya bertaraf edilmesi atık yönetiminin temel amacıdır. Günümüzde birçok ülke, atık kaynaklı risklerin önlenebilmesi adına sıfır atık yönetimini benimsemiştir. Sıfır atık yönetimi kapsamında gerçekleştirilen atıkların yeniden kullanılması, geri dönüştürülmesi ve kazanılması gibi uygulamaların çevresel unsurlar üzerinde çeşitli etkileri bulunmaktadır. Sıfır atık yönetimi kapsamındaki uygulamaların hangilerinin çevre ve insan sağlığı açısından iyi ve doğru olduğunun tespit edilmesine yönelik tartışmalar, konuya insan ve çevre ilişkilerini sistematik bir şekilde inceleyen çevre etiği perspektifinden bakmayı mümkün kılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, sıfır atık yönetiminin çevre etiği yaklaşımları açısından incelenmesi ve ilgili yönetimin söz konusu yaklaşımlar içerisindeki konumunun tespit edilmesidir. Çalışma kapsamında, sıfır atık yönetimi ve çevre etiği yaklaşımları incelenmiş, söz konusu atık yönetim sisteminin çevre merkezli etik yaklaşım içerisinde konumlandırılmasının daha doğru bir bakış açısı olacağı tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Atık Atık Yönetimi Sıfır Atık Çevre Etiği

