Radiology's role in dermatology: A closer look at two years of data

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 395 - 403, 04.03.2025

Betül Tiryaki Baştuğ , Hatice Gencer Başol

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1639130

Abstract

Objectives: Radiological imaging plays a vital role in dermatology, addressing complex diagnostic needs beyond visual examination. The study focuses on the use of radiology services by the dermatology clinic at Bilecik Training and Research Hospital over two years (January 2023-December 2024), focusing on modality preferences, clinical indications, and diagnostic impact.

Methods: Data from 451 imaging referrals were analyzed, covering patient demographics, imaging types, and clinical indications. Modalities included ultrasonography (USG), X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and other specialized techniques. Trends and diagnostic yields were assessed, with subgroup analysis by age and gender.

Results: Ultrasonography was the most frequently used imaging method (65.2%), followed by X-ray (18.6%), with MRI and CT used less often (5.1% and 4.4%, respectively). General medical examinations (29.93%) were the leading indication, achieving the highest diagnostic yield (85%). Pruritus (9.31%) and psoriasis (7.76%) were also notable indications. Most referrals involved middle-aged (41-60 years) and older adults (61+ years).

Conclusions: Ultrasonography and X-ray remain foundational tools in dermatology, providing essential support for diagnosis and management. These findings highlight the need for resource optimization and stronger collaboration between dermatology and radiology. Future research should explore imaging outcomes and emerging technologies to advance dermatological care.

Keywords

Dermatological imaging trends, radiology utilization in dermatology, X-Ray, ultrasound, CT, MRI

Ethical Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of Non-Interventional Clinical Research of Bilecik ¸Seyh Edebali University (Decision date: 27.11.2024 and no: 3).

Thanks

We would like to thank Bilecik Training and Research Hospital for providing the dataset and all the patients who volunteered to participate. All individuals have agreed to this consent

References

• 1. Gaurav V, Agrawal S, Najeeb A, Ahuja R, Saurabh S, Gupta S. Advancements in Dermatological Imaging Modalities. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2024;15(2):278-292. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_852_23.
• 2. Williams HC. On the definition of dermatological disease. Part 1: conceptual frameworks. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47(10):1805-1811. doi: 10.1111/ced.15279.
• 3. Rong J, Liu Y. Advances in medical imaging techniques. BMC Methods. 2024;1:10. doi: 10.1186/s44330-024-00010-7
• 4. Klibanov AL, Hossack JA. Ultrasound in Radiology: From Anatomic, Functional, Molecular Imaging to Drug Delivery and Image-Guided Therapy. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(9):657-670. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000188.
• 5. Ou X, Chen X, Xu X, et al. Recent Development in X-Ray Imaging Technology: Future and Challenges. Research (Wash D C). 2021;2021:9892152. doi: 10.34133/2021/9892152.
• 6. Hussain S, Mubeen I, Ullah N, et al. Modern Diagnostic Imaging Technique Applications and Risk Factors in the Medical Field: A Review. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5164970. doi: 10.1155/2022/5164970.
• 7. Alamri A, Alshareef M, Aljoudi SB, et al. Patterns of Dermatological Diseases in Inpatient Consultations at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: An Underexploited Opportunity for Dermatology Clinical Training. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22132. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22132.
• 8. Meşe İ, Taşlıçay CA, Kuzan BN, Kuzan TY, Sivrioğlu AK. Educating the next generation of radiologists: a comparative report of ChatGPT and e-learning resources. Diagn Interv Radiol . 2024;30(3):163-174. doi:10.4274/dir.2023.232496.
• 9. Kaffas AE, Vo-Phamhi JM, Griffin JF, Hoyt K. Critical Advances for Democratizing Ultrasound Diagnostics in Human and Veterinary Medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2024;26(1):49-65. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110222-095229.
• 10. Frush DP, Callahan MJ, Coley BD, Nadel HR, Paul Guillerman R. Comparison of the different imaging modalities used to image pediatric oncology patients: A COG diagnostic imaging committee/SPR oncology committee white paper. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023;70 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e30298. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30298.
• 11. Florkow MC, Willemsen K, Mascarenhas VV, Oei EHG, van Stralen M, Seevinck PR. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;56(1):11-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28067.
• 12 Ståhlbrandt H, Björnfot I, Cederlund T, Almén A. CT and MRI imaging in Sweden: retrospective appropriateness analysis of large referral samples. Insights Imaging. 2023;14(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01483-w.
• 13 Courtney A, Lopez DJ, Lowe AJ, Holmes Z, Su JC. Burden of Disease and Unmet Needs in the Diagnosis and Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Diverse Skin Types in Australia. J Clin Med. 2023;12(11):3812. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113812.
• 14. Jaworecka K, Kwiatkowska D, Marek-Józefowicz L, et al. Characteristics of pruritus in various clinical variants of psoriasis: Final report of the binational, multicentre, cross-sectional study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37(4):787-795. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18850.
• 15. Shafiei M, Shomal Zadeh F, Mansoori B, et al. Imaging More than Skin-Deep: Radiologic and Dermatologic Presentations of Systemic Disorders. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(8):2011. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12082011.
• 16. Jartarkar SR, Patil A, Wollina U, et al. New diagnostic and imaging technologies in dermatology. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(12):3782-3787. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14499.
• 17. Li Z, Koban KC, Schenck TL, Giunta RE, Li Q, Sun Y. Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology Image Analysis: Current Developments and Future Trends. J Clin Med. 2022;11(22):6826. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226826.
• 18. da Silva RBZ, Fogliatto FS, Krindges A, Dos Santos Cecconello M. Dynamic capacity allocation in a radiology service considering different types of patients, individual no-show probabilities, and overbooking. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):968. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06918-y.
• 19. Arkoudis NA, Karofylakis E, Moschovaki-Zeiger O, et al. Interdepartmental miscommunication regarding radiology: Addressing chronic challenges and exploring solutions. World J Radiol. 2024;16(5):109-114. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i5.109.