Cep Telefonu Sensörlerinin STEM Yaklaşımına Dahil Edilmesi: Phyphox Uygulaması ile Salıncak Etkinliği

Year 2023, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 508 - 533, 18.12.2023

Handan Ürek , Mustafa Çoramık

https://doi.org/10.56423/fbod.1292666

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, fen bilgisi öğretmen adayları için Phyphox uygulaması kullanılarak geliştirilen bir STEM etkinliğinin uygulanıp değerlendirilmesidir. Bu kapsamda 21 öğretmen adayı ile karma desende bir araştırma yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın verileri; Baydas ve Goktas (2016) tarafından geliştirilen “Öğretmen Adaylarının Gelecekteki Derslerinde Bilişim Teknolojilerini Kullanma Eğilimleri Ölçeği” ile araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen “Çalışma Yaprağı” ve “Etkinlik Değerlendirme Formu” yardımıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, etkinliğin öğretmen adaylarının gelecekteki derslerinde teknoloji kullanma eğilimleri üzerinde pozitif yönde anlamlı bir etki yarattığı ve öğretmen adaylarının Phyphox yardımıyla üç farklı cep telefonu sensöründen yararlanarak salıncak tasarımları yaptıkları belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanında, öğretmen adaylarının etkinlik ile ilgili olumlu görüşler ileri sürmekle birlikte bu süreçte bazı güçlükler de yaşadıkları saptanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar ışığında bu tür güncel teknolojik uygulamaların fen bilgisi öğretmen eğitiminde sıklıkla kullanılması önerilmektedir.

Keywords

Fen bilgisi öğretmen adayları, STEM etkinliği, Phyphox

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

Integration of Mobile Phone Sensors into STEM Approach: Swing Activity with Phyphox Application

Abstract

The aim of this research is to implement and evaluate a STEM activity developed using the Phyphox application for pre-service science teachers. For this purpose, a mixed design research was conducted with 21 pre-service science teachers. The data of the research was collected with the help of the "Teacher Candidates' Tendency to Use Information Technologies in Their Future Courses Scale” developed by Baydas and Goktas (2016) in addition to the “Worksheet” and “Activity Evaluation Form” developed by the researchers. The research includes the process of collecting pre and post-test data with three weeks of teaching and activity implementation. Data were analyzed both using quantitative and qualitative approaches. According to the results, the activity showed a significant positive effect on the tendency of pre-service teachers to use technology in their future courses and three different mobile phone sensors were utilized to make swing designs with the help of Phyphox. Also, the participants generally held positive views towards the activity whereas several of them stated difficulties. In the light of the study results, it can be suggested that such recent technological applications should be used more frequently in science teacher education.

Keywords

Pre-service science teachers, STEM activity, Phyphox.

