Economic analysis of biogas production from small scale anaerobic digestion systems for cattle manure

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 6 - 12, 31.03.2019

Fatih Tufaner , Yasar Avsar

Abstract

One of the major concerns of biogas
plants can’t be operated economical and environmental sustainable manner. In
order to produce biogas in rural areas, using anaerobic systems with high
organic content of farm wastes can be able to remove these concerns. The
production of biogas can then be used for cooking, lighting and heating. Biogas
is a good alternative to kitchen gas cylinder. However, there is a lack of
knowledge and experience available on design methods for these systems.
Anaerobic digestion is generally economically applicable waste treatment
systems for large farms (>100 cattle). However, majority of Turkey farms
have less than 100 cattle, making this technology economically inaccessible to
the vast majority farms. The objective of this study is to determine the
economic viability of small scale anaerobic digester systems taking into
account on domestic production conditions.

Keywords

Anaerobic systems, Small-Scale, Biogas, Economic Analysis

References

• [1] Turkish Statistical Institute. "Animal Production Statistics", http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=13512, 26 February 2018.
• [2] (ZMO), (2014). TMMOB Chamber of Agricultural Engineers. "Cattle breeding in Turkey", http://www.zmo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=23449&tipi=17&sube=0, 23 November 2015.
• [3] Search results for "Biogas" on Google Maps, https://www.google.com/maps/search/biogas+/@44.7642108,43.3069914,3z, 22 July 2015.
• [4] Types of Biogas Plants, Fixed-dome Plants, http://www.sgpindia.org/documents/Biogas_Plants.pdf, 20 Fabruary 2018.
• [5] Berkes, F. and Kışlalıoğlu, M., (1994). Ekoloji ve Çevre Bilimleri, Remzi Bookstore, İstanbul.
• [6] Singh, K.J. and Sooch, S.S., (2004). "Comparative Study of Economics of Different Models of Family Size Biogas Plants for State of Punjab, India", Energy Conversion and Management, 45 (9): 1329-1341.
• [7] Vu, Q.D., Tran, T.M., Nguyen, P.D., Vu, C.C., Vu, V.T.K. and Jensen, L.S., (2012). "Effect of Biogas Technology on Nutrient Flows for Small- and Medium-Scale Pig Farms in Vietnam", Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 94 (1): 1-13.
• [8] Karttek, D., Venkata Seshaiah, C., Suresh, J., Punyakumari, B., V., D.R.M. and Srivani, M., (2014). "Potential for Value Addition of Buffalo Dung through Eco-friendly Disposal in India", International Research Journal of Natural Sciences, 3 (12): 52-57.
• [9] Neves, L., Oliveira, R. and Alves, M.M., (2009). "Fate of LCFA in the Co-Digestion of Cow Manure, Food Waste and Discontinuous Addition of Oil", Water Research, 43 (20): 5142-5150.
• [10] El-Mashad, H.M., Zeeman, G., van Loon, W.K.P., Bot, G.P.A. and Lettinga, G., (2004). "Effect of Temperature and Temperature Fluctuation on Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Manure", Bioresource Technology, 95 (2): 191-201.
• [11] Ahring, B.K., Ibrahim, A.A. and Mladenovska, Z., (2001). "Effect of Temperature Increase from 55 to 65 Degrees C on Performance and Microbial Population Dynamics of an Anaerobic Reactor Treating Cattle Manure", Water Research, 35 (10): 2446-2452.
• [12] Boe, K. and Angelidaki, I., (2009). "Serial CSTR Digester Configuration for Improving Biogas Production from Manure", Water Research, 43 (1): 166-172.
• [13] Tufaner, F., (2015). Investigation of improving biomethanization processes of cattle manure. Ph. D. Thesis, Phd Thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul.
• [14] Abuşka, M., Güneş Enerjisi ve Uygulamaları Ders Notları III, Güneş Enerjili Su Isıtma Sistem Projelendirilmesi, http://akhisarmyo.cbu.edu.tr/db_images/file/gunes-enerjisi-3-1285TR.pdf, 17 February 2015.
• [15] Vet, E., (2018). Hayvancılık San. ve Ticaret Limited Şirketi, Kaba Yem Kalitesi – Türkiye’de İnek Performansını Arttıran En Önemli Faktör, http://www.egevet.com.tr/kaba_yem_kalitesi_turkiyede_inek_performansini_artiran_en_onemli_faktor.htm, 22 February 2018.
• [16] TDSYMB, (2018). Türkiye Damızlık Sığır Yetiştiricileri Merkez Birliği (TDSYMB) Fiyat İstatistikleri, http://www.dsymb.org.tr/, 22 February 2018.
• [17] EPDK, (2018). Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurulu (EPDK), LPG Piyasası Ürün Fiyatları, Bayi satış fiyatı bülteni, https://bildirim.epdk.org.tr/bildirim-portal/faces/pages/tarife/lpg/yonetim/bultenSorgula.xhtml, 22 February 2018.
• [18] Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M. and Haan, C.d., (2006). Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
• [19] Güç, M. and Yılmaz, V., (2008). "Organik Atıklardan Kaynaklı Sera Gazları Salınımlarının Azaltılmasında Anerobik Bozundurmanın Önemi", VII. Ulusal Temiz Enerji Sempozyumu, UTES’2008, 17-19 December 2008, İstanbul,
• [20] Barton, J., Issaias, I. and Stentiford, E.I., (2008). "Carbon–Making the Right Choice for Waste Management in Developing Countries", Waste Management, 28 (4): 690-698.