Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE EPIDEMIC OF HAPPINESS AT WORK: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF SOCIALIZING WITH COLLEAGUES AND WORK CELEBRATIONS

Year 2023, Issue: 66, 7 - 15, 31.12.2023

Adeviye Erdoğan

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1253470

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify employees’ levels of happiness, to test whether their happiness
levels vary depending on demographic variables, to measure the contagion of happiness and to
determine whether socialization with colleagues and celebrations at work play an intermediate role in
the transmission. It is estimated that the research is very valuable, especially in working environments,
and will contribute in terms of setting up environments that can be provided for the spread of
happiness. The research was designed as a quantitative study. The study’s sample is composed of
healthcare professionals. The research had 332 health professionals as participants. The happiness and
happiness sub-dimension of emotional contagion scales, as well as the “socializing with employees”
and “celebration at work” sub-dimensions of the fun at work scale, were employed in the context of
the study. The demographic characteristics of the participants and happiness, and happiness subdimension of emotional contagion, socializing with employees, and workplace celebrations were
demonstrated to differ significantly in the research. The study’s findings revealed that happiness is
contagious among health workers and that socializing with employees has a mediating effect, but
celebrations at the workplace do not have a mediating effect on the contagion of happiness.

Keywords

Happiness Socializing with Colleagues Emotional Contagion Workplace Celebrations Healthcare Professionals

