Barış Performanslarının LOPCOW Tabanlı WISP Yöntemi İle Analizi: G7 Ülkeleri Örneği

Year 2023, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 215 - 241, 30.12.2023

Furkan Fahri Altıntaş

https://doi.org/10.58620/fbujoss.1313949

Abstract

Büyük ekonomilerin barış performansları, küresel anlamda ekonomiyi ve ekonomi ile bağlantılı diğer boyutların gelişimini etkilediği için söz konusu büyük ekonomilere sahip olan ülkelerin barış performanslarının incelenmesinin önemli olduğu değerlendirilebilir. Bu bağlamda araştırmada, G7 gurubu ülkelerin Küresel Barış Endeksi (GPI) 2022 raporunda belirtilen GPI bileşen değerleri ile söz konusu ülkelerin barış performansları LOPCOW tabanlı WISP yöntemi ile ölçülmüştür. Bulgulara göre, LOPCOW yöntemi kapsamında ilk olarak ülkeler açısından en önemli GPI bileşeninin ‘‘organize çatışma (içsel)’’, en az önemli GPI bileşenin ise ‘‘silahlara erişim’’ olduğu gözlenmiştir. İkinci olarak LOPCOW tabanlı WISP yöntemine göre ülkelerin barış performansları İtalya, Kanada, Almanya, Japonya, İngiltere, Fransa ve ABD olarak sıralanmıştır. Ayrıca ülkelerin ortalama barış performans değeri ölçülmüş ve söz konusu ortalama barış performans değerinin üstünde performansa sahip olan ülkelerin İtalya ve Kanada olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuca göre, küresel ekonomiye daha fazla katkılarının olması için Almanya, Japonya, İngiltere, Fransa ve ABD’nin barış performanslarının artırması gerektiği değerlendirilmiştir. Yöntem açısından ise duyarlılık, diskriminant ve ilişki analizlerine göre ülkelerin GPI kapsamında barış performanslarının LOPCOW tabanlı WISP yöntemi ile ölçülebileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Barış, barış performansı, G7, LOBCOW, LOBCOW tabanlı WISP

Analysis of Peace Performances by LOPCOW-Based WISP Method: The Case of G7 Countries

Abstract

Since the peace performances of large economies affect the global economy and the development of other dimensions related to the economy, it can be considered that it is important to examine the peace performances of the countries with these large economies. In this context, in the research, the GPI component values specified in the Global Peace Index (GPI) 2022 report of the G7 group countries and the peace performances of these countries were measured with the LOPCOW-based WISP method. According to the findings, within the scope of the LOPCOW method, it was observed that the most important GPI component for countries was "organized conflict (internal)", and the least important GPI component was "access to weapons". Secondly, according to the LOPCOW-based WISP method, the peace performances of the countries were ranked as Italy, Canada, Germany, Japan, England, France and the USA. In addition, the average peace performance value of the countries was measured and it was determined that the countries with performance above the said average peace performance value were Italy and Canada. According to this result, it was evaluated that the peace performances of Germany, Japan, England, France and the USA should increase in order to contribute more to the global economy. In terms of method, according to sensitivity, discriminant and relationship analysis, it was concluded that the peace performances of the countries within the scope of GPI can be measured with the LOPCOW-based WISP method.

