SEÇİLMİŞ BAZI ÜLKELERDE SIĞINMACI EĞİTİM POLİTİKALARI VE UYGULAMALARINA BİR BAKIŞ

Year 2020, Volume: 2020 Issue: 14, 52 - 78, 30.04.2020

Emine Saklan

https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.674446

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Dünya üzerinde savaşların şiddetlenerek devam etmesi, insanların ekonomik olarak darboğazda kalması, yerlerinden edilmesi ve işsizlik gibi nedenler milyonlarca kişinin kendilerine çeşitli haklar sağladıklarına inanılan gelişmiş Avrupa ülkelerine göç etmelerine yol açmaktadır. Göç edenlerin uzun vadede göç ettikleri ülkede kaldıkları ve ülkenin sosyal, politik ve ekonomik yapısına uyum sağlamaya çalıştıkları düşünüldüğünde ülkeler için en öncelikli konulardan biri kuşkusuz sığınmacıların uyumu olmaktadır. OECD ülkeleri sığınmacıların işgücü piyasalarına uyum sağlamaları ve topluma katılımlarının gerçekleştirilebilmesi ve gelecekte ekonomik büyümenin sağlanabilmesi için eğitimin son derece önemli olduğu görüşündedirler. Eğitime, göçe ve sığınmacılık olgusuna dair geliştirilen politikaların ülkelerin gelişmişlik seviyesine göre değiştiği ve uygulamalarda farklılıklar görüldüğü söylenebilir. Gelişmiş ülkelerde sığınmacılara yönelik hazırlık eğitim süreçleri ve uyum programları uygulanırken, gelişmekte olan ülkelerde sığınmacılar doğrudan eğitim süreçlerine dahil edilebilmektedirler. Bu araştırmada Avrupa ülkeleri arasında en fazla göç alan İsveç, Almanya ve Avusturya’nın sığınmacı eğitim politikaları ve uygulamalarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada veriler, Uluslararası Kalkınma ve İşbirliği Örgütü (OECD), Global Migration Data Analysis Centre (GMDAC), Birleşmiş Milletler Mülteciler Yüksek Komiserliği (UNHCR) gibi kuruluşların yayınladığı raporlar ve seçilmiş ülkelerin sığınmacı eğitimleri ile ilgili yayınlanmış akademik makaleler esas alınarak oluşturulmuş ve doküman incelemesi yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir.