References

  • Akarsu, B. (1997). Bilimsel özgürlük ve çevre etiği. R. Keleş (Ed.), İnsan çevre toplum içinde (s. 18-40). 2. Baskı. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Attfield, R. (2012). Biocentrism and artificial life. Environmental Values, 21(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327112X13225063228069
  • Barkin, J. S. (2006). Discounting the discount rate: Ecocentrism and environmental economics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(4), 56-72.
  • Bilgili, M. Y. (2021). Sıfır atık yaklaşımının kökenleri ve günümüzdeki anlamı. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(40), 683-703. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.787711
  • Buczyńska-Pizoń, N. (2020). The promotion of the zero-waste concept by ınfluencers in social media. Zarządzanie Publiczne (Public Governance), 2(52), 63-74. https://doi.org: 10.15678/ZP.2020.52.2.06
  • Callicott, J. B. (1984). Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(4), 299-309.
  • Cano, N. S. S. L., Iacovidou E. ve Rutkowski, E. W. (2022). Typology of municipal solid waste recycling value chains: A global perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 336, 130386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130386
  • Carrico, M. ve Kim, V. (2014). Expanding zero-waste design practices: A discussion paper. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 7(1), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2013.837967
  • Chen, T., Zhang, S. ve Zengwei, Y. (2020). Adoption of solid organic waste composting products: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122712
  • Chen, X., Geng, Y. ve Fujita, T. (2010). An overview of municipal solid waste management in China. Waste Management, 30, 716-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.10.011
  • Cleary, J. (2010). The incorporation of waste prevention activities into life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: Methodological issues. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 579-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0186-1
  • Curran, T. ve Williams, I. D. (2012). A zero waste vision for industrial networks in Europe. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 207-208, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.122
  • Debnath, B. (2020). The basic concept of environmental ethics. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 7(1), 385-391.
  • Demirbas, A. (2011). Waste management, waste resource facilities and waste conversion processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(2), 1280-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.025
  • Des Jardins, J. R. (2013). Environmental ethics: An introduction to environmental philosophy. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Dicks, H. (2017). Environmental ethics and biomimetic ethics: Nature as object of ethics and nature as source of ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30, 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9667-6
  • Dijkgraaf, E. ve Vollebergh, H. R. J. (2004). Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods. Ecological Economics, 50(3-4), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.029
  • Dileep, M. R. (2007). Tourism and waste management: A review of implementation of ‘zero waste’ at Kovalam. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 12(4), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941660701823314
  • Ertan, B. (2004). 2000’li yıllarda çevre etiği yaklaşımları ve Türkiye. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 93-108.
  • Fortuna, L. M. ve Diyamandoglu, V. (2017). Optimization of greenhouse gas emissions in second-hand consumer product recovery through reuse platforms. Waste Management, 66, 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.032
  • Fox, W. (2000). Introduction: Ethics and built environment. W. Fox (Ed.), Ethics and built environment içinde (s. 1-12). London: Routledge.
  • Giovanis, E. (2014). Relationship between well-being and recycling rates: Evidence from life satisfaction approach in Britain. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(2), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2014.883941
  • Giusti, L. (2009). A review of waste management practices and their ımpact on human health. Waste Management, 29(8), 2227-2239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.028
  • Gosling, J. ve Case, P. (2013). Social dreaming and ecocentric ethics: Sources of non-rational ınsight in the face of climate change catastrophe. Organization, 20(5),705-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413489814
  • Hannon, J., Zaman, A., Rittl, G., Rossi, R., Meireles, S., & Palandi, F. E. D. (2019). Moving toward zero waste cities: A nexus for international zero waste academic collaboration (NIZAC). Walter Leal Filho ve Udo Bardi (Eds.). Sustainability on University Campuses: Learning, Skills Building and Best Practices içinde (s. 379-414). Cham: Springer.
  • Hoornweg, D. ve Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. Washington: World Bank Group.
  • Jakobsen, T. G. (2017). Environmental ethics: Anthropocentrism and nonanthropocentrism revised in the light of critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(2), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2016.1265878
  • Kania, O. D. (2017). Zero waste philosophy on the example of a selection of international projects. World Scientific News, 72, 576-583.
  • Karakoç, G. (2004). Çevre sorunlarına etik yaklaşım. M. C. Marın ve U. Yıldırım (Ed.), Çevre sorunlarına çağdaş yaklaşımlar içinde (s. 59-72). İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kernohan, A. (2012). Environmental ethics: An interactive introduction. Ontario: Broadview Press.
  • Khattab, M. ve El Haggar, S. (2016). Beyond zero waste concept: A revolution for sustainable community. International Journal of Sustainable Water & Environmental Systems, 8(1), 13-19.
  • Kılıç, S. (2008). Çevre etiği. Ankara: Orion Kitabevi.
  • Lee, L. M. (2017). Bridge back to the future: Public health ethics, bioethics, and environmental ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(9), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1353164
  • Likhacheva, O. I. ve Sovetov, P. M. (2017). Methodological aspects of governing residential solid waste management sphere. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 10(4), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2017.4.52.6
