Design studio in a challenging period: Implications for a digitalized education

Year 2023, , 19 - 41, 28.03.2023

A. Tolga İlter

https://doi.org/10.37246/grid.1112987

Abstract

The unexpected and extensive emergency caused by the Covid-19 pandemic between 2020-2022 created a test environment that incorporates valuable data for the digitalization of education. Using the data obtained from architecture and interior architecture students, this research focuses on one of the fundamental elements of architectural education, the design studio. Examining online design studio (ODS) students from three different schools of architecture, this research tries to identify the technical resources utilized, students’ social interactions, physical and emotional wellbeing, and how these factors and demographic variables effected their ODS evaluations. The findings acquired by both qualitative and quantitative methods show significant relations between the technical resources of the students with their overall satisfaction from the ODS experience, as well as the level of their social interactions, physical, and emotional status. While ease of reaching resources, watching recorded lectures and critics, presenting student projects digitally both for critics and juries are strengths of the ODS, technical challenges for digital sketching and differing social requirements depending on the student’s year of study (YofS) are observed as weaknesses. Although the research has substantial limitations, the findings are proposed to be valuable for the research on developing a digital design studio.

Keywords

Architecture, Covid-19, Information technologies, ICT, Online design studio

Zorlu bir dönemde tasarım stüdyosu: Sayısal eğitim için çıkarımlar

Abstract

Covid-19 salgının 2020-2022 yılları arasında neden olduğu ani ve geniş çaplı acil durum ortamı eğitimin sayısallaştırlmasına yönelik pek çok verinin elde edilebildiği deneysel bir ortam yaratmıştır. Mimarlık ve İç Mimarlık bölümü öğrencilerinden elde edilen verileri kullanan bu araştırma, mimarlık eğitiminin temel yapıtaşlarından birisini oluşturan tasarım stüdyosuna odaklanmaktadır. Üç farklı mimarlık fakültesinin çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosu öğrencileri ele alınarak, kullanılan teknik ekipman, öğrencilerin sosyal etkileşimleri, fiziksel ve ruhsal iyilik durumları ve bu etkenlerle demografik değişkenlerin çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosu deneyimlerini nasıl etkilediğinin ortaya konması amaçlanmıştır. Nicel ve nitel yöntemler kullanılarak elde edilen sonuçlar öğrencilerin kullandıkları teknik ekipmanla çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosu memnuniyetleri, sosyal etkileşimleri, fiziksel ve ruhsal iyilik durumları arasında bağlantı olduğunu göstermektedir. Ders kaynaklarına erişim, stüdyo kayıtları ve kritiklerin tekrar izlenebilirliği, jüri ve kritiklerin sayısal ortamda yapılmasının olumlu etkileri çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosunun güçlü yönlerini oluştururken, sayısal ortamda eskiz ve çizim yapmanın zorluğu, ve öğrencinin kaçıncı sınıfta olduğuna bağlı olarak değişkenlik gösteren sosyal gereksinimler çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosunun zayıflıkları olarak tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmanın belli kısıtları olsa da bulguların sayısal tasarım stüdyosu derslerinin geliştirilmesi konusundaki araştırmalara katkı sunması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

Mimarlık, Covid-19, Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri, BİT, Çevrimiçi Tasarım Stüdyosu

