Zihinsel Yetersizliği Olan Çocukların Annelerinin Çocukluk Dönemi Cinsel İstismar Mitleri ve İlişkili Faktörler

Year 2023, Volume: 33 Issue: 2, 136 - 141, 30.04.2023

Ayşe Şener Taplak , Rabia Demirer

https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1199849

Abstract

Amaç: Zihinsel yetersizliği olan çocuklar, sağlıklı yaşıtlarına göre cinsel istismar açısından risk grubunda yer almaktadır. Annelerin cinsel istismara ilişkin yanlış inanışları, istismarın ya da istismarcının gözden kaçırılmasına neden olabilir. Bu araştırma, zihinsel yetersizliği olan çocukların annelerinin çocukluk çağı cinsel istismarına ilişkin mitlerinin düzeyini ve tanıtıcı faktörlerle ilişkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı.
Yöntem: Kesitsel tipteki araştırmanın örneklemini, iki farklı özel eğitim kurumuna devam eden zihinsel yetersizliği olan çocukların anneleri (n=100) oluşturdu. Çalışmada kurum izni, etik onay ve katılımcılardan yazılı onam alındı. Veriler, tanıtıcı özellikler veri formu ve çocukluk dönemi cinsel istismarına ilişkin mitler ölçeği (ÇCİMÖ) ebeveyn formu ile toplandı. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistiksel analizler ve nonparametrik testler kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Annelerin ÇCİMÖ toplam puan ortalaması 33.75±11.92 olarak bulundu. Annelerin eğitim düzeyi, aile tipi, çocuk sayısı ve yaşı ile ÇCİMÖ puanları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu. Daha önce çocukluk çağı cinsel istismarı konusunda eğitim alan ve almayan annelerin ÇCİMÖ puanları arasında fark yoktu. Çocuklarını cinsel istismardan koruma konusunda bilgiye ihtiyacı olmadığını düşünenlerin ÇCİMÖ puanları daha yüksekti.
Sonuç: Risk grubundaki annelerin çocukluk çağı cinsel istismar mitlerine yönelik farkındalık düzeylerinin artırılması için hemşirelerce eğitim ve müdahale çalışmalarının planlanması ve uygulanması önerilir.

Keywords

Cinsel istismar, çocuk, hemşire, inanış, zihinsel yetersizlik

Supporting Institution

YOK

Project Number

YOK

Childhood Sexual Abuse Myths of Mothers of Children with Intellectual Disabilities and Related Introductory Factors

Abstract

Objective: Children with intellectual disabilities are in the risk group in terms of sexual abuse compared to healthy peers. Mothers’ false beliefs about sexual abuse may cause the abuse or the abuser to be overlooked. This study aimed to determine the myths about childhood sexual abuse and related ıntroductory factors of mothers of children with intellectual disabilities.
Methods: The sample of the cross-sectional study consisted of mothers of children with intellectual disabilities (n=100) enrolled in two different special education institutions. Institutional permission, ethics approval, and written consent from the participants was obtained in the study. The data were collected with introductory characteristics data form and parent form of the childhood sexual abuse myths scale (CSAMS). Descriptive and non-parametric tests were used for data analyses.
Results: The mean CSAMS total score of the mothers of the children with intellectual disabilities was 33.75±11.92. There were statistically significant differences between mothers’ education level, family type, number of children, age, and CSAMS scores. There was no difference between the CSAMS scores of the mothers who received and did not receive training on childhood sexual abuse previously. Those who thought that they did not need information about protecting their children from sexual abuse had higher CSAMS scores.
Conclusion: It is recommended to plan and implement training and intervention studies by nurses to increase mothers in the risk group awareness of childhood sexual abuse myths.

