Determination of orthodontic anomaly patterns in patients in the Thrace region and assessment of the relationship between orthodontic anomalies and DMFT indices: a retrospective study

Year 2024, Volume: 41 Issue: 3, 105 - 112, 04.09.2024

Hande Uzunçıbuk , Meltem Tekbaş Atay

https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1410956

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of dental and skeletal anomalies that could be a cause of malocclusion and their relationship with caries distribution in the western region of Türkiye.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted with 1815 digital panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs taken from patients, age ranging between 6 and 47 years, who applied for orthodontic treatment. The lateral cephalometric radiographs, panoramic radiographs, and dental records were reviewed according to skeletal anomaly, dental malocclusion (Angle classification), and decay-missing- filling teeth (DMFT) index. Kruskal Wallis test was used in intergroup comparisons of variables that did not show normal distribution, and Dunn’s multiple comparison test was used in subgroup comparisons. The chi-square test and Yates correction were used in comparisons of qualitative data.
RESULTS: The mean DMFT of the dental Class I malocclusion group was statistically and significantly lower than Class II division 1 and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.05). The mean DMFT index of Class II subdivision malocclusion group was statistically and significantly lower than that of Class III malocclusion group (p < 0.05). The DMFT index was significantly lower in the skeletal
Class I group compared to the skeletal Class II and Class III anomaly groups (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: There is a correlation between DMFT indices and dental malocclusions as well as skeletal anomalies. By correcting dental malocclusions and skeletal anomalies with orthodontic treatment and providing ideal occlusion, it becomes easier for patients to maintain oral hygiene and DMFT indices might decrease.

Keywords

Angle classification, decay, malocclusion, orthodontics, retrospective study

Ethical Statement

This study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, and the protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Trakya University, Edirne, Turkiye (Protocol number: 18/29, Date: 27/11/2023).

Trakya bölgesindeki hastalarda ortodontik anomali paternlerinin belirlenmesi ve bu anomalilerin DMFT indeksleri ile ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesi: retrospektif bir çalışma

Abstract

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin batı bölgesindeki popülasyonda maloklüzyona neden olabilecek dental ve iskeletsel anomalilerin yaygınlığını ve bunların çürük dağılımı ile ilişkisini araştırmaktır.
GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Ortodontik tedavi için başvuran, yaşları 6 ile 47 arasında değişen 1815 hastanın dijital panoramik ve lateral sefalometrik radyografileri retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Lateral sefalometrik radyografiler, panoramik radyografiler ve dental kayıtlar ile iskeletsel anomali, dental maloklüzyon (Angle Sınıflaması) ve çürük-eksik-dolgulu diş (DMFT) indeksi belirlenerek, bu anomalilerin çürük dağılımı ile ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Normal dağılım göstermeyen değişkenlerin gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarında Kruskal Wallis testi, alt grup karşılaştırmalarında Dunn’s çoklu karşılaştırma testi ve nitel verilerin karşılaştırmalarında ki-kare testi ve Yates düzeltmesi kullanılmıştır.
BULGULAR: Dental Sınıf I maloklüzyon grubunun DMFT ortalaması Sınıf II Bölüm 1 ve Sınıf III maloklüzyon gruplarından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Sınıf II Subdivizyon maloklüzyon grubunun ortalama DMFT indeksi, dental Sınıf III maloklüzyon grubundan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşüktür (p<0.05). DMFT indeksi, iskeletsel Sınıf I hastalarda iskeletsel Sınıf II ve Sınıf III hastalara kıyasla anlamlı derecede düşüktür (p < 0.05).
SONUÇ: DMFT indeksleri ile dental maloklüzyonlar ve iskeletsel anomaliler arasında bir korelasyon bulunmaktadır. Ortodontik tedavi ile dental maloklüzyonların ve iskeletsel anomalilerin düzeltilerek ideal oklüzyonun sağlanması ile hastaların ağız hijyenini sağlamaları kolaylaşmakta ve DMFT indeksleri düşmektedir.