References

• Ahmad, L., Sosa, M., & Musfy, K. (2020). Interior design teaching methodology during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Interiority, 3(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v3i2.100
• Akçay Kavakoğlu, A., Güleç Özer, D., Domingo-Callabuig, D., & Bilen, Ö. (2021). Architectural design communication (ADC) in online education during COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of Turkish and Spanish universities. Open House International. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-07-2021-0144
• Alnusairat, S., al Maani, D., & Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Architecture students’ satisfaction with and perceptions of online design studios during COVID-19 lockdown: the case of Jordan universities. Archnet-IJAR, 15(1), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-09-2020-0195/FULL/PDF
• Asadpour, A. (2019). Student challenges in online architectural design courses in Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(6), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022923
• Broadfoot, O., & Bennett, R. (2003). Design Studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face Design Studio education with modern internet-based design studios The Traditional Design Studio. Apple University Consortium Academic and Developers Conference Proceedings, 9–21. Retrieved April 15, 2022, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.124.3548&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Brzezicki, M. (2020). Strengths and weaknesses of architectural education on-line classes conducted during COVID-19. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18(4). Retrieved March 25, 2022, from http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/WTE&TE/Pages/Vol.18,%20No.4%20(2020)/03-Brzezicki-M.pdf
• Ceylan, S., Şahin, P., Seçmen, S., Somer, M. E., & Süher, K. H. (2021). An evaluation of online architectural design studios during COVID-19 outbreak. Archnet-IJAR, 15(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0230
• Charters, M., & Murphy, C. (2021). Taking Art School Online in Response to COVID 19: From Rapid Response to Realising Potential. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 40(1), 723-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12384
• Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2007.02.007
• Dinç Uyaroğlu, İ. (2021). Resilience in interior architecture education: Distance universal design learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.47818/drarch.2021.v2i2022
• Fleischmann, K. (2020). Online design education: Searching for a middle ground. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 19(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022218758231
• Hacıhasanoğlu, O. (2019). Architectural Design Studio Culture. Journal of Design Studio, 1(1), 5–15. Retrieved March 15, 2022, from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/775310
• Hassanpour, B., & Şahin, N. P. (2021). Technology adoption in architectural design studios for educational activities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(4), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1897037
• Iranmanesh, A., & Onur, Z. (2021). Mandatory Virtual Design Studio for All: Exploring the Transformations of Architectural Education amidst the Global Pandemic. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 40(1), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12350
• Iulo, L. D., Gorby, C., Poerschke, U., Kalisperis, L. N., & Woollen, M. (2013). Environmentally conscious design - educating future architects. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(4), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2011-0065/FULL/HTML
• IZTECH. (2021). IZTECH IV. Training Workshop. Retrieved March 15, 2022, from https://hdl.handle.net/11147/10799
• James, D. E., Schraw, G., & Kuch, F. (2015). Using the sampling margin of error to assess the interpretative validity of student evaluations of teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.972338
• Kararmaz, Ö., & Ciravoğlu, A. (2017). A research on the integration of the experience based approaches into the early period architectural design studio. Megaron, 12(3), 409-419. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2017.05925
• Kasalı, A., Doğan, F., & Akış, T. (2020). Is disaster blessing? Notes on distance education. Mimarlık Journal, 414, 24–27. Retrieved April 16, 2022, from http:/www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=429&RecID=5079
• Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.1233
• Levent Kasap, T. (2023). Evaluation of the views of the interior architecture undergraduate program faculty members on the education process in the covid-19 epidemic process. Online Journal of Art and Design, 11(1). Retrieved April 20, 2022, from http://adjournal.net/articles/111/11110.pdf
• Marshalsey, L. (2021). Talking to art and design students at home: Evaluating the differences in student engagement online. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 40(4), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12382
• Masdéu, M., & Fuses, J. (2017). Reconceptualizing the design studio in architectural education: Distance learning and blended learning as transformation factors. Archnet-IJAR, 11(2), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.26687/ARCHNET-IJAR.V11I2.1156
• Milovanović, A., Kostić, M., Zorić, A., Dordević, A., Pešić, M., Bugarski, J., Todorović, D., Sokolović, N., & Josifovski, A. (2020). Transferring COVID-19 challenges into learning potentials: Online workshops in architectural education. Sustainability, 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177024
• NIH (2005) Sample size calculations for the modular grant application process outcome evaluation study. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health. Retrieved September 22, 2022, from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/eval/ sample_mgap.doc
• Powell, A. (2009). Educational possibilities of humanitarian architecture. Field, 3(1), 113–124. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from http://field-journal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/field_03_9_Educational_Possibilities_of_Humanitarian_Architecture.pdf
• Şekerci̇, Y., Mutlu Danaci, H., Kaynakci Eli̇nç, Z. (2021). Uzaktan eğitimin uygulamalı derslerde sürdürülebilirliği: Mimarlık bölümleri örneği. The Journal of Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 12(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.29048/MAKUFEBED.874055
• UNAI (2020). COVID-19 and Higher Education: Education and Science as a Vaccine for the Pandemic | United Nations. United Nations Academic Impact Webinar Series. Retrieved March 10, 2022, from https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/covid-19-and-higher-education-education-and-science-vaccine-pandemic
• Yazıcıoğlu Halu, Z., & Kula Say, S. (2021). Can new pathways be opened for architectural education following the ordeal of the pandemic period? Or is distance architectural education only to be in digital medium? Mimarist Journal, 70, 60–67. Retrieved March 20, 2022, from https://www.mimarist.org/wp-content/uploads/yayinlar/mimarist/pdf/70.pdf
• Yu, R., Ostwald, M. J., Gu, N., Skates, H., & Feast, S. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of online teaching in architecture courses. Architectural Science Review, 65(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2021.1921689