References

  • Adıgüzel, O., Erdoğan, A., ve Yalçın, B. (2015). İşyerinde yapılan sosyal kutlamalar ve örgütsel çekicilik ilişkisi. 23. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, 14-16 Mayıs, Muğla s. 952-958
  • Akın, A., Uysal, R., ve Akın, Ü. (2015). Duygusal Bulaşma Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Formu’nun geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 97–104.
  • Araz, A., ve Direkçi, E. A. (2019). Mutluluk, Üzüntü ve Öfke Dışavurum Tarzlarında Cinsiyet ve Yaş Farklılıkları. In Yeni Symposium, 57(1).
  • Aydoğan, A. (2020). Öfke Kavramı ve Sağlık Çalışanı Olmak. Türkiye Sağlık Araştırmaları Dergisi. (Turkish Journal of Health Research), 1(1), 14–22.
  • Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4).
  • Barsade, S. G., Coutifaris, C. G. V., ve Pillemer, J. (2018). Emotional contagion in organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 137–151.
  • Bilek, G. (2022). Güç Analizi ve R Uygulamaları. In Sosyal Bilimler Alanında Teori, Uygulama, Tarihsel ve Güncel Tartışmalar (p. 187).
  • Bilginoğlu, E., ve Yozgat, U. (2020). İşyerinde Eğlence: Çalışanların İşe Angaje Edilmeleri İçin Bir Yönetim Aracı mı? İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(1), 13–22.
  • Bolton, S. C., ve Houlihan, M. (2009). Are we having fun yet? A consideration of workplace fun and engagement. Employee Relations, 31(6), 556–568.
  • Bradburn, N. M., ve Noll, C. E. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Aldine.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Byrne, B. M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 427–456.
  • Cheng, H., ve Furnham, A. (2003). Personality, self-esteem, and demographic predictions of happiness and depression. Personality and individual differences, 34(6), 921-942.
  • Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 93(5), 1082.
  • Cooper‐Thomas, H. D., ve Anderson, N. (2006). Organizational socialization: A new theoretical model and recommendations for future research, HRM practices in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(5), 492–516.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M.,ve Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of happiness studies, 4, 185-199.)
  • Çirkin, Z., ve Göksel, T. (2016). Mutluluk ve gelir. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 71(2), 375-400.
  • De Neve, J. E., & Ward, G. W. (2017). Happiness at work. CEP Discussion Paper No (p. 1474).
  • Demirci, İ. ve Ekşi. H. (2018). Keep calm and be happy: A mixed method study from character strengths to well-being. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 18(29) 303–354.
  • Demirkaya, F., ve Sönmez, B. (2020). Bir Kamu Hastanesinde Çalışan Hemşirelerin Duygusal Bulaşma Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, 8(3), 802-813.
  • Dhingra, V., ve Dhingra, M. (2021). Who doesn’t want to be happy? Measuring the impact of factors influencing work–life balance on subjective happiness of doctors. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 16.
  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.
  • Diener, E., Kahneman, D., ve Helliwell, J. (2010). International Differences in Well-Being. In Google Books. Oxford University Press.
  • Doherty, R. W. (1997). The Emotional Contagion Scale: A Measure of Individual Differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 21:2, 21(2), 131–154.
  • Dutton, J. E. (2003). Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high-quality connections at work. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Eckhaus, E. (2021). The Fourth Dimension of Happiness and Work Satisfaction. Management and Marketing, 16(2), 118–133.
  • Elfenbein, H. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(4), 326-362..
  • Erdoğdu, M., Koçyiğit, M., Çinar, M., ve Uyar, M. (2018). Kişilerarası iletişim bağlamında rekreatif faaliyetlere katılan üniversite öğrencilerinin benlik saygısı ve sosyalleşme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 2022(47), 507-523.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: Book plus code for E version of text (Vol. 896). London, UK: SAGE Publications Limited.
  • Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at Work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384–412.
  • Fluegge, E. R. (2008). Who put the fun in functional? fun at work and its effects on job performance (Order No. 3322919). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (193646042). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/who-put-fun-functional-at-work-effects-on-job/docview/193646042/se-2
  • Fluegge-Woolf, E. R. (2014). Play hard, work hard: Fun at work and job performance. Management Research Review, 37(8), 682-705.
  • Ford, R. C., McLaughlin, F. S., ve Newstrom, J. W. (2003). Questions and Answers about Fun at Work. Human Resource Planning, 26(4), 1-17.
  • Gavin, J. H., ve Mason, R. O. (2004). The virtuous organization: The value of happiness in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 379–392.
  • Hair, J. ., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., ve Tatham, R. L. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
  • Hatfield, E., ve Rapson, R. L. (2010). Emotional contagion. In In I. B. Weiner ve W. E. Craighead (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Psychology, 4 th Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Hayes, A. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis A Regression-Based Approach (3.Ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Herzberg, F. (2017). Motivation to work. Routledge.
  • Kahil, A., ve Palabıyıkoğlu, N. R. (2018). İkincil Travmatik Stres. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 10(1), 59–70.
  • Karl, K., Peluchette, J., Hall-Indiana, L., ve Harland, L. (2016). Attitudes Toward Workplace Fun: A Three Sector Comparison., 12(2), 1–17.
  • Kesebir, P., ve Diener, E. (2009). In Pursuit of Happiness: Empirical Answers to Philosophical Questions. Social Indicators Research Series, 59–74.
  • Keser, A. (2018). İşte Mutluluk Araştirmasi. Paradoks Ekonomi Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, 14(1), 43-57
  • Kolb, D. A., Osland, J., ve Rubin, I. M. (1995). The organizational behavior reader. Prentice Hall.
  • Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., ve Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111(24), 8788–8790.
  • Küçüksille, E. (2014). Basit doğrusal regresyon-çoklu doğrusal regresyon modeli. In Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (pp. 199–204; 259–269). Asil Yayın.
  • Larsen, J. T., ve McKibban, A. R. (2008). Is happiness having what you want, wanting what you have, or both? Psychological Science, 19(4), 371–377.
  • Layard, R. (2011). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. Penguin UK.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
  • Limon, S. (2019). Sağlık kuruluşlarında duygusal bulaşma ve iş motivasyonu: tıbbi sekreterler üzerinde bir uygulama. Bucak İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 224–241.
  • Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). The myths of happiness: What should make you happy, but doesn’t, what shouldn’t make you happy, but does. Penguin.
  • Mak, B. C. N., Liu, Y., ve Deneen, C. C. (2012). Humor in the workplace: A regulating and coping mechanism in socialization. Discourse and Communication, 6(2), 163–179.
  • Mazzuca, S., Kafetsios, K., Livi, S. ve Presaghi F. (2019). Emotion regulation and satisfaction in long-term marital relationships: The role of emotional contagion. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 2880-2895
  • McDowell, T. (2004). Fun at work: Scale development, confirmatory factor analysis, and links to organizational outcomes (Order No. 3155834). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  • Michel, J. W., Tews, M. J., ve Allen, D. G. (2019). Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 98–110.
  • Mitchell, L., Frank, M. R., Harris, K. D., Dodds, P. S., & Danforth, C. M. (2013). The geography of happiness: Connecting twitter sentiment and expression, demographics, and objective characteristics of place. PloS one, 8(5), e64417.
  • Moreland, R. L., ve Levine., J. M. (2014). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In Groups at work (pp. 83–126). Psychology Press.
  • Nadler, R. T., Rabi, R. ve Minda, J. P. (2010). Better mood and better performance: learning rule-described categories is enhanced by positive mood. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1770-1776.
  • Nedim Bal, P., ve Gülcan, A. (2014). Genç Yetişkinlerde İyimserliğin Mutluluk ve Yaşam Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Asya Öğretim Dergisi, 2(Özel), 41–52.
  • Ory, D. T., ve Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2-3), 97–123.
  • Ozkara San, E. (2015). Concept analysis of nurses’ happiness. In Nursing Forum, 50(1), 55–62.
  • Petitta, L., Jiang, L., Hartel, E. J. C. (2017). Emotional contagion and burnout among nurses and doctors: Do joy and anger from different sources of stakeholders matter? Stress and Health, 33, 358-369.
  • Pryce-Jones, J., ve Lutterbie, S. (2010). Why leveraging the Science of Happiness at Work Matters: the happy and productive employee. Assessment & Devolepment Matters, 2,4.
  • Qaiser, S., Abid, G., Arya, B., ve Farooqi, S. (2020). Nourishing the bliss: antecedents and mechanism of happiness at work. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 31(15–16), 1669–1683.
  • Saenghiran, N. (2013). Towards Enhancing Happiness at Work: A Case Study: Ekual Keşif. Social Research Reports, 25, 21–35.
  • Schachtel, H. J. (1954). Schachtel: The real enjoyment of living - Google Scholar. Dutton.
  • Schmidt, E., ve Rosenberg, J. (2014). How google works. Grand Central Publishing.
  • Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L., ve Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work Snapshots of Thriving at Work. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 155–162.
  • Tsaur, S. H., Hsu, F. S., ve Lin, H. (2019). Workplace fun and work engagement in tourism and hospitality: The role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 131–140.
  • Verquer, M., Beehr, T., ve Wagner, S. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 473–489.
  • Wills, T. A., ve Ainette, M. C. (2012). Social networks and social support (A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. Singer (Eds.); pp. 465–492). Psychology Press.