Keywords

Sığınmacı eğitimi, göç, doküman analizi

References

• Anger, C., Erdmann, V., Plünnecke, A. and Riesen, I. (2010). Intearationsrendite. Volkswirtschaftliche effekte einer besseren integration von migranten. Köln: Wirtschaft im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums fur Wirtschaft und Technologie.
• Aycan Çelikaksoy, A. and Wadensjö, E. (2015). Unaccompanied minors and separated refugee children in Sweden: An outlook on demography, education and employment. Discussion Paper No. 8963. Germany: The Institute for the Study of Labor (Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit).
• Bade, K. J. (2009). Almanya’da entegrasyon ve katılımcılık. Die Gaste, 8, 3-9.
• Bendel, P. (2014). Coordinating immigrant integration in Germany: Mainstreaming at the federal and local levels. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe.
• Bourgonje, P. (2010). Education for refugee and asylum seeking children in OECD countries: Case studies from Australia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Belgium: Education International.
• Castles, S. ve Miller, M. J. (1998). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (s. 244-250). London: Mcmillan Press.
• Dryden-Peterson, S. (2015a). Refugee education in countries of first asylum: Breaking open the black box of pre-resettlement experiences. Theory and Research in Education, 14(2), 131-148. doi:10.1177/1477878515622703f
• Dryden-Peterson, S., Adelman, E. and Nieswandt, M. (2016). Inside Syrian refugee schools: Syrian children in Germany. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. Erişim adresi: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development/2016/05/23/inside-syrian-refugee-schools-syrian-children-in-germany/
• Erdmann, V., Plünnecke, A., Riesen, I. and Settes, O. (2011): Bildungsmonitor 2011 - Fortschritte auf dem Weg zu mehr Wachstum und Gerechtigkeit.
• Forschungsbericht im auftrag der initiative neue soziale marktwirtschaft. Köln: Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft.
• Fernández, C. ve Kriegbaum Jensen, K. (2017). The civic integrationist turn in Danish and Swedish school politics. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(5), 1-20.
• Fernandez-Kelly, P. (2012). The unequal structure of the German education System: structural reasons for educational failures of Turkish youth in Germany. Spaces Flows, 2(2), 93-112.
• Global Migration Data Analysis Centre (GMDAC) (2016). Migration, asylum and refugees in Germany: Understanding the data. Global Migration Data Analysis Centre: Data Briefing Series.
• Gomolla, M. (2013). Schuleffektivität und die Verschiebung von Gerechtigkeitsdiskursen im Bildungsbereich. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 39 (2), 245-265.
• Huggler, J. and Holehouse, M. (Ekim, 2015). Germany expects up to 1.5 million migrants in 2015. The Telegraph. Erişim adresi: http://www.telegraph.co.uk
• Jonsson, J. O. (2007). The farther they come, the harder they fall? First and second-generation immigrants in the Swedish labour market. Immigrants in the swedish labour market içinde (s. 451-505). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Jonsson, J. O. ve Rudolphi, F. (2011). Weak performance-Strong determination: School achievement and educational choice among children of immigrants in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 27(4), 487-508.
• Korntheuer, A., Pritchard, P., Maehler, D. B. (2017). Structural context of refugee integration in Canada and Germany. GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Erişim adresi: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-52101-0
• Koyuncu, Ü. (2012). Almanya’da göç ve eğitim. Artı Doksan Dergisi, 4, 36-39.
• Landry, O. (2015). Wir sind alle Oranienplatz! Space for refugees and social justice in Berlin. Journal of Germanic Studies, 51(4), 398-413.
• Lunneblad, J. (2017). Integration of refugee children and their families in the Swedish preschool: strategies, objectives and standards, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(3), 359-369. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2017.1308162.
• Maurice, J. and Roßbach, H. G. (2017). Structural context of refugee integration in Canada and Germany. A. Korntheuer, P. Pritchard, D. Maehler (Ed.). The educational system in Germany içinde (s. 50-53). Köln: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.
• Miera, F. (2009). Comparing the differentiation within educational systems according to ethnicity and the ‘selected minority ethnic groups’. B. Moldenhawer, F. Miera, J. Kallstenius, V. Messing and C. Schiff (Ed.). Comparative report on education içinde (s. 16-27). Budapest: Edumigrom Comparative Papers.
• Ministry of Education and Research (2017). Government policy. Erişim adresi: http://www.government.se/government-policy/ Ministry of Justice, for Integration and Europe of the State of Hessen (2012). Statistical report on the education of children with an immigration background in Hessen: Preschool, primary, and secondary education 2011-2012. Erişim adresi: www.hmdj.hessen.de