Keywords

Peace, peace performance, G7, LOBCOW, LOBCOW based WISP

References

• Akkuş, E. G. (2020). Yumuşak Güç ve Küresel Barış Gücü Arasındaki İlişki. SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi, 30(2), 161-178.
• Altıntaş, F. F (2022). G20 Ülkelerinin istatistik performanslarının analizi istatistik varyans prosedürü tabanlı MOOSRA yöntemi ile bir uygulama. Journal of Pure Social Sciences, 3(5), 1-18. Amavilah, V., Asongu, S. A., & Andrés, A. R. (2017). Effects of Globalization on Peace and Stability: Implications for Governance and The Knowledge Economy of African Countries. Yaoundé: African Governance and Development Institute.
• Bektaş, S. (2022). Türk Sigorta Sektörünün 2002-2021 Dönemi için MEREC, LOPCOW, COCOSO, ÇKKV Yöntemleri ile Performansının Değerlendirilmesi. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, 16(2), 247-283.
• Biswas, S., & Joshi, N. (2023). A Performance based Ranking of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in India. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), 15-32.
• Biswas, S., Bandyopadhyay, G., & Mukhopadhyaya, J. N. (2022). A Multi Dividend Pay Capabil Ities: Evidence From Indian Fmcg And Consumer Durable Sector. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 5(2), 140-175.
• Biswas, S., Bandyopadhyay, G., & Mukhopadhyaya, J. N. (2022). A Multi-Criteria Based Analytic Framework for Exploring The Impact of Covid-19 on Firm Performance In Emerging Market. Decision Analytics Journal, 5(2), 140-175.
• Bove, V., & Elia, L. (2017). Economic Development in Peacekeeping Host Countries. CESifo Economic Studies,, 0(0), 1-17.
• Demir, G., & Arslan, R. (2022). Sensitivity Analysis in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 1025-1056.
• Deyshappriya, N. (2016). Do Corruption and Peace Affect Economic Growth? Evidences from The Cross-Country Analysis. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 17(2), 135-147.
• Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2022). A Novel LOPCOW-DOBI Multi-Criteris Sustainability Performance Assessmwnt Methodology: An Application in Developing Country Banking Sector . Omega, 1-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102690.
• Ecer, F., Küçükönder, H., Kayapınar Kaya, S., & Görçün, Ö. F. (2023). Sustainability Performance Analysis of Micro Mobility solutions in Urban Transportation with A Novel IVFNN Delphi LOPCOW CoCoSo Framework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 172, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103667.
• Ecer, F., Yaran Ögel, İ., Krishankumar, R., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2023). The q rung Fuzzy LOPCOW VIKOR Model to Assess The Role of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Precision Agriculture Realization In The Agri Food 4.0 Era. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10476-6.
• Enyi, E. P., Rufus, A. I., & Iyanuoluwa, A. T. (2020). The Impact of Peace Accounting on Economic Growth of Sub-Saharan African Countries. The International Journal Of Business & Management, 8(3), 162-168.
• Feyzabadi, V. Y., Haghdoost, A., Mehrolhassani, M. H., & Aminian, Z. (2015). The Association between Peace and Life Expectancy: An Empirical Study of the World Countries. Iran J Public Health, 44(3), 341-351.
• Galtung, J. (1967). Theories of Peace A Synthetic Approach to Peace Thinking. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.
• Gigovič, L., Pamučar, D., Bajič, Z., & Milicevič, M. (2016). The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots. Sustainability, 8(232), 1-30.
• Grewal, B. S. (2003). School of Social Science-Auckland University of Technology, 1-7.
• Harris, I. M. (2004). Peace Education Theory. Journal of Peace Education, 1(1), 5–20.
• Harris, I. M., & Morrıson, M. L. (2013). Peace Education. North Carolina: Mcfarland Company Publishers.
• Hasan, M. M., Ali, M. A., & Xuan, L. (2013). Does FDI Promote Peace? A Relationship Between Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Global Peace. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(19), 28-37.
