COVID-19 SÜRECİNDE AÇIK İNOVASYON ve AÇIK BİLİM

Year 2021, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 389 - 397, 30.06.2021

Derya Yücel

https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.939207

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Covid-19 pandemisinin oluşturduğu koşulların çok daha net olarak ortaya çıkardığı açık inovasyon ve açık bilim yaklaşımlarının ne olduğu ve sağladığı faydalar ele alınmaktadır. Bu amaçla Covid-19 sürecinin bu yaklaşımlar açısından değerlendirmesine yer verilmekte ve bu süreçte açık inovasyon ve açık bilim uygulamalarının sağladığı yararlar örnekleriyle ele alınmaktadır.
Ülkelerin Covid-19 salgının yayılmasına karşı daha hızlı cevap verebilmeleri için bilgi, yenilikçi fikir ve havuzlanmış fon paylaşımlarının artık sadece bir seçenek değil toplumların daha hızlı iyileşmesi için bir gereklilik haline geldiği ve bunu pandemi sonrasında normal iş süreçlerine uygulanmayı başaran ülke ve işletmelerin bu tehdidi fırsata dönüştürerek sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı elde edebileceği değerlendirilmektedir.

Keywords

Covid-19, açık inovasyon, açık bilim.

OPEN INNOVATION AND OPEN SCIENCE IN THE COVID-19 PROCESS

Abstract

In this study, it is discussed what open innovation and open science approaches revealed by the conditions created by the Covid-19 pandemic more clearly and the benefits they provide. For this purpose, the evaluation of the Covid-19 process in terms of these approaches is included and the benefits of open innovation and open science applications in this process are discussed with examples.
In order for countries to respond faster to the spread of the Covid-19 epidemic, information, innovative ideas and pooled fund sharing are no longer an option but a necessity for the faster recovery of societies, and countries and businesses that succeeded in applying this to normal business processes after the pandemic turn this threat into an opportunity. It is evaluated that it can gain a sustainable competitive advantage.

Keywords

Covid-19, open innovation, open science.

References

• BECK, S., BERGENHOLTZ, C., BOGERS, M., BRASSEUR, T.-M., CONRADSEN, M. L., MARCO, D. DI, DISTEL, A. P., DOBUSCH, L., DÖRLER, D., EFFERT, A., FECHER, B., FILIOU, D., FREDERIKSEN, L., GILLIER, T., GRIMPE, C., GRUBER, M., HAEUSSLER, C., HEIGL, F., HOISL, K., …& XU, S. M. (2020). The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach. Industry and Innovation, Latest Articles, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274
• CHESBROUGH, H. W. (2003a). Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2003, 44(3), 35-41.
• CHESBROUGH, H. W. (2003b). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
• CHESBROUGH, H. W. (2020). To recover faster from Covid-19, open up: Managerial implications from an open innovation perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 410–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.010
• CRICK, J. M., & CRICK, D. (2020). Coopetition and Covid -19: Collaborative business-to-business marketing strategies in a pandemic crisis. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.016
• DELOITTE. (2020). Yeni Nesil Teknolojilerin Covid-19 Mücadelesindeki Önemi: Ülke Örnekleri, 1-19. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tr/Documents/ consulting/yeni-nesil-teknolojilerin-covid-19-mucadelesindeki-onemi.pdf)
• ENKEL, E., GASSMANN, O. & CHESBROUGH, H. (2009). Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon. R&D Management, 39, 311-316. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x.
• ESCAP. (2020). Collaborative actions to harness technologies during pandemics. United Nations Economic and Social Council, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Committee on Information and Communications Technology, Science, Technology and Innovation. ESCAP/CICTSTI/2020/1, 27 August 2020, 1-16. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/CICTSTI_1_item%202_E.pdf
• FELIN, T. & ZENGER, T. (2014). Closed or Open Innovation? Problem Solving and the Governance Choice. Research Policy. 43, 914-925.
• GASSMANN, O. & ENKEL, E. (2004). Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. R&D Management Conference (RADMA) 2004, Lissabon.
• HÜRRİYET, 03.07.2020, https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/koronaviruse-inovasyonla-cozum-aradilar-41556690
• IDB (Inter-American Development Bank). (2020). Responding to Covid -19 with Science, Innovation, and Productive Development. 1st Edition, Editors: Gonzalo Rivas and Claudia Suaznabar, WDC: Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Responding-to- Covid -19-with-Science-Innovation-and-Prod uctive-Development.pdf
• LATOUCHE, P. (2019). Open Innovation: Corporate Incubator. Innovation and Technology Set, Vol. 7. UK: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• LEE, S. M., & TRIMI, S. (2021). Convergence innovation in the digital age and in the Covid -19 pandemic crisis. Journal Of Business Research, 123, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.041
• MCCAUSLAND, T. (2020). Covid -19’s Impact on Globalization and Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 63(6), 54-59, DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2020.1813506
• VANHAVERBEKE, W. & ROIJAKKERS, N. (2014). Open Innovation. 1-7. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/282236088_Open_Innovation/stats.
• VASILJEVA, M., NESKORODIEVA, I., PONKRATOV, V., KUZNETSOV, N., IVLEV, V., IVLEVA, M., MARAMYGİN, M. & ZEKIY, A. (2020). A Predictive Model for Assessing the Impact of the Covid -19 Pandemic on the Economies of Some Eastern European Countries. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 92, 1-20. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030092
• VICENTE-SAEZ, R. & MARTINEZ-FUENTES, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043
• WOELFLE, M., OLLIARO, P. & TODD, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149