Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strengths of a self-etch adhesive with two different multi-mode adhesive systems which can also be used as self-etch adhesive.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this study, 36 extracted human molar teeth were used. The teeth were embedded in acrylic molds. In order to obtain flat dentin surfaces, the occlusal enamel surfaces of the teeth were abraded. Then, to obtain standard smear layer, surfaces were polished with 200 and 600 grid sandpaper under running water. The samples were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=12) according to the adhesive systems: Group 1: Single Bond Universal (universal adhesive), Group 2: All Bond Universal (universal adhesive), Group 3: Clearfil SE Bond (self-etch adhesive). Composite resin cylinders (radius=2 mm, height=2 mm; Tetric N Ceram) were bonded to the adhesive applied surfaces by using teflon molds. After storing in distilled water for 24 h, a shear load was applied to the samples using an Instron universal test machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure occurred. Shear bond strength values were calculated. Data were analyzed by using One-Way Variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests. The level of statistical significance was set to p=0.05.
RESULTS: The shear bond strength values of Single Bond Universal and Clearfil SE groups were not significantly different (p>0.05). The All Bond Universal group showed significantly lower bond strength values than the other groups (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: When Single Bond Universal was used as a self-etch system, it showed similar shear bond strength to Clearfil SE Bond, an adhesive accepted as the gold standard among self-etch adhesive systems.
Keywords
References
- Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Ste- fano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008;24:90-101.
- De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tis- sue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-32.
- Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Wurst M, Duschner H, Dörfer C. The nanolea- kage phenomenon: influence of moist vs dry bonding. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:23-30.
- Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-91.
- Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26:1176-84.
- Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1459-67.
- Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meer- beek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-84.
- Itthagarun A, Tay FR. Self-contamination of deep dentin by dentin fluid. Am J Dent 2000;13:195-200.
- Shinoda Y, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Otsuki M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of smear layer characteristics on dentin bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J 2011;30:501-10.
- Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of üniversal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42:800-7.
- Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 2001;14:163- 9.
- Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bon- ding systems: effect of testing method and operator. Quintessence Int 2004;35:845-52.
- Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012;25:153-8.
- Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41:404-11.
- Barutcigil Ç, Barutcigil K, Kürklü D, Harorlı OT. Güncel Dentin Bağ- layıcı Ajanların ve Uygulama Yöntemlerinin Makaslama Bağlanma Da- yanımlarının Karşılaştırılması. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2013;2:27-32.
- Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled Nano-layering at the Adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;91:376-81.
- Waidyasekera K, Nikaido T, Weerasinghe DS, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Reinforcement of dentin in self-etch adhesive technology: a new con- cept. J Dent 2009;37:604-9.
- Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial- hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000;79:709-14.
- Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass- ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res 1992;71:1836-41.
Abstract
AMAÇ: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı kendinden pürüzlendirmeli
(self-etch) bir adeziv sistem ve kendinden pürüzlendirmeli
olarak da kullanılabilen iki farklı üniversal adeziv
sistemin dentine makaslama bağlanma dayanım değerlerinin
karşılaştırılmasıdır.
GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Bu çalışmada çekilmiş 36 adet çürüksüz
insan molar dişi kullanıldı. Dişler akril kalıplara gömüldükten
sonra okluzal mine yüzeyleri aşındırıldı, düzgün bir
dentin yüzeyi elde etmek için önce 200 grid ve ardından
standart smear tabakası elde etmek için 600 grid silikon
karbid disklerle su soğutması altında zımparalandı. Elde
edilen örnekler, kullanılan adeziv sisteme göre rastgele 3
gruba ayrıldı (n=12): Grup 1: Single Bond Universal (üniversal
adeziv), Grup 2: All-Bond Universal (üniversal adeziv),
grup 3: Clearfil-SE Bond (kendinden pürüzlendirmeli
adeziv). Adeziv uygulanmış yüzeylere 2 mm çapında, 2 mm
yüksekliğinde teflon kalıplar kullanarak kompozit rezin silindirler
bağlandı (Tetric N-Ceram). Örnekler 24 saat distile
suda bekletildikten sonra kafa hızı 0.5 mm/dk olan Instron
üniversal test cihazına yerleştirildi ve makaslama bağlanma dayanımları ölçüldü. Veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi
(ANOVA) ve Tukey HSD testleri kullanılarak
değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel anlamlılık düzeyi p=0.05 olarak
kabul edildi.
BULGULAR: Single Bond Universal ile Clearfil SE grubunun
makaslama bağlanma dayanım değerleri arasında istatistiksel
olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı (p > 0.05). All-Bond
Universal grubu diğer gruplara göre istatistiksel olarak
daha düşük bağlanma değerleri gösterdi (p < 0.05).
SONUÇ: Single Bond Universal adeziv sistemi kendinden
pürüzlendirmeli olarak kullanıldığında, kendinden pürüzlendirmeli
adeziv sistemler için altın standart olarak kabul
edilen Clearfil SE Bond ile benzer dentine bağlanma değerleri gösterdi.
References
- Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Ste- fano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008;24:90-101.
- De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tis- sue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-32.
- Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Wurst M, Duschner H, Dörfer C. The nanolea- kage phenomenon: influence of moist vs dry bonding. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:23-30.
- Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-91.
- Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26:1176-84.
- Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1459-67.
- Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meer- beek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-84.
- Itthagarun A, Tay FR. Self-contamination of deep dentin by dentin fluid. Am J Dent 2000;13:195-200.
- Shinoda Y, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Otsuki M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of smear layer characteristics on dentin bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J 2011;30:501-10.
- Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of üniversal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42:800-7.
- Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 2001;14:163- 9.
- Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bon- ding systems: effect of testing method and operator. Quintessence Int 2004;35:845-52.
- Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012;25:153-8.
- Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41:404-11.
- Barutcigil Ç, Barutcigil K, Kürklü D, Harorlı OT. Güncel Dentin Bağ- layıcı Ajanların ve Uygulama Yöntemlerinin Makaslama Bağlanma Da- yanımlarının Karşılaştırılması. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2013;2:27-32.
- Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled Nano-layering at the Adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;91:376-81.
- Waidyasekera K, Nikaido T, Weerasinghe DS, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Reinforcement of dentin in self-etch adhesive technology: a new con- cept. J Dent 2009;37:604-9.
- Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial- hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000;79:709-14.
- Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass- ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res 1992;71:1836-41.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 15, 2015 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2015 Volume: 32 Issue: 3 |