• Hezam, I. M., Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., & Alshamrani, A. M. (tarih yok). A Combined Intuitionistic Fuzzy Closeness Coefficient and A Double Normalization-Based WISP Method To Solve The Gerontechnology Selection Problem For Aging Persons And People With Disability. AIMS Mathematics, 8(6), 13680–13705.
• İmamoğlu, H. V., & Bayraktar, G. (2014). Türk ve Macar Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Barış Kavramına İlişkin Algılarının Karşılaştırılması. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1), 20-44.
• Institute for Economics & Peace . (2022). Global Peace Index 2022: Measuring Peace in a Complex World. Sydney: Institute for Economics & Peace Publisching .
• Iyanuoluwa, A. T., Rufus, A. I., & Enyi, E. P. (2020). The Impact of Peace Accounting on Human Capital Development of Sub-Saharan African Countries. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 8(3), 168-175.
• Jelilov, G., & Aleshinloye, M. F. (2017). Aspect of Inclusion in Sustainable Peace and Development. Pyrex Journal of Business and Finance Management Research, 3(1), 1-7.
• Jensen, L. (2020). Foreign Direct Investment And Growth In Fragile And Conflictaffected-The Role of Peacekeeping and Natural Resources. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Tsojvold, D. (2012). Effective Cooperation, The Foundation of Sustainable Peace. P. Coleman içinde, Psychological Components of Sustainable Peace (s. 15-53). New York: Springer.
• Joseph, J., Katsos, J. E., & Buren, H. J. (2022). Entrepreneurship and Peacebuilding: A Review and Synthesis. Business & Society, 1-41. DOI: i.org/10.1177/00076503221084638.
• Kalaycı, İ. (2011). Afrika’nın Melez Yüzü, ‘MENA’:Makro İktisadi Göstergelere ve Küresel Endekslere Göre ‘Manası’. Avrasya Etüdleri, 40(2), 175-199.
• Keleş, N. (2023). Türkiye’nin 81 İlinin Sağlık Performansının Güncel Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Değerlendirilmesi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(75), 120-141.
• Kırmzı, M., Karakaş, S., & Uçar, H. (2023). Selecting the Optimal Naval Ship Drainage System Design Alternative Based on Integer Linear Programming TOPSIS, and Simple WISP Methods. J Ship Prod Des, 39(2), 63–74.
• Mahmoud, Y., Makoond, A., & Naik, A. (2017). Entrepreneurship for Sustaining Peace. Vıenna: International Peace Institute.
• Nor, M. I., & Masron, T. A. (2018). Turkish Foreign Direct Investment and Peace in Somalia: A New Political Stabilization Policy. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(2), s. 419-436.
• Organization, I. L. (2021). Peace and Conflict Analysis. Geneva: International Labour Organization .
• Özdemir, A., Eser, M., & Erol, H. (2018). Küresel Terörizm Ve Yoksulluk İlişkisi. Social Science Development Journal, 3(12), 434-446.
• Pala, O. (2023). SD VE WISP Yaklaşimlari ile Gıda Sektöründe Finansal Performans Analizi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 24(1), 59-79.
• Pierpont, B., & Krueger, G. (2005). Violent Conflict and Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Economies:A Panel Data Analysis. Erişim Adresi: https://www.minneapolisfed.org/~/media/files/mea/contest/2006papers/pierpont.pdf?la=en. Erişim Tarihi: 05.01.2023
• Pratt, S., & Liu, A. (2015). Does Tourism Really Lead to Peace? A Global View . International Journal of Tourism Research, s. 1-10. DOI: 10.1002/jtr.2035.
• Sanjiba, B., Gautam, B., Pamucar, D., & Sanyal, A. (2022). A Decision Making Framework for Comparing Sales and Operational Performance of Firms in Emerging Market. International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems, 26(3), 229-248.
• Santhirasegaram, S. (2008). Peace and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Pooled Data Cross-Country Empirical Study. International Conference on Applied Economics – ICOAE 2008 (s. 807-814). Kastoria: TEI of Western Macedonia Press.
• Scheffran, J. (2017). Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Peace. O. Olayide, V. Mauerhofer, & P. Cerin içinde, ISDRS NEWSLETTER Issue 3 (s. 1-4). ISDRS NEWSLETTER .
