ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE BESİN ETİKETİ OKUMA DAVRANIŞININ İNCELENMESİ

Year 2022, Volume: 31 Issue: 1, 71 - 78, 28.03.2022

Ezgi Arslan , Tuğçe Özlü , Gökçen Garipoğlu

https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.915320

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Besin etiketi okuma, bireylerin yeterli ve dengeli beslenmelerinde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı; lisans öğrencilerinin besin etiketi okuma davranışının incelenmesi ve satın almada en fazla önem verilen faktörleri belirlemektir. Çalışma Şubat-Mayıs 2019 tarihleri arasında Türkiye’de yapılmıştır. Dört kısım olarak hazırlanan anketin ilk bölümünde katılımcıların demografik özellikleri tespit edilmiştir. Diğer bölümlerin bir kısmında 5’li, bir kısmında 3’lü Likert ölçeği kullanılarak sorular sorulmuştur. Çalışmaya toplam 520 lisans öğrencisi katılmıştır. Anket katılımcılar tarafından yüz yüze veya online platform üzerinden doldurulmuştur. Çalışmada, istatistiksel anlamlılık sınırı olarak p<0.05 değeri kabul edilmiştir. Çalışmada, son kullanma tarihinin kadın (%67.4) ve erkek öğrencilerin (%55.6) çoğunluğu tarafından her zaman dikkat edilen bir faktör olduğu görülmüştür. Etikette belirtilen toplam yağ, doymuş/doymamış yağ bilgisi cinsiyetler arasında anlamlı fark göstermiştir (p<0.05). Kadın katılımcıların şeker içeriğine daha fazla dikkat ettiği saptanmıştır (p<0.05). Öte yandan sağlık alanında öğrenim gören öğrencilerin etiket üzerinde yazan bazı besin bilgilerine (kalori, toplam yağ, şeker) daha fazla dikkat ettikleri saptanmıştır (p<0.05). Çalışmamızın sonucu doğrultusunda besin etiketi okumaya yönelik yeni strateji ve eğitim programlarının geliştirilmesinin yararlı olduğu düşünülmüştür.

Keywords

etiket, etiket okuma davranışı, beslenme, besin etiketi

INVESTIGATION OF READING FOOD LABEL BEHAVIOUR IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Abstract

Reading food labels plays an important role in the adequate and balanced nutrition of individuals. The purpose of this study is to examine the nutritional label reading behaviour of undergraduate students and determine the most important factors in purchasing. The study was conducted in Turkey between February and May 2019. In the first part of the questionnaire, which was prepared in four parts, the demographic characteristics of the participants were determined. In some sections, questions were asked using a 5-point Likert scale, and in others a 3-point Likert scale. A total of 520 undergraduate students participated in the study. The questionnaire was filled in by the participants face-to-face or via the online platform. In the study, p<0.05 was accepted as the statistical significance. In the study, it was observed that expiration date was a factor always considered by the majority of female (67.4%) and male students (55.6%). Total fat, saturated/unsaturated fat information indicated on the label showed a significant difference between genders (p<0.05). It was determined that female participants paid more attention to sugar content (p<0.05). On the other hand, it was determined that students studying in the field of health paid more attention to some nutritional information (calorie, total fat, sugar) written on the label (p<0.05). In line with our findings, it was concluded that it would be beneficial to develop new strategies and training programs for reading food labels. 

