Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

ORGANİK GIDAYA DAİR GÜVEN UNSURLARININ TÜKETİCİLERİN SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞINA ETKİSİ

Year 2024, Issue: 68, 37 - 47, 31.08.2024

İbrahim Yemez , Tuğba Delice Akca

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1376067

Abstract

Organik ürün, içeriğinde kimyasal maddeler ve sağlığa zararlı unsurlar barındırmayan ve daha çok gıda ürünleri için kullanılan bir kavramdır. Organik ürün pazarı da her geçen gün büyümektedir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada organik ürüne dair güven unsurlarının tüketicilerin satın alma davranışı üzerindeki etkisi faydacı tüketim açısından ele alınmak istenmiştir. Bu amaçla 1-30 Haziran 2021 tarihlerinde 18 yaşından büyük, toplam 366 kişiden çevrimiçi anket tekniği ile veriler toplanmıştır. Elde edilen verilere ilk olarak Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi uygulanmıştır. Bu analizle kullanılan ölçeğin uyum ve ayrışma geçerliliği ile iç tutarlılığı ortaya konmuş ve ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu görülmüştür. Daha sonra araştırma modeli YEM altında Yol Analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Analiz sonucunda organik gıda etiketi, yüksek fiyat ve yerli üretim değişkenlerinin faydacı tüketimi olumlu anlamda etkilediği ve ayrıca faydacı tüketim davranışının da satın alma davranışını olumlu yönde etkilediği bulunmuştur. Ancak çevresel bilinç ve sağlık içeriği değişkenlerinin hem faydacı tüketim hem de satın alma davranışı üzerinde doğrudan ve dolaylı, anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı bulunmuştur.