Project Number

-

References

• Akarsu, M., Okur Akçay, N., & Elmas, R. (2020). STEM eğitimi yaklaşımının özellikleri ve değerlendirilmesi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 37, 155-175.
• Anagün, Ş. S., Karahan, E., & Kılıç, Z. (2020). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının probleme dayalı STEM uygulamalarına yönelik deneyimleri. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 11(4), 571-598.
• Aydoğan, B., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2022). The effects of engineering design‑based instruction on 7th grade students’ nature of engineering views. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31, 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09931-2
• Baydas, O., & Goktas, Y. (2016). Influential factors on preservice teachers' intentions to use ICT in future lessons. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 170-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.030
• Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2019). The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21465
• Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 1-8. 101827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827
• Borrachero, A. B., Brígido, M., Dávila, M. A., Costillo, E., Cañada, F., & Mellado, V. (2019). Improving the self-regulation in prospective science teachers: The case of the calculus of the period of a simple pendulum. Heliyon, 5(12), e02827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02827
• Brunsell, E. (2012). The engineering design process. In Brunsell, E. (Ed.), Integrating engineering + science in your classroom (pp. 3-5). Arlington, Virginia: National Science Teacher Association [NSTA].
• Buachoom, A., Thedsakhulwong, A., & Wuttiprom, S. (2019). An Arduino board with ultrasonic sensor investigation of simple harmonic motion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1380, 1-4. 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/012098
• Büyükdede, M., & Tanel, R. (2019). Effect of the STEM activities related to work-energy topics on academic achievement and prospective teachers’ opinions on STEM activities. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4), 507-518. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.507
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (11. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 30-35.
• Capobianco, B. M., & Radloff, J. (2022). Elementary preservice teachers’ trajectories for appropriating engineering design–based science teaching. Research in Science Education, 52, 1623–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10020-y
• Cin, A., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2019). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ile bilişim teknolojisi kullanım düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(65), 741-755.
• Çelik, C., Çelik, B., & Alpaslan, M. M. (2021). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının derste teknoloji kullanımına yönelik eğilimleri. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 503- 519. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.835314
• Çoramık, M., & Ürek, H. (2021). Calculation of kinetic friction coefficient with Phyphox, Tracker and Algodoo. Physics Education, 56(6), 1–10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac1e75
• English, L. D., King, D., & Smeed, J. (2017). Advancing integrated STEM learning through engineering design: Sixth-grade students’ design and construction of earthquake resistant buildings. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1264053
• Ercan, S. (2014). Fen eğitiminde mühendislik uygulamalarının kullanımı: Tasarım temelli fen eğitimi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Eroğlu, S., & Bektaş, O. (2022). The effect of 5E-based STEM education on academic achievement, scientific creativity, and views on the nature of science. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102181.
• Fan, S-C., & Yu, K-C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x
• Guzey, S. S., Moore, T., & Morse, G. (2016). Student interest in engineering design-based science. School Science and Mathematics, 116(8), 411–419. https://doi. org/10.1111/ssm.12198
• Gülçiçek, Ç., & Yağbasan, R. (2004). Basit sarkaç sisteminde mekanik enerjinin korunumu konusunda öğrencilerin kavram yanılgıları. GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 23-38.
• Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing students’ creativity through STEM project-based learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(2), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271
• Hochberg, K., Kuhn, J., & Müller, A. (2018). Using smartphones as experimental tools—Effects on interest, curiosity, and learning in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9731-7
• Iradat, R. D., & Alatas, F. (2017). The implementation of problem-solving based laboratory activities to teach the concept of simple harmonic motion in senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012014
• Irmak, M., & Öztürk, N. (2022). Understanding preservice science teachers’ views about engineers and engineering in an engineering-focused STEM course. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/12603
• Karamustafaoğlu, O., Aydın, M., & Özmen, H. (2005). Bilgisayar destekli fizik etkinliklerinin öğrenci kazanımlarına etkisi: Basit harmonik hareket örneği. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 4(4), 67-81.
• Kaya, A., Çepni, S., & Küçük, M. (2004). Fizik öğretmenlerinin laboratuarlara yönelik hizmet içi ihtiyaçları için bir program geliştirme çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 12(1), 41-56.
• Kuvac, M., & Koc, I. (2022). Enhancing preservice science teachers’ perceptions of engineer and engineering through STEM education: a focus on drawings as evidence. Research in Science & Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2052038
• Lou, S-J., Shih, R-C., Diez, R. C., & Tseng, K-H. (2011). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: An exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8
