Are the Concepts “Onsite Study” and “Distance Study” Outdated?

Year 2015, , 1 - 18, 31.07.2015

İngibjörg B. Frímannsdóttir

https://doi.org/10.22596/erj2017.0101.1.18

Abstract

Today’s students demand another approach to learning than the approach taken for students entering the school system 20 to 30 years ago. Modern students’ expectations and demands with regard to how and when they want to study are not the same as they used to be.  Students now want more independence in how they plan their study, including having the ability to take distance courses, receive material and information posted online and take advantage of the potential of today’s technology. A growing interest in distance learning is one part of this development. Concepts like “onsite” and “distance” study and students have been used, but with a large – and growing – part of the course material being available online for both onsite and distance students, the barriers between these two groups have been minimized. The question is: are these concepts outdated, and is it necessary to make a distinction between onsite and distance study and students? Research was done within the course Spoken and written language at the University of Iceland in the year 2012 to discover whether it is possible to combine onsite and distance courses into one, throw away the old concepts and use only “study” and “students”.

Keywords

Onsite and distance learning, onsite and distance education, changes in teaching

References

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States 2011 Needham, MA: Babson Survey Research Group & Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/going_distance_2011
• Alvarez, B. (2011). Flipping the classroom: Homework in class, Lessons at home. Retrieved from http://www.learningfirst.org/flipping-classroom-homework-class-lessons-home
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your Classroom. Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Eugene, Or.: International Society for Technology in Education
• Björnsdóttir, E. (2012). „Ég er svo óvanur svona fjarnemastşssi.“ Aukinn sveigjanleiki við Háskólan á Akureyri [“I´m really not used to this distance education stuff”. More flexibility in learning at the University of Akureyri.] Netla – Veftímarit um uppeldi og menntun. Retrieved from http://netla.hi.is/?s=Eygl%C3%B3+Bj%C3%B6rnsd%C3%B3ttir
• Corry, M., & Stella, J. (2012). Developing a Framework for Research in online K-12 Distance Education. The Quarterly Review of distance Education, 13(3), 133–151
• Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Education Tech Research Dev 61, 563-580. doi:I 10,1007/s11423-013-9305-6
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 7, 95–105
• Hardesty, L. (2013). Higher-ed leaders meet to discuss future of online education. MIT news. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2013/edx-summit-0306.html
• Harvard Extension School. (2014–2015). Online and On-Campus Courses. Harvard Extension School. Retrieved from http://www.extension.harvard.edu/academics/online-campus-courses
• Jóhannsdóttir, Þ., & Jakobsdóttir, S. (2012). Samkennsla stað- og fjarnema í grunnnámi í kennaradeild við Menntavísindasvið Háskóla Íslands 2010–2011. [Multigrade onsite and distance-learning undergraduate students at the School of Education at University of Iceland 2010–2011]. Reykjavík, Iceland: Rannsóknarstofa í upplýsingatækni og miðlun
• KhanAcademy. Retrieved from http://www.khanacademy.org/
• Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23
• Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: An Opportunity to Engage Millennial Students through Active Learning. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49
• Staker, H. (2011). The Rise of K–12 Blended Learning: Profiles of emerging models. Retrieved from http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/The-Rise-of-K-12- Blended-Learning.pdf
• Stanford University. (e.d.). Stanford online. Retrieved from http://online.stanford.edu/
• Statistics Iceland. (2012). Registered students at the upper secondary and tertiary level in autumn 2011. Statistical series: Education, 95(4), 1–28. Retrieved from http://www.statice.is/Statistics/Education
• Sugar, W., Martindale, T., & Crawley, F. E. (2007). One Professor´s Face-to-Face Teaching Strategies while Becoming an Online Instructor. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 365–385
• University of Florida. (2014). UF, Distance Learning, University of Florida. Retrieved from http://www.distance.ufl.edu/
• University of Iceland. (2014). Distance learning. Course catalogue 2015–2016. Retrieved from https://ugla.hi.is/kennsluskra/khi.php?tab=skoli&chapter=content&id=32461