İŞYERİNDE MUTLULUK SALGINI: ÇALIŞMA ARKADAŞLARI İLE SOSYALLEŞME VE İŞYERİNDE KUTLAMALARIN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Year 2023, Issue: 66, 7 - 15, 31.12.2023

Adeviye Erdoğan

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1253470

Abstract

Çalışmanın amacı; çalışanların mutluluk düzeylerinin tespit edilmesi, mutluluk düzeylerinin
demografik değişkenlere göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğinin test edilmesi, mutluluğun
bulaşıcılığının ölçülmesi ve mutluluğun bulaşmasında çalışma arkadaşlarıyla sosyalleşmenin ve
işyerinde yapılan kutlamaların aracılık rolü olup olmadığının belirlenmesidir. Araştırmanın, özellikle
çalışma ortamlarında mutluluğun çok değerli olduğunun ve mutluluğun yayılması için işletmelerin
çaba sarfetmesi gerektiğinin ortaya konulması açısından katkı sağlayacağı değerlendirilmektedir.
Çalışma nicel araştırma olarak tasarlanmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini sağlık çalışanları oluşturmaktadır.
Araştırmaya toplam 332 sağlık çalışanı katılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında mutluluk ölçeği, yapılan
faktör analizi sonucunda elde edilen duygusal bulaşma ölçeğinin “mutluluk” alt boyutu ile iş yerinde
eğlence ölçeğinin “çalışma arkadaşları ile sosyalleşme” ve “iş yerinde kutlama” alt boyutları kullanılmıştır.
Araştırmada katılımcıların demografik özellikleri ile mutluluk, duygusal bulaşma ölçeğinin mutluluk
alt boyutu ve çalışma arkadaşları ile sosyalleşme ve iş yerinde kutlamalar arasında anlamlı farklılıklar
tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda sağlık çalışanlarında mutluluğun bulaşıcı olduğu ve çalışma
arkadaşlarıyla sosyalleşmenin aracılık etkisi olduğu ancak işyerinde yapılan kutlamaların aracılık etkisi
olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Mutluluk Çalışma Arkadaşları ile Sosyalleşme Duygusal Bulaşma İş yeri Kutlamaları Sağlık Çalışanları

