THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF CONSTRUCTIVE THINKING ON ATTRIBUTIONS AND MARITAL SATISFACTION

Year 2018, Volume: 17 Issue: 66, 766 - 778, 15.04.2018

Ayşe Sibel Demirtaş , Kemal Baytemir , Ali Güllü

https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.359172

Abstract

In this study, the relationships between constructive
thinking, attributions and marital satisfaction in married individuals were
investigated and tried to reveal the predictive role of constructive thinking
on attributions and marital satisfaction. Correlational research design was
used in the study. The study group of the research consisted of a total of 202
married individuals, 142 females and 60 males. In order to collect data Constructive
Thinking Inventory, Relational Attribution Measure and Marital Life Scale were
used. Pearson product-moment correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis were used in the analysis of the data. According the results of
multiple regression analysis in order to reveal what extent to constructive
thinking predicts attributions it is seen that the model as a whole is
meaningful and the variables in the model all explain 20% of the total variance
of attributions. According to the results, emotional coping and superstitious
thinking have highest contribution on the model. According to the results of the multiple regression analysis
in order to reveal what extent to constructive thinking and attributions
together predict marital satisfaction, it is seen that the model as a whole is
meaningful. The variables in the model all explain 47% of the total variance of
marital satisfaction. Causal attributions, total attributions and behavioral
coping have highest contribution on the second model. 

Keywords

constructive thinking, attributions, marital satisfaction

THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF CONSTRUCTIVE THINKING ON ATTRIBUTIONS AND MARITAL SATISFACTION

Abstract

In this study, the relationships between constructive
thinking, attributions and marital satisfaction in married individuals were
investigated and tried to reveal the predictive role of constructive thinking
on attributions and marital satisfaction. Correlational research design was
used in the study. The study group of the research consisted of a total of 202
married individuals, 142 females and 60 males. In order to collect data
Constructive Thinking Inventory, Relational Attribution Measure and Marital
Life Scale were used. Pearson Moments Correlation Coefficient Analysis and
Multiple Regression Analysis were used in the analysis of the data. According
the results of multiple regression analysis in order to reveal what extent to
constructive thinking predicts attributions it is seen that the model as a
whole is meaningful and the variables in the model all explain 20% of the total
variance of attributions. According to the results, emotional coping and
superstitious thinking have highest contribution on the model. According to the
results of the multiple regression analysis in order to reveal what extent to
constructive thinking and attributions together predict marital satisfaction,
it is seen that the model as a whole is meaningful. The variables in the model
all explain 47% of the total variance of marital satisfaction. Causal
attributions, total attributions and behavioral coping have highest
contribution on the second model. 

Keywords

Constructive Thinking, Attributions, Marital Satisfaction

References

• Beck A. T. (1988). Love is never enough. New York: Harper & Row
• Benzies, K., & Mychasiuk, R. (2008). Fostering family resiliency: A review of the key protective factors. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 103-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00586.x
• Bradbury, T. N., Beach, S. R. H., Fincham, F. D., & Nelson, G. M. (1996). Attributions and behavior in functional and dysfunctional marriages. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 569−576
• Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, E D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3-33.
• Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 613-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.613
• Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964–980.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge/ Falmer.
• Demirtaş, A. S. (2016). Bilişsel-Yaşantısal Teori temelli psiko-eğitim programının yapılandırmacı düşünme üzerindeki etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Epstein, S. (1973). The self concept revisited or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404-416.
• Epstein, S. (1992a). Coping ability, negative self evaluation and overgeneralizations: experiment and theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 826-836.
• Epstein, S. (1992b). Constructive thinking and mental and physical well-being. L. Montada, S. H. Filipp, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Life crises & experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 112-125). New York: Cambridge University.
• Epstein, S. (1998). Constructive thinking: the key to emotional intelligence. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
• Epstein, S. (2001). Manual for The Constructive Thinking Inventory. Odessa, Florida Psychological Assessment.
• Epstein, S. (2014). Cognitive-experiential theory: an integrative theory of personality. New York: Oxford University.
• Epstein, N., & Baucom, D. H. (1993). Cognitive factors in marital disturbance. In K. S. Dobson & E C. Kendall (Eds.), Psychopathology and cognition (pp. 351-385). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Epstein, S. & Meier, P. (1989). Constructive thinking: A broad coping variable with specific components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 332-350.
• Epstein, S., & Katz, L. (1992). Coping ability, stress, productive load, and symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 813-825.
• Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The relationship attribution measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 457-468.
• Fincham, E D. (1994). Cognition in marriage: Current status and future challenges. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 3, 185-189.
• Fincham, E D., Beach, S. R. H., & Bradbury, T. N. (1989). Marital distress, depression, and attributions: Is the marital distress-attribution association an artifact of depression? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57. 768-771.
• Fincham, F. D., Beach, S, R. H,, & Nelson, G. (1987). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 3. Causal and responsibility attributions for spouse behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 71-86.
• Fincham, F. D., & O'Leary, K. D. (1983). Causal inferences for spouse behavior in maritally distressed and nondistressed couples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 42-57.
• Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1989). ENRICH marital inventory: A discriminant validity and cross-validation assessment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 65-79
• Heyman, R. E., Sayers, S. L., & Bellack, A. S. (1994). Global Marital Satisfaction Versus Marital Adjustment: An Empirical Comparison of Three Measures. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(4), 432-446.
• Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
• Heppner P. P, Wampold B. E, & Kivlighan D. M., (2008). Research design in counseling. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Graham, J. M., Liu, Y. J., & Jeziorski, J. L. (2006). The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 701-717.
• Gottman JM, & Levenson RW. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 221–233.
• Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2000). Attributions in marriage: State or trait? A growth curve analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 295-309.
• Katz, L. , & Epstein, S. (1991). Constructive thinking and coping with laboratory-induced stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 789-800.
• Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Volume 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
• Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255.
• Rogge, R. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1999). Till violence does us part: The differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 340–351.
• Tezer, E. (1996). Evlilik ilişkisinden sağlanan doyum: Evlilik yaşamı ölçeği. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2(7), 1-7.
• Tutarel-Kışlak, Ş. (1999). İlişkilerde Yükleme Ölçeğinin güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3P Dergisi, 7 (3), 193-199.