“Şeylerin” Toplumsalı Mümkün Kılması Üzerine: Cam, Saat, Doğum Kontrol Hapı

Year 2024, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 299 - 326, 31.08.2024

Ezgi Pehlivanlı

Abstract

Bu kuramsal çalışma sosyolojik analizlerde çoğunlukla yer verilmeyen toplumsal ilişkileri cansız nesnelerin mümkün kıldığı yaklaşımını nesnelerin sosyal tarihini alternatif bir yöntem ile ele alarak düşünmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Örneğin sosyal kuramda bir analiz kategorisi olarak kullanılan Üretim Araçları kavramı bu araçların kendisinden hiç bahsedilmeden yalnız toplumsal izdüşümleri araştırılarak anlaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın ana problemi sosyolojinin yalnız insanları analiz kategorisi olarak görmesinden kaynaklanan tarihi ve sosyal dinamikleri anlamlandırmada eksiklik yaratan bu kuramsal tavrı yeniden ele almaya çalışmaktır. Bu kapsamda yazıda bilgi arkeolojisi ve Aktör Ağ Kuramı ortaklaştırılarak şeylerin toplumsalı mümkün kılan araçlar olarak anlatılması ve toplumsal cinsiyet ve sınıf gibi dinamiklerin de bu yöntemle araştırılabileceğini ortaya koymak amaçlanmaktadır.

Keywords

Nesnelerin Failliği, Şeyler, Bilgi Arkeolojisi, Aktör Ağ Kuramı, Sosyolojik Yöntem