Keywords

Angle sınıflaması, çürük, maloklüzyon, ortodonti, retrospektif çalışma

References

• 1. Abdelgader I, Gnaiber T, Emnina K, Orofi S. Radiographic investigation of dental anomalies in Libyan orthodontic patients. Libyan Dent J 2015;5:22119441.
• 2. Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Ceylan I, Kamak H. Frequency and distribution of developmental anomalies in the permanent teeth of a Turkish orthodontic patient population. J Dent Sci 2011;6:82-9.
• 3. Grund K, Goddon I, Schüler IM, Lehmann T, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Clinical consequences of untreated dental caries in German 5- and 8-year-olds. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:140.
• 4. Milona M, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Szmidt M, Kłoda K, Olszowski T. Oral Health Related Behaviors in Relation to DMFT Indexes of Teenagers in an Urban Area of North-West Poland—Dental Caries Is Still a Common Problem. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:2333.
• 5. García-Cortés JO, Medina-Solís CE, Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Mejia-Cruz JA, Medina-Cerda E, Patino-Marin N, et al. Dental caries’ experience, prevalence and severity in Mexican adolescents and young adults. Rev Salud Pública 2009;11:82-91.
• 6. Hasegawa Y, Batbayar N, Sukhbaatar N, Bazar A, Kageyama I. Relationship between index of orthodontic treatment need dental health component (IOTN‐DHC) and caries prevalence in school‐age children. Int J Dent Hyg 2023;21:582-89.
• 7. Fernandez CCA, Pereira CVCA, Luiz RR, Vieira AR, De Castro Costa M. Dental anomalies in different growth and skeletal malocclusion patterns. Angle Orthod 2018;88:195-201.
• 8. Onyeaso CO, Aderinokun GA, Arowojolu MO. The pattern of malocclusion among orthodontic patients seen in Dental Centre, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci 2002;31:207-11.
• 9. Disha P, Poornima P, Pai S, Nagaveni N, Roshan N, Manoharan M. Malocclusion and dental caries experience among 8–9-year-old children in a city of South Indian region: A cross-sectional survey. J Educ Health Promot 2017;6:98.
• 10. Gomide RT, Frencken JE, Leal SC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Faber J. Impact of proximal cavities and primary molar absence on space in the dental arches. Peer J 2020;8:e8924.
• 11. Claudino D, Traebert J. Malocclusion, dental aesthetic self-perception and quality of life in a 18 to 21 year-old population: a cross sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2013;13:3.
• 12. Memon M, Qureshi AMN, Memon AA, Ramzan S, Shaikh AG, Shams S. Association of Dental Caries with Body Mass Index in Patients Attending Dental OPD of Tertiary Care Hospital, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Pharm Res Int 2021;13:23-8.
• 13. Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, Roger C, Thaliath A. Prevalence of malocclusion and its relationship with caries among school children aged 11 - 15 years in southern India. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:35-41.
• 14. Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod 2009;79:436-41.
• 15. Shapira Y, Finkelstein T, Shpack N, Lai YH, Kuftinec MM, Vardimon A. Mandibular second molar impaction. Part I: Genetic traits and characteristics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:32-7.
• 16. Mossey PA. The heritability of malocclusion: part 2. The influence of genetics in malocclusion. Br J Orthod 1999;26:195-203.
• 17. Vastardis H. The genetics of human tooth agenesis: new discoveries for understanding dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:650-56.
• 18. Marcenes W, Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Flaxman A, Naghavi M, Lopez A, et al. Global Burden of Oral Conditions in 1990-2010. J Dent Res 2013;92:592-97.
• 19. Hong CL, Broadbent JM, Thomson WM. Long-Term Survival of Enamel-Defect-Affected Teeth. Caries Res 2020;54:350-57.
• 20. Oliveira AFB, Chaves AMB, Rosenblatt A. The Influence of Enamel Defects on the Development of Early Childhood Caries in a Population with Low Socioeconomic Status: A Longitudinal Study. Caries Res 2006;40:296-302.
• 21. Hong L, Levy SM, Warren JJ, Broffitt B. Association between Enamel Hypoplasia and Dental Caries in Primary Second Molars: A Cohort Study. Caries Res 2009;43:345-53.
• 22. Seow W. Developmental defects of enamel and dentine: challenges for basic science research and clinical management. Aust Dent J 2014;59:143-54.
• 23. Baume LJ. Uniform methods for the epidemiologic assessment of malocclusion. Results obtained with the World Health Organization standard methods (1962 and 1971) in South Pacific populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1974;66:251-72.
• 24. Tang EL, Wei SH. Recording and measuring malocclusion: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:344-51.
• 25. Proffit WR, Ackerman JL. Rating the characteristics of malocclusion: a systematic approach for planning treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1973;64:258-69.
• 26. Dodda KK, Prasad SER V, Kanuru RK, Nalluri S, Mittapalli R, Raghavendra. Diagnostic features of Angle’s Class II div 2 malocclusion. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5:513-17.
• 27. Celikoglu M, Akpinar S, Yavuz I. The pattern of malocclusion in a sample of orthodontic patients from Turkey. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010:791-96.
• 28. Sayin MO, Türkkahraman H. Malocclusion and crowding in an orthodontically referred Turkish population. Angle Orthod 2004;74:635-39.
• 29. Ahangar-Atashi MH, Dabaghi-Tabriz F, Ahangar-Atashi S, Rahbar M. Prevalence of Dental Malocclusions in Patients admitted to the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tabriz, in 2016. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18:1034-39.
• 30. Joshi N, Hamdan AM, Fakhouri WD. Skeletal Malocclusion: A Developmental Disorder With a Life-Long Morbidity. J Clin Med Res 2014;6:399-408.
• 31. Costa AMG, Trevizan M, Matsumoto MAN, da Silva RAB, da Silva LAB, Horta KC, et al. Association between Tooth Agenesis and Skeletal Malocclusions. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2017;8:e3.
• 32. Li J, He Y, Wang Y, Chen T, Xu Y, Xu X, et al. Dental, skeletal asymmetries and functional characteristics in Class II subdivision malocclusions. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:588-99.
• 33. Mageet AO. Classification of Skeletal and Dental Malocclusion: Revisited. Stoma Edu J 2016;3:205-11.
• 34. Petrovski M, Ivanovski K, Minovska A. DMFT index among institutionalized elderly. Balk J Dent Med 2015;19:221-25.
• 35. Zander A, Sivaneswaran S, Skinner J, Byun R, Jalaludin B. Risk factors for dental caries in small rural and regional Australian communities. Rural Remote Health 2013;13:2492.