• Sharifi, A., & Simangan, D. (2022). Environmental Sustainability: The Missing Pillar of Positive Peace. K. Standish, H. Devere, A. Suazo, & R. Rafferty içinde, The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Peace (s. 661-679). New York: palgrave mcmillan.
• Simangan, D., Lee, C. Y., Sharifi, A., Candelaria, J. L., & Kaneko, S. (2022). A Global Analysis of Interactions between Peace and Environmental Sustainability. Earth System Governance(14), 1-13.
• Simic, V., Dabicmiletic, S., Tirkolaee, E. B., Stević, Ž., Ala, A., & Amirteimoori, A. (2023). Neutrosophic LOPCOW ARAS Model for Prioritizing Industry 4.0 Based Material Handling Technologies In Smart And Sustainable Warehouse Management Systems. Applied Soft Computing, 143, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110400.
• Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., Popovic, G., Smarandache, F., Stanimirović, P. S., Saračević5, M., et al. (2022). A Single Valued Neutrosophic Extension of the Simple WISP Method. Informatica, 33(3), 635–651.
• Stanujkic, D., Karabaševic, D., Popovic, G., Zavadskas, E. K., Saracevic, M., Stanimirovic, P. S., et al. (2021). Comparative Analysis of the Simple WISP and Some Prominent MCDM Methods: A Python Approach. Axioms , 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10040347.
• Stanujkic, D., Popovic, G., Karabasevic, D., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., & Ulutaş, A. (2021). An integrated Simple Weighted Sum Product Method—WISP. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1-12. DOI: /doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3075783.
• Svensson, P., Andersson, F. O., Mahoney, T. Q., & Ha, J.-P. (2019). Antecedents and Outcomes of Social Innovation: A Global Study of Sport for Development and Peace Organizations. Sport Management Review, 23(4), 657-670.
• Taheri, M. A., & Dehghan, M. (2014). Definitioan of Peace and Its Different Types as Approached by Halqeh Mysticscm. Social and Behavioral Sciences(114), 56–61.
• Takian, A., & Rajaeieh, G. (2020). Peace, Health, and Sustainable Development in the Middle East. Arch Iran Med., 23(4), 23-26.
• Topal, M. H., & Günay, H. F. (2017). Küresel Kamu Mallari Perspektifinden Küreselleşme, Yoksulluk ve Küresel Barış Arasındakİ İlişki. Global Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 6(11), s. 57-69.
• Türker, O. (2018). Kamu Harcamalarinin Dış Ticaret Üzerindeki Etkisi: G7 Ükeleri Örneği. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(27), 141-156.
• Ulutaş, A., Balo, F., & Topal, A. (2023). Identifying the Most Efficient Natural Fibre for Common Commercial Building Insulation Materials with an Integrated PSI, MEREC, LOPCOW and MCRAT Model. Polymers, 15, 1-23.
• Ulutaş, A., Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., Popovic, G., & Novaković, S. (2022). Pallet Truck Selection with MEREC and WISP-S Methods. Strategic Management, 27(4), 23-29.
• Ulutaş, A., Topal, A., Pamucar, D., Stevic, Ž., Karabaševic, D., & Popovic, G. (2022). A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods. Sustainability, 14, 1-20.
• United Nations. (2012). UN System Task Team on the POST-2015 UN Development Agenda. New York: UN Publisching.
• Ünlü, A. D. (2022). Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States. Üsküdar University Journal of Social Sciences(14), 91-108.
• Webel, C., & Kaba, M. (2019). A Cultural History of Peace in the Modern Age. R. Edsforth içinde, Definitions of Peace in the Modern Era since 1920 (s. 21-40). London: Bloomsbury Publisching.
• Zavadskas, E. K., Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., & Turskis, Z. (2022). Analysis of the Simple WISP Method Results Using Different Normalization Procedures. Studies in Informatics and Control, 31(1), 5-12.
• Zavadskas, E. K., Stanujkic, D., Turskis, Z., & Karabasevic, D. (2022). An Intuitionistic Extension of the Simple WISP Method. Entropy, 24, 1-11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/e24020218.