References

• Barad, K. (2022) Posthümanist Edimsellik: Maddenin Nasıl Maddeleştiğini/Önem Arz Ettiğini Kavramaya Doğru. Buran, S. & Kümbet, P. haz. Çokdisiplinli Çalışmalarda Posthümanizm içinde. Londra: Transnational Press: 65-115.
• Basso, P. (2003) Modern Times, Ancient Hours: Working Lives in the Twenty-First Century. Londra: Verso.
• Bauman, Z. & May, T. (2014) Thinking Sociologically. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Bennett, J. (2020) Vibrant matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Blevins, J. (2014) Thomas Hardy's Timing: Poems and Clocks in late NineteenthCentury England. Victorian Poetry, 52(4): 591-618.
• Bowker, G. C. (2014) All Together Now: Synchronization, Speed, and the Failure of Narrativity. History and Theory, 53(4): 563-576.
• Braidotti, R. (1993) Discontinuous Becomings. Deleuze on the Becoming-Woman of Philosophy. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 24 (1): 44-55.
• Burns, T. (1969) Industrial Man: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Cahn, N. & Carbone, J. (2009) Family Classes: Rethinking Contraceptive Choice. U. Fla. JL & Pub. Poly (20): 361.
• Callon, M., Rip, A. ve Law, J. haz. (1986) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. New York: Springer.
• Callon, M. (1999). Actor‐Network Theory – the Market Test. The Sociological Review, 47(1): 181-195.
• Callon, M. (2008). Economic Markets and the Rise of Interactive Agencements: From ProstheticAagencies to Habilitated Agencies. Pinch, T. & Swedberg, R. haz. Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies içinde. Cambridge: MIT Press: 29-56.
• Canales, J. (2016) Clock/lived. Burges, J., & Elias, A. J. haz. Time: A Vocabulary of the Present içinde. Londra: NYU Press: 113-128.
• Chatterjee, P. (1997) Our Modernity. Rotterdam & Dakar: Sephis Press.
• Collins, P. H. (2017) Intersectionality and Epistemic Injustice. Kidd, J. Medina, J. & Pohlhaus, G. haz. The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice içinde. Londra: Routledge: 115–124.
• Cowan, R. S. (1998). The ‘Industrial Revolution’ in the Home: Household Technology and Social Change in the Twentieth Century. Hopkins, P. haz. Sex/Machine: Readings in Culture, Gender and Technology içinde. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press: 128-142.
• Diken, B. (2018) Strangers, Ambivalence and Social Theory. Londra: Routledge.
• Dhont, M. (2010) History of Oral Contraception. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 15(2): 12-18.
• Dohrn-van Rossum, G. (1996) History of the Hour: Clocks and Modern Temporal Orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Dragoman, M. V. (2014) The Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill-Recent Developments, Risks and Benefits. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 28(6): 825834.
• Drake, P. (2015) Marxism and the Nonhuman Turn: Animating Nonhumans, Exploitation, and Politics with ANT and Animal Atudies. Rethinking Marxism, 27(1): 107122.
• Everett, B.G., Sanders, J.N., Myers, K., Geist, C. ve Turok, D. K. (2018) One In Three: Challenging Heteronormative Assumptions Family Planning Health Centers. Contraception içinde, 98(4): 270-274.
• Foucault, M. (1982) The subject and power. Critical inquiry, 8(4): 777-795.
• Foucault, M. (1984) Cinselliğin Tarihi. Çev. H. U. Tanrıöver, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Foucault, M. (1999) Discipline and Punish. New York: Pantheon.
• Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977-1978. New York: Picador.
• Gad, C. ve Bruun Jensen, C. (2010) On the consequences of post-ANT. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(1): 55-80.
• Goldin, C. & Katz, L.F. (2002) The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4): 730-770.
• Grose, D.F. (2017). The Hellenistic, Roman and Medieval Glass from Cosa. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press.
• Habermas, J. (1970). Technology and science as “Ideology”. J. Habermas. haz. Toward a Rational Society içinde. Boston, MA: Beacon Press: 56-87.
• Habermas, J. (2001) İletişimsel Eylem Kuramı. Çev. M. Tüzel. İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınları
• Haraway, D. (2006) Siborg Manifestosu. Çev. O. Akınhay. İstanbul: Agora
• Haraway, D. (2013) Situated Knowledges: The Science Question In Feminism and The Privilege of Partial Perspective. Women, Science, and Technology. Londra: Routledge: 455-472.
• Harvey, P & Knox, H. (2014) Objects and Materials: An Introduction’, P. Harvey, E. C. Casella G. Evans, vd. haz. Objects & Materials içinde, Londra: Routledge:1-17.
• Harootunian, H. (2010) ‘Modernity’and the Claims of Untimeliness. Postcolonial Studies, 13(4): 367-382.
• Heilbroner, R. L. (1967) Do Machines Make History?. Technology and Culture, 8(3): 335-345.
• Koskela, H. (2000) ‘The Gaze Without Eyes’: Video-Surveillance and The Changing Nature of Urban Space. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2): 243-265.
• Ignatiadou, D., Dotsika, E. Kouras, A. ve Maniatis, Y. (2005) Nitrum Chalestricum: the Natron of Macedonia. Annales du 16e Congres de l’Association Internationale pour l’Histoire du Verre (16): 64-67.
• Johnson, E. (2020) Why Does ANT Need Haraway for Thinking about Gendered Bodies?, The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, Routledge, Londra: 121-132.
• LaFratta, Isabella. (2023) Exploring LGBT experiences with family planning and reproductive health. bsu honors program theses and projects, item 646, içinde. Available at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/ 646. (Erişim tarihi: 12 Ağustos 2024).
• Lagesen, V.A. (2012) Reassembling Gender: Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and the Making of the Technology in Gender. Social Studies of Science, 42(3): 442-448.
• Laszlo E (2008) Quantum Shift in the Global Brain: How the New Scientific Reality can Change Us and Our World. Rochester, VT.:Inner Traditions.
• Laszlo, C. (2008) Sustainable Value: How the World’s Leading Companies are Doing Well by Doing Good. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Latour B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Çev. C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
• Latour, B. (1996) On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications. Soziale welt: 369-381.
• Latour, B. (1998) To Modernize or to Ecologize? That’s the Question, Castree, N. & Braun, W.B. haz. Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium içinde, Londra: Routledge: 249-273
• Latour, B. (1999) On Recalling ANT. The sociological review, 47(1): 15-25.
• Latour, B. (2007) Reassembling The Social: An İntroduction To Actor-NetworkTheory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lemke, T. (2015) New Materialisms: Foucault and the ‘Government of Things’. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(4): 3-25.
• Law, J. (1999) After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology. The Sociological Review, 47(1): 1-14.
• Law, J. (2009) Actor-Network Theory and Material Semiotics.: Turner, B. haz. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory içinde. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 141-58.
• Layard, A. H. (1882) Nineveh and Babylon: A Narrative of a Second Expedition to Assyria during the Years 1849, 1850, and 1851, London: John Murray.
• Malešević, S. (2010) How Pacifist were the Founding Fathers?: War and Violence in Classical Sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(2): 193-212.
• Marx, K. (1873) Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production. Berlin: Humboldt.
• Marx, K. (1859) Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. The Marx-Engels Reader, (2):3-6.
• Marx K. (1920) The Poverty of Philosophy. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr
• Marx, K. (2016) Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Londra: Routledge.
• Marx, K. (1976) Capital: Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1. l. Princeton: Princeton University Press:1-284.
• Meillassoux, Q. (2008) After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. New York: Continuum.
• Michael, M. (2000) Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature. From Society to Heterogeneity. New York: Routledge.
• Mouzakitis, A. (2017) Modernity and the Idea of Progress. Frontiers in Sociology, 2:3.
• Oppenheım (1970) Glass-making in Ancient Mesopotamia Corontoning Museum of Glass. Londra: Associated University Presses
• Pompa, L. (2013) One Brick at a Time: The Power and Possibility of Dialogue Across The Prison Wall. The Prison Journal, 93(2): 127-134.
• Porcheron, M. (2019) Understanding Conversation around Technology Use in CasualSocial Settings. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi: Nottingham Üniversitesi.
• Preciado, P. B. (2013) Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs, andBiopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era, Çev. B. Benderson. New York: The Feminist Press
• Ritzer, G. (2012) Modern Sosyoloji Kuramları. Çev. H. Hülür. Ankara: De Ki.
• Shaw, W. H. (1979) “The Handmill Gives You the Feudal Lord": Marx's Technological Determinism. History and Theory, 18(2): 155-176.
• Shortland, A. J. (2007) Who were the glassmakers? Status, Theory and Method In MidSecond Millennium Glass Production. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 26(3): 261-274.
• Saussure, F. D. (2006) Writings in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.
• Taştemür, E. (2017) Arkeolojik Veriler Işığında Camin Tarihsel Süreci. Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(13): 67-91.
• Thompson, E. P. (2017) Time, Work‐Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism. Class: The Anthology: 27-40.
• Thompson, E.P. & Hardy, T. (2001) Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism. Organizational Studies: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 1: 743.
• Tyrer, L. (1999) Introduction of the Pill and its Impact. Contraception, 59(1): 11-16.
• Watkins, E.S. (1998) On the Pill: A Social History of Oral Contraceptives, 1950-1970. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Williams, R. (1983) Keywords a Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Winner, L. (1978) Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought.Massachussets: MIT Press.
• Wray, S. ve Deery, R. (2008) The Medicalization of Body Size and Women's Healthcare. Health Care For Women International, 29(3): 227-243.