Evaluation of Turkish videos about breast self-examination on YouTube

Year 2024, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 210 - 217, 04.03.2024

Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş , Eray Balcı

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1329729

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Objectives: Breast self-examination (BSE) is very important to early detect breast cancer in women in addition to imaging methods. The easiest way to access information concerning how to perform this examination is undoubtedly the internet, and the most popular platform is YouTube. However, the most important disadvantage of this massive platform is the risk of spreading false information since it cannot be audited. This study aimed to evaluate Turkish videos on BSE on YouTube in terms of quality and content.

Methods: On January 17, 2022, a search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword “breast self-examination”, and the first 210 videos presented on the first five pages were obtained. After applying the study criteria, 156 were included in the sample and evaluated by two general surgeons in terms of educational value, content, and upload source.

Results: Of the 156 videos, 23 were categorized as useful (14.7%) and 133 as misleading (85.3%). When examined according to the upload source group, universities/professional organizations/non-profit physicians/physicians had the highest rate of misleading videos (96.9%), while stand-alone health information websites had the highest rate of useful videos (24%). There was no significant difference between the upload sources in terms of video length, number of views, content score, or quality score.

Conclusions: The number of useful Turkish videos on BSE is very low. Our results indicate the need for more educational and useful videos to be produced, especially by healthcare professionals who use the YouTube platform.

Keywords

Breast cancer, YouTube, video, usefulness, quality

References

• 1. GLOBOCAN 2020: New global cancer data. https://www.uicc.org/news/globocan-2020-new-global-cancer-data (Accessed on November 24, 2021).
• 2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654.
• 3. Glass AG, Lacey JV Jr, Carreon JD, Hoover RN. Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(15):1152-1161. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm059.
• 4. Kohler BA, Sherman RL, Howlader N, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(6):djv048. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv048.
• 5. de Gelder R, Heijnsdijk EA, Fracheboud J, Draisma G, de Koning HJ. The effects of population-based mammography screening starting between age 40 and 50 in the presence of adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(1):165-172. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29364.
• 6. Munoz D, Near AM, van Ravesteyn NT, et al. Effects of screening and systemic adjuvant therapy on ER-specific US breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(11):dju289. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju289.
• 7. World Health Organization. Breast cancer: prevention and control; 2015. http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/ (Accessed on July 27, 2015).
• 8. Kegeles SS. Education for breast self-examination: why, who, what, and how? Prev Med. 1985;14(6):702-720. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90068-4.
• YouTube statistics. California, 2012, http://www.viralblog.com/research-cases/youtube-statistics/
• 10. Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1035.
• 11. Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Hesse B. Cancer-related information seeking: hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Commun. 2006;11 (Suppl 1):147-156. doi: 10.1080/10810730600637574.
• 12. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111114.
• 13. Tutar MS, Mustafa A, ATCI AA, Yazar MA, Tosun OM, KOZANHAN B. [Evaluation of youtube-sourced Turkish videos for the usage of COVID-19 personal protective equipment]. Turk J Clin Lab. 2023;14:75-81. doi: 10.18663/tjcl.1212878. [Article in Turkish]
• 14. Briones R, Nan X, Madden K, Waks L. When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Commun. 2012;27(5):478-485. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.610258.
• 15. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2482-2484. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.21.2482.
• 16. Ache KA, Wallace LS. Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Oct;35(4):389-392. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.029.
• 17. Tian Y. Organ donation on Web 2.0: content and audience analysis of organ donation videos on YouTube. Health Commun. 2010;25(3):238-246. doi: 10.1080/10410231003698911.
• 18. Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(3):e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.007.
• 19. Steinberg PL, Wason S, Stern JM, Deters L, Kowal B, Seigne J. YouTube as source of prostate cancer information. Urology. 2010;75(3):619-622. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059.
• 20. Yoo JH, Kim J. Obesity in the new media: a content analysis of obesity videos on YouTube. Health Commun. 2012;27(1):86-97. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.569003.
• 21. Murugiah K, Vallakati A, Rajput K, Sood A, Challa NR. YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(3):332-334. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.015.
• 22. Azer SA, Algrain HA, AlKhelaif RA, AlEshaiwi SM. Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e241. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2728.
• 23. Azer SA. Understanding pharmacokinetics: are YouTube videos a useful learning resource? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2014;18:1957-1967.
• 24. Azer SA. Can "YouTube" help students in learning surface anatomy? Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(5):465-468. doi: 10.1007/s00276-012-0935-x.
• 25. Azer SA, Aleshaiwi SM, Algrain HA, Alkhelaif RA. Nervous system examination on YouTube. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:126. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-126.
• 26. Esen E, Aslan M, Sonbahar BÇ, Kerimoğlu RS. YouTube English videos as a source of information on breast self-examination. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(3):629-635. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5044-z.
• 27. Elicabuk H, Yaylacı S, Yilmaz A, Hatipoglu C, Kaya FG, Serinken M. The Reliability of Turkish "Basic Life Support" and "Cardiac Massage" Videos Uploaded to Websites. Eurasian J Med. 2016;48(1):15-19. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2015.61.
• 28. Şaşmaz MI, Akça AH. Reliability of trauma management videos on YouTube and their compliance with ATLS® (9th edition) guideline. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44(5):753-757. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0803-9.
• 29. Elangovan S, Kwan YH, Fong W. The usefulness and validity of English-language videos on YouTube as an educational resource for spondyloarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40(4):1567-1573. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05377-w.
• 30.Meteran H, Høj S, Sigsgaard T, Diers CS, Remvig C, Meteran H. The usefulness of YouTube videos on lung cancer. J Public Health (Oxf). 2023;45(2):e339-e345. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac092.
• 31. Diers CS, Remvig C, Meteran H, et al. The usefulness of YouTube videos as a source of information in asthma. J Asthma. 2023;60(4):737-743. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2093218.
• 32. Levin M, Wu V, Lee DJ, Cusimano MD, Lee JM. Validity and Usefulness of YouTube Videos Related to Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Patient Information. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021;83(Suppl 2):e54-e59. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722269.
• 33. Enver N, Doruk C, Kara H, Gürol E, Incaz S, Mamadova U. YouTube™ as an information source for larynx cancer: a systematic review of video content. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(7):2061-2069. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05906-y.