OKULLARIN EĞİTSEL KAYNAKLARI VE TEOG PUANLARI

Year 2016, Volume: 15 Issue: 58, 0 - 0, 09.07.2016

Emine Önder

https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.258821

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Araştırmada, okulların eğitim kaynakları incelenmiş ve eğitim kaynaklarının TEOG puanları üzerindeki etkisi belirlenmiştir. Araştırma, Burdur’da 66 ortaokul üzerinde yapılmıştır. Betimsel modeldeki araştırmada veriler, okul anketiyle toplanmıştır. Araştırmada, betimleyici ve çoklu regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda, okulların finansman kaynaklarının büyük çoğunluğunun ailelerden toplanan bağışlardan elde edildiği, düşük TEOG ortalamasına sahip okullarda, öğretmen değişim hızının yüksek, rehber öğretmen bulunma ve derslerin okulun norm kadrolu branş öğretmenlerince yürütülme oranının düşük, deneyimsiz öğretmen oranının yüksek olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Okulların eğitsel kaynaklarının TEOG puanlarında yordayıcı olduğu, rehber öğretmen bulunmasının, Türkçe ve fen derslerinin okulun norm kadrolu branş öğretmenince verilmesinin TEOG ortalamalarında yüksek etkiye sahip olduğu saptanmıştır.

References

• Adeogun, A. A., & Osifila, G. I. (2008). Relationship between educational resources and students’ academic performance in Lagos State Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Management, 5(6), 144-153.
• Angrist, J. D. & Lavy, V. (1999). Using maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 533–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355399556061
• Atılgan, H. (2006). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Bacolod, M. & Tobias, J., (2006). Schools, School Quality and Academic Achievement: Evidence from the Philippines, Economics of Education Review, 25(6), 619-632.
• Card, D., & Krueger, A. (1996). School resources and student outcomes: An overview of the literature and new evidence from North and South Carolina. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 31-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.4.31
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000).Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1).
• Demir, C. E. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievement of the Turkish urban poor. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 17–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.03.003
• ERG (2009). Eğitimde eşitlik politika analizi ve öneriler. İstanbul. http://www.erg.sabanciuniv.edu.
• Ferreira, F. H. G., & Gignoux, J. (2010). Inequality of opportunity for education: The case of Turkey. State Planning Organization of the Republic of Turkey and World Bank. Working Paper Number: 4.
• Fetler, M. (2001). Student mathematics achievement test scores, dropout rates, and teacher characteristics. Teacher Education Quarterly, 151–168.
• Fuller, B. & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64, 122–131.
• Gamoran, A., & Willms, J. D. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1-30.
• Greenwald, R., Hedges, L.V., & Laine, R. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.
• Hakkinen, I., Kirjavainen, T., & Uusitalo, R. (2003). School resources and student achievement revisited: New evidence from panel data. Economics of Education Review, 22, 329-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00060-2
• Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F. & Rivkin, S. G. (1998). Teachers school and academic achievement, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 6691.
• Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input based schooling policies, The Economic Journal 113.
• Hanushek, E. A., & Luque, J. A. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review, 22, 481-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00038-4
• Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141-164.
• Hanushek, E. A., Rivkin, S. G., & Taylor, L. L. (1996). Aggregation and the estimated effects of school resources. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 611–627. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2109949
• Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effect of primary school quality on academic achievement across 29 high- and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162-1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227799
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik uygulamaları. Ankara: Asil Yayınevi.
• Krueger, A. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355399556052
• Lindahl, M. (2005). Home versus school learning: A new approach to estimating the effect of class size on achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(2), 375-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00413.x
• MEB (2005). PISA 2003 projesi ulusal nihai rapor. MEB, ANKARA.
• OECD (2011). School questionnaire for PISA 2012. http://pisa2012.acer.edu.au/downloads/ MS12_ ScQ_ENG.pdf
• Parcel, T.L. & Dufur, J.M. (2001). Capital at home and at school: Effects on student achievement. Social Forces, 79(3), 881–911.
• Psacharopoulos, G. (1990). Why educational policies can fail: An overview of selected African experiences. Discussion Paper No. 82. World Bank.
• Rockoff, J. E., (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247-252.
• Savaşçı, H. S. (2010). Sosyoekonomik değişkenlerin ve okulun eğitim kaynaklarının İlköğretim 7. Sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarı düzeyleri ile ilişki durumu. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Burdur.
• Savaşçı, S. & Tomul, E. (2013). The relationship between educational resources of school and academic achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4).
• Shin, Y. & Raudenbush, S.W. (2011). The causal effect of class size on academic achievement: Multivariate instrumental variable estimators with data missing at random. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36(2), 154-185. DOI: 10.3102/1076998610388632
• Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
• Tansel, A. ve Bircan, F. (2006). Demand for education in Turkey: A tobit analysis of private tutoring expenditures. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 303-313.
• UNESCO (2007). Global monitoring report, education for all 2008. New York: Oxford Press..
• Willms, D.J. & Somers, M.A. (2001). Family, classroom and school effects on children’s educational outcomes in Latin America. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(4), 409-445.
• Wößmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational ınstitutions and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 117-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00045
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (7.Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.