Keywords

College students, label, label reading behaviour, nutrition

References

• 1. Sandvik P, Nydahl M, Kihlberg I, et al. Consumers’ health-related perceptions of bread – Implications for labeling and health communication. Appetite 2018;121:285-93.
• 2. Todua N. Impact of food labeling on buying behavior regarding to healthy nutrition. Globalization & Business [Internet]. 25 Haziran 2018 [a.yer 05 Mart 2021]; Erişim adresi: http://www.eugb.ge/view_archive2.php?content=content&id=122&IMPACT%20OF%20FOOD%20LABELING%20ON%20BUYING%20BEHAVIOR%20REGARDING%20TO%20HEALTHY%20NUTRITION
• 3. Neal B, Crino M, Dunford E, et al. Effects of Different Types of Front-of-Pack Labelling Information on the Healthiness of Food Purchases—A Randomised Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2017;9(12):1284.
• 4. Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann S, Wills JM. Nutrition Labeling to Prevent Obesity: Reviewing the Evidence from Europe. Curr Obes Rep 2012;1(3):134-40.
• 5. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report [Internet]. Wartella EA, Lichtenstein AH, Boon CS, editörler. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010 [a.yer 19 Temmuz 2020]. Erişim adresi: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209847/
• 6. Cecchini M, Warin L. Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. Obesity Reviews 2016;17(3):201-10.
• 7. Sonnenberg L, Gelsomin E, Levy DE, et al. A traffic light food labeling intervention increases consumer awareness of health and healthy choices at the point-of-purchase. Preventive Medicine 2013;57(4):253-7.
• 8. Egnell M, Crosetto P, d’Almeida T, et al. Modelling the impact of different front-of-package nutrition labels on mortality from non-communicable chronic disease. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2019;16(1):56.
• 9. Nayga R. Toward an understanding of consumers’ perceptions of food labels. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 1999;2(1):29-45.
• 10. Jaafar SN. Consumers’ Perceptions, Attitudes and Purchase Intention towards Private Label Food Products in Malaysia. 2(8):19.
• 11. Kolodinsky J, Green J, Michahelles M, et al. The use of nutritional labels by college students in a food-court setting. J Am Coll Health 2008;57(3):297-302.
• 12. Beaudreault AR. Natural: Influences of Students’ Organic Food Perceptions. Journal of Food Products Marketing 2009;15(4):379-91.
• 13. Xie B, Wang L, Yang H, et al. Consumer perceptions and attitudes of organic food products in Eastern China. British Food Journal 2015;117(3):1105-21.
• 14. Peltzer K, Pengpid S, Samuels TA, et al. Prevalence of overweight/obesity and its associated factors among university students from 22 countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11(7):7425-41.
• 15. Bandara BES, De Silva DAM, Maduwanthi BCH, et al. Impact of Food Labeling Information on Consumer Purchasing Decision: With Special Reference to Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. Procedia Food Science 2016;6:309-13.
• 16. Annunziata A, Vecchio R. Factors affecting use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels: evidences from customers. Agricultural Economics Review 2012;13(2):1-14.
• 17. Olatona FA, Onabanjo OO, Ugbaja RN, et al. Dietary habits and metabolic risk factors for non-communicable diseases in a university undergraduate population. J Health Popul Nutr [İnternet]. 2018 [a.yer 06 Ağustos 2020];37. Erişim adresi: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097209/
• 18. Wilczek MM, Olszewski R, Krupienicz A. Trans-Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease: Urgent Need for Legislation. Cardiology 2017;138(4):254-8.
• 19. Jasti S, Kovacs S. Use of Trans Fat Information on Food Labels and Its Determinants in a Multiethnic College Student Population. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2010;42(5):307-14.
• 20. Santos SJ, Hurtado-Ortiz MT, Armendariz M, et al. Obesity-Related Dietary Patterns and Health Status of Diabetes among At-Risk Latino College Students. J Hispanic High Educ 2017;16(4):291-313.
• 21. Heidal KB, Colby SE, Mirabella GT, et al. Cost and Calorie Analysis of Fast Food Consumption in College Students. FNS 2012;03(07):942-6.
• 22. Cooke R, Papadaki A. Nutrition label use mediates the positive relationship between nutrition knowledge and attitudes towards healthy eating with dietary quality among university students in the UK. Appetite 2014;83:297-303.
• 23. de Carvalho ÉB, Vitolo MR, Gama CM, et al. Fiber intake, constipation, and overweight among adolescents living in Sao Paulo city. Nutrition 2006;22(7-8):744-9.
• 24. Byrd-Williams CE, Strother ML, Kelly LA, et al. Dietary fiber and associations with adiposity and fasting insulin among college students with plausible dietary reports. Nutrition 2009;25(9):896-904.
• 25. Grimes CA, Riddell LJ, Nowson CA. Consumer knowledge and attitudes to salt intake and labelled salt information. Appetite 2009;53(2):189-94.
• 26. Sağlam F, Gümüş A, Dokcan B. Tüketicilerin Besin Satın Alımına İlişkin Bilgi Tutum ve Davranışları. Beslenme ve Diyet Dergisi 1999;28(1):39-46.
• 27. Murphy G, Corcoran C, Tatlow-Golden M, et al. See, Like, Share, Remember: Adolescents’ Responses to Unhealthy-, Healthy- and Non-Food Advertising in Social Media. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(7).
• 28. Zimmerman FJ, Shimoga SV. The effects of food advertising and cognitive load on food choices. BMC Public Health 2014;14(1):342.
• 29. Henderson VR, Kelly B. Food Advertising in the Age of Obesity: Content Analysis of Food Advertising on General Market and African American Television. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2005;37(4):191-6.