Keywords

Organik Gıda Yerli Üretim Sağlık İçeriği Faydacı Tüketim

References

  • Abdullah, F.A., Saidi, S.F.S., Abu Bakar, T.H.S.T. and Young, L. J. (2022). The level of buying behaviour towards organic food among Malays consumers. 4th International Conference on Tropical Resources and Sustainable Sciences. 1-7. Doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1102/1/012051
  • Alamsyah, D.P. and Angliawati, R.Y. (2015). Buying behavior of organic vegetables product: The effects of perceptions of quality and risk. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4 (12), 28-35.
  • Alshammari, E.H. (2020). Factors influencing organic food purchase intention in an emergent market: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabia. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5 (6), 1-8. Al-Waseti, L. and İrfanoğlu, M. (2022). The effect of consumption value on organic food purchase intention with the mediating role of consumer involvement. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 12 (1), 177-191. DOI: 10.7456/11201100/008
  • Annunziata, A. and Vecchio, R. (2016). Organic farming and sustainability in food choices: An analysis of consumer preference in Southern Italy. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.093.
  • Asif, M., Xuhui, W., Nasiri, A. and Ayyub, S. (2018). Determinant factors influencing organic food purchase intention and the moderating role of awareness: A comparative analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 63, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.08.006
  • Ayyub, S., Wang, X., Asif, M. and Ayyub, R. M. (2018). Antecedents of trust in organic foods: The mediating role of food related personality traits. Sustainability, 10, 3597. doi: 10.3390/su10103597
  • Bai, S., Zhang, X., Han, C. and Yu, D. (2023). Research on the influence mechanism of organic food attributes on customer trust. Sustainability, 15, 6733. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086733
  • Başkaya Sezer, D., Kılıç, O. ve Başer, U. (2023). The preferences of consumers for organic food products: The case of Samsun province in Türkiye. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10 (1), 60-67. doi: 10.19159/tutad.1232752
  • Bauer, H.H., Heinrich, D. and Schäfer, D.B. (2013). The effects of organic labels on global, local, and private brands: More hype than substance. Journal of Business Research. 66 (8), 1035-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.028
  • Canova, L., Bobbio, A. and Manganelli, A.M. (2020). Buying organic food products: The role of trust in the theory of planned behavior, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575820, 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575820
  • Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295–358).
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Curvelo, I. C. G., de Morais Watanabe, E. A. and Alfinito, S. (2019). Purchase intention of organic food under the influence of attributes, consumer trust and perceived value. Revista de Gestão. 26 (3), 198–211. DOI:10.1108/REGE-01-2018-0010
  • Çelik, S. (2013). Kimler, neden organik gıda satın alıyor? Bir alan araştırması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (30), 93-108.
  • Çetin, O. ve Sain, A.D., (2018). Lojistik Sektöründe Sürdürülebilirlik Uygulamaları, IV. International Caucasus-Central Asia Foreign Trade and Logistics Congress September, 7-8, Didim/AYDIN, 910-921.
  • Daunfeldt, S.O. and Rudholm, N. (2014). Does shelf-labeling of organic foods increase sales? Results from a natural experiment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21 (5), 804-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.06.009
  • Denver, S. and Jensen, J.D. (2014). Consumer preferences for organically and locally produced apples. Food Quality and Preference, 31, 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.014
  • Denver, S., Christensen, T., Nordström, J., Ditlevsen, K., Jensen, J. D. and Sandøe, P. (2022). Dietary priorities and consumers’ views of the healthiness of organic food: Purity or flexibility? Org. Agr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-022-00396-0
  • Ditlevsen, K., Sandoe, P. and Lassen, J. (2019). Healthy food is nutritious, but organic food is healthy because it is pure: The negotiation of healthy food choices by Danish consumers of organic food. Food Quality Preference, 71, 46–53. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.001
  • Doan, H.Q. (2021). Critical factors affecting consumer buying behaviour of organic vegetables in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(9), 333–340. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no9.0333
  • Doğan, D. (2019). SmartPLS ile Veri Analizi, Zet Yayınları, 2. Baskı, Ankara.
  • Essoussi L. H. and Zahaf M. (2009). Exploring the decision-making process of Canadian organic food consumers. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 12 (4), 443–459.
  • Fatimah, Wulandari, D. and Suryaningsih, I.B. (2019). The importance of customer trust for the growth of organic product consumption. IJCIRAS, 2 (7). 5-9.
  • Fernqvist, F. and Ekelund, L. (2014). Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food – A review. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 340-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.005
  • Ferreira, S. and Pereira, O. (2023). Antecedents of consumers’ intention and behavior to purchase organic food in the Portuguese context. Sustainability, 15, 9670. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129670
  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
  • Giampietri, E., Verneau, F., Del Giudice, T., Carfora, V. and Finco, A. (2018). A theory of planned behaviour perspective for investigating the role of trust in consumer purchasing decision related to short food supply chains. Food Qualities Prefer. 64, 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.09.012
  • Grolleau, G. and Caswell, J.A. (2006). Interaction between food attributes in markets: The case of environmental labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics, 36, 471–484
  • Gupta, P., Gupta, S., Saini, P. and Jindal, A.K. (2021). A Study of Factors Identifying Intention to Purchase Organic Products. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 13(1), 21-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.37622/GJFM/13.1.2021.21-32
