Talebe Dayalı Video (TDV) hizmetleri dijitalleşmeye paralel olarak televizyon ve video izleme alışkanlıklarında da önemli bir değişimi beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu araştırmada Yozgat ilinde ikamet eden katılımcıların TDV hizmetleri kullanımına yönelik görüşleri incelenmiştir. Kullanıcıların TDV’ye abone olma nedeni ve söz konusu hizmetlerin tüketicilere sunduğu avantajların/dezavantajların belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaca ulaşmak adına nitel araştırma yöntemleri arasında yer alan nitel analiz tekniği kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada örnekleme yöntemi olarak amaçlı örnekleme yönteminin alt yöntemlerinden biri olan kolay ulaşılabilir örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında 42 TDV abonesinden yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu vasıtasıyla elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, talebe dayalı video hizmetleri ile sunulan içeriklerin zengin ve ilgi çekici olması ile TV içeriklerinin yetersiz olması en yüksek frekansa sahip abone olma nedenleri olarak belirlenmiştir. Pandemi sürecinde kapanma nedeniyle evde geçirilen sürenin fazla olması da abone olma nedenleri arasında yer almıştır. Ayrıca talebe dayalı video hizmetlerinin istenildiği zaman izlenme imkânı sunması ve zengin içeriğin olması en yüksek frekansa sahip avantajlar olarak tespit edilmiştir. TDV hizmetleri kapsamında sunulan uygun olmayan içerikli programların fazla olması, bağımlılığa neden olması ve fiyat artışlarının fazla olması ise en yüksek frekansa sahip dezavantajlar arasında yer almıştır.
Talebe Dayalı Video Hizmetleri Betimsel Analiz Tüketici Davranışları Dijitalleşme Video On-Demand Services Descriptive Analysis Consumer Behavior Digitalization.
In parallel with digitalization, Video on Demand (VOD) services have significantly changed in TV and video viewing habits. In this study, the opinions of the participants residing in Yozgat on the use of VOD services were examined. It is aimed to determine the reason for users to subscribe to VOD and the advantages/disadvantages of these services to consumers. To achieve this goal, the descriptive analysis technique, which is among the qualitative research methods, was used. In this study, an easily accessible sampling method, one of the sub-methods of the purposeful sampling method, was used as the sampling method. Within the scope of the research, the data obtained from 42 VOD subscribers through a semi-structured interview form were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, the fact that the content offered by demand-based video services is rich and exciting and the TV content is insufficient was determined as the reasons for subscribing with the highest frequency. The increased amount of time spent at home due to the closure during the pandemic was also among the reasons for subscribing. In addition, the fact that demand-based video services offer the opportunity to be watched at any time and that there is rich content has been identified as the advantages with the highest frequency. The fact that the programs with inappropriate content offered within the scope of VOD services are high, cause addiction and increase in prices are among the disadvantages with the highest frequency.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Subjects | Business Administration |
Journal Section | Makaleler |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | August 18, 2023 |
Publication Date | August 31, 2023 |
Acceptance Date | April 27, 2023 |
Published in Issue | Year 2023 Issue: 65 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.