  • Liu, X., Liu, G., Yang, Z., Chen, B. ve Ulgiati, S. (2016). Comparing national environmental and economic performances through emergy sustainability indicators: Moving environmental ethics beyond anthropocentrism toward ecocentrism. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1532-1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.188
  • Lundmark, C. (2007). The new ecological paradigm revisited: Anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430448
  • Martínez, F. (2017). Waste is not the end. For an anthropology of care, maintenance and repair. Social Anthropology, 25(3), 346-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12436
  • McShane, K. (2007). Anthropocentrism vs. nonanthropocentrism: Why should we care?. Environmental Values, 16(2), 169-185.
  • Mesjasz-Lech, A. (2019). Reverse logistics of municipal solid waste - towards zero waste cities. Transportation Research Procedia, 39, 320-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.034
  • Mizzoni, J. (2008). Franciscan biocentrism and the Franciscan tradition. Ethics & the Environment, 13(1), 121-134.
  • Onanuga, M. Y. ve Odunsi, O. (2018). Health is wealth: Concern for households’ solid waste self-disposal practices. Environmental Quality Management, 27, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21556
  • Pasotti, E. (2010). Sorting through the trash: The waste management crisis in Southern Italy. South European Society and Politics, 15(2), 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740903497733
  • Percival, R. (2018). Eating animals: An ecocentric perspective. The Ecological Citizen, 2(1), 33-39.
  • Pietzsch, N., Ribeiro, J. L. D. ve Medeiros, J. F. (2017). Benefits, challenges and critical factors of success for Zero Waste: A systematic literature review. Waste Management, 67, 324-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.004
  • Pigeon, L.E. ve Létourneau, L. (2014). The leading Canadian NGOs’ discourse on fish farming: From ecocentric intuitions to biocentric solutions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27, 767-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9489-8
  • Pongrácz, E. ve Pohjola, V. J. (2004). Re-defining waste, the concept of ownership and the role of waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 40, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00057-0
  • Porta, D., Milani, S., Lazzarino, A. I., Perucci, C. A. ve Forastiere, F. (2009). Systematic review of epidemiological studies on health effects associated with management of solid waste. Environmental Health, 8(60). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-8-60.
  • Preston, C. J. (2007). Re-thinking the unthinkable: Environmental ethics and the presumptive argument against geoengineering. Environmental Values, 20, 457–479.
  • Raman, N. ve Narayanan, D. S. (2008). Impact of solid waste effect on ground water and soil quality nearer to Pallavaram solid waste landfill site in Chennai. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 1(4), 828-836.
  • Reddy, J. P. (2011). Municipal solid waste management: Processing-energy recovery global examples. Hyderabad: BS Publications.
  • Rolston III, H. (2012). A new environmental ethics: The next millennium for life on earth. New York: Routledge.
  • Ross, N. (2020). Anthropocentric tendencies in environmental education: A critical discourse analysis of nature-based learning. Ethics and Education, 15(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1780550
  • Simon, J. M. (2019). A zero waste hierarchy for Europe. https://zerowasteeurope.eu/2019/05/a-zero-waste-hierarchy-for-europe/ (Erişim: 11.09.2022)
  • Singh, S., Ramakrishna, S. ve Gupta, M. K. (2017). Towards zero waste manufacturing: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1230-1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.108
  • Smith, K. K. (2018). Exploring environmental ethics: An introduction. New York: Springer.
  • T. C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. (2014). Düzenli depolama tesisleri saha yönetimi ve işletme kılavuzu. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db /destek/editordosya/ Duzenli _Depolama_Tesis_Saha_Yon_ve_isletme_kilavuzu.pdf (Erişim: 10.09.2022).
  • Taşkaya, S. (2018). Environmental quality and well-being level in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 27935-27944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2806-4
  • Taylor, P. W. (1985). Respect for nature. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press.
  • Thompson, P. B. (2005). The spirit of the soil: Agriculture and environmental ethics. London: Routledge.
  • Wienhues, A. (2022). Looking through the microscope: Microbes as a challenge for theorising biocentrism within environmental ethics. Endeavour, 46(1-2), 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2022.100819
  • Zaman, A. U. (2014). Identification of key assessment indicators of the zero waste management systems. Ecological Indicators, 36, 682-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.024
  • Zero Waste International Alliance. (2022). Zero Waste Hierarchy of Highest and Best Use 8.0. https://zwia.org/zwh/ (Erişim: 11.09.2022)
  • Zorpas, A. A. ve Lasaridi, K. (2013). Measuring waste prevention. Waste Management, 33, 1047-1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.017
There are 63 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Muhammed Yunus Bilgili 0000-0002-6062-8858

Early Pub Date April 18, 2023
Publication Date April 27, 2023
Acceptance Date February 10, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Issue: 64

Cite

APA Bilgili, M. Y. (2023). SIFIR ATIK YÖNETİMİNİN ÇEVRE ETİĞİ YAKLAŞIMLARI AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(64), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1173752

Cited By

ORTAOKUL ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE GÖRSEL SANATLAR DERSİNDEKİ ETKİNLİKLERİN ÇEVRESEL TUTUMLARINA ETKİSİ
EKEV Akademi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1549430
Hemşirelik Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Merhamet Düzeyleri ve Çevre Etiği Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişki
Bingöl Üniversitesi Sağlık Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.58605/bingolsaglik.1445035
GELENEKSEL TÜRK KADIN GİYSİLERİNDE SIFIR ATIK TASARIM YAKLAŞIMI
Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1506104
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.