• Nanto, D., Agustina, R. D., Ramadhanti, I., Putra, R. P., & Mulhayatiah, D. (2022). The usefulness of LabXChange virtual lab and PhyPhox real lab on pendulum student practicum during pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2157, 1-8. https//doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/2157/1/012047
• Nuhoğlu, H, & Güvercin Seçkin, G. (2021). Öğretmenlerin 21. yüzyıl öğreten-öğrenen becerileri ile bilişim teknolojisi kullanım düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(3), 1358-1388.
• Nuryantini, A. Y., Fajriah, H. N., Zakwandi, R., & Nuryadin, B. W. (2020). Simple harmonic motion experiments with the accelerometer sensor on a smartphone: Improving the problem solving-ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1572, 1-4. 012058 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012058
• Oliveira, A., Behnagh, R. F., Ni, L., Mohsinah, A. A., Burgess, K. J., & Guo, L. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.141
• Parker, C., Smith, E. L., McKinney, D., & Laurier, A. (2016). The application of the engineering design process to curriculum revision: A collaborative approach to STEM curriculum refinement in an urban district. School Science and Mathematics, 116(7), 399-406.
• Pierratos, T., & Polatoglou, H. M. (2020). Utilizing the phyphox app for measuring kinematics variables with a smartphone. Physics Education, 55, 1-6.
• Pili, U., & Violanda, R. (2018). A simple pendulum-based measurement of g with a smartphone light sensor. Physics Education, 53, 1-4. 043001
• Pili, U., & Violanda, R. (2019). Measurement of the gravitational acceleration using a simple pendulum apparatus, ultrasonic sensor, and Arduino. Physics Education, 54, 1-5. 043009
• Purba, S. W. D., & Hwang, W-Y. (2018). Investigation of learning behaviors and achievement of simple pendulum for vocational high school students with ubiquitous-physics app. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2877-2893. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90985
• Pusch, A., Ubben, M. S., Laumann, D., Heinicke, S., & Heusler, S. (2021). Real-time data acquisition using Arduino and phyphox: measuring the electrical power of solar panels in contexts of exposure to light in physics classroom. Physics Education, 56, 1-13.
• Ringo, S. S., Samsudin, A., & Ramalis, T. R. (2019). Utilizing Rasch model to analyze a gender gap in students’ cognitive ability on simple harmonic motion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012054
• Shume, T., Bowen, B., Altimus, J., & Kallmeyer, A. (2022). Rural secondary STEM teachers’ understanding of the engineering design process: Impacts of participation in a research experiences for teachers program. Theory & Practice in Rural Education (TPRE), 12(2), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2022.v12n2p89-103
• Som, İ. (2017). The examination of the opinions of pre-service teachers on usage of the information technologies for educational purposes. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(3), 882-898.
• Somroob, S., & Wattanakasiwich, P. (2017). Investigating student understanding of simple harmonic Motion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 901, 1-4. 012123 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/901/1/012123
• Staacks, S., Dorsel, D., Hütz, S., Stallmach, F., Splith, T., Heinke, H., & Stampfer, C. (2022). Collaborative smartphone experiments for large audiences with phyphox. European Journal of Physics, 43, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ac7830
• Staacks, S., Hütz, S., Heinke, H., & Stampfer, C. (2018). Advanced tools for smartphone-based experiments: Phyphox. Physics Education, 53, 1-7.
• Stampfer, C., Heinke, H., & Staacks, S. (2020). A lab in the pocket. Nature Reviews Materials, 5, 169-170.
• Sungur Gül, K. (2020). Tasarım temelli öğrenme yaklaşımı ile STEM eğitimi. (Ed. M. Çevik). Ders planları kurgusunda öğretme öğrenme yaklaşımlarıyla uygulamalı STEM eğitimi içinde (ss. 319-341). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Tseng, K-H., Chang, C-C., Lou, S-J., & Chen, W-P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
• Tuada, R. N., Kuswanto, H., Saputra, A. T., & Aji, S. H. (2020). Physics mobile learning with scaffolding approach in simple harmonic motion to improve student learning independence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440, 1-8. 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012043
• Tzamalis, P. G., Kateris, A., Lazos, P., Tsoukos, S., & Velentzas, A. (2021). An educational proposal for students’ experimentation in a distance learning environment. Physics Education, 56, 1-8.
• Uzun, F. (2013). Bağlam temelli yaklaşıma dayalı genel fizik-I laboratuvar dersinin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının başarılarına, bilimsel süreç becerilerine, motivasyonlarına ve hatırlamalarına etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Ürek, H., & Çoramık, M. (2022). A suggestion and evaluation of a STEM activity about friction coefficient for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 10(19), 202–235. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1063301
• Wendell, K. B., Connolly, K. G., Wright, C. G., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., Barnett, M., & Maruclu, I. (2010, January). Incorporating engineering design into elementary school science curricula. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY.
• Wijaya, P. A., Widodo, A., & Muslim. (2020). Virtual experiment of simple pendulum to improve student’s conceptual understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806, 1-7. 012133 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012133
• Yıldırım, B. (2020). 5E öğrenme modeliyle STEM eğitimi. (Ed. M. Çevik). Ders planları kurgusunda öğretme öğrenme yaklaşımlarıyla uygulamalı STEM eğitimi içinde (ss. 29-45). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (11. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Zhai, X., Zhang, M., Li, M., & Zhang, X. (2019). Understanding the relationship between levels of mobile technology use in high school physics classrooms and the learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 750-766. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12700