SABİT PROTETİK RESTORASYONLAR İÇİN BİLGİ KAYNAĞI OLARAK YOUTUBE’UN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2021, , 191 - 199, 15.09.2021

Filiz Yağcı

https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.901420

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Günümüzde hastalar, sağlık alanında pek çok konuda olduğu gibi protetik diş tedavileri için de YouTube'da arama yapmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, sabit protetik restorasyonlar ile ilgili YouTube videolarından sağlanan bilgilerin kalitesini değerlendirmektir. Google Trends uygulamasıyla sabit protetik restorasyonlarla ilgili yapılan aramalarda en sık kullanılan kelime belirlenmiş ve YouTube’da aranmıştır. YouTube’da konu hakkında en çok izlenen 200 videodan kriterlere uyan 50’si analiz edilmiştir. Videolar, bilgi içerik kalitesine göre zayıf, orta veya iyi olarak sınıflandırılırken, yükleyici tipine göre bireysel deneyim, diş hekimi ve ticari kurum olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. İstatistiksel değerlendirme için Kruskal Wallis testi ve post-hoc Mann-Whitney U testleriyle Spearman ilişki analizi uygulanmıştır. Analiz edilen videoların bilgi içeriği yönünden %22’sinin zayıf, %60’ının orta, %18’inin ise iyi olduğu görülmüştür. İyi/orta düzeyde bilgi içeren gruplardaki videolarda izlenme sayısı ile beğenilme sayısı arasında iyi grupta güçlü pozitif ilişki(r=0.895, p<0.001); orta grupta orta seviyede pozitif ilişki (r=0.611, p<0.001) görülmüştür. Hekimler ve ticari kurumlar tarafından yüklenen videolarda izlenme sayısı ile beğenilme sayısı ve beğenilmeme sayısı arasında orta seviyede pozitif ilişki görülmüştür(Beğenilme: Hekim, r=0.561, p=0.003; Ticari kurum, r=0.685, p=0.001/ Beğenilmeme: Hekim, r=0.44, p=0.024; Ticari kurum, r=0.602, p=0.006). YouTube’da sabit protetik restorasyonlar ile ilgili bilgi düzeyinin özellikle kontrendikasyon, prognoz ve kalıcılık konularında sınırlı olduğu görülmüştür. YouTube video platformunda uzman diş hekimlerinin ve akademisyenlerin konu hakkında bilgi paylaşmasının toplum sağlığı açısından yararlı olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Bilgi kaynağı, sabit protetik restorasyon, Youtube

EVALUATION OF YOUTUBE AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION FOR FIXED PROSTHETIC RESTORATIONS

Abstract

Today, patients search YouTube to consult also on prosthetic dentistry, as well as on many other health- related topics. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of information on YouTube videos about fixed prosthetic restorations. The most frequently searched term about fixed prosthetic restorations was determined by using "Google Trends" website and searched by YouTube. Fifty of the most viewed 200 videos about the topic on YouTube, were analyzed. While videos were classified according to their contents as poor, moderate and good, they were classified according to the source as personal experience, dentist and companies. Kruskal Wallis test, post-hoc Mann-Whitney U tests, and Spearman correlation analysis were applied to the data. Of the videos which were analyzed, 22% were found poor, 60% were found moderate, and 18% were found favorable in terms of content. For good quality videos, a positive strong correlation was found between the viewing number and the number of likes (r=0.895, p<0.00) and for moderate quality videos a positive moderate correlation was found (r=0.611, p<0.001). The videos that were uploaded by dentists and companies revealed a positive moderate correlation between the number of view and the number of likes/dislikes (Number of likes: Dentist, r=0.561, p=0.003; Company, r=0.685, p=0.001)(Number of dislikes: Dentist, r=0.44, p=0.024; Company, r=0.602, p=0.006). Information about fixed prosthetic restorations on YouTube especially contraindication, prognosis-durability and cost, was found limited. It is concluded that for dental specialists and academicians, it would be beneficial to share information about the subject on YouTube video platform for community health.

Keywords

Fixed prosthetic restoration, informa- tion source, YouTube.

References

• 1. Şimşek-İşliyen F. Dijital çağda bilginin değişen niteliği ve infobezite: z kuşağı üzerine bir odak grup çalışması. Selçuk İletişim 2020;13:246-72.
• 2. Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, et al. YouTube™ as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 2017;44:90-6.
• 3. Al-Silwadi FM, Gill DS, Petrie A, Cunningham SJ. Effect of social media in improving knowledge among patients having fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:231-7.
• 4. Müller F, Naharro M, Carlsson GE. What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18 Suppl 3:2-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01459.x
• 5. Karahanoglu S, Özcivelek-Mersin T, Yeşil-Duymuş Z, Aybala-Oktay E, Toksoy-Topçu F. Ağız ve Diş Sağlığı Hastanesine Başvuran Hastaların Mevcut Protezleri Açısından Demografik Verilere Göre Değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri (J Dental Sci) 2018;24:175-82.
• 6. Stevens PJ, Fredrickson EJ, Gres ML. Implant prosthodontics: Clinical and laboratory procedures. 2nd ed. USA: Mosby Co. Inc., 2000.
• 7. Ayranci F, Buyuk S, Kahveci K. Are YouTube™ videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;30:S2468-7855(20)30091-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.04.009.
• 8. ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube as a source for parents’ education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017;27:437-43.
• 9. Pasaoglu Bozkurt A, Aras I. Cleft Lip and Palate YouTube Videos: Content Usefulness and Sentiment Analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2020:1055665620948722. doi: 10.1177/1055665620948722.
• 10. Lotto M, Aguirre PE, Strieder AP, Cruvinel AF, Cruvinel T. Levels of toothache-related interests of Google and YouTube users from developed and developing countries over time. Peer J 2019;7:e7706. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7706.
• 11. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res 2003;163:1727-34.
• 12. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016;22:202-8.
• 13. Nason GJ, Kelly P, Kelly ME, et al. YouTube as an educational tool regarding male urethral catheterization. Scand J Urol 2015;49:189-92.
• 14. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube TM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:e463-8.
• 15. Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Isik BK. Are YouTube videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;121:661-4.
• 16. Eksi-Ozsoy H. Evaluation of YouTube videos about smile design using the DISCERN tool and Journal of the American Medical Association benchmarks. J Prosthet Dent 2020;18:S0022-3913(20)30022-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.016.
• 17. Turkyilmaz I, Hariri NH, Jahangiri L. Student's perception of the impact of E-learning on dental education. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20:616-21.
• 18. Bozkurt AP, Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ. YouTube video analysis as a source of information for patients on impacted canine. Int Orthod 2019;17:769-75.
• 19. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:31-41.
• 20. Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:286-91.
• 21. Balshi TJ, Mingledorff EB. Maintenance procedures for patients after complete fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:420-31.
• 22. Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube video analysis. Angle Orthod 2018;88:208-14.
• 23. Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:1776-83.
• 24. Hatipoğlu Ş, Gaş S. Is Information for surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion available on YouTube reliable? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;78:1017.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.01.013.
• 25. Guo J, Yan X, Li S, et al. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube. Angle Orthod 2020 Feb 3. doi: 10.2319/082019-542.1.