• Mitchell, M. and Russell, D. (1998). Immigration, citizenship and social exclusion in the New Europe. R. Sykes and P. Alcock (Ed.). Developments in European social policy convergence and diversity içinde (s. 75-112). Bristol: The Policy Press.
• Nohl, A. M. (2014). Kültürlerarası pedagoji (R. N. Somel, Çev.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Nusche, D. (2009). What works in migrant education? A review of evidence and policy options. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 22, OECD Publishing. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/227131784531
• Nusche, D., Shewbridge, C. and Rasmussen, C. L. (2009). OECD reviews of migrant education: Austria. OECD: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
• Nygård, O. (2017). Early tracking and immigrant optimism: a comparative study of educational aspirations among students in disadvantaged schools in Sweden and the Netherlands. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(20), 1-18.
• Rogh, W. (2015). Educational policies: Germany (2015). Erişim adresi: http://www.perfar.eu/policy/education/germany
• Rydin, I., Eklund, M., Högdin, S. and Sjöberg, U. (2012). Integrating refugee and asylum-seeking children in the educational systems of EU member states. A. Nonchev and N. Tagarov (Ed.). Country report: Sweden içinde (s. 182-215). Bulgaria: Center for the Study of Democracy.
• Salchegger, S. and Herzog-Punzenberger, B. (2016). Lesekompetenz und sozioökonomischer Status von Jugendlichen mit Migration shinter grund: Entwicklungen seit dem Jahr 2000 in Österreich, der Schweiz und Deutschland Silvia Salchegger. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311504789_Lesekompetenz_und_soziookonomischer_Status_von_Jugendlichen_mit_Migrationshintergrund_Entwicklungen_seit_dem_Jahr_2000_in_Osterreich_der_Schweiz_und_Deutschland
• Sax, H., Ammer, M. and Mandl, S. (2012). Integrating refugee and asylum-seeking children in the educational systems of EU member states. A. Nonchev and N. Tagarov (Ed.). Country report: Austria içinde (s. 77-108). Bulgaria: Center for the Study of Democracy.
• Schnell, P. (2015). Education: Children of Turkish migrants in Austria are more disadvantaged than in other countries. Erişim adresi: https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-in-practice/project-presentations-archive/2015/pv2015-kw22/
• Schroeder, J. (2016). Für ein freiheitliches und soziales bildungsrecht. Dimensionen einer bildungspolitik im asyl und in der duldung. ISA Jahrbuch zur sozialen arbeit içinde (s.158-172). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
• Silins, H. and B. Mulford (2002). Schools as Learning Organisations: The Case for System, Teacher and Student Learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 425-446.
• Skolinspektionens Rapport. (2010). Rätten till kunskap: En granskning av hur skolan kan lyfta alla elever. Erişim adresi: www.skolinspektionen.se Stanfors, M. (2014). Educational Policies: Sweden (2014). http://www.perfar.eu/policy/education/sweden
• Statistics Austria (2014): Education in figures 2012/13 – Key indicators and analysis. Erişim adresi: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/134EN.pdf
• Süssmuth, R. (2009). The future of migration and integration policy in Germany. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
• Svensk författningssamling. (1882). Folkskolestadgan SFS, 8.
• Swedish National Agency for Education (2016). Erişim adresi: http://www.government.se/government-agencies/the-swedish-national-agency-for-education-statens-skolverk/
• Taguma, M., Kim, M., Brink, S. and Teltemann, J. (2010). OECD reviews of migrant education: Sweden. OECD: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
• Tekin, U. ve Yükseker, D. (2017). Göç ve eğitim: Türkiye’de ve Almanya’da aile dili okul dilinden farklı olan çocukların okullaşması: Çalıştay sonuç raporu. Heinrich Böll Stiftung Derneği ve Anadolu Kültür Derneği. Erişim adresi: https://tr.boell.org/tr/2017/08/22/goc-ve-egitim-calistay-sonuc-raporu.
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015c). ISCED 2011 Operational Manual: Guidelines for Classifying National Education Programmes and Related Qualifications. OECD Publishing.
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2014). Education policy outlook Germany. OECD: Education Policy Outlook.
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009). Thematic review on migrant education international questionnaire: Migrant education policies in response to longstanding diversity: Austria. Erişim adresi: http://www.schule-mehrsprachig.at/fileadmin/schule_mehrsprachig/redaktion/hintergrundinfo/pdfs/18847.pdf
• Weiss, H., Unterwurzacher, A. and Strodl, R. (2007). Schülerinnen mit Migrationshintergrund an österreichischen Schulen: Probleme aus der Sicht der Lehrkrâfte, Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. Vienna: Institute für Soziologie.
• Wroblewski, A. and Herzog-Punzenberger, B. (2009). OECD Review of Migrant Education-Country Background Report for Austria. Erişim adresi: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/8/26/42485003.pdf