  • Goetzke, B., Nitzko, S. and Spiller, A. (2014). Consumption of organic and functional food: A matter of well-being and Health. Appetite, 77, 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.012
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L. (2016). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
  • Hansmann, R., Baur, I. and Binder, C. R. (2020). Increasing organic food consumption: An integrating model of drivers and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 123058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123058
  • Henseler, J., Christian M.R. and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discirimant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135
  • Khanal, A. R., Mishra, S. K. and Honey, U. (2018). Certified organic food production, financial performance, and farm size: An unconditional quantile regression approach. Land Use Policy, 78, 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.012
  • Kledal, P.R., Sirieix, L., El-Naggar, A.H. and Auersalmi, M. (2011). Organic food consumers’ trade-offs between local or imported, conventional or organic products in the Egyptian Metropolis of Cairo. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, Vol. 6 Nos 2-3, 26-48.
  • Krystallis, A. and Chryssohoidis G. (2005). Consumers’ willingness to pay for organic food. British Food Journal, 107 (5), 320–343. DOI:10.1108/00070700510596901
  • Konuk, F. (2018). The role of store image, perceived quality, trust and perceived value in predicting consumers’ purchase intentions towards organic private label food. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.04.011
  • Köse, Ş.G. (2020). Is organic food a sustainable choice? Evaluating organic food production in the framework of environmental sustainability. BMIJ, 8 (4), 685-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i4.1579
  • Kvatchadze, S. ve Akıncı, S. (2018). Sağlık bilinci, çevre bilinci ve organik gıda bilgisinin satın alma niyetine organik gıdalara yönelik tutum aracılığıyla etkisi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (37), 158-183.
  • Ladwein, R. and Romero, A.M.S. (2021). The role of trust in the relationship between consumers, producers and retailers of organic food: A sector-based approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60. 1-25.
  • Labbe, D., Ferrage, A., Rytz, A., Pace, J. and Martin, N. (2015). Pleasantness, emotions and perceptions induced by coffee beverage experience depend on the consumption motivation (hedonic or utilitarian). Food Quality and Preference, 44, 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.03.017
  • Laureti, T. and Benedetti, I. (2018). Exploring pro-environmental food purchasing behaviour: An empirical analysis of Italian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3367-3378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.086
  • Lea, E. and Worsley, T. (2005). Australians’ organic food beliefs, demographics and values. British Food Journal, 107 (11), 855-869.
  • Lee, H.J. and Hwang, J. (2016). The driving role of consumers’ perceived credence attributes in organic food purchase decisions: A comparison of two groups of consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 54, 141 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.011
  • Lee, T.H., Fu, C.-J. and Chen, Y.Y. (2019). Trust factors for organic foods: Consumer buying behavior. British Food Journal, 122 (2), 414-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0195
  • Mahongnao, M. (2022). Factors influencing organic food purchase of young Indian consumers. Research Square. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1457928/v1
  • Meyerding, S.G. and Merz, N. (2018). Consumer preferences for organic labels in Germany using the example of apples – Combining choice-based conjoint analysis and eye-tracking measurements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 772-783.
  • Muhammad, S., Fathelrahman, E. and Ullah, R.U. (2015). Factors affecting consumers’ willingness to pay for certified organic food products in United Arab Emirates. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 46 (1), 37-45.
  • Murphy, B., Martini, M., Fedi, A., Loera, B. L., Elliott, C. T. and Dean, M. (2022). Consumer trust in organic food and organic certifications in four European countries. Food Control, 133, 108484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108484
  • Müller, C.E. and Gaus, H. (2015). Consumer response to negative media information about certified organic food products. Journal of Consumer Policy, 38 (4), 387-409.
  • Mondelaers, K. (2009). Importance of health and environment as quality traits in the buying decision of organic products. British Food Journal, 111 (10), 1120-1139, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700910992952
  • Moser, R., Raffaelli, R. and Thilmany-McFadden, D. (2011). Consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables with credence-based attributes: A review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14 (2), 121-142.
  • Nagy, L.B. and Temesi, Z.L.A. (2022). Is it really organic? Credibility factors of organic food– A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE 17 (4), e0266855. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266855
  • Naspetti, S. and Bodini, A. (2008). Consumer perception of local and organic products: Substitution or complementary goods?. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3 (2), 111– 122. DOI:10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v03i02/52526
  • Nguyen, T.M., Park, J.H. and Choi, W.L. (2021). Factors influencing consumer purchase intention toward organic food products: An empirical study in Vietnam market. Journal of Channel and Retailing, 26 (1), 127-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.17657/jcr.2021.01.31.6
  • Nuttavuthisit, K. and Thøgersen, J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics, 140 (2), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5
  • Pattweekongka, S. (2022). Organic food brand trust and brand loyalty: Evidence from Thailand. AgBioForum, 24 (1), 129-133.
  • Padel S. and Foster C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour. British Food Journal, 107 (8), 606–625. DOI:10.1108/00070700510611002
  • Pereira, B.M., Silva, C.R.M.D. Sobreira, É.M.C. and Oliveira, L.V.C. (2022). Intention to purchase organic food with certification label: Do trust and coolness matter? Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 16 (3). 1-15. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v16n3-