References

  • Adıgüzel, O., Erdoğan, A., ve Yalçın, B. (2015). İşyerinde yapılan sosyal kutlamalar ve örgütsel çekicilik ilişkisi. 23. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, 14-16 Mayıs, Muğla s. 952-958
  • Akın, A., Uysal, R., ve Akın, Ü. (2015). Duygusal Bulaşma Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Formu’nun geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 97–104.
  • Araz, A., ve Direkçi, E. A. (2019). Mutluluk, Üzüntü ve Öfke Dışavurum Tarzlarında Cinsiyet ve Yaş Farklılıkları. In Yeni Symposium, 57(1).
  • Aydoğan, A. (2020). Öfke Kavramı ve Sağlık Çalışanı Olmak. Türkiye Sağlık Araştırmaları Dergisi. (Turkish Journal of Health Research), 1(1), 14–22.
  • Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4).
  • Barsade, S. G., Coutifaris, C. G. V., ve Pillemer, J. (2018). Emotional contagion in organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 137–151.
  • Bilek, G. (2022). Güç Analizi ve R Uygulamaları. In Sosyal Bilimler Alanında Teori, Uygulama, Tarihsel ve Güncel Tartışmalar (p. 187).
  • Bilginoğlu, E., ve Yozgat, U. (2020). İşyerinde Eğlence: Çalışanların İşe Angaje Edilmeleri İçin Bir Yönetim Aracı mı? İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(1), 13–22.
  • Bolton, S. C., ve Houlihan, M. (2009). Are we having fun yet? A consideration of workplace fun and engagement. Employee Relations, 31(6), 556–568.
  • Bradburn, N. M., ve Noll, C. E. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Aldine.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Byrne, B. M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 427–456.
  • Cheng, H., ve Furnham, A. (2003). Personality, self-esteem, and demographic predictions of happiness and depression. Personality and individual differences, 34(6), 921-942.
  • Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 93(5), 1082.
  • Cooper‐Thomas, H. D., ve Anderson, N. (2006). Organizational socialization: A new theoretical model and recommendations for future research, HRM practices in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(5), 492–516.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M.,ve Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of happiness studies, 4, 185-199.)
  • Çirkin, Z., ve Göksel, T. (2016). Mutluluk ve gelir. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 71(2), 375-400.
  • De Neve, J. E., & Ward, G. W. (2017). Happiness at work. CEP Discussion Paper No (p. 1474).
  • Demirci, İ. ve Ekşi. H. (2018). Keep calm and be happy: A mixed method study from character strengths to well-being. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 18(29) 303–354.
  • Demirkaya, F., ve Sönmez, B. (2020). Bir Kamu Hastanesinde Çalışan Hemşirelerin Duygusal Bulaşma Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, 8(3), 802-813.
  • Dhingra, V., ve Dhingra, M. (2021). Who doesn’t want to be happy? Measuring the impact of factors influencing work–life balance on subjective happiness of doctors. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 16.
  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.
  • Diener, E., Kahneman, D., ve Helliwell, J. (2010). International Differences in Well-Being. In Google Books. Oxford University Press.
  • Doherty, R. W. (1997). The Emotional Contagion Scale: A Measure of Individual Differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 21:2, 21(2), 131–154.
  • Dutton, J. E. (2003). Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high-quality connections at work. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Eckhaus, E. (2021). The Fourth Dimension of Happiness and Work Satisfaction. Management and Marketing, 16(2), 118–133.
  • Elfenbein, H. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(4), 326-362..
  • Erdoğdu, M., Koçyiğit, M., Çinar, M., ve Uyar, M. (2018). Kişilerarası iletişim bağlamında rekreatif faaliyetlere katılan üniversite öğrencilerinin benlik saygısı ve sosyalleşme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 2022(47), 507-523.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: Book plus code for E version of text (Vol. 896). London, UK: SAGE Publications Limited.
  • Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at Work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384–412.
  • Fluegge, E. R. (2008). Who put the fun in functional? fun at work and its effects on job performance (Order No. 3322919). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (193646042). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/who-put-fun-functional-at-work-effects-on-job/docview/193646042/se-2
  • Fluegge-Woolf, E. R. (2014). Play hard, work hard: Fun at work and job performance. Management Research Review, 37(8), 682-705.
  • Ford, R. C., McLaughlin, F. S., ve Newstrom, J. W. (2003). Questions and Answers about Fun at Work. Human Resource Planning, 26(4), 1-17.
  • Gavin, J. H., ve Mason, R. O. (2004). The virtuous organization: The value of happiness in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 379–392.
  • Hair, J. ., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., ve Tatham, R. L. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
  • Hatfield, E., ve Rapson, R. L. (2010). Emotional contagion. In In I. B. Weiner ve W. E. Craighead (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Psychology, 4 th Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Hayes, A. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis A Regression-Based Approach (3.Ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Herzberg, F. (2017). Motivation to work. Routledge.