Keywords

Intellectual Disabilities, belief, child, burse, sexual abuse

Project Number

YOK

References

• 1. Ferragut M, Ortiz-Tallo M, Blanca MJ. Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse in Spain: A Representative Sample Study. J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP19358-NP19377. doi: 10.1177/08862605211042804.
• 2. Akbaş S, Turla A, Karabekiroğlu K, Pazvantoglu O, Keskin T, Böke Ö. Characteristics of sexual abuse in a sample of Turkish children with and without mental retardation, referred for legal appraisal of the psychological repercussions. Sex Disabil. 2009; 27:205. doi.org/10.1007/s11195-009-9139-7.
• 3. Kucuk S. Analyses of Child Sex Abuse Cases in Turkey: A Provincial Case. J Child Sex Abus. 2016 Apr;25(3):262-75. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2016.1153557.
• 4. Wissink IB, van Vugt E, Moonen X, Stams GJ, Hendriks J. Sexual abuse involving children with an intellectual disability (ID): a narrative review. Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Jan;36:20-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.09.007.
• 5. Fang Z, Cerna-Turoff I, Zhang C, Lu M, Lachman JM, Barlow J. Global estimates of violence against children with disabilities: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 May;6(5):313-323. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00033-5.
• 6. Gökçe İmren S, Ayaz A, Yusufoğlu C, Rodopman Arman A. Clinical features and risk factors related with suicide attempts in sexually abused children and adolescents. Marmara Medical Journal 2015;26 (1): 11-16. doi.org/10.5472/MMJ.2012.02518.1.
• 7. Tutar Güven Ş, İşler A. Sex education and its ımportance in children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing 2015;6(3):143-148.
• 8. Atbaşı Z. Determining how informed the mothers with mentally retarded children about preventing sexual abuse. INES Journal 2016;(8): 32-43.
• 9. Mendelson T, Letourneau EJ. Parent-Focused Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse. Prev Sci. 2015 Aug;16(6):844-52. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0553-z.
• 10. Walsh K, Brandon L. Their children's first educators: Parents' views about child sexual abuse prevention education. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2012;21(5): 734-746.
• 11. Wurtele SK, Kenny MC. Partnering with parents to prevent childhood sexual abuse. Child Abuse Review 2010;19:130-152. doi.org/10.1002/car.1112.
• 12. Şahin SK, Koçtürk N. The childhood sexual abuse myths of parents. Turkish Studies- Social 2021;16(3): 1223-1239. doi.org/10.47356/TurkishStudies.46751.
• 13. Koçtürk N, Bilge F. Social support of adolescent survivors of child sexual abuse and sexual revictimization in Turkey. J Child Sex Abus. 2018;27:38-52.
• 14. Chen JQ, Chen DG. Awareness of child sexual abuse prevention education among parents of Grade 3 elementary school pupils in Fuxin City, China. Health Educ Res. 2005 Oct;20(5):540-7. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh012.
• 15. Alzoubi FA, Ali RA, Flah IH, Alnatour A. Mothers' knowledge & perception about child sexual abuse in Jordan. Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Jan;75:149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.06.006.
• 16. Babatsikos G, Miles D. How parents manage the risk of child sexual abuse: a grounded theory. J Child Sex Abus. 2015;24(1):55-76. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2015.981352.
• 17. Koçtürk N, Kızıldağ S. The development of the childhood sexual abuse myths scale: Validity and reliability study. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 2018;(30):778-808. doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.406626.
• 18. Cromer LD, Goldsmith RE. Child sexual abuse myths: attitudes, beliefs, and individual differences. J Child Sex Abus. 2010 Nov;19(6):618-47. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2010.522493.
• 19. Koçtürk N, Kızıldag Şahin S. Empathy and sexism as predictors of childhood sexual abuse myths in university students. Current Approaches in Psychiatry 2021;13(Ek 1), 172-186. doi.org/10.18863/pgy.958097.
• 20. Koçtürk N, Kızıldağ Şahin S. Parent form of the childhood sexual abuse myths scale: Validity and reliability study. Turk J Child Adolesc Ment Health 2021;28(1): 31-37. doi.org/10.4274/tjcamh.galenos.2020.61687.
• 21. Abeid M, Muganyizi P, Massawe S, Mpembeni R, Darj E, Axemo P. Knowledge and attitude towards rape and child sexual abuse--a community-based cross-sectional study in rural Tanzania. BMC Public Health 2015 Apr 28;15:428. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1757-7.
• 22. Ige OK, Fawole OI. Preventing child sexual abuse: parents' perceptions and practices in urban Nigeria. J Child Sex Abus. 2011 Nov;20(6):695-707. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2011.627584.
• 23. Kalay Z. Investigation of the awareness levels of health worker parents about sexual abuse. Master's Thesis, Department of Social Work, Karabuk, 2022.
• 24. Bozcan EÜ, Berkmen B, Koran N, Tatlıcalı E. The awareness levels of parents whose children ages between 4 and 6. Folklore/Literature 2019;25: 97-1.
• 25. Wurtele SK, Moreno T, Kenny MC. Evaluation of a sexual abuse prevention workshop for parents of young children. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma 2008;1:4: 331-340. doi: 10.1080/19361520802505768.