  • Prada, M., Rodrigues, D. and Garrido, M.V. (2016). Deliberate choices or strong motives: Exploring the mechanisms underlying the bias of organic claims on leniency judgments. Appetite, 103, 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.012
  • Prakash, G., Singh, P.K., Ahmad, A. and Kumar, G. (2023). Trust, convenience and environmental concern in consumer purchase intention for organic food. Spanish Journal of Marketing. DOI 10.1108/SJME-09-2022-0201
  • Rana, J. and Paul, J. (2017). Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. Journal of Retailing Consumer Services, 38, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.004
  • Ratan, S.R.A., Tat, H.H., Latiff, A.S.A. and Nadarajah, D. (2021). Achieving favourable organic food purchase behavior through the mediating role of healthy lifestyle: A perspective of health economics. Studies Applied Economics, Volume 39-10. 1-11. DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i10.6046
  • Ricci, E. C., Banterle, A. and Stranieri, S. (2018). Trust to go green: An exploration of consumer intentions for eco-friendly convenience food. Ecological Economics 148, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.010
  • Rousseau, S. and Vranken, L. (2013). Green market expansion by reducing information asymmetries: Evidence for labeled organic food products. Food Policy, 40, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.01.006
  • Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. and Mayerhofer, T. (2017). What is this thing called organic? How organic farming is codified in regulations. Food Policy, 68, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.009
  • Seydioğulları, H.S. (2013). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma için yenilenebilir enerji, Planlama, 23(1), 19-25. doi: 10.5505/planlama.2013.14633
  • Shaharudin, M.R., Pani, J.J., Mansor, S.W. and Elias, S.J. (2010). Factors affecting purchase intention of organic food in Malaysia’s Kedah State, Cross-Cultural Communication, 6 (2), 105-116.
  • Söğüt, B., İnci, H., Taysı, M.R. ve Karakaya, E. (2020). Organik yumurta tüketim eğilimleri ve tüketici özelliklerinin belirlenmesi (Bingöl ili kent merkezi örneği). Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Engineering, Natural & Medical Sciences, 7 (13), 181-199. DOI: 10.38065/euroasiaorg.428
  • Sultan, P., Tarafder, T., Pearson, D. and Henryks, J. (2020). Intention-behaviour gap and perceived behavioural control-behaviour gap in theory of planned behaviour: Moderating roles of communication, satisfaction and trust in organic food consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 81, 103838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103838
  • Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Kushwah, S. and Salo, J. (2020). Why do people buy organic food? The moderating role of environmental concerns and trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102247, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102247
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve Spss ile veri analizi. Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Thorsøe, M.H. (2015). Maintaining trust and credibility in a continuously evolving organic food system. Journal Agric. Environ. Ethics, 28, 767–787. DOI 10.1007/s10806-015-9559-6S
  • Tsakiridou, E., Boutsouki, C., Zotos, Y., and Mattas, K. (2008). Attitudes and behaviour towards organic products: An exploratory study. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(2), 158-175. DOI 10.1108/09590550810853093
  • Ueasangkomsate, P. and Santiteerakul, S. (2016). A study of consumers’ attitudes and intention to buy organic foods for sustainability. Procedia Environmental Sciences 34, 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENV.2016.04.037
  • Van Loo, E.J., Caputo, V., Nayga, R.M. and Verbeke, W. (2014). Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy, 49, 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.002
  • Vermeir, I. and Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer ‘attitude-behavioural intention’ gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19 (2), 169-194.
  • Vega-Zamora, M., Torres-Ruiz, F.J. and Parras-Rosa, M. (2019). Towards sustainable consumption: Keys to communication for improving trust in organic foods. Journal of Cleaner Production 216, 511-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.129
  • Yadav, R. (2016). Altruistic or egoistic: Which value promotes organic food consumption among young consumers? A study in the context of a developing nation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.008
  • Yadav, R. and Pathak, G. S. (2016). Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers: Evidences from a developing nation. Appetite, 96, 122-128.
  • Yaşar, M. (2017). Hedonik ve faydacı tüketim bağlamında tüketici davranışlarının incelenmesi: Gençlerin hedonik tüketim eğilimlerini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi.
  • Yaşlıoğlu, M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(0), 74-85. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuisletme/issue/32177/357061
  • Yavuz, V.A. (2010). Sürdürülebilirlik kavramı ve işletmeler açısından sürdürülebilir üretim stratejileri, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 63-86.
  • Yazdanpanah, M. and Forouzani, M. (2015). Application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict Iranian students’ intention to purchase organic Food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 342 352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.071
  • Yiridoe, E.K., Bonti-Ankomah, S. and Martin, R.C. (2005). Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference towards organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 20 (4), 193-205.
  • Yu, Y., He, Y., Zhao, X. and Zhou, L. (2019). Certify or not? An analysis of organic food supply chain with competing suppliers. Annals of Operations Research, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03465-y
  • Yuan, X. and Xiao, Y. (2021). Cognition, value perception and purchase intention of organic food—Evidence from China’s organic milk market. Sustainability, 13, 910. 1- 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020910
  • Zander, K. and Hamm, U. (2010). Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 21 (5), 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.01.006