  • Kahil, A., ve Palabıyıkoğlu, N. R. (2018). İkincil Travmatik Stres. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 10(1), 59–70.
  • Karl, K., Peluchette, J., Hall-Indiana, L., ve Harland, L. (2016). Attitudes Toward Workplace Fun: A Three Sector Comparison., 12(2), 1–17.
  • Kesebir, P., ve Diener, E. (2009). In Pursuit of Happiness: Empirical Answers to Philosophical Questions. Social Indicators Research Series, 59–74.
  • Keser, A. (2018). İşte Mutluluk Araştirmasi. Paradoks Ekonomi Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, 14(1), 43-57
  • Kolb, D. A., Osland, J., ve Rubin, I. M. (1995). The organizational behavior reader. Prentice Hall.
  • Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., ve Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111(24), 8788–8790.
  • Küçüksille, E. (2014). Basit doğrusal regresyon-çoklu doğrusal regresyon modeli. In Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (pp. 199–204; 259–269). Asil Yayın.
  • Larsen, J. T., ve McKibban, A. R. (2008). Is happiness having what you want, wanting what you have, or both? Psychological Science, 19(4), 371–377.
  • Layard, R. (2011). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. Penguin UK.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
  • Limon, S. (2019). Sağlık kuruluşlarında duygusal bulaşma ve iş motivasyonu: tıbbi sekreterler üzerinde bir uygulama. Bucak İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 224–241.
  • Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). The myths of happiness: What should make you happy, but doesn’t, what shouldn’t make you happy, but does. Penguin.
  • Mak, B. C. N., Liu, Y., ve Deneen, C. C. (2012). Humor in the workplace: A regulating and coping mechanism in socialization. Discourse and Communication, 6(2), 163–179.
  • Mazzuca, S., Kafetsios, K., Livi, S. ve Presaghi F. (2019). Emotion regulation and satisfaction in long-term marital relationships: The role of emotional contagion. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 2880-2895
  • McDowell, T. (2004). Fun at work: Scale development, confirmatory factor analysis, and links to organizational outcomes (Order No. 3155834). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  • Michel, J. W., Tews, M. J., ve Allen, D. G. (2019). Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 98–110.
  • Mitchell, L., Frank, M. R., Harris, K. D., Dodds, P. S., & Danforth, C. M. (2013). The geography of happiness: Connecting twitter sentiment and expression, demographics, and objective characteristics of place. PloS one, 8(5), e64417.
  • Moreland, R. L., ve Levine., J. M. (2014). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In Groups at work (pp. 83–126). Psychology Press.
  • Nadler, R. T., Rabi, R. ve Minda, J. P. (2010). Better mood and better performance: learning rule-described categories is enhanced by positive mood. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1770-1776.
  • Nedim Bal, P., ve Gülcan, A. (2014). Genç Yetişkinlerde İyimserliğin Mutluluk ve Yaşam Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Asya Öğretim Dergisi, 2(Özel), 41–52.
  • Ory, D. T., ve Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2-3), 97–123.
  • Ozkara San, E. (2015). Concept analysis of nurses’ happiness. In Nursing Forum, 50(1), 55–62.
  • Petitta, L., Jiang, L., Hartel, E. J. C. (2017). Emotional contagion and burnout among nurses and doctors: Do joy and anger from different sources of stakeholders matter? Stress and Health, 33, 358-369.
  • Pryce-Jones, J., ve Lutterbie, S. (2010). Why leveraging the Science of Happiness at Work Matters: the happy and productive employee. Assessment & Devolepment Matters, 2,4.
  • Qaiser, S., Abid, G., Arya, B., ve Farooqi, S. (2020). Nourishing the bliss: antecedents and mechanism of happiness at work. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 31(15–16), 1669–1683.
  • Saenghiran, N. (2013). Towards Enhancing Happiness at Work: A Case Study: Ekual Keşif. Social Research Reports, 25, 21–35.
  • Schachtel, H. J. (1954). Schachtel: The real enjoyment of living - Google Scholar. Dutton.
  • Schmidt, E., ve Rosenberg, J. (2014). How google works. Grand Central Publishing.
  • Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L., ve Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work Snapshots of Thriving at Work. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 155–162.
  • Tsaur, S. H., Hsu, F. S., ve Lin, H. (2019). Workplace fun and work engagement in tourism and hospitality: The role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 131–140.
  • Verquer, M., Beehr, T., ve Wagner, S. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 473–489.
  • Wills, T. A., ve Ainette, M. C. (2012). Social networks and social support (A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. Singer (Eds.); pp. 465–492). Psychology Press.
There are 70 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Adeviye Erdoğan 0000-0002-5996-7334

Early Pub Date December 30, 2023
Publication Date December 31, 2023
Acceptance Date July 19, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Issue: 66

Cite

APA Erdoğan, A. (2023). İŞYERİNDE MUTLULUK SALGINI: ÇALIŞMA ARKADAŞLARI İLE SOSYALLEŞME VE İŞYERİNDE KUTLAMALARIN ARACILIK ROLÜ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(66), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1253470
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.