THE EFFECT OF TRUST FACTORS İN ORGANİC FOOD ON CONSUMERS' PURCHASİNG BEHAVİOR

Year 2024, Issue: 68, 37 - 47, 31.08.2024

İbrahim Yemez , Tuğba Delice Akca

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1376067

Abstract

Organic product is a concept that does not contain chemicals or harmful elements and is mostly used for food products. The organic product market is also growing day by day. In this context, this study aimed to discuss the impact of trust factors regarding organic products on consumers' purchasing behavior from a utilitarian consumption perspective. For this purpose, data was collected via online survey technique from a total of 366 people over the age of 18 between 1-30 June 2021. First,Confirmatory Factor Analysis was applied to the data obtained. With this analysis, the convergent and discriminant validity and internal consistency of the scale used were demonstrated and the scale was found to be valid and reliable. Then, the research model was subjected to Path Analysis under SEM. As a result of the analysis, it was found that organic food label, high price and domestic production variables positively affected utilitarian consumption, and also utilitarian consumption behavior positively affected purchasing behavior. However, it was found that environmental awareness and health content variables did not have a significant direct or indirect effect on both utilitarian consumption and purchasing behavior.

Keywords

Organic Food Domestic Production Health Content Utilitarian Consumption

References

  • Abdullah, F.A., Saidi, S.F.S., Abu Bakar, T.H.S.T. and Young, L. J. (2022). The level of buying behaviour towards organic food among Malays consumers. 4th International Conference on Tropical Resources and Sustainable Sciences. 1-7. Doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1102/1/012051
  • Alamsyah, D.P. and Angliawati, R.Y. (2015). Buying behavior of organic vegetables product: The effects of perceptions of quality and risk. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4 (12), 28-35.
  • Alshammari, E.H. (2020). Factors influencing organic food purchase intention in an emergent market: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabia. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5 (6), 1-8. Al-Waseti, L. and İrfanoğlu, M. (2022). The effect of consumption value on organic food purchase intention with the mediating role of consumer involvement. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 12 (1), 177-191. DOI: 10.7456/11201100/008
  • Annunziata, A. and Vecchio, R. (2016). Organic farming and sustainability in food choices: An analysis of consumer preference in Southern Italy. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.093.
  • Asif, M., Xuhui, W., Nasiri, A. and Ayyub, S. (2018). Determinant factors influencing organic food purchase intention and the moderating role of awareness: A comparative analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 63, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.08.006
  • Ayyub, S., Wang, X., Asif, M. and Ayyub, R. M. (2018). Antecedents of trust in organic foods: The mediating role of food related personality traits. Sustainability, 10, 3597. doi: 10.3390/su10103597
  • Bai, S., Zhang, X., Han, C. and Yu, D. (2023). Research on the influence mechanism of organic food attributes on customer trust. Sustainability, 15, 6733. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086733
  • Başkaya Sezer, D., Kılıç, O. ve Başer, U. (2023). The preferences of consumers for organic food products: The case of Samsun province in Türkiye. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10 (1), 60-67. doi: 10.19159/tutad.1232752
  • Bauer, H.H., Heinrich, D. and Schäfer, D.B. (2013). The effects of organic labels on global, local, and private brands: More hype than substance. Journal of Business Research. 66 (8), 1035-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.028
  • Canova, L., Bobbio, A. and Manganelli, A.M. (2020). Buying organic food products: The role of trust in the theory of planned behavior, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575820, 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575820
  • Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295–358).
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Curvelo, I. C. G., de Morais Watanabe, E. A. and Alfinito, S. (2019). Purchase intention of organic food under the influence of attributes, consumer trust and perceived value. Revista de Gestão. 26 (3), 198–211. DOI:10.1108/REGE-01-2018-0010
  • Çelik, S. (2013). Kimler, neden organik gıda satın alıyor? Bir alan araştırması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (30), 93-108.
  • Çetin, O. ve Sain, A.D., (2018). Lojistik Sektöründe Sürdürülebilirlik Uygulamaları, IV. International Caucasus-Central Asia Foreign Trade and Logistics Congress September, 7-8, Didim/AYDIN, 910-921.
  • Daunfeldt, S.O. and Rudholm, N. (2014). Does shelf-labeling of organic foods increase sales? Results from a natural experiment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21 (5), 804-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.06.009
  • Denver, S. and Jensen, J.D. (2014). Consumer preferences for organically and locally produced apples. Food Quality and Preference, 31, 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.014
  • Denver, S., Christensen, T., Nordström, J., Ditlevsen, K., Jensen, J. D. and Sandøe, P. (2022). Dietary priorities and consumers’ views of the healthiness of organic food: Purity or flexibility? Org. Agr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-022-00396-0
  • Ditlevsen, K., Sandoe, P. and Lassen, J. (2019). Healthy food is nutritious, but organic food is healthy because it is pure: The negotiation of healthy food choices by Danish consumers of organic food. Food Quality Preference, 71, 46–53. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.001
  • Doan, H.Q. (2021). Critical factors affecting consumer buying behaviour of organic vegetables in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(9), 333–340. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no9.0333
  • Doğan, D. (2019). SmartPLS ile Veri Analizi, Zet Yayınları, 2. Baskı, Ankara.
  • Essoussi L. H. and Zahaf M. (2009). Exploring the decision-making process of Canadian organic food consumers. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 12 (4), 443–459.
  • Fatimah, Wulandari, D. and Suryaningsih, I.B. (2019). The importance of customer trust for the growth of organic product consumption. IJCIRAS, 2 (7). 5-9.
  • Fernqvist, F. and Ekelund, L. (2014). Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food – A review. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 340-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.005
  • Ferreira, S. and Pereira, O. (2023). Antecedents of consumers’ intention and behavior to purchase organic food in the Portuguese context. Sustainability, 15, 9670. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129670
  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
  • Giampietri, E., Verneau, F., Del Giudice, T., Carfora, V. and Finco, A. (2018). A theory of planned behaviour perspective for investigating the role of trust in consumer purchasing decision related to short food supply chains. Food Qualities Prefer. 64, 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.09.012
  • Grolleau, G. and Caswell, J.A. (2006). Interaction between food attributes in markets: The case of environmental labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics, 36, 471–484
  • Gupta, P., Gupta, S., Saini, P. and Jindal, A.K. (2021). A Study of Factors Identifying Intention to Purchase Organic Products. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 13(1), 21-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.37622/GJFM/13.1.2021.21-32
  • Goetzke, B., Nitzko, S. and Spiller, A. (2014). Consumption of organic and functional food: A matter of well-being and Health. Appetite, 77, 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.012
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L. (2016). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
  • Hansmann, R., Baur, I. and Binder, C. R. (2020). Increasing organic food consumption: An integrating model of drivers and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 123058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123058
  • Henseler, J., Christian M.R. and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discirimant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135
  • Khanal, A. R., Mishra, S. K. and Honey, U. (2018). Certified organic food production, financial performance, and farm size: An unconditional quantile regression approach. Land Use Policy, 78, 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.012
  • Kledal, P.R., Sirieix, L., El-Naggar, A.H. and Auersalmi, M. (2011). Organic food consumers’ trade-offs between local or imported, conventional or organic products in the Egyptian Metropolis of Cairo. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, Vol. 6 Nos 2-3, 26-48.
  • Krystallis, A. and Chryssohoidis G. (2005). Consumers’ willingness to pay for organic food. British Food Journal, 107 (5), 320–343. DOI:10.1108/00070700510596901
  • Konuk, F. (2018). The role of store image, perceived quality, trust and perceived value in predicting consumers’ purchase intentions towards organic private label food. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.04.011
  • Köse, Ş.G. (2020). Is organic food a sustainable choice? Evaluating organic food production in the framework of environmental sustainability. BMIJ, 8 (4), 685-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i4.1579
  • Kvatchadze, S. ve Akıncı, S. (2018). Sağlık bilinci, çevre bilinci ve organik gıda bilgisinin satın alma niyetine organik gıdalara yönelik tutum aracılığıyla etkisi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (37), 158-183.
  • Ladwein, R. and Romero, A.M.S. (2021). The role of trust in the relationship between consumers, producers and retailers of organic food: A sector-based approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60. 1-25.
  • Labbe, D., Ferrage, A., Rytz, A., Pace, J. and Martin, N. (2015). Pleasantness, emotions and perceptions induced by coffee beverage experience depend on the consumption motivation (hedonic or utilitarian). Food Quality and Preference, 44, 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.03.017
  • Laureti, T. and Benedetti, I. (2018). Exploring pro-environmental food purchasing behaviour: An empirical analysis of Italian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3367-3378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.086
  • Lea, E. and Worsley, T. (2005). Australians’ organic food beliefs, demographics and values. British Food Journal, 107 (11), 855-869.
  • Lee, H.J. and Hwang, J. (2016). The driving role of consumers’ perceived credence attributes in organic food purchase decisions: A comparison of two groups of consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 54, 141 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.011
  • Lee, T.H., Fu, C.-J. and Chen, Y.Y. (2019). Trust factors for organic foods: Consumer buying behavior. British Food Journal, 122 (2), 414-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0195
  • Mahongnao, M. (2022). Factors influencing organic food purchase of young Indian consumers. Research Square. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1457928/v1
  • Meyerding, S.G. and Merz, N. (2018). Consumer preferences for organic labels in Germany using the example of apples – Combining choice-based conjoint analysis and eye-tracking measurements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 772-783.
  • Muhammad, S., Fathelrahman, E. and Ullah, R.U. (2015). Factors affecting consumers’ willingness to pay for certified organic food products in United Arab Emirates. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 46 (1), 37-45.
  • Murphy, B., Martini, M., Fedi, A., Loera, B. L., Elliott, C. T. and Dean, M. (2022). Consumer trust in organic food and organic certifications in four European countries. Food Control, 133, 108484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108484
  • Müller, C.E. and Gaus, H. (2015). Consumer response to negative media information about certified organic food products. Journal of Consumer Policy, 38 (4), 387-409.
  • Mondelaers, K. (2009). Importance of health and environment as quality traits in the buying decision of organic products. British Food Journal, 111 (10), 1120-1139, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700910992952
  • Moser, R., Raffaelli, R. and Thilmany-McFadden, D. (2011). Consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables with credence-based attributes: A review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14 (2), 121-142.
  • Nagy, L.B. and Temesi, Z.L.A. (2022). Is it really organic? Credibility factors of organic food– A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE 17 (4), e0266855. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266855
  • Naspetti, S. and Bodini, A. (2008). Consumer perception of local and organic products: Substitution or complementary goods?. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3 (2), 111– 122. DOI:10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v03i02/52526
  • Nguyen, T.M., Park, J.H. and Choi, W.L. (2021). Factors influencing consumer purchase intention toward organic food products: An empirical study in Vietnam market. Journal of Channel and Retailing, 26 (1), 127-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.17657/jcr.2021.01.31.6
  • Nuttavuthisit, K. and Thøgersen, J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics, 140 (2), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5
  • Pattweekongka, S. (2022). Organic food brand trust and brand loyalty: Evidence from Thailand. AgBioForum, 24 (1), 129-133.
  • Padel S. and Foster C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour. British Food Journal, 107 (8), 606–625. DOI:10.1108/00070700510611002
  • Pereira, B.M., Silva, C.R.M.D. Sobreira, É.M.C. and Oliveira, L.V.C. (2022). Intention to purchase organic food with certification label: Do trust and coolness matter? Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 16 (3). 1-15. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v16n3-
  • Prada, M., Rodrigues, D. and Garrido, M.V. (2016). Deliberate choices or strong motives: Exploring the mechanisms underlying the bias of organic claims on leniency judgments. Appetite, 103, 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.012
  • Prakash, G., Singh, P.K., Ahmad, A. and Kumar, G. (2023). Trust, convenience and environmental concern in consumer purchase intention for organic food. Spanish Journal of Marketing. DOI 10.1108/SJME-09-2022-0201
  • Rana, J. and Paul, J. (2017). Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. Journal of Retailing Consumer Services, 38, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.004
  • Ratan, S.R.A., Tat, H.H., Latiff, A.S.A. and Nadarajah, D. (2021). Achieving favourable organic food purchase behavior through the mediating role of healthy lifestyle: A perspective of health economics. Studies Applied Economics, Volume 39-10. 1-11. DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i10.6046
  • Ricci, E. C., Banterle, A. and Stranieri, S. (2018). Trust to go green: An exploration of consumer intentions for eco-friendly convenience food. Ecological Economics 148, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.010
  • Rousseau, S. and Vranken, L. (2013). Green market expansion by reducing information asymmetries: Evidence for labeled organic food products. Food Policy, 40, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.01.006
  • Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. and Mayerhofer, T. (2017). What is this thing called organic? How organic farming is codified in regulations. Food Policy, 68, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.009
  • Seydioğulları, H.S. (2013). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma için yenilenebilir enerji, Planlama, 23(1), 19-25. doi: 10.5505/planlama.2013.14633
  • Shaharudin, M.R., Pani, J.J., Mansor, S.W. and Elias, S.J. (2010). Factors affecting purchase intention of organic food in Malaysia’s Kedah State, Cross-Cultural Communication, 6 (2), 105-116.
  • Söğüt, B., İnci, H., Taysı, M.R. ve Karakaya, E. (2020). Organik yumurta tüketim eğilimleri ve tüketici özelliklerinin belirlenmesi (Bingöl ili kent merkezi örneği). Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Engineering, Natural & Medical Sciences, 7 (13), 181-199. DOI: 10.38065/euroasiaorg.428
  • Sultan, P., Tarafder, T., Pearson, D. and Henryks, J. (2020). Intention-behaviour gap and perceived behavioural control-behaviour gap in theory of planned behaviour: Moderating roles of communication, satisfaction and trust in organic food consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 81, 103838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103838
  • Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Kushwah, S. and Salo, J. (2020). Why do people buy organic food? The moderating role of environmental concerns and trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102247, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102247
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve Spss ile veri analizi. Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Thorsøe, M.H. (2015). Maintaining trust and credibility in a continuously evolving organic food system. Journal Agric. Environ. Ethics, 28, 767–787. DOI 10.1007/s10806-015-9559-6S
  • Tsakiridou, E., Boutsouki, C., Zotos, Y., and Mattas, K. (2008). Attitudes and behaviour towards organic products: An exploratory study. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(2), 158-175. DOI 10.1108/09590550810853093
  • Ueasangkomsate, P. and Santiteerakul, S. (2016). A study of consumers’ attitudes and intention to buy organic foods for sustainability. Procedia Environmental Sciences 34, 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENV.2016.04.037
  • Van Loo, E.J., Caputo, V., Nayga, R.M. and Verbeke, W. (2014). Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy, 49, 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.002
  • Vermeir, I. and Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer ‘attitude-behavioural intention’ gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19 (2), 169-194.
  • Vega-Zamora, M., Torres-Ruiz, F.J. and Parras-Rosa, M. (2019). Towards sustainable consumption: Keys to communication for improving trust in organic foods. Journal of Cleaner Production 216, 511-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.129
  • Yadav, R. (2016). Altruistic or egoistic: Which value promotes organic food consumption among young consumers? A study in the context of a developing nation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.008
  • Yadav, R. and Pathak, G. S. (2016). Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers: Evidences from a developing nation. Appetite, 96, 122-128.
  • Yaşar, M. (2017). Hedonik ve faydacı tüketim bağlamında tüketici davranışlarının incelenmesi: Gençlerin hedonik tüketim eğilimlerini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi.
  • Yaşlıoğlu, M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(0), 74-85. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuisletme/issue/32177/357061
  • Yavuz, V.A. (2010). Sürdürülebilirlik kavramı ve işletmeler açısından sürdürülebilir üretim stratejileri, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 63-86.
  • Yazdanpanah, M. and Forouzani, M. (2015). Application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict Iranian students’ intention to purchase organic Food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 342 352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.071
  • Yiridoe, E.K., Bonti-Ankomah, S. and Martin, R.C. (2005). Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference towards organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 20 (4), 193-205.
  • Yu, Y., He, Y., Zhao, X. and Zhou, L. (2019). Certify or not? An analysis of organic food supply chain with competing suppliers. Annals of Operations Research, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03465-y
  • Yuan, X. and Xiao, Y. (2021). Cognition, value perception and purchase intention of organic food—Evidence from China’s organic milk market. Sustainability, 13, 910. 1- 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020910
  • Zander, K. and Hamm, U. (2010). Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 21 (5), 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.01.006
There are 88 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

İbrahim Yemez 0000-0003-3176-6394

Tuğba Delice Akca 0000-0002-3626-0424

Early Pub Date August 22, 2024
Publication Date August 31, 2024
Submission Date October 14, 2023
Acceptance Date March 25, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Issue: 68

Cite

APA Yemez, İ., & Delice Akca, T. (2024). ORGANİK GIDAYA DAİR GÜVEN UNSURLARININ TÜKETİCİLERİN SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞINA ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(68), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1376067
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.